Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #401074 > unrolled thread

Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5)

Started by	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
First post	2016-12-07 20:05 -0800
Last post	2016-12-09 20:52 -0800
Articles	20 on this page of 53 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

  Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:05 -0800
    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:12 -0800
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-08 15:29 +1100
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:01 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:09 -0800
          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-08 17:27 +1100
            Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 04:37 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 04:41 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 04:58 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 05:06 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 05:10 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-08 22:48 +0100
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 14:37 -0800
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-09 07:57 +0100
                      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 13:02 -0800
                        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 18:18 -0800
                          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 18:23 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 17:22 -0800
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-09 08:04 +0100
                      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 07:20 -0800
                        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-10 06:50 +0100
                          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-10 00:38 -0800
                            Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-13 06:37 +0100
                          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 18:55 -0800
                            Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 19:01 -0800
                              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 19:37 -0800
                                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-17 07:22 -0800
                                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-17 08:19 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-09 11:05 +1100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 17:08 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-09 12:12 +1100
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 17:30 -0800
                      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-09 13:03 +1100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 18:08 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 18:46 -0800
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 19:48 -0800
                      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:04 -0800
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:32 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 23:10 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 07:02 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 11:37 -0800
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 11:42 -0800
                      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 11:45 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:34 -0800
                  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:44 -0800
                    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:59 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:31 -0800
          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:32 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:50 -0800
          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:53 -0800
    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-12-09 17:04 -0800
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 17:23 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 20:52 -0800

Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →

#401074 — Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5)

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-07 20:05 -0800
Subject	Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5)
Message-ID	<8700e540-e4da-4b43-8d1f-71b4891e458a@googlegroups.com>

((0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2)/ 6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT




http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula


https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/koide-formula-derived

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#401075

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-07 20:12 -0800
Message-ID	<20d2dbe8-3f3c-47c9-9e2e-d65edd8c6905@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401074

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:05:25 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> ((0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2)/ 6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
> 
> 
> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/koide-formula-derived

https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/-c-derived-solely-from-koide-pi-rms

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401077

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date	2016-12-08 15:29 +1100
Message-ID	<eas5sjFd3ccU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#401075

On 8/12/2016 3:12 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:05:25 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>> ((0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2)/ 6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
>>
>>
>> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/koide-formula-derived
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/-c-derived-solely-from-koide-pi-rms
>

Only works for c expressed in metres per second. Express it in miles per 
hour, and it fails horribly.

Did you learn nothing about the requirements for the dimensions to be 
consistent?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401079

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-07 21:01 -0800
Message-ID	<dadf7147-ee7e-4927-a67d-ef6d49a41641@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401077

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:29:10 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 8/12/2016 3:12 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:05:25 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >> ((0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2)/ 6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9
> >>
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
> >>
> >>
> >> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/koide-formula-derived
> >
> > https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/-c-derived-solely-from-koide-pi-rms
> >
> 
> Only works for c expressed in metres per second. Express it in miles per 
> hour, and it fails horribly.
> 
> Did you learn nothing about the requirements for the dimensions to be 
> consistent?
> 
> Sylvia.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+((3%5E2%2F2%5E2*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)))%5E2)%2F+6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-7

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401080

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-07 21:09 -0800
Message-ID	<51b16461-b127-4886-8efd-5e50aa016fe9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401077

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:29:10 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 8/12/2016 3:12 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:05:25 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >> ((0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2)/ 6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9
> >>
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
> >>
> >>
> >> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/koide-formula-derived
> >
> > https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/-c-derived-solely-from-koide-pi-rms
> >
> 
> Only works for c expressed in metres per second. Express it in miles per 
> hour, and it fails horribly.
> 
> Did you learn nothing about the requirements for the dimensions to be 
> consistent?
> 
> Sylvia.

OMG !!!

Please quite yer Bellowing about (requirements for the dimensions to be consistent)  

Look at this picture please https://goo.gl/photos/RY1BvkY43Qew7NZB7

It is just another Dimensionless constant of time to space, 
just a damn ratio. 
just like alpha 

Space Time is a HETERODYNE  = http://i68.tinypic.com/2lcxw7t.jpg

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+((3%5E2%2F2%5E2*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)))%5E2)%2F+6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-7

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401090

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date	2016-12-08 17:27 +1100
Message-ID	<eascr9FeitbU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#401080

On 8/12/2016 4:09 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:29:10 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 8/12/2016 3:12 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:05:25 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>>>> ((0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2)/ 6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F6.666594965576469306355880465394898643184092809854009e-9
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/koide-formula-derived
>>>
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/-c-derived-solely-from-koide-pi-rms
>>>
>>
>> Only works for c expressed in metres per second. Express it in miles per
>> hour, and it fails horribly.
>>
>> Did you learn nothing about the requirements for the dimensions to be
>> consistent?
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> OMG !!!
>
> Please quite yer Bellowing about (requirements for the dimensions to be consistent)

The reason they need to be consistent is that otherwise your equation 
only works for one set of arbitrarily chosen units, which is a powerful 
indication that the equation is devoid of any physical significance.

You may care to note that the Koide formula doesn't suffer that defect, 
because it divides mass by mass, making it dimensionless. Had it not 
been dimensionless Koide himself would certainly have regarded it as a 
curious numerical coincidence, and nothing more.

If your equations only work for a particular set of units, they are 
meaningless.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401095

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 04:37 -0800
Message-ID	<2039aa88-3211-4f82-b82b-35f29a87d511@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401090

Yah. 
But you guys act like alpha & the Koide Ratio are mysterious & unknown 
When they are clearly just the (PURE geometry ) of light bouncing around inside a spherical cavity 

All your units & all your constants , Everything,  is a just ratio reflection of light bouncing between horizons
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/photon_mass.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401096

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 04:41 -0800
Message-ID	<51f3e4d5-6c66-4e3c-9eb7-d9e9c526ae58@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401095

if we approximate pi with 2*11/7 

this would be 
Q~=(9 *11/7)^2 * c^-1 * 10^6 

Interesting coincidence: 

The term  9*11/7 belongs to occultism. 



TH 

Mr Heger's Reference to OCCULTISM seems to mightily apply to your method of SCIENCE. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZhAffw9KSg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401097

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 04:58 -0800
Message-ID	<55ac9083-81f9-4744-ae6a-4f19d94fb76b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401096

Sci.physics.relativity of OCCULTISM 

http://i68.tinypic.com/2vwsjzm.jpg

Mr Heger is right
Priesthood of the scientific

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401098

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 05:06 -0800
Message-ID	<9b26ae9c-f4f8-4fe3-9fb7-a1c081c93ae5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401096

http://www.kysolareclipse.com/

Yah.....
2017 eclipse Yah... OCCULTISM science

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401099

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 05:10 -0800
Message-ID	<c340673d-93f9-44d1-b52a-7b99bd48260e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401098

Yah... I know the Hidden Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5Xo-6-v0as

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401127

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date	2016-12-08 22:48 +0100
Message-ID	<eau2prFrcmrU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#401096

Am 08.12.2016 13:41, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller:
> if we approximate pi with 2*11/7
>
> this would be
> Q~=(9 *11/7)^2 * c^-1 * 10^6
>
> Interesting coincidence:
>
> The term  9*11/7 belongs to occultism.
>
>
>
> TH
>
> Mr Heger's Reference to OCCULTISM seems to mightily apply to your method of SCIENCE.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZhAffw9KSg

I just had that idea, the formula might contain something in nature, for 
which our forefathers had used such an approximation.

Such a relation eventually could have been regarded as a secret, hence 
kept hidden in an occult sects.

22/7 - Pi is something small (about 0.00126).

This small number could also be used to alter the numerical value of c:

Since the meter is derived from c, we could 'adjust' the length of the 
meter a bit.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401134

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 14:37 -0800
Message-ID	<ac2f0446-b746-4883-8f5e-df4d7af09ffa@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401127

- hide quoted text -
Am 08.12.2016 13:41, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller: 
> if we approximate pi with 2*11/7 
> 
> this would be 
> Q~=(9 *11/7)^2 * c^-1 * 10^6 
> 
> Interesting coincidence: 
> 
> The term  9*11/7 belongs to occultism. 
> 
> 
> 
> TH 
> 
> Mr Heger's Reference to OCCULTISM seems to mightily apply to your method of SCIENCE. 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZhAffw9KSg

I just had that idea, the formula might contain something in nature, for 
which our forefathers had used such an approximation. 

Such a relation eventually could have been regarded as a secret, hence 
kept hidden in an occult sects. 

22/7 - Pi is something small (about 0.00126). 

This small number could also be used to alter the numerical value of c: 

Since the meter is derived from c, we could 'adjust' the length of the 
meter a bit. 


TH 

Hi Mr Heger

I've gone round & round but "these here" seem to badger you with (kook crank gibberish babboon references) if you try to suggest pi has gone Polyhedral 

Like 22/7
Or 
1e-5/8
As pseudoscience

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401160

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date	2016-12-09 07:57 +0100
Message-ID	<eav2u6F3mkfU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#401134

Am 08.12.2016 23:37, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller:

>>
>> Mr Heger's Reference to OCCULTISM seems to mightily apply to your method of SCIENCE.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZhAffw9KSg
>
> I just had that idea, the formula might contain something in nature, for
> which our forefathers had used such an approximation.
>
> Such a relation eventually could have been regarded as a secret, hence
> kept hidden in an occult sects.
>
> 22/7 - Pi is something small (about 0.00126).
>
> This small number could also be used to alter the numerical value of c:
>
> Since the meter is derived from c, we could 'adjust' the length of the
> meter a bit.
>
>
> TH
>
> Hi Mr Heger
>
> I've gone round&  round but "these here" seem to badger you with (kook crank gibberish babboon references) if you try to suggest pi has gone Polyhedral

But I don't want to promote occultism or similar.

I was thinking about the problem, which natural phenomenon occultisms 
tries to address with symbolism.

Eventually the number pi was not discovered at the time, when occultism 
was invented. So these ancient people might eventually have substituted 
an irrational number with a close approximation by a (much more 
convenient) rational number.

But meant was pi and circles, not polyhedra.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401665

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-13 13:02 -0800
Message-ID	<a3810587-6cc2-4c27-a103-305dea26a2e8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401160

Thomas Heger wrote:

> Hi Mr Heger 
> 
> I've gone round&  round but "these here" seem to badger you with (kook crank gibberish babboon references) if you try to suggest pi has gone Polyhedral 

But I don't want to promote occultism or similar. 

I was thinking about the problem, which natural phenomenon occultisms 
tries to address with symbolism. 

Eventually the number pi was not discovered at the time, when occultism 
was invented. So these ancient people might eventually have substituted 
an irrational number with a close approximation by a (much more 
convenient) rational number. 

But meant was pi and circles, not polyhedra. 

TH 

49.9790327594 / 50 = 0.99958065518

1e-8/(G/(50 - 49.9790327594)) = pi 

1 / (gravitational constant * 49.9790327594) = 
299792487

https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/wes-johnson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401711

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-13 18:18 -0800
Message-ID	<5352069b-22b4-49af-8cd4-4ef9dc54fef6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401665

On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 3:02:34 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mr Heger 
> > 
> > I've gone round&  round but "these here" seem to badger you with (kook crank gibberish babboon references) if you try to suggest pi has gone Polyhedral 
> 
> But I don't want to promote occultism or similar. 
> 
> I was thinking about the problem, which natural phenomenon occultisms 
> tries to address with symbolism. 
> 
> Eventually the number pi was not discovered at the time, when occultism 
> was invented. So these ancient people might eventually have substituted 
> an irrational number with a close approximation by a (much more 
> convenient) rational number. 
> 
> But meant was pi and circles, not polyhedra. 
> 
> 
> TH 
> 
> 49.9790327594 / 50 = 0.99958065518
> 
> 
> 1e-8/(G/(50 - 49.9790327594)) = pi 
> 
> 1 / (gravitational constant * 49.9790327594) = 
> 299792487
> 
> https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/wes-johnson

Electromagnetic 3D Quantum Aether Matrix ... I Drew Pictures of it for you even 

solve (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154845995747363528

solve ((2e-9/G) + (c*1e-9)) * 2 = 1836.154845995747363528

1e-8/(G/(50 - 49.9790327594)) = pi

https://goo.gl/photos/z8yqVXWBwTrudhFB6

https://goo.gl/photos/Nqts93ao9Qpy39sv8

https://goo.gl/photos/EbNpedNP2ZXrF5AS6

http://i57.tinypic.com/294ksba.jpg

Think of the Whole Damn universe, "In Unison, as one Big Block"  Jiggling back and forth 2.4263e-12 meters in 8.09326564e-21 seconds

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401712

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-13 18:23 -0800
Message-ID	<1638bddf-6aab-4d90-a892-db07674a2736@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401711

On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 8:19:00 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 3:02:34 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Mr Heger 
> > > 
> > > I've gone round&  round but "these here" seem to badger you with (kook crank gibberish babboon references) if you try to suggest pi has gone Polyhedral 
> > 
> > But I don't want to promote occultism or similar. 
> > 
> > I was thinking about the problem, which natural phenomenon occultisms 
> > tries to address with symbolism. 
> > 
> > Eventually the number pi was not discovered at the time, when occultism 
> > was invented. So these ancient people might eventually have substituted 
> > an irrational number with a close approximation by a (much more 
> > convenient) rational number. 
> > 
> > But meant was pi and circles, not polyhedra. 
> > 
> > 
> > TH 
> > 
> > 49.9790327594 / 50 = 0.99958065518
> > 
> > 
> > 1e-8/(G/(50 - 49.9790327594)) = pi 
> > 
> > 1 / (gravitational constant * 49.9790327594) = 
> > 299792487
> > 
> > https://sites.google.com/site/lordkronosprime/wes-johnson
> 
> Electromagnetic 3D Quantum Aether Matrix ... I Drew Pictures of it for you even 
> 
> solve (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154845995747363528
> 
> solve ((2e-9/G) + (c*1e-9)) * 2 = 1836.154845995747363528
> 
> 1e-8/(G/(50 - 49.9790327594)) = pi
> 
> https://goo.gl/photos/z8yqVXWBwTrudhFB6
> 
> https://goo.gl/photos/Nqts93ao9Qpy39sv8
> 
> https://goo.gl/photos/EbNpedNP2ZXrF5AS6
> 
> http://i57.tinypic.com/294ksba.jpg
> 
> Think of the Whole Damn universe, "In Unison, as one Big Block"  Jiggling back and forth 2.4263e-12 meters in 8.09326564e-21 seconds

(Elastic Property / Inertial Property)^0.5  = Velocity 

((1 / ((4 * pi) / (10^7))) / 8.8541885e-12)^0.5 = 299792446.448 

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/permot3.html 

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/souspe2.html#c1 

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/permot2.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pespr.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401145

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-08 17:22 -0800
Message-ID	<d76d60fe-e574-4e90-bca5-62b24dcaed04@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401127

Thomas Heger wrote:


Since the meter is derived from c, we could 'adjust' the length of the meter a bit. 


TH 

Relativity says we are allowed to do just that. 

Light leaving any point in the universe acts just like "THAT POINT" it just left is the surface of a white hole, which makes our space time just like the volume inside the schwarzschild radius of a White hole. Making the CMBR really Hawking Radiation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401161

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date	2016-12-09 08:04 +0100
Message-ID	<eav3ciF3peaU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#401145

Am 09.12.2016 02:22, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller:

> Since the meter is derived from c, we could 'adjust' the length of the meter a bit.
>
>
> TH
>
> Relativity says we are allowed to do just that.
>
> Light leaving any point in the universe acts just like "THAT POINT" it just left is the surface of a white hole, which makes our space time just like the volume inside the schwarzschild radius of a White hole. Making the CMBR really Hawking Radiation

A 'white hole' is the same thing as a 'black hole', only time reverted.

We could also assume, that the white hole is 'the other side' of a black 
hole.

I actually think, this is true (both statements).

This would require a geometric treatment of time and multiple timelines.

Then to any timeline belongs one 'universe'. This is not universal, but 
actually a picture. It is in fact the past light cone of the observer.

The future light cone is than similar to a white hole, which is the 
future light cone of a black hole.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401183

From	"David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-12-09 07:20 -0800
Message-ID	<5bcc8808-9d13-4e06-8dc8-2672166e1002@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#401161

> Light leaving any point in the universe acts just like "THAT POINT" it just left is the surface of a white hole, which makes our space time just like the volume inside the schwarzschild radius of a White hole. Making the CMBR really Hawking Radiation 

A 'white hole' is the same thing as a 'black hole', only time reverted. 

We could also assume, that the white hole is 'the other side' of a black 
hole. 

I actually think, this is true (both statements). 

This would require a geometric treatment of time and multiple timelines. 

Then to any timeline belongs one 'universe'. This is not universal, but 
actually a picture. It is in fact the past light cone of the observer. 

The future light cone is than similar to a white hole, which is the 
future light cone of a black hole. 


TH 

I Like it... again ... logical. 

http://vixra.org/pdf/1310.0191vC.pdf

Like this link but interwoven into a Swiss cheese Schwartz P Minimal Surface neutralizing to opposing Farads

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →

csiph-web

Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5)

Contents

#401074 — Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5)

#401075

#401077

#401079

#401080

#401090

#401095

#401096

#401097

#401098

#401099

#401127

#401134

#401160

#401665

#401711

#401712

#401145

#401161

#401183