Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400521 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-01 15:25 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-12-05 18:40 -0800 |
| Articles | 15 on this page of 55 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:25 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-02 20:12 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 05:29 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-03 13:10 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 18:41 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-03 13:53 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:24 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-04 16:04 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 22:01 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-04 19:18 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:16 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:30 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:34 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:54 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 10:33 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 11:23 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 16:53 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 12:36 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 18:37 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 13:56 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 19:09 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 15:41 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 20:46 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 15:50 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 21:15 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 22:14 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 07:15 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 07:35 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 11:07 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:07 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 13:22 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:15 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:20 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:27 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 11:01 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 20:46 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 19:10 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 19:25 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 20:39 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 18:48 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 18:54 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:33 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:36 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:45 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:42 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 20:19 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-03 22:01 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:26 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:30 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:34 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:46 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 07:57 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:48 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:50 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 18:40 -0800
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 18:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ecfbbb78-d770-4640-8520-333c98c75588@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400809 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:48:51 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 7:36:46 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > > OK ... Change it to what looks "more Correct" to You and Let me SEE ... OK ?? > > > > > > Here is your Bare wood .. start Chiseling.. > > > > > > (((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi > > > > > > > > > which looks Surprisingly like the inverse of Kinetic energy > > > > > > > Now you have a equation consisting entirely of numbers, yet you seem to > > think it has some physical significance. > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > Ke = (m*v^2)/2 > > > > > > Here ... I fixed it for you Just Use the Below instead of alpha .... OK ?? > > (((pi / 2e+12)^0.5) / 6.67406745595e-11)^0.5 = 137.036 It is STILL the inverse of Kinetic Energy Sylvia , Show me some Examples of your Mathematics work please before asking me Any new Questions ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 19:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <33614d59-8a2d-4371-957c-17fe2c3b1bae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400647 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> Sylvia Else > >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>> > >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>> > >>> Sylvia > >>> > >>> > >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>> > >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>> > >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>> > >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>> > >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>> > >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>> > >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>> > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >> deeper problem? > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > not the same as being steady. > > Sylvia. (0.5109989461 * ((30.299792458^2) * 2)) / 938.2720813 = 1.0000011829 (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154846 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-to-electron_mass_ratio 30.299792458 = 0.5/G + c = 30266469558 2.99666771e+10 + 299792458 = 30266469558 ((2.99666771e+10 + 299792458)^2) * 2e-18 = 1832.1183590 Are you just testing me , or do you have some sort of MENTAL Block & cannot see Clearly that the proton electron ratio is a Mass Gravity Reaction ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 19:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dd026829-1925-4ece-a9f7-b67af14cc05c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400649 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 9:34:00 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>> Sylvia Else > > >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > >>>> > > >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > >>> > > >>> Sylvia > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > >>> > > >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > >>> > > >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > >>> > > >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > >>> > > >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > > >>> > > >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > >>> > > >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > >>> > > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > > >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > > >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > > >> deeper problem? > > >> > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > > > > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > > not the same as being steady. > > > > Sylvia. > > (0.5109989461 * ((30.299792458^2) * 2)) / 938.2720813 = 1.0000011829 > > (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154846 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-to-electron_mass_ratio > > 30.299792458 = 0.5/G + c = 30266469558 > > 2.99666771e+10 + 299792458 = 30266469558 > > > ((2.99666771e+10 + 299792458)^2) * 2e-18 = 1832.1183590 > > Are you just testing me , or do you have some sort of MENTAL Block & cannot see Clearly that the proton electron ratio is a Mass Gravity Reaction ? http://i63.tinypic.com/2nrkp68.jpg http://planetstar.wikia.com/wiki/Feynmanium
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 19:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a79f785e-4c0c-446c-a9e9-ab5cac9befaa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400649 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 9:34:00 PM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>> Sylvia Else > > >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > >>>> > > >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > >>> > > >>> Sylvia > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > >>> > > >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > >>> > > >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > >>> > > >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > >>> > > >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > > >>> > > >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > >>> > > >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > >>> > > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > > >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > > >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > > >> deeper problem? > > >> > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > > > > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > > not the same as being steady. > > > > Sylvia. > > (0.5109989461 * ((30.299792458^2) * 2)) / 938.2720813 = 1.0000011829 > > (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154846 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-to-electron_mass_ratio > > 30.299792458 = 0.5/G + c = 30266469558 > > 2.99666771e+10 + 299792458 = 30266469558 > > > ((2.99666771e+10 + 299792458)^2) * 2e-18 = 1832.1183590 > > Are you just testing me , or do you have some sort of MENTAL Block & cannot see Clearly that the proton electron ratio is a Mass Gravity Reaction ? 30.299792458 = 0.5/G + c = 30266469558 2.99666771e+10 + 299792458 = 30266469558 ((2/G + c)^2) * 2e-18 = 1832.1183590
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 19:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <98a20e12-4a20-4518-8d59-e6f3e5cd71e0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400647 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> Sylvia Else > >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>> > >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>> > >>> Sylvia > >>> > >>> > >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>> > >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>> > >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>> > >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>> > >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>> > >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>> > >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>> > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >> deeper problem? > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > not the same as being steady. > > Sylvia. Use your REAL Name, Nym Shyfter Wayne Static- Nym Shyfter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAN8ZTifIVQ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 20:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0dd8d240-4478-4f36-8222-dd516a33aa5b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400647 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> Sylvia Else > >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>> > >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>> > >>> Sylvia > >>> > >>> > >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>> > >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>> > >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>> > >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>> > >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>> > >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>> > >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>> > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >> deeper problem? > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > not the same as being steady. > > Sylvia. 1 / ((30299792458^2) / (1.23558996e+20 * (2 * pi))) = 0.84561938763 .... Compton Frequency
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 22:01 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eafmvuFckr0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400654 |
On 3/12/2016 3:19 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>> Sylvia Else >>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >>>>>> >>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. >>>>> >>>>> Sylvia >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess >>>>> >>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. >>>>> >>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. >>>>> >>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. >>>>> >>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. >>>>> >>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 >>>>> >>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 >>>>> >>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? >>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who >>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much >>>> deeper problem? >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow >>> >> >> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is >> not the same as being steady. >> >> Sylvia. > > 1 / ((30299792458^2) / (1.23558996e+20 * (2 * pi))) = 0.84561938763 .... Compton Frequency > My goodness - 6 replies to my 1. Someone's had his cage rattled. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 06:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9f42fae0-9e82-4cfb-be6d-bac502a36793@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400673 |
Sylvia Else My goodness - 6 replies to my 1. Someone's had his cage rattled. Sylvia. Are you just like a Sports Commentator with no real skill or talent in the sport you are commenting on? Are you like the radio commentator for the Hindenburg crash ? Should you Nymshyft to Vin Scully ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 06:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <665712eb-94f4-485e-bc0a-330e5ed39e97@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400686 |
Sylvia Else My goodness - 6 replies to my 1. Someone's had his cage rattled. Sylvia. You just be Trollin... (((15 * 2) + 0.3)^2) * 2 = 1836.18 ((e * cos(137035.9991232535539893 radians)) - 1) / phi = 1 ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 ((137035.8713^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1 (30.299792458^2) * 2 = 1836.154846 (5109989.461 * ((30.299792458^2) * 2)) / 938.2720813 = 10000011.829 ((2/G + c)^2) * 2e-18 = 1832.1183590
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 06:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <86b436b8-cb1f-455e-bbea-b2ffc59afe77@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400686 |
Sylvia Else My goodness - 6 replies to my 1. Someone's had his cage rattled. Sylvia. You must have some actual work of your own on the internet you can point me too ..... Oh that's right you can't cause you're just a troll https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z4m4lnjxkY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 19:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <78571756-509f-4f28-8d5c-ce42d01407b7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400643 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > Sylvia Else > > On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >> > >> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >> > > I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > > > Sylvia > > > > > > To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > > > In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > > > This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > > > All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > > > & the fourth root of c is 131. > > > > 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > > > (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > > > ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > > > > > > > What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > deeper problem? > > Sylvia. OBFUSCATION & DERAILMENT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 07:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <50fa84fa-29c7-4a0e-a066-6234d4e44d71@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400521 |
On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 1:25:23 PM UTC-10, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat as a combination of a governor & a Throttle. > Too much = photons are radiated > Too little Gravity compacts it. > > If ((1.5e+10*2+299792458)*1e-9)^2*2 = 1836.154846 is Accurate then the proton electron ratio is a mediator between energy, gravity & the volume of spacetime. > > Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. Alpha has been included in the Gravity Volume Theory. Unifying electromagnetism and gravity in the two Planck Constant derivations provides the Folmsbee Relation : m /(r*alpha) = q / (4 pi a0) = 2.41 Angstroms where m is proton mass, r is proton radius, q is proton charge, a0 is Bohr Radius. alpha = 4 pi m a0 / (r*q) = 1/137.5 The units can be dimensionless when the mass=area theorem is used. Using Olde Science units alpha = (1/137) kilograms per Coulomb Alpha does not make space time flat, alpha is a ratio describing a nuclear and atomic balance of nature. Charge is dynamically balanced with mass to allow orbitals of radius from a0=.526 Angstroms to 2.41 Angstroms.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 09:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a13c491d-1cb2-4d02-88e7-06745697fa62@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400860 |
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:02 AM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote: > On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 1:25:23 PM UTC-10, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat as a combination of a governor & a Throttle. > > Too much = photons are radiated > > Too little Gravity compacts it. > > > > If ((1.5e+10*2+299792458)*1e-9)^2*2 = 1836.154846 is Accurate then the proton electron ratio is a mediator between energy, gravity & the volume of spacetime. > > > > Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > Alpha has been included in the Gravity Volume Theory. Unifying electromagnetism and gravity in the two Planck Constant derivations provides the Folmsbee Relation : > > m /(r*alpha) = q / (4 pi a0) = 2.41 Angstroms > > where m is proton mass, r is proton radius, q is proton charge, a0 is Bohr Radius. > > alpha = 4 pi m a0 / (r*q) = 1/137.5 > > The units can be dimensionless when the mass=area theorem is used. Using Olde Science units > > alpha = (1/137) kilograms per Coulomb > > Alpha does not make space time flat, alpha is a ratio describing a nuclear and atomic balance of nature. Charge is dynamically balanced with mass to allow orbitals of radius from a0=.526 Angstroms to 2.41 Angstroms. Yes ... I had Already thought about that As your theory seem to be based on Surface area, the expanding surface area of the proton IS GRAVITY as a warping / curvature of Time in relation to space
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 09:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678445d0-4618-4be9-80f5-81df6987c770@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400860 |
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:02 AM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote: > On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 1:25:23 PM UTC-10, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat as a combination of a governor & a Throttle. > > Too much = photons are radiated > > Too little Gravity compacts it. > > > > If ((1.5e+10*2+299792458)*1e-9)^2*2 = 1836.154846 is Accurate then the proton electron ratio is a mediator between energy, gravity & the volume of spacetime. > > > > Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > Alpha has been included in the Gravity Volume Theory. Unifying electromagnetism and gravity in the two Planck Constant derivations provides the Folmsbee Relation : > > m /(r*alpha) = q / (4 pi a0) = 2.41 Angstroms > > where m is proton mass, r is proton radius, q is proton charge, a0 is Bohr Radius. > > alpha = 4 pi m a0 / (r*q) = 1/137.5 > > The units can be dimensionless when the mass=area theorem is used. Using Olde Science units > > alpha = (1/137) kilograms per Coulomb > > Alpha does not make space time flat, alpha is a ratio describing a nuclear and atomic balance of nature. Charge is dynamically balanced with mass to allow orbitals of radius from a0=.526 Angstroms to 2.41 Angstroms. I knew you would connect the Dots .. That is why I offered you, on contingency, $(c/300) for Advertising & P.R.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 18:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <30248f81-5632-4648-9921-28beeaf1fa40@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400860 |
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:02 AM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote: > On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 1:25:23 PM UTC-10, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat as a combination of a governor & a Throttle. > > Too much = photons are radiated > > Too little Gravity compacts it. > > > > If ((1.5e+10*2+299792458)*1e-9)^2*2 = 1836.154846 is Accurate then the proton electron ratio is a mediator between energy, gravity & the volume of spacetime. > > > > Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > Alpha has been included in the Gravity Volume Theory. Unifying electromagnetism and gravity in the two Planck Constant derivations provides the Folmsbee Relation : > > m /(r*alpha) = q / (4 pi a0) = 2.41 Angstroms > > where m is proton mass, r is proton radius, q is proton charge, a0 is Bohr Radius. > > alpha = 4 pi m a0 / (r*q) = 1/137.5 > > The units can be dimensionless when the mass=area theorem is used. Using Olde Science units > > alpha = (1/137) kilograms per Coulomb > > Alpha does not make space time flat, alpha is a ratio describing a nuclear and atomic balance of nature. Charge is dynamically balanced with mass to allow orbitals of radius from a0=.526 Angstroms to 2.41 Angstroms. Alpha does not make space time flat, alpha is a ratio describing a nuclear and atomic balance of nature. Charge is dynamically balanced with mass to allow orbitals of radius from a0=.526 Angstroms to 2.41 Angstroms. But ... (orbitals of radius from a0=.526 Angstroms to 2.41 Angstroms) are based on Time and Distance which is directly transferable to the impedance to the vacuum & c & 3.33564095e-9 second. Making The Vacuum of free space equivalent to the Quantum Mechanical Aether of Susskind based on Alpha .... Watch for 4 or 5 minutes https://youtu.be/OBPpRqxY8Uw?t=1h28m41s
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web