Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376696 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-22 14:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 222 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 15:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 15:40 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Neac <gnn.net> - 2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 09:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 09:55 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:50 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
[OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-05 10:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 12:43 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 14:38 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 10:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 12:00 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 11:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-19 12:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 21:20 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 09:33 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 09:58 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 11:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-02-21 21:09 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-26 19:54 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jstaredits@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 11:22 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 11:09 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:41 +0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 04:57 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). throbbingsausage@gmail.com - 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:38 +0000
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 07:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-26 15:30 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-02-26 14:19 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:47 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-27 09:09 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 20:21 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 19:24 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mara H. <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 13:38 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 23:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 18:22 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-13 19:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-15 09:29 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-22 14:59 -0700
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dj4gu7Frb8dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376696 |
On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > If you ask people > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > You either going to get > a Yes or No answer. > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > His answer would be... > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." > Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but not God? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56CD642B.7970@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #376992 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > If you ask people > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > You either going to get > > a Yes or No answer. > > > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > > > His answer would be... > > > > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." > > > > Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but > not God? > > Sylvia. zeros and ones, off and on...yes or no are people concepts. God exist in both states at the same time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dj5kg2F52qqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377019 |
On 24/02/2016 7:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: >> >> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> If you ask people >>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>> You either going to get >>> a Yes or No answer. >>> >>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>> >>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>> >>> His answer would be... >>> >>> >>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." >>> >>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." >>> >> >> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >> not God? >> >> Sylvia. > > > zeros and ones, off and on...yes or no are people concepts. > > > God exist in both states at the same time. > That isn't really an answer. If people would reply yes or no anyway, then you'll get the same answer with or without the constraint, making the constraint redundant. Essentially, you're proposing to ask people and God different questions, and then you're remarking on the anticipated difference in the answers. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tf7rcb9qr646oujfp3ou6peec2rnpjpjm7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #377030 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:03:11 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >On 24/02/2016 7:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> If you ask people >>>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>>> You either going to get >>>> a Yes or No answer. >>>> >>>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>>> >>>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>>> >>>> His answer would be... >>>> YES. I am here. Why do you ask, my son? w.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamesl51165@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 11:09 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <2190fb93-9ccd-4da1-972f-dfee4282d356@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #377030 |
сряда, 24 февруари 2016 г., 4:31:03 UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me написа: > > Mr. Starmaker wrote: > > > > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > > > > > God exist in both states at the same time. > > Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug; > a painkiller/aphrodisiac. There is proof of a God. There is order before the mind of man... As old as the Big Bang and a little... Mitchell Raemsch; The Orderer is Real... > Schrödinger doesn't know if his cat is dead or alive; > his ignorance doesn't, can't, alter reality. > > Ignorance is not a spatial dimension, > as string theory would have you believe. > > Hallucinations are just that, hallucinations, > not "alternate realities/universes", > as pop science would have you believe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 18:41 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <namljk$r24$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377053 |
On 2/25/2016 3:09 AM, jamesl51165@gmail.com wrote: > > There is proof of a God. There is order before the mind of man... > As old as the Big Bang and a little... It's not really about proof of God or Jesus, but *faith* to believe so. :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 18:30:01 up 8 days 16:02 0 users load average: 1.14 1.07 1.06 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 04:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <3178e013-0f0f-4bf2-b17a-a33fb2b14720@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #377084 |
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 3:41:46 AM UTC-7, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > > It's not really about proof of God or Jesus, but *faith* to believe so. :) It' not really about proof that there is no God, but "faith" that there is none. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <djpes9F8dflU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377030 |
On 24/02/2016 11:31 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > Mr. Starmaker wrote: > > > > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > > > > > God exist in both states at the same time. > > Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug; > a painkiller/aphrodisiac. > > Schrödinger doesn't know if his cat is dead or alive; > his ignorance doesn't, can't, alter reality. > > Ignorance is not a spatial dimension, > as string theory would have you believe. > > Hallucinations are just that, hallucinations, > not "alternate realities/universes", > as pop science would have you believe. > > You do realise that formatted text in Usenet marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800 |
| Subject | WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2{5.18P.Seattle.2016}> |
| In reply to | #377753 |
You (Sylvia Else) told me (Jeff Relf): > You do realise that formatted text[?!] in Usenet > marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond > seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting? The HMTL markup I post is just: <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'> It's very, very simple. WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_markup_language You might want to look up the word "crank" because I don't think you're using it correctly. No matter, feel free to ignore me, my feelings won't be hurt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <Y1OBy.43052$Io5.16941@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #377756 |
On 3/2/2016 6:18 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: <snip> > > It's very, very simple. > WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): > Neither of which are _Usenet_. Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, but there are people in here on PINE!). Thus, you _do not format anything_. If you want to use ellipsis, you use three separate periods. If you want to use an en-dash, you use two separate hyphens. And you're gonna get plonked by more people than will ever open another posting of yours if you don't follow those rules *always*. -- Chrysi Cat 1/2 anthrocat, nearly 1/2 anthrofox, all magical Transgoddess, quick to anger Call me Chrysi or call me Kat, I'll respond to either!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800 |
| Subject | WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2{7.54P.Seattle.2016}> |
| In reply to | #377760 |
You (Chrysi Cat) replied (to me): > > The HMTL markup I post is just: > > > > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'> > > > > It's very, very simple. > > WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): > > Neither of which are _Usenet_. > > Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only newsreaders > (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, but there are people > in here on PINE!). Usenet allows for it, same as email, to wit, my: "Content-Type: text/html". You want something else ? Go fuck yourself, I don't care.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-1B4851.23363402032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #377764 |
In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2{7.54P.Seattle.2016}>, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
wrote:
> You (Chrysi Cat) replied (to me):
> > > The HMTL markup I post is just:
> > >
> > > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>
> > >
> > > It's very, very simple.
> > > WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML):
> >
> > Neither of which are _Usenet_.
> >
> > Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only newsreaders
> > (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, but there are people
> > in here on PINE!).
>
> Usenet allows for it, same as email, to wit, my:
But most people use newsreaders that cannot read anything but ASCII.
My newsreader lets me choose the font I see, which is Georgia (I really
like the way it looks and how easy it is for me to read). If I get
messages with a lot of gibberish in them, that person is gonna get
kill-filed for being annoying and rude.
--
JD
"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <53970980.YuPZMplS0g@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #377760 |
"Chrysi Cat" amok-crossposted to 5(!) newsgroups, across alt.ALL and the Big 8(!), without Followup-To: > Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only newsreaders > (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, but there are people > in here on PINE!). Their problem. There are locales and fonts supporting UTF-8 and other non- ASCII encodings even on the text console. A newsreader that does not support MIME in the 21st century is officially borked now. See below. > Thus, you _do not format anything_. Incorrect. Text can be formatted *bold*, /italic/ and _underlined_ as decent newsreaders would support some kind of highlighting, with the specified marks and meanings being the common and therefore best supported ones. For example, you mentioned Thunderbird which supports that minimum markup in plain-text messages. > If you want to use ellipsis, you use three separate periods. > > If you want to use an en-dash, you use two separate hyphens. Your half-knowledge is decades out of date. The first version of the Unicode standard has been published in 1991 CE, non-ASCII encodings and character sets had been standardized and implemented before, and MIME (1996) supports encodings such as ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8 whose character sets include the proper typographical marks (e.g., EN DASH “–” and HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS “…”, respectively). Keyboard drivers like XKB also support typing those characters directly. It is no longer necessary or useful to insist on US- ASCII. In fact, MIME support is required nowadays; see also RFC 5536, § 2.3. As for the Thunderbird example, it recognizes when you type characters that cannot be encoded with US-ASCII, and suggests to encode the message with UTF-8 instead. Other newsreaders, like KNode can automatically use and declare the minimum required encoding for typed text. For example, this message will be encoded using UTF-8. > And you're gonna get plonked by more people than will ever open another > posting of yours if you don't follow those rules *always*. Incorrect. However, posting multipart messages (for example, a section using HTML as part of a multi-part message) to non-binary newsgroups might have the described effect. HTML support in a newsreader is neither required nor desired. X-Post trimmed to the Big 8; F'up2 poster PointedEars -- A neutron walks into a bar and inquires how much a drink costs. The bartender replies, "For you? No charge." (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5C0968089BF9taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #377829 |
On 03 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written:
> "Chrysi Cat" amok-crossposted to 5(!) newsgroups, across alt.ALL
> and the Big 8(!), without Followup-To:
>
>> Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only
>> newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more,
>> but there are people in here on PINE!).
>
> Their problem. There are locales and fonts supporting UTF-8 and
> other non- ASCII encodings even on the text console. A
> newsreader that does not support MIME in the 21st century is
> officially borked now. See below.
Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of people find
your crap unreadable? Seriously, what's the point? You're a
litterbug, leaving your trash in other people's way, for no reason
other than it makes you feel important to force other people to clean
up after you.
And now you're reduced to email replies only? What a chickenshit way
to try to get the last word. Childish.
--
Terry Austin
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <20851496.Uz2CdLcj16@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #377834 |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > On 03 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written: >> "Chrysi Cat" amok-crossposted to 5(!) newsgroups, across alt.ALL >> and the Big 8(!), without Followup-To: >>> Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only >>> newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, >>> but there are people in here on PINE!). >> >> Their problem. There are locales and fonts supporting UTF-8 and >> other non- ASCII encodings even on the text console. A >> newsreader that does not support MIME in the 21st century is ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> officially borked now. See below. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of people find > your crap unreadable? The “lot of people” exist only in your vivid imagination. While very few users prefer to stay in the dark ages, the rest of us have moved on *decades ago*. RTFRFC, RTFM, STFW. > Seriously, what's the point? You're a litterbug, leaving your trash in > other people's way, for no reason other than it makes you feel important > to force other people to clean up after you. Utter nonsense, to be expected from a trolling pseudo-hole. > And now you're reduced to email replies only? What a chickenshit way > to try to get the last word. Childish. Not so. Different to you and those that did not ask for your unqualified, unkind support, I attempt to limit the off-topic content that I generate. *PLONK* F'up2 poster -- PointedEars
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | throbbingsausage@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5C894A0EEC7taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #378618 |
Still playing childish retard games with followups, I see. Is that
the only way you can get the last word?
On 11 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written:
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>
>> On 03 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written:
>>> "Chrysi Cat" amok-crossposted to 5(!) newsgroups, across
>>> alt.ALL and the Big 8(!), without Followup-To:
>>>> Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only
>>>> newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more,
>>>> but there are people in here on PINE!).
>>>
>>> Their problem. There are locales and fonts supporting UTF-8
>>> and other non- ASCII encodings even on the text console. A
>>> newsreader that does not support MIME in the 21st century is
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> officially borked now. See below.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of people
>> find your crap unreadable?
>
> The “lot of people” exist only in your vivid imagination.
Prove it. I'm hardly the only one who has commented on this idiocy,
even in this thread.
> While very few users prefer to stay in the dark ages, the rest
> of us have moved on *decades ago*. RTFRFC, RTFM, STFW.
I repeat: Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of
people find your cap unreadable?
>
>> Seriously, what's the point? You're a litterbug, leaving your
>> trash in other people's way, for no reason other than it makes
>> you feel important to force other people to clean up after you.
>
> Utter nonsense, to be expected from a trolling pseudo-hole.
Your posts are exactly that, yes. But you didn't answer my
question.
>
>> And now you're reduced to email replies only? What a
>> chickenshit way to try to get the last word. Childish.
>
> Not so.
Yes, so.
> Different to you and those that did not ask for your
> unqualified, unkind support, I attempt to limit the off-topic
> content that I generate.
No, that's not it. You have a desperate need to get the last word,
at least in yoru own imagination, and you're too childish to do it
any other way. It's childish, stupid, and makes you look
chickenshit. You know that, but you really can't help yourself.
>
> *PLONK*
Yeah, that's effective.
>
> F'up2 poster
>
Go ask mummy for a cookie, and have her wipe the snot form your
nose. It's time for beddie-bye, and a growing boy needs his sleep.
--
Terry Austin
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 22:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <nbvhd3$33t$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378647 |
throbbingsausage wrote: >> Different to you and those that did not ask for your unqualified, >> unkind support, I attempt to limit the off-topic content that I >> generate. > > No, that's not it. You have a desperate need to get the last word, at > least in yoru own imagination, and you're too childish to do it any > other way. It's childish, stupid, and makes you look chickenshit. You > know that, > but you really can't help yourself. >> >> *PLONK* > > Yeah, that's effective. >> >> F'up2 poster >> > Go ask mummy for a cookie, and have her wipe the snot form your nose. > It's time for beddie-bye, and a growing boy needs his sleep. http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/ukraines-government-crisis-becomes-bad-farce/ri13281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <djq332FcqtfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377756 |
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote: >You (Sylvia Else) told me (Jeff Relf): >> You do realise that formatted text[?!] in Usenet >> marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond >> seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting? > >The HMTL markup I post is just: > > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'> > >It's very, very simple. In my newsreader, it was formatted as an icon of my default web browser. Like Sylvia says, I ignored it and went on to the next post. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5C06E927C624taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #377767 |
My theory is that you deliberately use an incomprehesible method of
posting because you know full well you have nothing to say, but are
too stupid and narcissitic to not say it.
You're more a loser for choosing to be a loser than for being a
retard, but you're a loser, either way.
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2
{11.35P.Seattle.2016}:
> You (Greg Goss) replied (to me):
>> > The HMTL markup I post is just:
>> >
>> > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>
>> >
>> > It's very, very simple.
>>
>> In my newsreader [[Forte Agent]],
>> it was formatted as an icon of my default web browser.
>> Like Sylvia says, I ignored it and went on to the next post.
>
> Forte Agent is simpler than Mozilla Thunderbird,
> but it doesn't let you assign CSS rules to its
> user interface and/or to the content of emails/posts.
>
> Unlike Thunderbird,
> your can't write (JavaScript) extensions for it.
>
> It doesn't understand the basic rules of emails and posts;
> it can't mix fonts. You get one font, and that's it.
> No UTF-8 (Unicode), no fixed-width guarantee.
>
> It's a reflection of your lack of communication skills.
>
> You don't care about my posts,
> I don't care about yours... problem solved.
>
--
Terry Austin
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <djq8cgFe11hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377756 |
On 3/03/2016 12:18 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You (Sylvia Else) told me (Jeff Relf): >> You do realise that formatted text[?!] in Usenet >> marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond >> seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting? > > The HMTL markup I post is just: > > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'> > > It's very, very simple. > WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_markup_language > > You might want to look up the word "crank" because > I don't think you're using it correctly. > > No matter, feel free to ignore me, my feelings won't be hurt. > I'm not saying you are a crank. I don't read your postings because of the formatting so I don't actually have enough information to form a view. I'm saying that the formatting *marks* you as a crank. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web