Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372375 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-19 07:21 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-24 11:27 +1100 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-19 07:21 -0800
Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-19 07:33 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-23 14:25 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 20:10 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-23 15:38 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 21:04 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-23 17:30 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-23 06:08 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-24 11:35 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-24 12:35 +0100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 13:52 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-28 14:46 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-29 09:49 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 19:30 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 19:50 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-29 15:09 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 09:22 -0800
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-30 11:37 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-23 12:07 +0100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-23 23:58 +1100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-23 14:53 +0100
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Carmine Portacio <unibox42@doubleclick.org> - 2015-12-23 14:01 +0000
Re: Does Suskind's holographic model allow for time travel because the 3D data is permanently stored in a 2D Copy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-24 11:27 +1100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-23 14:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n5e91k$grm$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #372609 |
Użytkownik "Sylvia Else" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:ddvk2pF2alvU1@mid.individual.net... > In the imagination of a relativistist. > Samely, as everything related to black holes. > |If you don't believe in the subject matter of a thread, then what's the |point in commenting? Oh, nothing important. Just usual reminding, that while noone has ever seen a black hole, group madness is a common thing in the history of human kind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Carmine Portacio <unibox42@doubleclick.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-23 14:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n5e9gb$n34$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #372614 |
Maciej Woźniak wrote: > |If you don't believe in the subject matter of a thread, then what's the > |point in commenting? > > Oh, nothing important. Just usual reminding, that while noone has ever > seen a black hole, group madness is a common thing in the history of > human kind. Also known as "heard immunization".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-24 11:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <de0sfaFce6bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372614 |
On 24/12/2015 12:53 AM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > Użytkownik "Sylvia Else" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:ddvk2pF2alvU1@mid.individual.net... > >> In the imagination of a relativistist. >> Samely, as everything related to black holes. >> > > |If you don't believe in the subject matter of a thread, then what's the > |point in commenting? > > Oh, nothing important. Just usual reminding, > that while noone has ever seen a black hole, > group madness is a common thing in the > history of human kind. No one's ever seen an atom, either. Stars, other than the sun, are just points of light, even in large telescopes. The orbits of the planets are mathematical derivations - no one has seen a planet orbit. Look out into the night sky - can you tell which are close, and which are far away? Just how much will you not believe absent the ability to see it? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web