Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372417 > unrolled thread
| Started by | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-19 15:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-21 17:37 -0800 |
| Articles | 7 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
My science is built on my native tongue John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-19 15:23 -0800
Re: My science is built on my native tongue John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-19 15:28 -0800
Re: My science is built on my native tongue John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-21 16:48 -0800
Re: My science is built on my native tongue Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-22 12:15 +1100
Re: My science is built on my native tongue John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-21 17:26 -0800
Re: My science is built on my native tongue John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-21 17:33 -0800
Re: My science is built on my native tongue John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-21 17:37 -0800
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 15:23 -0800 |
| Subject | My science is built on my native tongue |
| Message-ID | <24871610-c52c-4f8c-ac52-b87c16dde1c8@googlegroups.com> |
My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 15:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <544014e9-3704-4bca-88ff-71af528fddd7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #372417 |
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 5:24:01 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote: > My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically. The dictionary is my best friend.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-21 16:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5dbd80de-8433-4449-ae0c-1fdf0085d164@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #372418 |
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 5:28:16 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote: > On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 5:24:01 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote: > > My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically. > > The dictionary is my best friend. If I was born Chinese, my language would be Chinese. But the dictionary will still be my best friend.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 12:15 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ddrmgoF30t0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372417 |
On 20/12/2015 10:23 AM, John Gogo wrote: > My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically. > This has to be trolling. No one could be that mentally deranged. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-21 17:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fe834b7c-5d5a-4e2f-a3ef-560debed6161@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #372510 |
On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 7:15:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 20/12/2015 10:23 AM, John Gogo wrote: > > My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically. > > > This has to be trolling. No one could be that mentally deranged. > > Sylvia. I'm trying to make the link between seeing and feeling and the way I write the verse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-21 17:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dba56381-b853-4183-a652-9362fa475dab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #372512 |
On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 7:26:27 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote: > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 7:15:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 20/12/2015 10:23 AM, John Gogo wrote: > > > My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically. > > > > > This has to be trolling. No one could be that mentally deranged. > > > > Sylvia. > > I'm trying to make the link between seeing and feeling and the way I write the verse. I think there should be a world-wide attempt to create a world-wide dictionary- a single dictionary for all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-21 17:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6005aa93-0205-4b37-8e1d-9b6074804710@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #372513 |
On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 7:33:49 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote: > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 7:26:27 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote: > > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 7:15:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > On 20/12/2015 10:23 AM, John Gogo wrote: > > > > My science is based on English. It is not in totality resting in math. The fact that there are paradoxes in science draws me linguistically. > > > > > > > This has to be trolling. No one could be that mentally deranged. > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > I'm trying to make the link between seeing and feeling and the way I write the verse. > > I think there should be a world-wide attempt to create a world-wide dictionary- a single dictionary for all. Intuitively, I believe that the English dictionary has a best start when it comes to all forms of phenomena. Chinese even better. How do we meld the knowledge? Could it be in the color of our eyes?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web