Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #371911 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-12 20:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-12-14 16:27 +0000 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 46 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-12 20:24 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-12 20:54 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-13 16:27 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-13 08:38 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-13 17:58 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-13 13:59 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-13 14:56 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-13 23:05 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-13 15:15 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-13 23:23 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 16:50 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-15 15:31 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 13:03 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-15 22:24 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 15:07 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-15 23:56 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 16:08 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-16 00:27 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 19:49 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Ezra Farrow <ezrafa@dubtechno.org> - 2015-12-18 10:20 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Ezra Farrow <ezrafa@dubtechno.org> - 2015-12-18 10:21 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 03:45 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Ezra Farrow <ezrafa@dubtechno.org> - 2015-12-18 17:51 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-13 15:10 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-13 23:26 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-13 15:32 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover finds no evidence for the moon-landing Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-14 06:47 +0100
Re: Chinese Rover finds no evidence for the moon-landing pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-13 22:07 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover finds no evidence for the moon-landing Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 16:42 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 16:35 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 10:40 -0600
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 16:48 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-14 10:11 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 18:32 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-14 12:02 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 20:39 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-14 13:08 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 21:22 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-14 13:40 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 22:06 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-14 15:25 -0800
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-15 15:43 +0000
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-12-16 14:19 +0100
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-14 13:17 +1100
Re: Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> - 2015-12-14 16:27 +0000
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 22:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n4nehm$d33$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #372033 |
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) pnalsing wrote: >> A free-body diagram equating forces shows that a crater formation >> should take place. Disregard how small or soil particularity and >> directions. I see no any. > > Show your work, your word has no authority. This sentence contradicts itself. No authority and still want to see my work. Sir, you act like a moron and therefore likely severely uneducated, not knowing what a *free-body* diagram stands for. Approximate the exhaust and direction necessary to prevent 1/6 of the many tones not brake into pieces assuming landing on hard rocks. The legs of that lander are not even covered by dust, which indicates the lander was kept suspended before touchdown. You don't need work. What you need is education.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 15:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a3d784ea-085f-4556-af1f-2a2dc40c3640@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #372037 |
On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 2:06:52 PM UTC-8, Jason Wyome wrote: > ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) pnalsing wrote: > > >> A free-body diagram equating forces shows that a crater formation > >> should take place. Disregard how small or soil particularity and > >> directions. I see no any. > > > > Show your work, your word has no authority. > > This sentence contradicts itself. No authority and still want to see my > work. Sir, you act like a moron and therefore likely severely uneducated, > not knowing what a *free-body* diagram stands for. > > Approximate the exhaust and direction necessary to prevent 1/6 of the many > tones not brake into pieces assuming landing on hard rocks. The legs of > that lander are not even covered by dust, which indicates the lander was > kept suspended before touchdown. You don't need work. What you need is > education. You didn't actually read the paper, did you. Either that, or you don't comprehend what you read. The words are not mine, they are the words of NASA. You obviously did't read any of the other links, either, or watch the video. Here, try again, and this time learn something... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#crater "... the engine nozzle was about 54 inches across (from the Encyclopaedia Astronautica), which means it had an area of 2300 square inches. That in turn means that the thrust generated a pressure of only about 1.5 pounds per square inch! That's not a lot of pressure. Moreover, in a vacuum, the exhaust from a rocket spreads out very rapidly. On Earth, the air in our atmosphere constrains the thrust of a rocket into a narrow column, which is why you get long flames and columns of smoke from the back of a rocket. In a vacuum, no air means the exhaust spreads out even more, lowering the pressure. That's why there's no blast crater! Three thousand pounds of thrust sounds like a lot, but it was so spread out it was actually rather gentle."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 15:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n4pcf1$ore$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #372043 |
pnalsing wrote: > "That's why there's no blast crater! Three thousand pounds of thrust > sounds like a lot, but it was so spread out it was actually rather > gentle." That's why no dust on legs, but a spacesuit needs $700.000 crowd funding to clean the dust out. Reboot the lie: Neil Armstrong's suit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEfNT685WVI
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-16 14:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n4rodm$27b$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #372043 |
On 15.12.2015 00:25, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 2:06:52 PM UTC-8, Jason Wyome wrote: >> ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) pnalsing wrote: >> >>>> A free-body diagram equating forces shows that a crater formation >>>> should take place. Disregard how small or soil particularity and >>>> directions. I see no any. >>> >>> Show your work, your word has no authority. >> >> This sentence contradicts itself. No authority and still want to see my >> work. Sir, you act like a moron and therefore likely severely uneducated, >> not knowing what a *free-body* diagram stands for. >> >> Approximate the exhaust and direction necessary to prevent 1/6 of the many >> tones not brake into pieces assuming landing on hard rocks. The legs of >> that lander are not even covered by dust, which indicates the lander was >> kept suspended before touchdown. You don't need work. What you need is >> education. > > You didn't actually read the paper, did you. Either that, or you don't comprehend what you read. The words are not mine, they are the words of NASA. > > You obviously did't read any of the other links, either, or watch the video. Here, try again, and this time learn something... > > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#crater > > "... the engine nozzle was about 54 inches across (from the Encyclopaedia Astronautica), which means it had an area of 2300 square inches. That in turn means that the thrust generated a pressure of only about 1.5 pounds per square inch! That's not a lot of pressure. Moreover, in a vacuum, the exhaust from a rocket spreads out very rapidly. On Earth, the air in our atmosphere constrains the thrust of a rocket into a narrow column, which is why you get long flames and columns of smoke from the back of a rocket. In a vacuum, no air means the exhaust spreads out even more, lowering the pressure. That's why there's no blast crater! Three thousand pounds of thrust sounds like a lot, but it was so spread out it was actually rather gentle." > You are discussing with a nymshifting troll. He doesn't try to make sense, he is only writing what he think will provoke you. With success. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 13:17 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dd6n67FnlilU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #371911 |
On 13/12/2015 7:24 AM, Plexippus Kritikos wrote: > I don't understand. Where are they? > Stealing aliens on Moon from other planets? > > Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung > http://www.oe24.at/welt/Rover-findet-keine-Beweise-fuer-Mondlandung/158854028 > Even if this were news, and no a satirical work of fiction, it would be old news. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Wyome <jasonw@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 16:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n4mql4$tab$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #371975 |
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Sylvia Else wrote: > On 13/12/2015 7:24 AM, Plexippus Kritikos wrote: >> I don't understand. Where are they? >> Stealing aliens on Moon from other planets? >> Chinese Rover findet keine Beweise für Mondlandung >> http://www.oe24.at/welt/Rover-findet-keine-Beweise-fuer- Mondlandung/158854028 > > Even if this were news, and no a satirical work of fiction, it would be > old news. You just need to learn to read the news, lady. There can be more news in the satiricals than it is in your allegedlycal proper "news".
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web