Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #363839 > unrolled thread

Unified Field Theory: Finite

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Unified Field Theory: Finite Phil Bouchard <pbouchard8@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 22:16 -0400
    Autistic Imbecile Philippe Bouchard perseveres, shamelessly "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-09-11 19:58 -0700
    Re: Unified Field Theory: Finite John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:57 -0700
      Re: Unified Field Theory: Finite Phil Bouchard <pbouchard8@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 17:45 -0400
        Re: Unified Field Theory: Finite John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 17:19 -0700
          Re: Unified Field Theory: Finite Phil Bouchard <pbouchard8@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 21:06 -0400
            Re: Unified Field Theory: Finite kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-13 22:00 -0400

#363839 — Unified Field Theory: Finite

Greetings,

I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable 
astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following 
areas:

- the perihelion precession disparity
- the gravitational light bending
- the galactic rotation curve using the mass distribution of the galaxy
- part of the Pioneer 10 anomaly
- the GPS time dilations cancellation altitude
- the expansion of the universe
- the black holes
- the time dilation of speeds < 40% c
- solving the mass of the visible universe based on the value of kappa
- the FEL experiment (derivation is unknown but should be easy to solve)

What is outstanding is:

- the muon decay (lack of resources)
- debunking heavy ion storage rings (lack of resources)

For example we can see here the flat rotation curve I get using my 
formulation:
http://cosmoquest.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20921&d=1440383030

This flat curve is based on the following formula:
http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308102#post2308102

The full debate can be found here:
http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308564#post2308564

Furthermore I have a simulator that I used to estimate most of my 
predictions and its code can be downloaded and run on your Linux (Ubuntu 
preferably) with:
$ svn co https://github.com/philippeb8/finite-theory

Please make sure Qt5 is installed on your system and then you can simply 
type:
$ cd finite-theory/trunk
$ qmake
$ make
$ ./ft

My question is: is there anybody from NASA I can contact at this point?


Sincerely yours,
Phil Bouchard
www.unifiedfieldtheoryfinite.com

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#363842 — Autistic Imbecile Philippe Bouchard perseveres, shamelessly

On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 7:16:14 PM UTC-7, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable 
> astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following 
> areas:


No, Philippe

You had your ass handed to you, delusional cretin. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#364014

On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 10:16:14 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable 
> astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following 
> areas:
> 
> - the perihelion precession disparity
> - the gravitational light bending
> - the galactic rotation curve using the mass distribution of the galaxy
> - part of the Pioneer 10 anomaly
> - the GPS time dilations cancellation altitude
> - the expansion of the universe
> - the black holes
> - the time dilation of speeds < 40% c
> - solving the mass of the visible universe based on the value of kappa
> - the FEL experiment (derivation is unknown but should be easy to solve)
> 
> What is outstanding is:
> 
> - the muon decay (lack of resources)
> - debunking heavy ion storage rings (lack of resources)
> 
> For example we can see here the flat rotation curve I get using my 
> formulation:
> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20921&d=1440383030
> 
> This flat curve is based on the following formula:
> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308102#post2308102
> 
> The full debate can be found here:
> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308564#post2308564
> 
> Furthermore I have a simulator that I used to estimate most of my 
> predictions and its code can be downloaded and run on your Linux (Ubuntu 
> preferably) with:
> $ svn co https://github.com/philippeb8/finite-theory
> 
> Please make sure Qt5 is installed on your system and then you can simply 
> type:
> $ cd finite-theory/trunk
> $ qmake
> $ make
> $ ./ft
> 
> My question is: is there anybody from NASA I can contact at this point?
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours,
> Phil Bouchard
> www.unifiedfieldtheoryfinite.com

Hi Phil

I took two gems from this debate 

A] Time is absolute in the sense that it cannot take negative values. It's like a Kelvin.

Well said!

B] I apologize but I was busy answering Shaula.

That was funny.

Before talking to anyone you need a new prediction that comes from finite theory that is not covered by other theories. Not an easy task but it is the fast way to get attention from those who matter in physics. Talk is one thing but if you have the empirical evidence in your back pocket it is a very different story. Let the experiment do the talking for you. No one worth their salt in physics will turn their back on empirical evidence. An example of this is a Bell test for entanglement. Entanglement is a bitter pill to swallow but few turned their back's on the disappointing test results indicating entanglement is true.

It does not end there. Once a new prediction is at hand it must be testable at a reasonable cost. The Doppler vs frequency of Voyager 1 dish could be one test. Perhaps there are other tests?   

For VEPS theory I am keeping it simple with a blunt statement that time dilation has a voltage coefficient of 1 part in 10^9 per M Volt FoR. That coefficient matches our sky charge for our GPS satellites of 1/2 CPS at 1 GHz for 500 K Volts FoR. If anyone cares to debate this I show them the hard data from my test results on earth , plus GPS data to back it up and it correlates with general relativity. Mass warps space is replaced by voltage frame of reference warps space caused by mass. Space being virtual positronium in this case. The electron comes from our vacuum not matter to get a feel for how that works. This way there is no wiggle room or need for debates with blah blah blah as the empirical evidence is already in place. 

This would be the way to get your Finite theory on its way. A new prediction that has already been tested and is is repeatable by others. I am liking the Doppler vs frequency ratio of voyager 1 dish for Finite theory but there could be others.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#364021

On 09/13/2015 04:57 PM, John Heath wrote:
> On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 10:16:14 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable
>> astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following
>> areas:
>>
>> - the perihelion precession disparity
>> - the gravitational light bending
>> - the galactic rotation curve using the mass distribution of the galaxy
>> - part of the Pioneer 10 anomaly
>> - the GPS time dilations cancellation altitude
>> - the expansion of the universe
>> - the black holes
>> - the time dilation of speeds < 40% c
>> - solving the mass of the visible universe based on the value of kappa
>> - the FEL experiment (derivation is unknown but should be easy to solve)
>>
>> What is outstanding is:
>>
>> - the muon decay (lack of resources)
>> - debunking heavy ion storage rings (lack of resources)
>>
>> For example we can see here the flat rotation curve I get using my
>> formulation:
>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20921&d=1440383030
>>
>> This flat curve is based on the following formula:
>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308102#post2308102
>>
>> The full debate can be found here:
>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308564#post2308564
>>
>> Furthermore I have a simulator that I used to estimate most of my
>> predictions and its code can be downloaded and run on your Linux (Ubuntu
>> preferably) with:
>> $ svn co https://github.com/philippeb8/finite-theory
>>
>> Please make sure Qt5 is installed on your system and then you can simply
>> type:
>> $ cd finite-theory/trunk
>> $ qmake
>> $ make
>> $ ./ft
>>
>> My question is: is there anybody from NASA I can contact at this point?
>>
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Phil Bouchard
>> www.unifiedfieldtheoryfinite.com
>
> Hi Phil
>
> I took two gems from this debate
>
> A] Time is absolute in the sense that it cannot take negative values. It's like a Kelvin.
>
> Well said!
>
> B] I apologize but I was busy answering Shaula.
>
> That was funny.
>
> Before talking to anyone you need a new prediction that comes from finite theory that is not covered by other theories. Not an easy task but it is the fast way to get attention from those who matter in physics. Talk is one thing but if you have the empirical evidence in your back pocket it is a very different story. Let the experiment do the talking for you. No one worth their salt in physics will turn their back on empirical evidence. An example of this is a Bell test for entanglement. Entanglement is a bitter pill to swallow but few turned their back's on the disappointing test results indicating entanglement is true.
>
> It does not end there. Once a new prediction is at hand it must be testable at a reasonable cost. The Doppler vs frequency of Voyager 1 dish could be one test. Perhaps there are other tests?
>
> For VEPS theory I am keeping it simple with a blunt statement that time dilation has a voltage coefficient of 1 part in 10^9 per M Volt FoR. That coefficient matches our sky charge for our GPS satellites of 1/2 CPS at 1 GHz for 500 K Volts FoR. If anyone cares to debate this I show them the hard data from my test results on earth , plus GPS data to back it up and it correlates with general relativity. Mass warps space is replaced by voltage frame of reference warps space caused by mass. Space being virtual positronium in this case. The electron comes from our vacuum not matter to get a feel for how that works. This way there is no wiggle room or need for debates with blah blah blah as the empirical evidence is already in place.
>
> This would be the way to get your Finite theory on its way. A new prediction that has already been tested and is is repeatable by others. I am liking the Doppler vs frequency ratio of voyager 1 dish for Finite theory but there could be others.
>

I do have an experiment ready to go; it consists of sending a wavemeter 
of high precision aboard the ISS:
http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2306007#post2306007

The problem is nobody is willing to take the challenge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#364030

On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 5:45:52 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 09/13/2015 04:57 PM, John Heath wrote:
> > On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 10:16:14 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable
> >> astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following
> >> areas:
> >>
> >> - the perihelion precession disparity
> >> - the gravitational light bending
> >> - the galactic rotation curve using the mass distribution of the galaxy
> >> - part of the Pioneer 10 anomaly
> >> - the GPS time dilations cancellation altitude
> >> - the expansion of the universe
> >> - the black holes
> >> - the time dilation of speeds < 40% c
> >> - solving the mass of the visible universe based on the value of kappa
> >> - the FEL experiment (derivation is unknown but should be easy to solve)
> >>
> >> What is outstanding is:
> >>
> >> - the muon decay (lack of resources)
> >> - debunking heavy ion storage rings (lack of resources)
> >>
> >> For example we can see here the flat rotation curve I get using my
> >> formulation:
> >> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20921&d=1440383030
> >>
> >> This flat curve is based on the following formula:
> >> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308102#post2308102
> >>
> >> The full debate can be found here:
> >> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308564#post2308564
> >>
> >> Furthermore I have a simulator that I used to estimate most of my
> >> predictions and its code can be downloaded and run on your Linux (Ubuntu
> >> preferably) with:
> >> $ svn co https://github.com/philippeb8/finite-theory
> >>
> >> Please make sure Qt5 is installed on your system and then you can simply
> >> type:
> >> $ cd finite-theory/trunk
> >> $ qmake
> >> $ make
> >> $ ./ft
> >>
> >> My question is: is there anybody from NASA I can contact at this point?
> >>
> >>
> >> Sincerely yours,
> >> Phil Bouchard
> >> www.unifiedfieldtheoryfinite.com
> >
> > Hi Phil
> >
> > I took two gems from this debate
> >
> > A] Time is absolute in the sense that it cannot take negative values. It's like a Kelvin.
> >
> > Well said!
> >
> > B] I apologize but I was busy answering Shaula.
> >
> > That was funny.
> >
> > Before talking to anyone you need a new prediction that comes from finite theory that is not covered by other theories. Not an easy task but it is the fast way to get attention from those who matter in physics. Talk is one thing but if you have the empirical evidence in your back pocket it is a very different story. Let the experiment do the talking for you. No one worth their salt in physics will turn their back on empirical evidence. An example of this is a Bell test for entanglement. Entanglement is a bitter pill to swallow but few turned their back's on the disappointing test results indicating entanglement is true.
> >
> > It does not end there. Once a new prediction is at hand it must be testable at a reasonable cost. The Doppler vs frequency of Voyager 1 dish could be one test. Perhaps there are other tests?
> >
> > For VEPS theory I am keeping it simple with a blunt statement that time dilation has a voltage coefficient of 1 part in 10^9 per M Volt FoR. That coefficient matches our sky charge for our GPS satellites of 1/2 CPS at 1 GHz for 500 K Volts FoR. If anyone cares to debate this I show them the hard data from my test results on earth , plus GPS data to back it up and it correlates with general relativity. Mass warps space is replaced by voltage frame of reference warps space caused by mass. Space being virtual positronium in this case. The electron comes from our vacuum not matter to get a feel for how that works. This way there is no wiggle room or need for debates with blah blah blah as the empirical evidence is already in place.
> >
> > This would be the way to get your Finite theory on its way. A new prediction that has already been tested and is is repeatable by others. I am liking the Doppler vs frequency ratio of voyager 1 dish for Finite theory but there could be others.
> >
> 
> I do have an experiment ready to go; it consists of sending a wavemeter 
> of high precision aboard the ISS:
> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2306007#post2306007
> 
> The problem is nobody is willing to take the challenge.

That experiment was done in 1971 by Hafele-Keating. Why would you want to repeat it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#364032

On 09/13/2015 08:19 PM, John Heath wrote:
> On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 5:45:52 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> On 09/13/2015 04:57 PM, John Heath wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 10:16:14 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable
>>>> astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following
>>>> areas:
>>>>
>>>> - the perihelion precession disparity
>>>> - the gravitational light bending
>>>> - the galactic rotation curve using the mass distribution of the galaxy
>>>> - part of the Pioneer 10 anomaly
>>>> - the GPS time dilations cancellation altitude
>>>> - the expansion of the universe
>>>> - the black holes
>>>> - the time dilation of speeds < 40% c
>>>> - solving the mass of the visible universe based on the value of kappa
>>>> - the FEL experiment (derivation is unknown but should be easy to solve)
>>>>
>>>> What is outstanding is:
>>>>
>>>> - the muon decay (lack of resources)
>>>> - debunking heavy ion storage rings (lack of resources)
>>>>
>>>> For example we can see here the flat rotation curve I get using my
>>>> formulation:
>>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20921&d=1440383030
>>>>
>>>> This flat curve is based on the following formula:
>>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308102#post2308102
>>>>
>>>> The full debate can be found here:
>>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308564#post2308564
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore I have a simulator that I used to estimate most of my
>>>> predictions and its code can be downloaded and run on your Linux (Ubuntu
>>>> preferably) with:
>>>> $ svn co https://github.com/philippeb8/finite-theory
>>>>
>>>> Please make sure Qt5 is installed on your system and then you can simply
>>>> type:
>>>> $ cd finite-theory/trunk
>>>> $ qmake
>>>> $ make
>>>> $ ./ft
>>>>
>>>> My question is: is there anybody from NASA I can contact at this point?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>> Phil Bouchard
>>>> www.unifiedfieldtheoryfinite.com
>>>
>>> Hi Phil
>>>
>>> I took two gems from this debate
>>>
>>> A] Time is absolute in the sense that it cannot take negative values. It's like a Kelvin.
>>>
>>> Well said!
>>>
>>> B] I apologize but I was busy answering Shaula.
>>>
>>> That was funny.
>>>
>>> Before talking to anyone you need a new prediction that comes from finite theory that is not covered by other theories. Not an easy task but it is the fast way to get attention from those who matter in physics. Talk is one thing but if you have the empirical evidence in your back pocket it is a very different story. Let the experiment do the talking for you. No one worth their salt in physics will turn their back on empirical evidence. An example of this is a Bell test for entanglement. Entanglement is a bitter pill to swallow but few turned their back's on the disappointing test results indicating entanglement is true.
>>>
>>> It does not end there. Once a new prediction is at hand it must be testable at a reasonable cost. The Doppler vs frequency of Voyager 1 dish could be one test. Perhaps there are other tests?
>>>
>>> For VEPS theory I am keeping it simple with a blunt statement that time dilation has a voltage coefficient of 1 part in 10^9 per M Volt FoR. That coefficient matches our sky charge for our GPS satellites of 1/2 CPS at 1 GHz for 500 K Volts FoR. If anyone cares to debate this I show them the hard data from my test results on earth , plus GPS data to back it up and it correlates with general relativity. Mass warps space is replaced by voltage frame of reference warps space caused by mass. Space being virtual positronium in this case. The electron comes from our vacuum not matter to get a feel for how that works. This way there is no wiggle room or need for debates with blah blah blah as the empirical evidence is already in place.
>>>
>>> This would be the way to get your Finite theory on its way. A new prediction that has already been tested and is is repeatable by others. I am liking the Doppler vs frequency ratio of voyager 1 dish for Finite theory but there could be others.
>>>
>>
>> I do have an experiment ready to go; it consists of sending a wavemeter
>> of high precision aboard the ISS:
>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2306007#post2306007
>>
>> The problem is nobody is willing to take the challenge.
>
> That experiment was done in 1971 by Hafele-Keating. Why would you want to repeat it?
>

That is not the same because now the wavemeter is traveling faster than 
the equivalent of Mach 3, relative to the surface of the Earth.  This 
makes all the difference.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#364038

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:06:09 -0400, Phil Bouchard <pbouchard8@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 09/13/2015 08:19 PM, John Heath wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 5:45:52 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>>> On 09/13/2015 04:57 PM, John Heath wrote:
>>>> On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 10:16:14 PM UTC-4, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have debated a theory this August on Cosmoquest.org against creditable
>>>>> astrophysicists and I was able to defend or add answers to the following
>>>>> areas:
>>>>>
>>>>> - the perihelion precession disparity
>>>>> - the gravitational light bending
>>>>> - the galactic rotation curve using the mass distribution of the galaxy
>>>>> - part of the Pioneer 10 anomaly
>>>>> - the GPS time dilations cancellation altitude
>>>>> - the expansion of the universe
>>>>> - the black holes
>>>>> - the time dilation of speeds < 40% c
>>>>> - solving the mass of the visible universe based on the value of kappa
>>>>> - the FEL experiment (derivation is unknown but should be easy to solve)
>>>>>
>>>>> What is outstanding is:
>>>>>
>>>>> - the muon decay (lack of resources)
>>>>> - debunking heavy ion storage rings (lack of resources)
>>>>>
>>>>> For example we can see here the flat rotation curve I get using my
>>>>> formulation:
>>>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=20921&d=1440383030
>>>>>
>>>>> This flat curve is based on the following formula:
>>>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308102#post2308102
>>>>>
>>>>> The full debate can be found here:
>>>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2308564#post2308564
>>>>>
>>>>> Furthermore I have a simulator that I used to estimate most of my
>>>>> predictions and its code can be downloaded and run on your Linux (Ubuntu
>>>>> preferably) with:
>>>>> $ svn co https://github.com/philippeb8/finite-theory
>>>>>
>>>>> Please make sure Qt5 is installed on your system and then you can simply
>>>>> type:
>>>>> $ cd finite-theory/trunk
>>>>> $ qmake
>>>>> $ make
>>>>> $ ./ft
>>>>>
>>>>> My question is: is there anybody from NASA I can contact at this point?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>> Phil Bouchard
>>>>> www.unifiedfieldtheoryfinite.com
>>>>
>>>> Hi Phil
>>>>
>>>> I took two gems from this debate
>>>>
>>>> A] Time is absolute in the sense that it cannot take negative values. It's like a Kelvin.
>>>>
>>>> Well said!
>>>>
>>>> B] I apologize but I was busy answering Shaula.
>>>>
>>>> That was funny.
>>>>
>>>> Before talking to anyone you need a new prediction that comes from finite theory that is not covered by other theories. Not an easy task but it is the fast way to get attention from those who matter in physics. Talk is one thing but if you have the empirical evidence in your back pocket it is a very different story. Let the experiment do the talking for you. No one worth their salt in physics will turn their back on empirical evidence. An example of this is a Bell test for entanglement. Entanglement is a bitter pill to swallow but few turned their back's on the disappointing test results indicating entanglement is true.
>>>>
>>>> It does not end there. Once a new prediction is at hand it must be testable at a reasonable cost. The Doppler vs frequency of Voyager 1 dish could be one test. Perhaps there are other tests?
>>>>
>>>> For VEPS theory I am keeping it simple with a blunt statement that time dilation has a voltage coefficient of 1 part in 10^9 per M Volt FoR. That coefficient matches our sky charge for our GPS satellites of 1/2 CPS at 1 GHz for 500 K Volts FoR. If anyone cares to debate this I show them the hard data from my test results on earth , plus GPS data to back it up and it correlates with general relativity. Mass warps space is replaced by voltage frame of reference warps space caused by mass. Space being virtual positronium in this case. The electron comes from our vacuum not matter to get a feel for how that works. This way there is no wiggle room or need for debates with blah blah blah as the empirical evidence is already in place.
>>>>
>>>> This would be the way to get your Finite theory on its way. A new prediction that has already been tested and is is repeatable by others. I am liking the Doppler vs frequency ratio of voyager 1 dish for Finite theory but there could be others.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I do have an experiment ready to go; it consists of sending a wavemeter
>>> of high precision aboard the ISS:
>>> http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?137103-Finite-Theory-of-the-Universe-Dark-Matter-Disproof-and-Faster-Than-Light-Speed&p=2306007#post2306007
>>>
>>> The problem is nobody is willing to take the challenge.
>>
>> That experiment was done in 1971 by Hafele-Keating. Why would you want to repeat it?
>>
>
>That is not the same because now the wavemeter is traveling faster than 
>the equivalent of Mach 3, relative to the surface of the Earth.  This 
>makes all the difference.

          Are you senile, or just inept at typing,  OR,
is your math that BAD:

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=velocity+of+iss


          The equator rotation speed is nearly Mach 1.5,
so with that subtracted from the velocity of the ISS,
try about Mach 28.   ( don't do math, because I don't know how)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web