Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358441 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 228 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s5u6ta1rfs88sft525395ofusv3hmj2o8j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361023 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote: >> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >> replaces God as supreme creator of all things. > >If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then >there's no need to replace God as that creator. Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1445093120461617436.246467mike-xenocyte.com@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #361209 |
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote: >>> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>> replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >> >> If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then >> there's no need to replace God as that creator. > > Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. > So who was the creator of your God? -- So much universe, and so little time. - Sir Terry Pratchett
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D388A2.4A16@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #361212 |
Mike M wrote: > > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > > > >> On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote: > >>> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that > >>> replaces God as supreme creator of all things. > >> > >> If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then > >> there's no need to replace God as that creator. > > > > Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. > > > > So who was the creator of your God? God's mother! http://religiousfreaks.com/UserFiles/Image/mary.holy.mother.of.god.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k20atalumfprfdmd10pu5v85fprse2sjob@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361212 |
On 18 Aug 2015 19:04:47 GMT, Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote: >>>> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>>> replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >>> >>> If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then >>> there's no need to replace God as that creator. >> >> Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. >> > >So who was the creator of your God? No man can ever know. Unless God reveals it, of course. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3v4bta5esu6a4bbr8dl6cjkeu6lm9brsdj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361333 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:17:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <k20atalumfprfdmd10pu5v85fprse2sjob@4ax.com> wrote: >On 18 Aug 2015 19:04:47 GMT, Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: > >>duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>>>> replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >>>> >>>> If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then >>>> there's no need to replace God as that creator. >>> >>> Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. >>> >> >>So who was the creator of your God? > >No man can ever know. Unless God reveals it, of course. > Another evasive and useless answer. You do that a lot. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mr0ccf$ila$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361209 |
duke wrote: > > Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. Until the invention of the microscope and the phrasing of the germ theory, the fermentation of wine was the proof of divine intervention. Wine has one miracle. Until the invention of X-ray crystalography and the phrasing of the lock and key theory of enzyme action, the malting of starch into sugar was proof of divone intervention. Ale has two miracles. We all have to believe in something. I believe I'll have an ale. Aristole thought life emerged spontaneously from non-living material. It has since been discovered that every example he knew of was from eggs, seeds and spores. In the Volspa Odin and a pair of brothers condensed the solar nebula to form the world, and the world is a living being. Anyone who has dug in a garden has seen first had that the soil is a living thing. This shows that stories lose meaning when viewed literally but do have value when viewed allegorically. In the Volspa Odin and a pair of brothers engineered humanity from existing materials. This is both the source of the intelligent designer idea and another demonstration that stories lose meaning when viewed literally but do have value when viewed allegorically. I am okay with science not yet being able to explain something from nothing without reference to a creator. Maybe not ever explained by science. Your not being secure with that suggests you lack serenity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <140ataljsf223srgqgj9nfvuud7htmmaua@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361231 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:42:24 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> wrote: >duke wrote: >> >> Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality. > >Until the invention of the microscope and the phrasing of the germ >theory, the fermentation of wine was the proof of divine intervention. >Wine has one miracle. > >Until the invention of X-ray crystalography and the phrasing of the >lock and key theory of enzyme action, the malting of starch into sugar >was proof of divone intervention. Ale has two miracles. We all have to >believe in something. I believe I'll have an ale. >Aristole thought life emerged spontaneously from non-living material. >It has since been discovered that every example he knew of was from >eggs, seeds and spores. > >In the Volspa Odin and a pair of brothers condensed the solar nebula >to form the world, and the world is a living being. Anyone who has dug >in a garden has seen first had that the soil is a living thing. This >shows that stories lose meaning when viewed literally but do have value >when viewed allegorically. > >In the Volspa Odin and a pair of brothers engineered humanity from >existing materials. This is both the source of the intelligent designer >idea and another demonstration that stories lose meaning when viewed >literally but do have value when viewed allegorically. >I am okay with science not yet being able to explain something from >nothing without reference to a creator. Maybe not ever explained by >science. Your not being secure with that suggests you lack serenity. Well, when you can provide a better, or even an equal, explanation for the existence of all things material and energy, something form nothing appearing in nothingness, then you have no where to go. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mr2vuv$mvm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361334 |
On 8/19/15 6:19 PM, duke wrote:
> Well, when you can provide a better, or even an equal, explanation for the
> existence
It just is. There, just as good as "God Just is", which is yours. Both
of them run into the First Cause problem. God doesn't explain anything
better than science does, and adds an infinitely complex something (God)
onto the universe for no purpose, other than to push the "First Cause"
problem back one more step.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr4m1a$ljd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361338 |
On 2015-08-20 06:30 AM, Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: > On 8/19/15 6:19 PM, duke wrote: > >> Well, when you can provide a better, or even an equal, explanation for >> the >> existence > > > It just is. There, just as good as "God Just is", which is yours. > Both of them run into the First Cause problem. God doesn't explain > anything better than science does, and adds an infinitely complex > something (God) onto the universe for no purpose, other than to push the > "First Cause" problem back one more step. Pure misunderstanding. God, as the Truth, is the foundation of all things that exist. Science, as the empirical truth, can only work under certain conditions. As soon as the situation is changed, the theory has to be modified. The truth of God never changes. The truth in science is always changing. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqqq5t$her$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361017 |
On 8/16/2015 2:16 PM, duke wrote: > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:23:56 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:48:08 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <60qesahdgkne3pj95u48eqks62hcu08o51@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <t2icsahjjj28phblstsuhfthj99abb2cn9@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:35:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>>>>>>>> "everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>>>>>>>> ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Much like the one above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I win, you lose. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Is a contest of come kind involved? >>>>> >>>>> Just showing you how much of a minority you are in. >>> >>>> According to you it doesn't matter. And it really doesn't. >>> >>> You don't have a lot of support. >>> >> More than you would ever admit. >> >> And more every year as education replaces superstition. > > And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that > replaces God as supreme creator of all things. > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** > How is that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4oa3tad4tps4g45gbglm66j77cm2398m2s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361017 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:16:35 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <abo1ta11n4b89k4fjd03nm6q2hk8bqfvav@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:23:56 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:48:08 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><60qesahdgkne3pj95u48eqks62hcu08o51@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><t2icsahjjj28phblstsuhfthj99abb2cn9@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:35:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>>>>>>>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>>>>>>>>ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Much like the one above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I win, you lose. >>>>>>> >>>>>>Is a contest of come kind involved? >>>>> >>>>>Just showing you how much of a minority you are in. >>> >>>>According to you it doesn't matter. And it really doesn't. >>> >>>You don't have a lot of support. >>> >>More than you would ever admit. >> >>And more every year as education replaces superstition. > >And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >replaces God as supreme creator of all things. > I don't need any since I have never any god was ever replaced by anything. I have repeatedly requested evidence to support the position that any god ever existed but all I ever get is ambiguities and unsupported opinions. I expect no better. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <69u6talr0igcdlr8qo7cqk2f6qevai43ld@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361069 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:38:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:16:35 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><abo1ta11n4b89k4fjd03nm6q2hk8bqfvav@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:23:56 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:48:08 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><60qesahdgkne3pj95u48eqks62hcu08o51@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><t2icsahjjj28phblstsuhfthj99abb2cn9@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:35:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>>>>>>>>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>>>>>>>>>ago. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Much like the one above. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I win, you lose. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>Is a contest of come kind involved? >>>>>> >>>>>>Just showing you how much of a minority you are in. >>>> >>>>>According to you it doesn't matter. And it really doesn't. >>>> >>>>You don't have a lot of support. >>>> >>>More than you would ever admit. >>> >>>And more every year as education replaces superstition. >> >>And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >> > >I don't need any since I have never any god was ever replaced by >anything. I have repeatedly requested evidence to support the >position that any god ever existed but all I ever get is ambiguities >and unsupported opinions. Your closed mind won't allow you to accept reality. > >I expect no better. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9c67tapdiko3hbc23nim23moqfd8ns98hq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361211 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:28:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <69u6talr0igcdlr8qo7cqk2f6qevai43ld@4ax.com> wrote: >>>And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>>replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >>> >> >>I don't need any since I have never any god was ever replaced by >>anything. I have repeatedly requested evidence to support the >>position that any god ever existed but all I ever get is ambiguities >>and unsupported opinions. > >Your closed mind won't allow you to accept reality. You have no clue as to what reality actually is. To learn begin by questioning everything without exception. Test everything. Accept nothing you are told without being sure you personally can perform the necessary validations if required. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l70atahlh8uc7iq45bs7oi6affa9e8vc3l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361223 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:48:48 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:28:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><69u6talr0igcdlr8qo7cqk2f6qevai43ld@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>>>replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >>>> >>> >>>I don't need any since I have never any god was ever replaced by >>>anything. I have repeatedly requested evidence to support the >>>position that any god ever existed but all I ever get is ambiguities >>>and unsupported opinions. >> >>Your closed mind won't allow you to accept reality. > >You have no clue as to what reality actually is. To learn begin by >questioning everything without exception. Test everything. Sure I do. I sit here at my computer every day and kick your butt in debate. That's reality. >Accept nothing you are told without being sure you personally can >perform the necessary validations if required. No need to. You boyz can't support your line of beliefs. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <425btalh0av34k7refudp0e7tam5eafdj4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361335 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <l70atahlh8uc7iq45bs7oi6affa9e8vc3l@4ax.com> wrote: >On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:48:48 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:28:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><69u6talr0igcdlr8qo7cqk2f6qevai43ld@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>>And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that >>>>>replaces God as supreme creator of all things. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I don't need any since I have never any god was ever replaced by >>>>anything. I have repeatedly requested evidence to support the >>>>position that any god ever existed but all I ever get is ambiguities >>>>and unsupported opinions. >>> >>>Your closed mind won't allow you to accept reality. >> >>You have no clue as to what reality actually is. To learn begin by >>questioning everything without exception. Test everything. > >Sure I do. I sit here at my computer every day and kick your butt in debate. >That's reality. Your kind of reality. > >>Accept nothing you are told without being sure you personally can >>perform the necessary validations if required. > >No need to. You boyz can't support your line of beliefs. > That you are full of male bovine excrement? That was established long before I came on the scene. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d1sg0vFdsoqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #358989 |
Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >guaranteed above average income for every person. I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular country or region. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359023 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>guaranteed above average income for every person. > >I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >country or region. Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population were below average intelligence? A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mpc0ej01lhg@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #359031 |
On 07/29/2015 11:56 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population > were below average intelligence? Quayle was Pappy Bush's impeachment insurance. McCain tried the same gambit with Palin, but it was moot since Mr. Obama won the election
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <da3kra5ksr9a7u9n18s28n1uvgh7r4nr3c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359077 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:59:35 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 07/29/2015 11:56 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >> were below average intelligence? > >Quayle was Pappy Bush's impeachment insurance. McCain tried the same >gambit with Palin, but it was moot since Mr. Obama won the election Bush should have been impeached, for his role in Iran/Contra even before Reagan was elected, for conspiring with the Ayatollahs to keep the hostages until the inauguration.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <r0njrah069qo7qbar79382vbuhgb2vdb9o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359031 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: > >>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >> >>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>country or region. > >Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >were below average intelligence? > >A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web