Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358441 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 231 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-20 17:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 Next page →
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #358560 |
On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >> how can an atheist >>>> >> prove >>>> >> there is no God >>> > >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.301d364ad0b07c9e9899ce@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #358589 |
In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk says... > > On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: > > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> > >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> >> how can an atheist > >>>> >> prove > >>>> >> there is no God > >>> > > >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your > >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. > >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > > > > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > > Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents that deserve to go to Hell. I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we don't just kill the bastards ourselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358595 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk >says... >> >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >> > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>>> >> how can an atheist >> >>>> >> prove >> >>>> >> there is no God >> >>> > >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> > >> > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? > >But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents >that deserve to go to Hell. > >I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is >that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we >don't just kill the bastards ourselves. You belong to the unrighteous that died. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.301daa59b3a217399899d5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #358618 |
In article <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 @cox.net says... > > On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk > >says... > >> > >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: > >> > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> >>>> >> how can an atheist > >> >>>> >> prove > >> >>>> >> there is no God > >> >>> > > >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your > >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. > >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > >> > > >> > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > >> > >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? > > > >But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents > >that deserve to go to Hell. > > > >I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is > >that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we > >don't just kill the bastards ourselves. > > You belong to the unrighteous that *-->died<--*. You keep using this word. I think it does not mean what you think it means.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d1jmf1F6k23U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #358637 |
On 25/07/2015 20:15, J. Clarke wrote: > In article <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 > @cox.net says... >> >> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk >>> says... >>>> >>>> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >>>>> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> how can an atheist >>>>>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>>>> there is no God >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>>>>> god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>>>>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >>>>> >>>>> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >>>> >>>> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? >>> >>> But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents >>> that deserve to go to Hell. >>> >>> I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is >>> that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we >>> don't just kill the bastards ourselves. >> >> You belong to the unrighteous that *-->died<--*. > > You keep using this word. I think it does not mean what you think it > means. > Inconceivable!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6l8aralfjt8ado20jab8cf4oqrjgo6ufee@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358637 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:15:27 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 >@cox.net says... >> >> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk >> >says... >> >> >> >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >> >> > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >>>> >> how can an atheist >> >> >>>> >> prove >> >> >>>> >> there is no God >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> >> > >> >> > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> >> >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? >> > >> >But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents >> >that deserve to go to Hell. >> > >> >I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is >> >that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we >> >don't just kill the bastards ourselves. >> >> You belong to the unrighteous that *-->died<--*. > >You keep using this word. I think it does not mean what you think it >means. Well?? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.301efa22e6b2f0c29899e5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #358729 |
In article <6l8aralfjt8ado20jab8cf4oqrjgo6ufee@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 @cox.net says... > > On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:15:27 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >In article <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 > >@cox.net says... > >> > >> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk > >> >says... > >> >> > >> >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: > >> >> > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> how can an atheist > >> >> >>>> >> prove > >> >> >>>> >> there is no God > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your > >> >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. > >> >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > >> >> > > >> >> > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > >> >> > >> >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? > >> > > >> >But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents > >> >that deserve to go to Hell. > >> > > >> >I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is > >> >that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we > >> >don't just kill the bastards ourselves. > >> > >> You belong to the unrighteous that *-->died<--*. > > > >You keep using this word. I think it does not mean what you think it > >means. > > Well?? You're not very good at this, are you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qtrfra1pk7o0d5vu1gboqfjui413q96abq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358738 |
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 15:08:04 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <6l8aralfjt8ado20jab8cf4oqrjgo6ufee@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 >@cox.net says... >> >> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:15:27 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 >> >@cox.net says... >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk >> >> >says... >> >> >> >> >> >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >> >> >> > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >> how can an atheist >> >> >> >>>> >> prove >> >> >> >>>> >> there is no God >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >> >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> >> >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> >> >> >> >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? >> >> > >> >> >But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents >> >> >that deserve to go to Hell. >> >> > >> >> >I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is >> >> >that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we >> >> >don't just kill the bastards ourselves. >> >> >> >> You belong to the unrighteous that *-->died<--*. >> > >> >You keep using this word. I think it does not mean what you think it >> >means. >> >> Well?? > >You're not very good at this, are you? A whole lot better than I need to be. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mp03fg21ogq@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #358589 |
On 07/25/2015 02:32 AM, Alex W. wrote: > On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >> how can an atheist >>>>> >> prove >>>>> >> there is no God >>>> > >>>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> >> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > > Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? I don't see how a God of love would take that as worthy of death, when later he is said to have inspired Paul to write: 1 Corinthians 13:4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5cg7rapnstqft7qbrrtna924mt6jr38rvo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358597 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:36:45 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 07/25/2015 02:32 AM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >>> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >> how can an atheist >>>>>> >> prove >>>>>> >> there is no God >>>>> > >>>>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >>> >>> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? > >I don't see how a God of love would take that as worthy of death, when >later he is said to have inspired Paul to write: >1 Corinthians 13:4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth >not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up. The innocent babies and puppies didn't die. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d1hvf1Foh2lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #358619 |
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:36:45 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >>On 07/25/2015 02:32 AM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >>>> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >> how can an atheist >>>>>>> >> prove >>>>>>> >> there is no God >>>>>> > >>>>>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>>>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >>>> >>>> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >>> >>> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? >> >>I don't see how a God of love would take that as worthy of death, when >>later he is said to have inspired Paul to write: > >>1 Corinthians 13:4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth >>not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up. > >The innocent babies and puppies didn't die. I'm visualizing a sea of bobbing babies and puppies bouncing off the hull of this giant ship drifting through the floodwaters. In other words, WTF are you talking about? There was supposedly a deliberately caused flood that wiped out all but eight adult people and two dogs. But now you say that all the other babies and baby dogs survived, too. It's an absurd statement. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fm8ara59aq916ns7mk171jv1ie6l2c0sde@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358624 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:31:11 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:36:45 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>>On 07/25/2015 02:32 AM, Alex W. wrote: >>>> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >>>>> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >> how can an atheist >>>>>>>> >> prove >>>>>>>> >> there is no God >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>>>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>>>>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >>>>> >>>>> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >>>> >>>> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? >>> >>>I don't see how a God of love would take that as worthy of death, when >>>later he is said to have inspired Paul to write: >> >>>1 Corinthians 13:4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth >>>not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up. >> >>The innocent babies and puppies didn't die. > >I'm visualizing a sea of bobbing babies and puppies bouncing off the >hull of this giant ship drifting through the floodwaters. But you're not very bright, because God clearly the innocent/righteous were saved. >In other words, WTF are you talking about? There was supposedly a >deliberately caused flood that wiped out all but eight adult people >and two dogs. But now you say that all the other babies and baby dogs >survived, too. It's an absurd statement. Supposedly??? Haahaahaa. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mp0hv811k8l@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #358619 |
On 07/25/2015 10:04 AM, duke wrote: > The innocent babies and puppies didn't die. All babies died, and all but two puppies. Try again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2q8ara5q7f4mi1sg5fqob8eeq670a6ca5j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358628 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:45:12 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 07/25/2015 10:04 AM, duke wrote: >> The innocent babies and puppies didn't die. > >All babies died, and all but two puppies. Try again. How many babies died? Try again. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <f038ra15ilg6kufsr7qtbpokbijuduuok7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358619 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:04:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:36:45 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >>On 07/25/2015 02:32 AM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >>>> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >> how can an atheist >>>>>>> >> prove >>>>>>> >> there is no God >>>>>> > >>>>>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>>>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >>>> >>>> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >>> >>> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? >> >>I don't see how a God of love would take that as worthy of death, when >>later he is said to have inspired Paul to write: > >>1 Corinthians 13:4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth >>not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up. > >The innocent babies and puppies didn't die. oh yeah the 3 month old babies all got together and built themselves a raft, and the puppies helped
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k5g7rap8u5bs177da9r1iefav7j06tjdsp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358560 |
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:27:28 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >> how can an atheist >>>> >> prove >>>> >> there is no God >>> > >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > >So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? They didn't. They're innocent. You just don't get it. Only the non righteous died. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mp0i0q21k8l@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #358616 |
On 07/25/2015 10:02 AM, duke wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:27:28 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> how can an atheist >>>>>>> prove >>>>>>> there is no God >>>>> >>>>> We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>> god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> >> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > > They didn't. They're innocent. So much the worse for your god, who killed all the babies, innocent or not, and all but two puppies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <449arah2it95j8ovsaubo9gi8u52vha7n8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358630 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:46:02 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 07/25/2015 10:02 AM, duke wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:27:28 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> how can an atheist >>>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>> there is no God >>>>>> >>>>>> We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>>>>> god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >>>> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >>> >>> So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> They didn't. They're innocent. > >So much the worse for your god, who killed all the babies, innocent or >not, and all but two puppies. Where does the bible say God killed any babies? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.301da9ec46201b8c9899d4@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #358616 |
In article <k5g7rap8u5bs177da9r1iefav7j06tjdsp@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 @cox.net says... > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:27:28 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > > >On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> > >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> >> how can an atheist > >>>> >> prove > >>>> >> there is no God > >>> > > >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your > >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. > >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > > > >So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > > They didn't. They're innocent. You just don't get it. Only the non righteous > died. If you mean in the sense of going on to eternal life, then you have a point, but unless they managed to swim for 40 days and 40 nights plus however long it took for the waters to subside, they died in the world in which the Flood took place.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <659ara5s1ivisc5s1efu1l0cs993b4mo4c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358636 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:13:37 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <k5g7rap8u5bs177da9r1iefav7j06tjdsp@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 >@cox.net says... >> >> On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:27:28 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>>> >> how can an atheist >> >>>> >> prove >> >>>> >> there is no God >> >>> > >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> > >> >So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> They didn't. They're innocent. You just don't get it. Only the non righteous >> died. > >If you mean in the sense of going on to eternal life, then you have a >point, but unless they managed to swim for 40 days and 40 nights plus >however long it took for the waters to subside, they died in the world >in which the Flood took place. Why would moses and his family live but not the babies? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web