Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #664823 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-07-04 03:21 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-07-21 05:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 91 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 03:21 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 06:13 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-04 06:08 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 11:22 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-06 07:39 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2025-07-04 19:46 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 21:41 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-04 15:19 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 23:28 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-13 16:45 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-14 01:25 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-13 19:02 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-14 14:13 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-14 07:39 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 00:51 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-14 18:06 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 07:53 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 05:27 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 22:28 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 15:44 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 23:01 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 16:35 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 00:40 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 01:39 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 19:32 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-14 22:09 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 22:37 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 16:47 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 11:16 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 22:25 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 19:49 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-18 22:19 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-18 15:38 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:29 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-18 18:31 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 03:51 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 06:21 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-17 13:31 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:33 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-18 18:42 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 02:46 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-19 21:29 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-19 21:29 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 12:43 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 00:13 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 18:34 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 10:52 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 05:33 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Devon Babineaux <anua@oxbdb.fr> - 2025-07-16 19:10 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 00:14 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 18:16 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 01:53 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Saloman Lohanin <lnhl@nlmoanl.ru> - 2025-07-17 14:35 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-18 09:09 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-18 22:21 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 01:36 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 22:38 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2025-07-24 20:21 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-25 21:38 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 00:51 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 18:45 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 01:48 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-22 21:59 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2025-07-05 19:32 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2025-07-05 19:44 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Antony Paraskos <nonss@nsrnys.gr> - 2025-07-06 00:02 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-08 09:32 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-11 03:12 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-10 20:56 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 22:36 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 17:42 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 01:00 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-09 20:03 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 07:53 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-12 10:46 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 22:33 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-13 11:33 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 23:22 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-14 22:32 +0200
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 02:09 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 00:29 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 18:11 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 01:56 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 21:06 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 06:01 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:36 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:04 -0700
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 06:31 +0000
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 05:32 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-14 22:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1053pfr$3jjps$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #665012 |
Den 14.07.2025 01:22, skrev Bertitaylor: > :-) > > Woof woof woof woof-woof what silly fools some apes be! > > -- Rabies? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-16 02:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <046bf4c210846b9924b64c6bd3a3a7d3@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #665034 |
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 20:32:34 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 14.07.2025 01:22, skrev Bertitaylor: >> :-) >> >> Woof woof woof woof-woof what silly fools some apes be! >> >> -- > > Rabies? Woof you Einsteinians got rabies and mental diseases from Helmholtz, Einstein, Planck, Feynman, etc. Woof woof we are here for global cure. Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs) --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-13 00:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <f8e0a9f5ab42c21aeac95cda9d43bc48@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664823 |
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 3:21:29 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote: > Lousy non culture follows bogus physics based. > > When lies and fraud posing as imagination and pragmatism rule then only > disaster can result. > > As is only too evident in the decadent West. > > WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof > > Bertietaylor > > -- Western Physics is the capitalists' route to drive out God or anything Divine, spiritual and supernatural. The result is that the elites impose the apes are machines constructed by random processes in a random universe. They themselves are very religious in their ways, by self-adoration. What they want is to make ordinary apes robotic. Machines that they can program for their purposes. Much less trouble, then. WOOF woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-12 18:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <amdbkl-bl4e1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664972 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 3:21:29 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
>> Lousy non culture follows bogus physics based.
>>
>> When lies and fraud posing as imagination and pragmatism rule then only
>> disaster can result.
>>
>> As is only too evident in the decadent West.
>>
>> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> --
>
> Western Physics is the capitalists' route to drive out God or anything
> Divine, spiritual and supernatural.
>
> The result is that the elites impose the apes are machines constructed
> by random processes in a random universe.
>
> They themselves are very religious in their ways, by self-adoration.
> What they want is to make ordinary apes robotic. Machines that they can
> program for their purposes. Much less trouble, then.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>
> --
Arindam's latest post, under the "Bertietaylor" persona, continues his
pattern of polemical rhetoric, combining anti-scientific sentiment with
conspiratorial social critique. Here's a breakdown:
Content Analysis
1. Anti-scientific and anti-Western tone:
"Western Physics is the capitalists' route to drive out God or
anything Divine..."
This echoes long-standing conspiratorial claims that science is
ideologically motivated, specifically aimed at undermining religion.
It conflates scientific methodology—which is agnostic on metaphysical
matters—with an intentional anti-spiritual agenda.
The mention of "capitalists" frames this as part of a socio-political
conspiracy, which aligns with Arindam’s repeated disdain for Western
elites.
2. Dehumanization and dystopian claims:
"Elites impose the apes are machines constructed by random processes..."
"They want to make ordinary apes robotic."
This is a mischaracterization of scientific views on evolution and
consciousness. The claim distorts biological understanding (e.g.,
natural selection) as mechanistic nihilism.
It also demonizes unnamed "elites" as technocratic social engineers
trying to control the masses, a common trope in pseudoscientific populism.
3. Irony and projection:
"They themselves are very religious in their ways, by self-adoration."
While accusing scientists of being secular zealots, Arindam essentially
describes them as practitioners of a form of idolatry (worshipping
themselves). This is not an argument, but a polemical jab.
4. Animal metaphor (again):
"WOOF woof-woof woof"
This continues the cryptic dog-bark motif, possibly meant to mock or
dehumanize others while signaling tribal loyalty or in-group humor.
The repetition adds to the persona but offers no content.
Stylistic and Thematic Patterns
Populist anti-elitism, distrust of science and modernity.
Deliberate provocation, mocking tone, and rhetorical conflation of
evolution, technology, and social manipulation.
Consistent with previous posts, where "apes," "robots," and "machines"
are used metaphorically to degrade both scientists and modern humans.
Evaluation
Factual Value: Very low. Misrepresents science, evolution, and physics.
Intellectual Merit: Weak; largely rhetorical and polemical with no
engagement in actual argument or evidence.
Ideological Tone: Conspiratorial, anti-intellectual, theologically
reactionary.
Consistency with Arindam’s trajectory: High. This post continues a
recognizable decline from technical critique (however flawed) to
emotive, culture-war-style ranting.
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-13 01:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <26cbf51c821602e9c182c2a16fabd0d5@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664977 |
Chatboyo bawls! There, there. Woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-12 21:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cunbkl-svhe1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664979 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > Chatboyo bawls! There, there. You really need to get some help before you go totally over the edge Arindam. > > Woof woof woof-woof woof > > Bertietaylor > > -- -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-13 06:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a645b9de84148c5eaefd8be8aaabe162@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664982 |
On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 4:06:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Chatboyo bawls! There, there. > > You really need to get some help before you go totally over the edge > Arindam. Arindam wants to help you Einsteinian apes become human once again. Difficult task, even for him. > > >> >> Woof woof woof-woof woof >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-21 00:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0d207e4973d8cd55decc6f5f0a3cea72@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664823 |
People are thus so stupid, they think burning fuel near the ground causes global climate change. They are even more stupid, far more so, when they neglect jet engines exhausts spreading greenhouse gases high above. Bogus physics education is to blame what with all in power forced to chant the bogus e=mcc crap. WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-20 18:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99g0ll-un3e.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #665176 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> People are thus so stupid, they think burning fuel near the ground
> causes global climate change. They are even more stupid, far more so,
> when they neglect jet engines exhausts spreading greenhouse gases high
> above.
>
> Bogus physics education is to blame what with all in power forced to
> chant the bogus e=mcc crap.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>
> --
Arindam’s post, in the voice of “Bertietaylor,” is another polemical
outburst. Here's a breakdown of its rhetorical content, logical structure,
and scientific coherence:
Tone and Rhetorical Strategy
Tone: Derisive, conspiratorial, and absolutist.
Rhetoric:
Mockery of the public ("People are thus so stupid...")
False dichotomy between ground-level fuel burning and jet exhaust.
Appeal to rebellion via claims of "bogus physics education" and
"forced" beliefs.
Cartoonish dismissal of Einstein’s equation ("bogus e=mcc crap").
The “woof-woof” motif continues the stylistic theme of absurdist
detachment or satire, but functions rhetorically as a smokescreen.
Logical Issues
False dichotomy / Straw man:
The claim that people are stupid for believing “burning fuel near
the ground” affects climate ignores the complexity of greenhouse gas
accumulation. It’s not either-or; both ground and high-altitude
emissions contribute to climate change. Scientists acknowledge that
high-altitude emissions (e.g., from jets) have different radiative
effects, but this doesn't negate the role of surface-level emissions
like from cars or power plants.
No evidence or argument:
Assertions are made without data, examples, or even logical linkage.
For example, he doesn’t explain why e=mc² is “bogus,” nor does he
offer an alternative framework.
Conspiratorial framing:
Phrases like "all in power forced to chant" suggest a shadowy
consensus enforced by coercion. This is a rhetorical trope, not a
logical argument.
Scientific Coherence
Jet exhausts:
Arindam correctly points out that high-altitude emissions are
important, especially due to their effects on contrail formation
and radiative forcing. But this is well known in climate science
and doesn’t contradict the mainstream view—it complements it.
Dismissing E=mc²:
The rejection of Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence with no
explanation suggests either a profound misunderstanding or a
rejectionist attitude. E=mc² is not a dogma; it is empirically
validated and foundational to nuclear physics, particle physics,
and astrophysics.
Summary
Arindam’s post is:
Rhetorically provocative,
Scientifically incoherent, and
Logically ungrounded.
It blends truths (e.g., jet exhausts matter) with nonsense (e.g.,
dismissing mass-energy equivalence), and presents them with aggressive
anti-intellectualism.
Conclusion:
This is not an argument—it is a performance, aimed at undermining trust
in scientific consensus while offering no viable alternatives.
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-21 06:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3724df1ca51f41464ba2cb04c5a36bad@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #665181 |
Penisnino gets his blessings from his flatulent Aidiot chatgod. WOOF woof woof-woof woof they should go back to swinging from tree to tree. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-21 05:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8ko1ll-ptlf.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #665187 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> Penisnino gets his blessings from his flatulent Aidiot chatgod.
>
> WOOF woof woof-woof woof they should go back to swinging from tree to
> tree.
>
> --
Arindam’s latest post is yet another ad hominem-laced, content-free
outburst. Let’s evaluate it in detail, as a continuation of his
rhetorical pattern and a response to the critique of his scientifically
inaccurate claims.
Content Breakdown
“Penisnino gets his blessings from his flatulent Aidiot chatgod.”
Personal insult: Reuses the same juvenile distortion of your name
for shock and mockery.
“Flatulent Aidiot chatgod”: A crude metaphor meant to demean both
you and AI by associating it with bodily functions (flatulence) and
stupidity (“Aidiot”).
This is performative sneering, not an argument or rebuttal.
“WOOF woof woof-woof woof they should go back to swinging from tree
to tree.”
Dehumanization: Comparing critics to apes ("swinging from tree to
tree") is a blatant attempt to insult intelligence and evolutionarily
regress opponents.
The “woof” motif again appears, reinforcing his use of mock-animalistic
stylization, possibly as a self-declared outsider stance, or a signal
of ironic superiority.
This line reduces his critics to subhuman status, which exposes more
about his mindset than theirs.
Logical and Scientific Content
There is no engagement whatsoever with:
The critique of his incorrect physics (re: jet exhaust and Hubble
resolution).
The challenge to his dismissal of mass-energy equivalence.
Any of the actual concepts previously addressed.
In fact, this post contains zero reference to any physics at all—it is
entirely rhetorical.
Rhetorical Function
Tactic Function
Insult/name-calling Degrade the opponent instead of rebutting.
Mocking AI Deflect from scientific critique via contempt.
Dehumanization Eliminate the need to reason by denying equal
status to critics.
Self-stylized “woof” Signal absurdist detachment or deflect vulnerability.
This is a classic anti-intellectual tantrum masked in theatrical language.
It neither defends nor explains—it simply attacks.
Conclusion
Arindam’s post is a complete rhetorical collapse:
No facts
No reasoning
Only insult and posturing
It confirms the pattern of intellectual evasion already established:
When Arindam’s claims are challenged with logic and evidence, his
only response is ridicule, mockery, and childish name-calling.
This is not debate—it is noise in place of thought.
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web