Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #673896 > unrolled thread

Super Intelligence

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-29 19:11 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-09-30 10:14 +0200
      Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-09-30 18:37 +1000
        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:34 -0700
        Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-01 20:07 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Bob <usenet@bananacorp.nl.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:51 +0000
            Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-07 17:15 +0200
              Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:03 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 12:59 -0700
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 04:20 +0800
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 16:03 -0700
                      Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:35 +0800
                        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 18:08 -0700
                          Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 10:01 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-08 09:02 +0200
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 21:11 +0800
                  Re: Super Intelligence Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-10-08 17:29 +0200
                  Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 10:38 -0700
                    Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:37 +0800
                      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 16:26 -0700
                        Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
                        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-18 12:30 -0700
                          Re: Super Intelligence Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-18 16:17 -0600
                            Re: Super Intelligence Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2026-10-19 11:26 +1300
                              Re: Super Intelligence Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-18 16:49 -0600
                      Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:49 +1100
                        Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 17:17 -0700
                        Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
                          Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 19:02 -0700
                          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:12 -0700
                  Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-09 09:27 +1300
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:16 -0700
                  Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:29 +1100
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:22 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence squalk <sq@net.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:17 +0100
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:43 +0800
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:26 -0700
              Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-08 11:00 +1300
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:30 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:22 -0700
        Re: Super Intelligence HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-02 12:07 +0000
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:26 -0700
        Re: Super Intelligence "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:56 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:47 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:27 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:30 -0700
        Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-02 11:37 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-02 22:57 +0800
          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:53 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2026-10-07 02:55 -0400
      Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:08 +0800
        Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-07 23:04 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:32 -0700

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#674078

On Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:22:45 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> Silvano wrote:
>> 
>> guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
>> > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
>> >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
>> >
>> > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
>> > irrationality?

Have you considered 'negative' intelligence?

>> >
>> >
>> Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> 
> dat would be The Three Stooges show, or the Abbot and Costello show,
> or any tvee show with a laugh track.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674058

s|b wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
> 
> > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
> >
> > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> > >
> > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> > > irrationality?
> 
> > Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> 
> What about REAL stupidity?

dat would be Kamala Harris

Kaka Mala.


> 
> --
> Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.
>                 - Julius Caesar

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674088

On Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:26:33 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> s|b wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
> > 
> > > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
> > >
> > > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> > > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> > > >
> > > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> > > > irrationality?
> > 
> > > Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> > 
> > What about REAL stupidity?
 
> dat would be Kamala Harris

The woman that warned that Drumpf is a fascist and that he would put the
US in an economic depression if he were to be chosen again? That Kamala
Harris?
 
> Kaka Mala.

Thank you for this example of real stupidity.

-- 
Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.
		- Julius Caesar

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674153

s|b wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:26:33 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > s|b wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
> > >
> > > > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
> > > >
> > > > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> > > > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> > > > >
> > > > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> > > > > irrationality?
> > >
> > > > Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> > >
> > > What about REAL stupidity?
> 
> > dat would be Kamala Harris
> 
> The woman that warned that Drumpf is a fascist and that he would put the
> US in an economic depression if he were to be chosen again? That Kamala
> Harris?
> 
> > Kaka Mala.
> 
> Thank you for this example of real stupidity.
> 
> --
> Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.
>                 - Julius Caesar


Does Kamala Harris speaks ...English????


i mean does she usage english??


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674059

s|b wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
> 
> > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
> >
> > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> > >
> > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> > > irrationality?
> 
> > Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> 
> What about REAL stupidity?

The majority of physics teachers don't have a physics degree.



> 
> --
> Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.
>                 - Julius Caesar

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674060

s|b wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
> 
> > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
> >
> > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> > >
> > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> > > irrationality?
> 
> > Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> 
> What about REAL stupidity?


Putting a peeing devise in the same place of a vagina?

dats real stupidity!

whos idea was dat?



> 
> --
> Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.
>                 - Julius Caesar

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674065

Op 2/10/2026 om 7:30 schreef The Starmaker:
> s|b wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
>>
>>> guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
>>>
>>>> Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
>>>>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
>>>>
>>>> What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
>>>> irrationality?
>>
>>> Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
>>
>> What about REAL stupidity?
> 
> 
> Putting a peeing devise in the same place of a vagina?
> 
> dats real stupidity!
> 
> whos idea was dat?

That's the joke about God's profession as creator of personkind. An 
artist? (the beauty of it all!) An architect? (monumental!) A civil 
engineer of course: who else is capable of laying the waste disposal 
systems through and along the leisure/pleasure areas?

-- 
guido wugi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674095

On 10/2/2026 5:37 PM, wugi wrote:
> Op 2/10/2026 om 7:30 schreef The Starmaker:
>> s|b wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
>>>
>>>> guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
>>>>
>>>>> Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
>>>>>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
>>>>> irrationality?
>>>
>>>> Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
>>>
>>> What about REAL stupidity?
>>
>>
>> Putting a peeing devise in the same place of a vagina?
>>
>> dats real stupidity!
>>
>> whos idea was dat?
> 
> That's the joke about God's profession as creator of personkind. An 
> artist? (the beauty of it all!) An architect? (monumental!) A civil 
> engineer of course: who else is capable of laying the waste disposal 
> systems through and along the leisure/pleasure areas?
> 

It is quite obvious that you are posting this from some other group than
sci.physics.relativity.  Because when we turn our pages in the nearest
book of Newtonian physics [1] -- please forgive me, I don't have one
handy -- to practical applications of /gravity/, we see that the planet
helps with both bowel movements and childbirth.  The latter of course
only if you're a woman, pregnant, and in labor [3].

Of course, western style toilets [4] do not make it easy to apply the
practicality of a graviton [5] to bowel movements, so it's best to stand
on the toilet seat, and then squat down in order to align the last end
of the rectal intestine perfectly perpendicular to the horizon, and let
the nearest graviton pull it down at its leisure rather than have to
strain [6] to get rid of some extraneous fecal matter.

People who have never had pleasurable bowel movements of course don't
know this trick, and will in error and confusion not understand the mind
of /the creator/ of humanity.  Simply because the are using western loos
wrong.  Please don't be that guy, and apply wisdom and experience to the
simple things in life, rather than post something utterly inane and id-
iotic on Usenet like a character from Black Adder [7].

Now, wugi can simply direct us to the nearest chapter in his or her You-
Tube station, where he or she explains the best way to have a bowel
movement like the character in Black Adder he or she is.

I mean, it /has/ to be funny, because nobody is intentionally that
stupid, right?


Best wishes, and happy reruns of Black Adder!


[1] An Englishman isn't a real [2] patriot unless he has a copy of New-
tonian physics on his bookshelf.

[2] For some value of real.  Perhaps /real/ value'd variable in Fortran
77?

[3] And hopefully not in a labor camp, but possibly a labor union;
though I don't recommend communism for obvious reasons.

[4] But not toiletry.  We are posting in alt.usage.english, of course.

[5] The members of sci.physics.relativity will have to comment on which
graviton, and whether that spelling is considered scientifically
correct.  My copy of a speling [sic] chequer [sic] does not have that
word in its vocabulary.

[6] But not a viral strain.  Not even on social media.

[7] People of rec.arts.tv will have to have something to imitate.  Isn't
rec.arts.tv about creating new shows for television?  So I presume all
posters of rec.arts.tv not only have their own YouTube station, but make
better jokes than the ones we enjoy in Black Adder!
-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674155

wugi wrote:
> 
> Op 2/10/2026 om 7:30 schreef The Starmaker:
> > s|b wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote:
> >>
> >>> guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben:
> >>>
> >>>> Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> >>>>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> >>>>
> >>>> What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> >>>> irrationality?
> >>
> >>> Artificial stupidity, IMHO.
> >>
> >> What about REAL stupidity?
> >
> >
> > Putting a peeing devise in the same place of a vagina?
> >
> > dats real stupidity!
> >
> > whos idea was dat?
> 
> That's the joke about God's profession as creator of personkind. An
> artist? (the beauty of it all!) An architect? (monumental!) A civil
> engineer of course: who else is capable of laying the waste disposal
> systems through and along the leisure/pleasure areas?
> 
> --
> guido wugi

you mean a plumbing system in a entertaiment center system..

my tv is wet, why is dat?

do i call a plummer to fix my wet tv?

get a plunger!




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674219

In article <6ABC6FC3.4B51@ix.netcom.com>, starmaker@ix.netcom.com wrote:

>Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?

Artifiical Inteligence is real bullshit, and now, so are we.

-- 
Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they 
love this country.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674231

On 10/7/2026 2:55 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> In article <6ABC6FC3.4B51@ix.netcom.com>, starmaker@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> 
>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> 
> Artifiical Inteligence is real bullshit, and now, so are we.
> 

Don't worry about humanity.  There are still some people left who like
to do things the old fashioned way, and won't cry when the A.I. data-
centres get shut down.


Best wishes, and happy shutting down A.I. datacentres!
-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674242

Op 7/10/2026 om 20:08 schreef Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson:
> On 10/7/2026 2:55 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>> In article <6ABC6FC3.4B51@ix.netcom.com>, starmaker@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>
>>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
>>
>> Artifiical Inteligence is real bullshit, and now, so are we.
>>
> 
> Don't worry about humanity.  There are still some people left who like
> to do things the old fashioned way, and won't cry when the A.I. data-
> centres get shut down.
> 
> 
> Best wishes, and happy shutting down A.I. datacentres!

Perhaps they'll shut down after having sucked up all remaining material 
and energetic resources of our planet, at the same occasion leaving 
nothing else for any other needs. As I've said before, it's sobering 
when one reminds oneself, always again after each new chat with AI: yet 
another part of forests and water and gas etc. gone, not necessarily out 
of necessity... :o|

-- 
guido wugi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#674291

Tony Cooper wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:24:10 +0200, Steve Hayes
> <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 10:21:27 +1100, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>And you've used a huge amount of electricity. Admittedly that's
> >>renewable energy, now that we're phasing out fossil fuels, but it's
> >>still electricity that is converted to heat in the air and water. Have
> >>the people who predict global warming rates taken data centres into
> >>account, or are the data centres too new for the experts to notice?
> >
> >It has been claimed that data centres already do far more damage to
> >the environment than cow farts.
> 
> This reminds me of when our son was a student at the University of
> Alabama.  We went up there on Parent's Day, when the father was there
> of one of my son's fraternity brothers.  The son was a graduate
> student in one of the sciences.  He was involved in a study of
> methane-from-cows.
> 
> When he told his father (A "good ole boy" from Southern Alabama) about
> his work, the father exploded "Goddammit, Son!  I'm going into debt to
> keep you in college and you're out there collecting cow farts?  We got
> cows at home, and you can hold a cup to their ass for free!".
> 
> 

'Why buy the cow when you can get the ass for free'????

dats not da vey i heard it...


wat kind of cows you people got up there??




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web