Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671920 > unrolled thread

OBSERVER

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2026-08-09 10:36 -0700
Last post2026-08-11 00:52 -0700
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  OBSERVER The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-09 10:36 -0700
    Re: OBSERVER Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-08-09 21:54 +0200
    Re: OBSERVER The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-09 19:04 -0700
      Re: OBSERVER The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-11 00:52 -0700

#671920 — OBSERVER

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2026-08-09 10:36 -0700
SubjectOBSERVER
Message-ID<6A78BA99.2B2B@ix.netcom.com>
another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word 
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one? 


 

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#671925

FromMaciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Date2026-08-09 21:54 +0200
Message-ID<18ca3b344de86deb$1964704$2346$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
In reply to#671920
On 8/9/2026 7:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> another thing i notice about this newsgroup...
> 
> yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

Of course they don't. They're physicists -
they're complete idiots. Or they are minions
of physicists, even stupider than their masters.


> 
> What consititutes an observer?

The ability of speaking in human
language.

> 
> Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

No, without an observer the phrase
"Earth exists" wouldn't have either sense
or logical value.

> 
> How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
> if you don't even know what the word
> 'observer' means???

Simply. By training - a neural network
acquire such ability.

> If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?
Wherever.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#671930

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2026-08-09 19:04 -0700
Message-ID<6A7931C1.3FC2@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#671920
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> another thing i notice about this newsgroup...
> 
> yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!
> 
> What consititutes an observer?
> 
> Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????
> 
> How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
> if you don't even know what the word
> 'observer' means???
> 
> If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?



Reality does not exist without an observable.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#671963

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2026-08-11 00:52 -0700
Message-ID<6A7AD4CB.4F48@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#671930
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > another thing i notice about this newsgroup...
> >
> > yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!
> >
> > What consititutes an observer?
> >
> > Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????
> >
> > How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
> > if you don't even know what the word
> > 'observer' means???
> >
> > If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?
> 
> Reality does not exist without an observable.

That might be a little above yours understanding...
since reality would be just a blur without an observable.

But, now..I'm going to take it to a whole new level beyond ANYONES
understading..

You already know, 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the
earth'.

So, it is simple for God to create the reality of a heavens and an earth
by being
The Observer...and making the heavens and the earth a reality..

But, but..
and this is beyond anyones level of understanding here..

There is another observer in this statement 

'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.

and it isn't God.

The Observer is the one who observed God creating the heavens and the
earth.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web