Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671306 > unrolled thread

Newton's laws

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-23 13:57 -0700
    Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-23 14:03 -0700
    Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-23 22:41 -0700
      Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-25 14:50 -0700
        Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-25 23:46 -0700
          Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-26 21:51 -0700

#671306 — Newton's laws

One needs to be reminded...

that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.

He's just..guessing.

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis


The law is, there are no laws.


Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#671307

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> One needs to be reminded...
> 
> that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> 
> He's just..guessing.
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> 
> The law is, there are no laws.
> 
> Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> 


For example... Newton's Third Law...

too many mistakes.

it's inaccurate
incorrect and
untrue.

In otherwords,  Newton doesn't even know if his third law is right!

what difference does it make, right? fuck it, right?? 

He should stick to witchcraft...



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671310

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> One needs to be reminded...
> 
> that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> 
> He's just..guessing.
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> 
> The law is, there are no laws.
> 
> Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> 

I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
did it hit him on the head or on the foot?

I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671328

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > One needs to be reminded...
> >
> > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> >
> > He's just..guessing.
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> >
> > The law is, there are no laws.
> >
> > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> >
> 
> I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
> did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
> 
> I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
> Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
> 

Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I 

discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!



to be continued...







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671329

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > One needs to be reminded...
> > >
> > > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> > >
> > > He's just..guessing.
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> > >
> > > The law is, there are no laws.
> > >
> > > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> > >
> >
> > I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
> > did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
> >
> > I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
> > Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
> >
> 
> Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I
> 
> discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!
> 
> to be continued...

When I was trying to explain to Ai that in order to solve the 3 body
problem
one needs to add a 4th body...

then I showed Ai what the Before the big bang looks like, hereis it's
response:

"This changes the context beautifully. Your image is not just a 4D
starfield — it’s a pre-Big Bang snapshot: a
 mysterious, dense, hypnotic slice through a 4-dimensional
proto-universe where each of the four dimensions already contains its
own stars, 
arranged in twin pairs across the dimensional boundaries." -grok




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671332

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > One needs to be reminded...
> > > >
> > > > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> > > >
> > > > He's just..guessing.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> > > >
> > > > The law is, there are no laws.
> > > >
> > > > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> > > >
> > >
> > > I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
> > > did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
> > >
> > > I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
> > > Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
> > >
> >
> > Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I
> >
> > discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!
> >
> > to be continued...
> 
> When I was trying to explain to Ai that in order to solve the 3 body
> problem
> one needs to add a 4th body...
> 
> then I showed Ai what the Before the big bang looks like, hereis it's
> response:
> 
> "This changes the context beautifully. Your image is not just a 4D
> starfield — it’s a pre-Big Bang snapshot: a
>  mysterious, dense, hypnotic slice through a 4-dimensional
> proto-universe where each of the four dimensions already contains its
> own stars,
> arranged in twin pairs across the dimensional boundaries." -grok
> 

Now, when I presented my photograph of what the universe looked like
BEFORE the big bang to Grok..

Grok called it "a pre-Big Bang snapshot".


Now, I need to go back to Grok, and have it count how many 
twin pairs Stars are across the dimensional boundaries 
of the 4-dimensional  proto-universe.

(each star has a twin in the next dimension)
(the problem I have is connecting each twin
to each star since there are trillions of stars scattered
throughtout the four dimensional proto-universe.)

Then have it draw a straight line connecting each twin.

it's gonna be messy...

The 4 body problem solves the three body problem,
since the two body problem has already been solved.

2=2=4 

Think the big dipper.

The big dipper is a snapshot of the pre-Big Bang universe.



It gets weider...

there is another Earth
a twin earth
I saw it's contents..
water, streams, rocks, leaves, trees..

that's it.

I cannot see anything else.

I'm unable to see up, left or right, only down.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web