Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671206 > unrolled thread

Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Y <Yborg@zenodo.com> - 2026-06-15 20:12 +1000
    Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-15 13:11 +0200
    Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 09:13 -0700
      Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-18 08:29 -0700
    Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-06-16 14:52 +0200
      Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-16 08:05 -0700
      Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-16 20:04 +0200
        Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-06-16 18:52 +0000
          Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-16 21:41 +0200
      Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-06-17 05:53 +0200
        Re: Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-17 00:26 -0700

#671206 — Recommended Kill-file List - Sci Physics Relativity Group

The group looks very noisy. Worse than it ever did.

I have KFd Starmaker.Thousands of ridiculous irrelevant spam postings 
gone in a flash. Finally some sanity can be tracked through the postings 
and topic structure of the group. Maybe it's possible to establish a 
routine kill file ledger - something that gets posted once a week ? This 
will allow a non-moderated group to self moderate to some degree and 
serve as a warning to others and newcomers about who exactly to lookout 
and killfile for.

I would like to make a point; that posters of the kind are not merely 
mentally debilitating to themselves, they have the potential to be 
mentally debilitating to those who engage with, consume/read their 
material. For clarity; this is not an attack on the character of such 
mentioned posters, but as a warning to those (particularly newcomers who 
are unable to differentiate between what is real and valid and relevant 
- and what is not).

With that said,

What is the consensus on the following poster ?

Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>

He appears to at least be on topic, but seems stuck on the definition of 
clocks; precisely how the electrodynamics between clocks in their 
respective frames is what relativity models. Has he offered anything 
genuinely novel in this regard - asides from the desire to have clocks 
flying around while being non-synchronized ?

btw. What happened to Pentcho Valev ? Did he eventually give in ?

-y

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#671207

On 6/15/2026 12:12 PM, Y wrote:


> What is the consensus on the following poster ?
> 
> Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
> 
> He appears to at least be on topic, but seems stuck on the definition of 
> clocks; precisely how the electrodynamics between clocks in their 
> respective frames is what relativity models.

And that seems important to you -  because...?



  Has he offered anything
> genuinely novel in this regard - asides from the desire to have clocks 
> flying around while being non-synchronized ?

MY desire?
It's actually your moronic religion trying to
enforce that with the help of your SI idiocy - for
the sake of some moronic symmetry of your precious
little formulas.

With no success, of course. Clocks keep ignoring
your SI and being synchronized - indicating t'=t
like always. Common sense has been warning
your idiot guru.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671212

Y wrote:
> 
> The group looks very noisy. Worse than it ever did.
> 
> I have KFd Starmaker.

I cannot wait for your next scientific paper...consider it dead on
arrival.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671264

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Y wrote:
> >
> > The group looks very noisy. Worse than it ever did.
> >
> > I have KFd Starmaker.
> 
> I cannot wait for your next scientific paper...consider it dead on
> arrival.
> 

Did you actually belive "Y", 
that you can enter a newsgroup
and the first thing you do is
attack others...
did you believe there would be
no consequences for your actions????

Evey paper you post here
will be torn to shreads.

Every idea
even if it's a
sentence long
will be torn to shreds.

Look at that
stupid person
with Pointed Ears..
he comes from
antiquated times
in Usenet where there
used to be 
hundreds and humdreds of
free newsservers...
now there is only 
only ONE free newsserver.

Wake up stupid.

This is a different world

Don't you know who are messing with?
https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/2003921143380824405/photo/1

Didn't you get the memo, I own this newsgroup!






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671224

Y wrote:
^
Playing stupid games like this as if this were a chat forum and you a
juvenile is guaranteed to get you killfiled by someone.  If I would still
use a newsreader capable of using regular expressions for filtering, your
postings would be automatically scored down merely because there is no
two-part real name.  Because experience tells me (and others) that people
who post (in science groups) under (one-part) pseudonym are likely to post
nonsense and/or to be trolls.

> The group looks very noisy. Worse than it ever did.

Not to me.  The only noise I still see here is that by the 'nym-shifting
troll because they cannot be killfiled (they are changing pseudodynms and
"addresses" on a daily basis, which is the maliciousness of it; some of
their providers have been responsive, but then they merely switch
providers).  They have a distinctly ridiculous posting style, though, so
maybe an "AI" could be trained and used to recognize them.

> I have KFd Starmaker.

I, too.

> I would like to make a point; that posters of the kind are not merely 
> mentally debilitating to themselves, they have the potential to be 
> mentally debilitating to those who engage with, consume/read their 
> material. 

It is pointless to correct/refute them, though.  First of all, that is what
they want.  Second, those who do not have the faculty to recognize that
delusional pseudoscientific trolling/nonsense for what it is *and* do not
question it are hopeless cases anyway.  If they /do/ question it in a
posting, a correction/clarification/warning can still be posted as a
follow-up.  But the record shows that it is a waste of time to post
corrections/rebuttals to that in advance in the dim hope that someone will
read them and appreciate them.

> What is the consensus on the following poster ?
> 
> Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>

Hopeless crackpot regarding relativity ==> waste of time ==> killfiled.

> btw. What happened to Pentcho Valev ? Did he eventually give in ?

I do not know because I have him killfiled, too.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671226

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> Y wrote:
> ^
> Playing stupid games like this as if this were a chat forum and you a
> juvenile is guaranteed to get you killfiled by someone.  If I would still
> use a newsreader capable of using regular expressions for filtering, your
> postings would be automatically scored down merely because there is no
> two-part real name.  Because experience tells me (and others) that people
> who post (in science groups) under (one-part) pseudonym are likely to post
> nonsense and/or to be trolls.
> 
> > The group looks very noisy. Worse than it ever did.
> 
> Not to me.  The only noise I still see here is that by the 'nym-shifting
> troll because they cannot be killfiled (they are changing pseudodynms and
> "addresses" on a daily basis, which is the maliciousness of it; some of
> their providers have been responsive, but then they merely switch
> providers).  They have a distinctly ridiculous posting style, though, so
> maybe an "AI" could be trained and used to recognize them.
> 
> > I have KFd Starmaker.
> 
> I, too.

I, three!!!!

Odd Bodkin and Tom Roberts commited Suicide-file..list.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671229

On 6/16/2026 2:52 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

>> Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
> 
> Hopeless crackpot regarding relativity ==> waste of time ==> killfiled.

Easier to humiliate an idiot ==> more hatred
in his powerless barking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671230

Le 16/06/2026 à 20:04, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
> On 6/16/2026 2:52 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
>>> Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
>> 
>> Hopeless crackpot regarding relativity ==> waste of time ==> killfiled.
> 
> Easier to humiliate an idiot ==> more hatred
> in his powerless barking.

You admit being an idiot, then? Good.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671232

On 6/16/2026 8:52 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 16/06/2026 à 20:04, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
>> On 6/16/2026 2:52 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>
>>>> Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
>>>
>>> Hopeless crackpot regarding relativity ==> waste of time ==> killfiled.
>>
>> Easier to humiliate an idiot ==> more hatred
>> in his powerless barking.
> 
> You admit being an idiot, then? Good.

Oh, that poor piece of shit is opening
its muzzle again, and again is pretending
to know something.
So, trll me, poor piece of shit, how is
"select now()::interval" in sql? I mean -
in sql, not in sql_by_some_idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671238

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Y wrote:
>> btw. What happened to Pentcho Valev ? Did he eventually give in ?
> 
> I do not know because I have him killfiled, too.

Due to my native language German, I used a word order that can be
misunderstood: "to have someone [present participle]" means "to have
[present particle] done to someone by someone else"; for example, the
wording "the king had him hanged" means "the king gave an order that
he should be hanged and this order was executed by the executioner".
But what I meant is "*I* have killfiled him, too." instead, meaning that
I have added him (i.e. rules that are suitable to recognize his postings)
to my killfile. ':-)

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671239

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > Y wrote:
> >> btw. What happened to Pentcho Valev ? Did he eventually give in ?
> >
> > I do not know because I have him killfiled, too.
> 
> Due to my native language German, I used a word order that can be
> misunderstood: "to have someone [present participle]" means "to have
> [present particle] done to someone by someone else"; for example, the
> wording "the king had him hanged" means "the king gave an order that
> he should be hanged and this order was executed by the executioner".
> But what I meant is "*I* have killfiled him, too." instead, meaning that
> I have added him (i.e. rules that are suitable to recognize his postings)
> to my killfile. ':-)
> 
> --
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

You killfiled Usenet.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web