Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617956 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 358 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-17 12:05 +1000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 13:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-19 06:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:19 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 23:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-20 07:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 22:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:53 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 17:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 19:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 00:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:13 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 02:05 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:33 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 17:46 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 20:06 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:20 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-08-17 08:13 -0600
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:18 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz and Laurence Crossen run out of arguments "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 09:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 23:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-18 12:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 04:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:00 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:54 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 16:49 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ben Harin <ianr@ninrbnnr.nn> - 2023-08-18 23:27 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:40 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:23 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:53 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Wayne Bereznevich <nwne@czewnebe.ze> - 2023-08-18 22:37 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:49 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Elton Vakar <eero@aklenaoo.av> - 2023-08-18 23:07 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Merlan Bauze <emeu@eabezeel.bn> - 2023-08-19 10:13 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 15:39 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:56 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 13:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 10:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 09:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:51 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:27 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 19:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 20:30 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 00:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 03:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 09:38 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 20:05 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 19:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-23 15:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:39 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-03 17:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 12:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 22:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 21:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 22:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 01:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 12:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 03:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 04:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 13:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 15:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 05:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Delmer Tupalo <rptm@lmlelodl.el> - 2023-08-20 18:44 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:29 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Travis Bazili <aail@ttttviat.sv> - 2023-08-23 09:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Clarence Talkovsky <nskl@eccaryec.kv> - 2023-08-23 11:53 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:26 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-25 21:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-19 11:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 11:52 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Brett Harkharov <aaah@rthtrath.rk> - 2023-08-19 17:12 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:08 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 02:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Chico Patsalo <tpac@slsialct.ac> - 2023-08-19 10:41 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:22 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 03:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 08:36 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 19:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 17:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 12:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 17:52 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:12 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 00:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 06:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:40 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Shon Babukh <koun@bnbuboab.ob> - 2023-08-18 23:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 13:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 01:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:19 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 15:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 07:07 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:59 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:39 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 20:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:03 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 00:35 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 22:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 10:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 17:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:34 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:42 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 15:30 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 19:11 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 18:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 23:33 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 22:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 14:06 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:17 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 23:20 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 00:44 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Colby Zolotar <bolr@obzooota.yr> - 2023-08-24 09:32 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:28 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 06:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:26 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-23 01:24 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 22:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-21 23:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 15:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 17:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Evenezer Peltser <etpv@pverreet.zz> - 2023-08-23 11:04 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-21 21:25 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 00:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 18:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:51 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:01 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:31 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:00 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Williard Bah <rhab@ihdiadrd.lw> - 2023-08-23 10:30 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:57 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Basil Hariton <athi@iaribinh.bo> - 2023-08-23 11:51 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 07:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 18:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 09:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-28 15:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-29 06:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700
Page 6 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 18 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 11:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64DFBA35.7EF9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #618147 |
Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > > On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank who does not even know high school physics! "high school physics"???? Who teachers "high school physics"???? Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or physics education. Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 college physics classes. 90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, geology, general science or physics). Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City high schools do not even offer physics. Of all school subjects, Physics has the most severe teacher shortage, followed by math and chemistry. There are large surpluses of biology and earth science teachers. http://phystec.physics.cornell.edu/content/crisis-physics-education -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfpggr.6m59ut1txe6hqN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618154 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06╯AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen: > > > > > Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > > > > On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It > > may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank > > who does not even know high school physics! > > "high school physics"???? Who teachers "high school physics"???? > > > > Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or > physics education. > Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 > college physics classes. > 90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher > lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, > geology, general science or physics). Let me guess, you are American? > Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty > finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City > high schools do not even offer physics. > Of all school subjects, Physics has the most severe teacher shortage, > followed by math and chemistry. There are large surpluses of biology and > earth science teachers. And you have had in idiot in charge who wanted to make America great again. That involved mostly real estate swindling and a surfeit of lawyers fighting each other. The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based on superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 11:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kkbhggF6evgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618244 |
On 2023-08-19 08:22:18 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> Paul Alsing wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06╯AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen: >>> >>>> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. >>> >>> On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It >>> may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank >>> who does not even know high school physics! >> >> "high school physics"???? Who teachers "high school physics"???? >> >> >> >> Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or >> physics education. >> Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 >> college physics classes. >> 90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher >> lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, >> geology, general science or physics). > > Let me guess, you are American? Of course. What he said makes no sense to me in relation to my science education (in England), to my daughter's (in France), or to my wife's (in Chile). > >> Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty >> finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City >> high schools do not even offer physics. >> Of all school subjects, Physics has the most severe teacher shortage, >> followed by math and chemistry. There are large surpluses of biology and >> earth science teachers. > > And you have had in idiot in charge > who wanted to make America great again. > That involved mostly real estate swindling > and a surfeit of lawyers fighting each other. > > The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based > on superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education, in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, I asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the biochemistry department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants could pay for? He had no coherent answer. -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36 years; mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 08:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <742ad5eb-3ec4-4c4b-9a5d-149bc9201b6cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618248 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based > > on superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, > Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc > at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education, > in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, I > asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the biochemistry > department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants could pay for? > He had no coherent answer. The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d125b34a-e2ca-491c-972d-00662f5ab1c7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618268 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 8:24:32 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based > > > on superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, > > Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc > > at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education, > > in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, I > > asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the biochemistry > > department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants could pay for? > > He had no coherent answer. > The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? Berkeley
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 18:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kkc7acF9pmpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618268 |
On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >>> The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on >>> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, >> Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc> >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education,> >> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, >> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the >> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants >> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer. > The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to have foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there. Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). > As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? I thought we were talking about high schools. Last I heard none of the places you mention were high schools. (Incidentally, if I spell Berkeley incorrectly my computer corrects it automatically; you should try that. I don't often need to write Berkeley nowadays, but there was a time when wrote it often.) Anyway, no one doubts that Berkeley, Stanford, MIT (and Harvard, I'm surprised you forgot that one, not to mention Yale, Princeton and Cornell) are good, but most American universities are not in their class. Not many foreigners flock to Bob Jones University, for example. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 09:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d62a3194-1f28-48c3-a2c3-5e9eb7a06638n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618271 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:01:21 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said: > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > >>> The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on > >>> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, > >> Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc> > >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education,> > >> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, > >> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the > >> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants > >> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer. > > The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. > Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to have > foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there. > Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the > contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a > specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). It doesn't, it is simply a delay tactic until they get a job offer along with the conversion to H1-B. > > As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you > > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? > I thought we were talking about high schools. You are the one who switched to your post-doc experience (at Berkeley)> Remember? > Anyway, no one doubts that Berkeley, Stanford, MIT (and Harvard, I'm > surprised you forgot that one, not to mention Yale, Princeton and > Cornell) are good, but most American universities are not in their > class. Not many foreigners flock to Bob Jones University, for example. > -- Not many flock to any of the French universities either (unless they are from North Africa). Why did you do your post-doc in the US and not in your home country (ies)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 18:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kkca9fFa831U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618272 |
On 2023-08-19 16:16:14 +0000, Dono. said: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:01:21 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said:>> > On Saturday, August 19, >> 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:> >> >>> The >> idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on> >>> >> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him,> >> Even >> half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc>> >> >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American >> education,>> >> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If >> that was true,> >> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the >> staff in the> >> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs >> as their grants> >> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer.> > The >> simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. >> Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to >> have> foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there.> >> Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the> >> contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a> >> specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). > > It doesn't, it is simply a delay tactic until they get a job offer > along with the conversion to H1-B. That may be true now. It wasn't in 1967 (did you notice that I put my reply to your post in the past tense? There was a reason for that). Even marrying a citizen of the USA (as I did in 1968) didn't confer any automatic right to live in the USA. In contrast, if a non-British person marries a UK citizen (as my present wife did in 1982) they do have an automatic right to live in the UK. That also works in France (though some racist politicians would like to change it) and elsewhere in the European Union. > >>> As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you> >>> > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? >> I thought we were talking about high schools. > You are the one who switched to your post-doc experience (at Berkeley)> > Remember? I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. > >> Anyway, no one doubts that Berkeley, Stanford, MIT (and Harvard, I'm> >> surprised you forgot that one, not to mention Yale, Princeton and> >> Cornell) are good, but most American universities are not in their> >> class. Not many foreigners flock to Bob Jones University, for example. >> -- > Not many flock to any of the French universities either (unless they > are from North Africa). How do you think you know that? What relevance does it have? Yes, we do have North African students and post-docs in the institute that I'm still loosely associated with, but we also have lots of Chinese (though not as many as before Covid-19), Sub-Saharan Africans, Italians and South Americans, even the occasional one from the USA. > Why did you do your post-doc in the US and not in your home country (ies)? Several reasons, of which I'll mention two. There were very few post-doc positions in the UK at that time, and the salaries were minuscule compared with the USA (in my first year at Berkeley I was paid about $9000 per annum; in the UK I'd have been lucky to get $3000). The person I wanted to work with (a world leader in his field) was at Berkeley. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 10:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d26238cc-e1e2-46aa-81dc-8ff07de64df2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618277 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:52:04 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-08-19 16:16:14 +0000, Dono. said: > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:01:21 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >> On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said:>> > On Saturday, August 19, > >> 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:> >> >>> The > >> idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on> >>> > >> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him,> >> Even > >> half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc>> >> > >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American > >> education,>> >> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If > >> that was true,> >> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the > >> staff in the> >> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs > >> as their grants> >> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer.> > The > >> simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. > >> Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to > >> have> foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there.> > >> Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the> > >> contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a> > >> specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). > > > > It doesn't, it is simply a delay tactic until they get a job offer > > along with the conversion to H1-B. > That may be true now. It wasn't in 1967 (did you notice that I put my > reply to your post in the past tense? There was a reason for that). > Even marrying a citizen of the USA (as I did in 1968) didn't confer any > automatic right to live in the USA. In contrast, if a non-British > person marries a UK citizen (as my present wife did in 1982) they do > have an automatic right to live in the UK. That also works in France > (though some racist politicians would like to change it) and elsewhere > in the European Union. > > > >>> As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you> > >>> > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? > >> I thought we were talking about high schools. > > You are the one who switched to your post-doc experience (at Berkeley)> > > Remember? > I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. So, it wasn't you who switched from the discussion of US high schools quality to your experience as a post-doc? Now, since we are on the subject of US high school quality, US teams at the math/physics/chemistry high school Olympiads score consistently in top 3. Neither of your two home counties is anywhere close (not even in top 10). You should get your facts straight.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1eb43460-159d-40c8-a0e9-3382ad8d8455n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618280 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:06:35 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:52:04 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-08-19 16:16:14 +0000, Dono. said: > > > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:01:21 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > >> On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said:>> > On Saturday, August 19, > > >> 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:> >> >>> The > > >> idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on> >>> > > >> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him,> >> Even > > >> half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc>> >> > > >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American > > >> education,>> >> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If > > >> that was true,> >> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the > > >> staff in the> >> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs > > >> as their grants> >> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer.> > The > > >> simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. > > >> Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to > > >> have> foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there.> > > >> Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the> > > >> contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a> > > >> specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). > > > > > > It doesn't, it is simply a delay tactic until they get a job offer > > > along with the conversion to H1-B. > > That may be true now. It wasn't in 1967 (did you notice that I put my > > reply to your post in the past tense? There was a reason for that). > > Even marrying a citizen of the USA (as I did in 1968) didn't confer any > > automatic right to live in the USA. In contrast, if a non-British > > person marries a UK citizen (as my present wife did in 1982) they do > > have an automatic right to live in the UK. That also works in France > > (though some racist politicians would like to change it) and elsewhere > > in the European Union. > > > > > >>> As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you> > > >>> > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? > > >> I thought we were talking about high schools. > > > You are the one who switched to your post-doc experience (at Berkeley)> > > > Remember? > > I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. > So, it wasn't you who switched from the discussion of US high schools quality to your experience as a post-doc? > Now, since we are on the subject of US high school quality, US teams at the math/physics/chemistry high school Olympiads score consistently in top 3. Neither of your two home counties is anywhere close (not even in top 10). You should get your facts straight. You bought your PhD (relativistic dynamics) in Lithuania, fucking Romanian gypsy, What the hell are you talking about the education in the USA? Try China now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfq81e.1ixmzh51k6h3c6N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618272 |
Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:01:21?AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said: > > > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08?AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden: > > > > > >>> The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on > > >>> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, > > >> Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc> > > >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education,> > > >> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, > > >> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the > > >> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants > > >> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer. > > > The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. > > Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to have > > foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there. > > Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the > > contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a > > specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). > > > It doesn't, it is simply a delay tactic until they get a job offer along > with the conversion to H1-B. > > > > As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you > > > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? > > I thought we were talking about high schools. > > You are the one who switched to your post-doc experience (at Berkeley)> > Remember? It is you who doesn't remember correctly. Athel replied to remarks by me about American decline in science and technology in general. Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 11:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kke480Fiv2tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618349 |
On 2023-08-20 08:38:49 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 9:01:21?AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >>> On 2023-08-19 15:24:30 +0000, Dono. said: >>> >>>> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08?AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden: >>>> >>>>>> The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based> > on >>>>>> superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, >>>>> Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc> >>>>> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education,> >>>>> in physics and chemistry was the best in the world. If that was true, >>>>> I> asked him, why it was that vitrtualy all the staff in the >>>>> biochemistry> department had as many foreign post-docs as their grants >>>>> could pay for?> He had no coherent answer. >>>> The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. >>> Wrong on both counts. First, I was asking why professors wanted to have >>> foreign post-docs, not why foreign post-docs wanted to go there. >>> Second, a J1 visa did not confer any right to stay in the USA; on the >>> contrary, it required you to return to your home country for a >>> specified period (a minimum of two years, I think). >> >> >> It doesn't, it is simply a delay tactic until they get a job offer along >> with the conversion to H1-B. >> >>>> As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you >>>> that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? >>> I thought we were talking about high schools. >> >> You are the one who switched to your post-doc experience (at Berkeley)> >> Remember? > > It is you who doesn't remember correctly. > Athel replied to remarks by me about American decline in science and > technology in general. Yes. At least you don't need a remedial course in reading comprehension. Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing racist buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and deliberate misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards nutters. That was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho Valev, Ken Seto and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 12:56 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfrhuy.1rp8d261yy8oi5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618352 |
Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> wrote: [-] > Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing racist > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and deliberate > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards nutters. That > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho Valev, Ken Seto > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie. When you say that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent (and many others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism in the establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 07:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <434dc367-7a29-4ca1-86f1-6293e9b71c50n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618354 |
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote: > [-] > > Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing racist > > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and deliberate > > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards nutters. That > > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho Valev, Ken Seto > > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. > Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie. > When you say that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent > (and many others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism > in the establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof, > > Jan Typical antisemite, Jan You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). But what is interesting is that you are still butthurt for being exposed to have not grasped the Alveger experiment. Keep sucking dick to your beloved palis. You and Athel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 16:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kkengnFlsu3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618360 |
On 2023-08-20 14:02:51 +0000, Dono. said: > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote:> [-] >>> Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing >>> racist> > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and >>> deliberate> > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards >>> nutters. That> > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho >>> Valev, Ken Seto> > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. >> Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie.> When you say >> that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent> (and many >> others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism> in the >> establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof,>> Jan > Typical antisemite, Jan > > You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write > Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). Nor can you, apparently. Her name was Hannah Arendt. > But what is interesting is that you are still butthurt for being > exposed to have not grasped the Alveger experiment. Keep sucking dick > to your beloved palis. You and Athel. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 07:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5af7891c-8dc7-4aab-b755-863de3fed9b0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618363 |
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 7:50:05 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-08-20 14:02:51 +0000, Dono. said: > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote:> [-] > >>> Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing > >>> racist> > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and > >>> deliberate> > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards > >>> nutters. That> > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho > >>> Valev, Ken Seto> > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. > >> Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie.> When you say > >> that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent> (and many > >> others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism> in the > >> establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof,>> Jan > > Typical antisemite, Jan > > > > You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write > > Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). > Nor can you, apparently. Her name was Hannah Arendt. She, a nazi cocksucker (Heidegger). You and Jan, pali cocksuckers. And US detractors. Keep it up, dumbestfucks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfrxmd.am3vqj16ed1ibN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618364 |
Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 7:50:05?AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-08-20 14:02:51 +0000, Dono. said: > > > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote:> [-] > > >>> Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing > > >>> racist> > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and > > >>> deliberate> > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards > > >>> nutters. That> > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho > > >>> Valev, Ken Seto> > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. > > >> Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie.> When you say > > >> that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent> (and many > > >> others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism> in the > > >> establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof,>> Jan > > > Typical antisemite, Jan > > > > > > You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write > > > Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). > > Nor can you, apparently. Her name was Hannah Arendt. > > She, a nazi cocksucker (Heidegger). You and Jan, pali cocksuckers. And US > detractors. Keep it up, dumbestfucks. Well, this is a coming out, you showing your true colours. Who could have guessed? Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2686181e-b7c1-4b06-8bdf-f27778f73e61n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618375 |
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 9:35:30 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Dono. <eggy20...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 7:50:05?AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > On 2023-08-20 14:02:51 +0000, Dono. said: > > > > > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > >> Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote:> [-] > > > >>> Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing > > > >>> racist> > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and > > > >>> deliberate> > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards > > > >>> nutters. That> > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho > > > >>> Valev, Ken Seto> > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. > > > >> Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie.> When you say > > > >> that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent> (and many > > > >> others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism> in the > > > >> establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof,>> Jan > > > > Typical antisemite, Jan > > > > > > > > You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write > > > > Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). > > > Nor can you, apparently. Her name was Hannah Arendt. > > > > She, a nazi cocksucker (Heidegger). You and Jan, pali cocksuckers. And US > > detractors. Keep it up, dumbestfucks. > Well, this is a coming out, you showing your true colours. > > Who could have guessed? > ...that I got your number? It was obvious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfrxxk.a9cyqy1g7pkcqN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618363 |
Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2023-08-20 14:02:51 +0000, Dono. said: > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04╯AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote:> [-] > >>> Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing > >>> racist> > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and > >>> deliberate> > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards > >>> nutters. That> > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho > >>> Valev, Ken Seto> > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. > >> Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie.> When you say > >> that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent> (and many > >> others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism> in the > >> establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof,>> Jan > > Typical antisemite, Jan > > > > You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write > > Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). > > Nor can you, apparently. Her name was Hannah Arendt. Yes, there are some names that always need double-checking. Julius Caesar/Ceasar is another one. And Messerschmitt also. I don't always bother. (and I don't like the lazy French solution of Jules Cesar) However, Daedalus and DREADCO always come out right, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 08:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9a138876-a38a-4441-a190-675b8327b88bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618360 |
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 11:02:54 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 3:56:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [-] > > > Anyway, I'm interested to see that patdolan has a new right-wing racist > > > buddy. I had previously ignored Dono.'s repeated and deliberate > > > misquoting, because he was mainly directing it towards nutters. That > > > was wrong of me. Now I see that he must join Pentcho Valev, Ken Seto > > > and Lawrence Clark Crossen in my collection of liars. > > Yes, he seems to be some kind of Jewish/Isreal fundie. > > When you say that good people like Albert Einstein and Hannah Ahrent > > (and many others) vehemently protested against the role Jewish terrorism > > in the establishment of the state of Isreal he jumps through the roof, > > > > Jan > Typical antisemite, Jan > > You (twice) wrote "Isreal" instead of Israel. You can't even write Hannah Arent name correctly (though she was a piece of work herself). > But what is interesting is that you are still butthurt for being exposed to have not grasped the Alveger experiment. Keep sucking dick to your beloved palis. You and Athel. Jan is Jewish, fucking retarded!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web