Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613164 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-06-17 21:32 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-07 16:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 317 — 40 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-17 21:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 10:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 10:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 11:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 13:10 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 15:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-06-19 09:31 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:45 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:51 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:56 -0700
Re: Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 08:01 -0700
Re: Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 11:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 10:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 10:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-06-19 07:52 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 14:48 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 16:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-20 20:05 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 18:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 20:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 21:08 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 21:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-21 06:23 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-21 17:41 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 10:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-21 13:39 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 02:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-21 12:09 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 10:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-22 11:06 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-23 11:49 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-23 11:59 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:38 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-23 13:28 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Chaston Kuipers <rsoc@scusseee.ps> - 2023-06-23 21:42 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 08:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 08:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 09:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:54 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 13:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 11:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 07:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 10:15 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 11:06 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 11:31 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:45 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 22:53 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:26 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2023-06-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:31 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 19:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 07:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 13:13 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Epifanio Schoonenburg <urou@sucinora.br> - 2023-06-23 17:28 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:35 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Reginal Langbroek <gorl@gblarllb.ra> - 2023-06-23 17:40 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 12:01 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 12:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 13:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 21:28 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 15:49 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:35 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 17:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 09:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:50 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 13:58 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 21:55 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 13:41 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 23:30 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 21:14 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 13:23 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 07:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 23:31 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 06:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-29 11:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-08 12:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 04:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 06:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-08 16:11 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-09 11:28 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 21:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 21:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 22:52 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 23:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-29 12:08 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 13:31 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 13:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 16:44 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:40 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 23:37 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 16:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 19:52 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-30 20:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 22:47 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 09:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 13:07 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 15:57 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 14:00 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 18:02 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 15:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 18:08 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:35 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:18 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:40 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 20:14 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 21:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 00:46 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 22:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 07:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 12:07 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-02 19:06 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 10:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-03 01:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 20:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 11:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 13:33 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 12:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 12:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 23:17 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-03 11:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 01:26 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 11:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 13:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 13:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 01:15 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:39 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Smith Can <aanh@nnnttcth.ia> - 2023-07-01 22:10 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-01 13:26 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Hillary Oorschot <lara@aocolror.ya> - 2023-06-29 21:29 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 17:04 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Emanuele Heel <manl@eeeeleee.ll> - 2023-06-29 22:31 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-29 20:30 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:53 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:46 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's David Agteren <ainv@gvdideig.aa> - 2023-06-30 09:18 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 09:17 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Woodrow Richard <rwao@rwwrrooo.rw> - 2023-07-01 11:43 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Demonte Achthoven <oado@ennmoaea.ch> - 2023-06-28 16:42 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Braxton Amstel <txmt@asememtm.ra> - 2023-06-28 16:50 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Bob Rumpade <peab@orbmarer.ou> - 2023-06-28 23:04 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 13:23 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-06-28 15:09 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 17:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 18:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 20:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 21:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 05:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 21:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Lou <noelturntive@live.co.uk> - 2023-06-29 05:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 07:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-29 12:14 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 12:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 14:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:42 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 17:33 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 13:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 14:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 19:44 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 21:08 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 21:49 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 00:25 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's Peter-John Maes <a-he@t-jtrjsm.ee> - 2023-06-30 11:13 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 00:23 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-30 11:45 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 04:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-01 13:26 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 14:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Keaton Konstantatos <ktnn@tksatooa.ta> - 2023-07-07 19:16 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-08 11:40 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 02:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 10:23 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 13:20 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 13:28 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 18:45 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 17:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 20:52 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:26 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 11:58 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 03:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 06:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-12 15:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 18:14 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-12 16:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:30 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-12 19:08 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 19:29 -0700
Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 18:48 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 20:48 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:29 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:38 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:52 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 09:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:36 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:14 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Barton Demakis <erom@akadikmr.no> - 2023-07-11 09:24 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Pasquale Nomikos <osai@qoauqsqm.ka> - 2023-07-08 20:47 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-09 12:35 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 09:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:38 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:00 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 11:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 14:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 22:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:01 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 14:10 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:08 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 14:25 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 18:43 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:18 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Lee Kanavos <alke@avvvvekn.ll> - 2023-07-09 19:21 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 19:54 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:25 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 13:31 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 10:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Jeiker Paraskos <okas@ppkiesre.rr> - 2023-07-10 22:20 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 16:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:27 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Eugene Antimisiaris <anse@neanenae.ir> - 2023-07-11 09:07 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Wyouman Petrakis <iawp@eyapkrsk.or> - 2023-07-10 11:39 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 14:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 15:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-08 17:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:12 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Fraga Kalakos <akol@fgkkakar.gk> - 2023-07-09 15:11 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-08 19:00 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:06 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz refuses to concede, "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 06:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 08:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 09:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 11:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 13:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 13:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 16:44 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 16:56 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 18:43 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 19:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 19:46 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 20:37 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 21:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 14:06 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:20 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:54 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:51 -0700
Page 3 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 16 Next page →
| From | Chaston Kuipers <rsoc@scusseee.ps> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 21:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u753jh$1h02s$3@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #613552 |
whodat wrote: > Check his patent applications and other economic activities. There is a > lot of crap included whenever one uses "Einstein" in an internet search. > The internet has been achieving less as its "dumbing down" progresses. a patent in not ownership. It's a right you may produce, for a period of time. Ye olde Irish proverb: “If two neighbors are fighting, there's an Englishman that has visited one of them yesterday”. If this is true, and it seems it is, my question is: Who is Prigozhin working for? Faction in FSB looking to overthrow the Gov. and if this is true, then the Wagner group *_was_a_dormant_giuda_agent_*. The leader must be worn cement shoes, taken for a boat trip and made to talk. *_FSB_opens_criminal_case_after_Wagner_boss_calls_for_‘armed_rebellion’__* https://%72t.com/r%75%73%73ia/578547-prigozhin-fsb-armed-rebellion/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qctq9k.k8ews446b40N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613552 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 6/23/2023 12:38 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 9:59:55?AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>> On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > >>>>>> [-] > >>>>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > >>>>>>>> military-related. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> He had no security clearance. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he > >>>>>>>> would have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to > >>>>>>>> do it (which he didn't). > >>>>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > >>>>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > >>>>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > >>>>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > >>>>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > >>>>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > >>>>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > >>>> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > >>>> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > >>>> > >>>> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>> Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity > >>> had no thing to do with it either. > >> Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > >> involved in lots of technological research/development other than > >> the relativity he was most famous for. > > How could he have contributed anything of real value when relativity is > > pseudoscience? > > > Check his patent applications and other economic activities. There is a > lot of crap included whenever one uses "Einstein" in an internet search. > The internet has been achieving less as its "dumbing down" progresses. > > It will probably take some time for this phenomena to subside and for > internet searches to yield academically significant results once more. > Hopefully all the books will not have been burned in the interim. We'l get a tsunami of AI-generated nonsense first. After that, there may be a job market for real people who really understand something. Let's hope Wikipedia survives, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qctq1y.bt7c2e6etdkjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613537 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > >>>> [-] > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > >>>>>> military-related. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > >>>>>> he didn't). > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > >>>> > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > >> > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > >> > >> Jan > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > nothing to do with it either. > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > the relativity he was most famous for. Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer than any of those here present. After all, he -was- an engineer by training. And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs in the engineering profession. You need to be able to understand the workings of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. According to his boss at the office in Bern he was the best patent examiner they ever had, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 08:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67323e7b-cf25-46b2-91cd-d2c4718e6e6bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613615 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > >>>> [-] > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > >>>>>> military-related. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > >>>> > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > >>>> > > >>>> Jan > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > >> > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > >> > > >> Jan > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > the relativity he was most famous for. > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > than any of those here present. > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > in the engineering profession. > You need to be able to understand the workings > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > Jan Employing the speed of light in calculations for Mercury's perihelion advance without any justification in physics and ad hoc selectively for Mercury alone without using the same method for the other underlying orbital dynamics of the other planets is absurd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 08:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <481baff1-8845-4341-adc4-e9d853210a53n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613615 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > >>>> [-] > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > >>>>>> military-related. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > >>>> > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > >>>> > > >>>> Jan > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > >> > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > >> > > >> Jan > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > the relativity he was most famous for. > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > than any of those here present. > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > in the engineering profession. > You need to be able to understand the workings > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > Jan What effect does the speed of light for gravity have other than jiggering the calculations? According to LaPlace and Van Flandern, it would throw off all orbital calculations because they only work with an assumption of instantaneous speed. Einstein continues to use the instantaneous speed of gravity for all other orbital calculations, including those involved in his Mercury calculations, with the sol exception of Mercury. The man is so ad hoc he just makes things up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 09:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9dfe0b94-31fa-42ae-9d81-0d738f6b71e3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613615 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > >>>> [-] > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > >>>>>> military-related. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > >>>> > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > >>>> > > >>>> Jan > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > >> > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > >> > > >> Jan > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > the relativity he was most famous for. > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > than any of those here present. > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > in the engineering profession. > You need to be able to understand the workings > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > Jan Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c56795f0-8bb7-4cfd-bbaa-9e2dbd1688een@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613624 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > >>>> [-] > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Jan > > > >>>> > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > >> > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > >> > > > >> Jan > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > than any of those here present. > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > in the engineering profession. > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > Jan > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? No relativist will answer you, because of: 1) Ignorance. 2) Sheer ignorance. 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 10:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58a3a568-7836-4b26-95a3-1a572ea9931an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613626 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > >>>> [-] > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Jan > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > > >> > > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > > >> > > > > >> Jan > > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > > than any of those here present. > > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > > in the engineering profession. > > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > > > Jan > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > 1) Ignorance. > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. I've asked before, and the only answer I got was, don't I know there are other variables to balance that out? My reply: Why take it out to put it back in?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 11:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <de361fa2-80b4-4e33-9cc3-bd2802eb5052n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613626 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > >>>> [-] > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Jan > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > > >> > > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > > >> > > > > >> Jan > > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > > than any of those here present. > > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > > in the engineering profession. > > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > > > Jan > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > 1) Ignorance. > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. Without justification from physics, it is only meaningless math.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 11:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <71fa8567-d61d-4e4b-bb2a-5a13e8208ef7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613626 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > >>>> [-] > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Jan > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > > >> > > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > > >> > > > > >> Jan > > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > > than any of those here present. > > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > > in the engineering profession. > > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > > > Jan > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > 1) Ignorance. > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. All they need to explain is why the speed of light for gravity is involved at all in the calculations. What effect does it have physically? Does it only have an effect on the math without any effect on the physics?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <561bc841-9a11-4848-bc6a-cd83f2cb763cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613631 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 3:07:02 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > > >>>> [-] > > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Jan > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Jan > > > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > > > than any of those here present. > > > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > > > in the engineering profession. > > > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > > > > > Jan > > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > > > 1) Ignorance. > > > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. > All they need to explain is why the speed of light for gravity is involved at all in the calculations. What effect does it have physically? Does it only have an effect on the math without any effect on the physics? Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Newton's INFINITE speed of gravity has been working perfectly since 1676, and they HATE THIS. Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Laplace's nebular theory explain perfectly the formation of the Solar System, and they HATE THIS. Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Einstein's GR CAN'T EXPLAIN the rotation of spiral galaxies like ours, and Newton/Poisson/Gauss CAN, and they HATE THIS. Relativists HATE any critic or refutation over the three mystic predictions done by Einstein, YEARS BEFORE he stole GR equations from Grossman, Levy-Civita and Hilbert/Schwarzschild.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 11:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <904d224c-3b29-4c38-a4b8-1d317b2257bfn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613634 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 11:21:38 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 3:07:02 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > > > >>>> [-] > > > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Jan > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Jan > > > > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > > > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > > > > than any of those here present. > > > > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > > > > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > > > > in the engineering profession. > > > > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > > > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > > > > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > > > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > > > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > > > > > 1) Ignorance. > > > > > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > > > > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > > > > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. > > All they need to explain is why the speed of light for gravity is involved at all in the calculations. What effect does it have physically? Does it only have an effect on the math without any effect on the physics? > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Newton's INFINITE speed of gravity has been working perfectly since 1676, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Laplace's nebular theory explain perfectly the formation of the Solar System, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Einstein's GR CAN'T EXPLAIN the rotation of spiral galaxies like ours, and Newton/Poisson/Gauss CAN, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists HATE any critic or refutation over the three mystic predictions done by Einstein, YEARS BEFORE he stole GR equations from > Grossman, Levy-Civita and Hilbert/Schwarzschild. Here is something amusing about the accepted cosmology involved with relativity nonsense: Our galaxy is no more than 13.8 billion years old, and our Sun orbits it four times every billion years. Then we are to believe our Sun has only orbited the galaxy 56 times! I think it would be far more likely to have orbited 60 million times.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <478f9624-02e4-4f76-a2c9-7b6285cb195bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613634 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 11:21:38 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > > > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > > > > > 1) Ignorance. > > > > > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > > > > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > > > > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. > > All they need to explain is why the speed of light for gravity is involved at all in the calculations. What effect does it have physically? Does it only have an effect on the math without any effect on the physics? > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Newton's INFINITE speed of gravity has been working perfectly since 1676, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Laplace's nebular theory explain perfectly the formation of the Solar System, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Einstein's GR CAN'T EXPLAIN the rotation of spiral galaxies like ours, and Newton/Poisson/Gauss CAN, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists HATE any critic or refutation over the three mystic predictions done by Einstein, YEARS BEFORE he stole GR equations from > Grossman, Levy-Civita and Hilbert/Schwarzschild. "Professor Eddington endorses the observation that a mathematician is never so 'happy' as when he 'does not know what he is talking about' (p. 185). He is not disturbed by the fact that he is talking nonsense because he is not aware of it." - The Einstein Delusion p. 23. The math alleged to explain Mercury's perihelion advance is nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-25 13:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7ec2859f-8f8a-4c57-9462-94c273ea1f95n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613634 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 11:21:38 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > > > >>>>>> military-related. Yet he signed thev petition for the atmoic bomb. > > > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > > > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > > > > > 1) Ignorance. > > > > > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > > > > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > > > > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. > > All they need to explain is why the speed of light for gravity is involved at all in the calculations. What effect does it have physically? Does it only have an effect on the math without any effect on the physics? > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Newton's INFINITE speed of gravity has been working perfectly since 1676, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Laplace's nebular theory explain perfectly the formation of the Solar System, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists just DON'T KNOW why Einstein's GR CAN'T EXPLAIN the rotation of spiral galaxies like ours, and Newton/Poisson/Gauss CAN, and they HATE THIS. > > Relativists HATE any critic or refutation over the three mystic predictions done by Einstein, YEARS BEFORE he stole GR equations from > Grossman, Levy-Civita and Hilbert/Schwarzschild. I Googled relativity theory is unnecessary and found this: The Simplicity of Disproving the Theory of Special Relativity Denis Thomas Abstract Einstein’s theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by Hendrick Lorentz. It is not necessary to expose the mathematical inconsistencies of special relativity, since the theory collapses by simply exposing the error made by Lorentz. In doing so, it not only causes special relativity to collapse, but also general relativity, and the many theories built upon these two deceptive theories. There are many claims of tests made which supposedly prove SR or GR, such as the eclipse of 1919, the Hafele-Keating experiment, GPS, the orbit of Mercury, and muons. The error of these will also be shown as well as an area of astronomy which has been negatively impacted by SR. The epistemology approach to special relativity: you can know it is a false theory when the theory requires deceiving the student for acceptance and the tests which support the theory can be proven false.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 11:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcxchp.4j6wqp8twh4tN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613720 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> wrote: > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > Hendrick Lorentz. So you cannot even spell a name correctly. It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. Ten points on the crackpot index for you, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 07:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <693859ce-cf8c-4ef7-b511-45ea47ee0aa0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613755 |
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > Hendrick Lorentz. > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > Jan That's a quote and not my spelling. That is your carelessness.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 10:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <83276e9e-ebb4-4cab-ad44-2a17097ac58bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613755 |
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > Hendrick Lorentz. > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > Jan Who's impressed by you other than by your stupidity and carelessness? If you were capable of reasoning it would be different but relativity is an ideology and they are not defended by reason.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a54ff4bb-859a-4cec-8fe3-7c7a4f1da35cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613755 |
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > Hendrick Lorentz. > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > Jan "Insofar as the theory is thought to explain the result of the Michelson-Morley experiment I am inclined to agree with Soddy that it is a swindle" - L Essen, Relativity Joke or Swindle?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 11:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <548343fb-ca4c-4172-99a6-afbdbc88ba60n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613755 |
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > Hendrick Lorentz. > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > Jan “ I contend that the Einsteinian preference for the Principle of Relativity is based in the final count - not on scientific or empirical grounds - but on ideological premises. ” —Mathematician and physicist Wolfgang Smith
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 12:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24e1792c-3783-4465-8826-7b747990cfacn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613755 |
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > Hendrick Lorentz. > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > Jan How do you tell who's telling the truth? The ones trying to silence the others are lying.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web