Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614014 > unrolled thread

"What time is it?"

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2023-06-29 00:00 -0700
Last post2023-06-30 11:11 -0700
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  "What time is it?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-29 00:00 -0700
    Re: "What time is it?" "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 09:29 -0700
    Re: "What time is it?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-29 09:35 -0700
      Re: "What time is it?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-29 12:16 -0700
        Re: "What time is it?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-29 13:56 -0700
          Re: "What time is it?" "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:54 -0700
    Re: "What time is it?" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 11:11 -0700

#614014 — "What time is it?"

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-06-29 00:00 -0700
Subject"What time is it?"
Message-ID<649D2C10.B1A@ix.netcom.com>
I don't know when things went wrong...

but some where along the line

you people got it all wrong.

And it's been wrong ever since.


But when a person ask the question..

"What time is it?"

They are not asking
what time is it...

they are asking

for you
to look
at your clock
and read to them
what the clock reads.


They are really asking...

"What clock is it?" or

"What o'clock is it?"

If you want to know
what time it is...
(even though you're really
asking What o'clock is it)

you look at a clock.

You don't find out
what time it is...
you find out
what o'clock it is.


"What clock is it?"

It's 12 o'clock.


If you ask "What time is it?"

you going to get the same answer..

It's 12 o'clock.

"What o'clock is it?"


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#614032

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-29 09:29 -0700
Message-ID<4cd4e880-11fc-4e6b-9f52-f2614222231fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614014
Our modern is really ancient...
We are mostly backward in our beginning.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#614034

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-06-29 09:35 -0700
Message-ID<649DB2D9.469F@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#614014
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I don't know when things went wrong...
> 
> but some where along the line
> 
> you people got it all wrong.
> 
> And it's been wrong ever since.
> 
> But when a person ask the question..
> 
> "What time is it?"
> 
> They are not asking
> what time is it...
> 
> they are asking
> 
> for you
> to look
> at your clock
> and read to them
> what the clock reads.
> 
> They are really asking...
> 
> "What clock is it?" or
> 
> "What o'clock is it?"
> 
> If you want to know
> what time it is...
> (even though you're really
> asking What o'clock is it)
> 
> you look at a clock.
> 
> You don't find out
> what time it is...
> you find out
> what o'clock it is.
> 
> "What clock is it?"
> 
> It's 12 o'clock.
> 
> If you ask "What time is it?"
> 
> you going to get the same answer..
> 
> It's 12 o'clock.
> 
> "What o'clock is it?"


                     MR. LEUCHTAG
         Liebchen, uh, sweetness heart,
         what watch?
She glances at her wristwatch.
                     MRS. LEUCHTAG
         Ten watch.
                     MR. LEUCHTAG
              (surprised)
         Such much?








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#614047

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-06-29 12:16 -0700
Message-ID<649DD8A4.2378@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#614034
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I don't know when things went wrong...
> >
> > but some where along the line
> >
> > you people got it all wrong.
> >
> > And it's been wrong ever since.
> >
> > But when a person ask the question..
> >
> > "What time is it?"
> >
> > They are not asking
> > what time is it...
> >
> > they are asking
> >
> > for you
> > to look
> > at your clock
> > and read to them
> > what the clock reads.
> >
> > They are really asking...
> >
> > "What clock is it?" or
> >
> > "What o'clock is it?"
> >
> > If you want to know
> > what time it is...
> > (even though you're really
> > asking What o'clock is it)
> >
> > you look at a clock.
> >
> > You don't find out
> > what time it is...
> > you find out
> > what o'clock it is.
> >
> > "What clock is it?"
> >
> > It's 12 o'clock.
> >
> > If you ask "What time is it?"
> >
> > you going to get the same answer..
> >
> > It's 12 o'clock.
> >
> > "What o'clock is it?"
> 
>                      MR. LEUCHTAG
>          Liebchen, uh, sweetness heart,
>          what watch?
> She glances at her wristwatch.
>                      MRS. LEUCHTAG
>          Ten watch.
>                      MR. LEUCHTAG
>               (surprised)
>          Such much?


Since Time doesn't exist...when did people
start asking "What time is it?"

Yous certaintly know a lot about clocks, but
you don't know what time is...it.








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#614055

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-06-29 13:56 -0700
Message-ID<649DF015.57C1@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#614047
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't know when things went wrong...
> > >
> > > but some where along the line
> > >
> > > you people got it all wrong.
> > >
> > > And it's been wrong ever since.
> > >
> > > But when a person ask the question..
> > >
> > > "What time is it?"
> > >
> > > They are not asking
> > > what time is it...
> > >
> > > they are asking
> > >
> > > for you
> > > to look
> > > at your clock
> > > and read to them
> > > what the clock reads.
> > >
> > > They are really asking...
> > >
> > > "What clock is it?" or
> > >
> > > "What o'clock is it?"
> > >
> > > If you want to know
> > > what time it is...
> > > (even though you're really
> > > asking What o'clock is it)
> > >
> > > you look at a clock.
> > >
> > > You don't find out
> > > what time it is...
> > > you find out
> > > what o'clock it is.
> > >
> > > "What clock is it?"
> > >
> > > It's 12 o'clock.
> > >
> > > If you ask "What time is it?"
> > >
> > > you going to get the same answer..
> > >
> > > It's 12 o'clock.
> > >
> > > "What o'clock is it?"
> >
> >                      MR. LEUCHTAG
> >          Liebchen, uh, sweetness heart,
> >          what watch?
> > She glances at her wristwatch.
> >                      MRS. LEUCHTAG
> >          Ten watch.
> >                      MR. LEUCHTAG
> >               (surprised)
> >          Such much?
> 
> Since Time doesn't exist...when did people
> start asking "What time is it?"
> 
> Yous certaintly know a lot about clocks, but
> you don't know what time is...it.

I mean, why do you call it spacetime...shouldn't it be
called...spaceclock?


I means, you don't say bodytime, yous say bodyclock.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#614146

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-30 10:54 -0700
Message-ID<f6f7af20-94f8-422c-80f8-e88f8621612fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614055
If the stars are young in age how is there an infinite universe?
If the stars have been around forever would that not require God?
God created an absolute beginning. God creates gravity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#614147

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-30 11:11 -0700
Message-ID<u7n5s1$2jrji$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#614014
On 6/29/2023 12:00 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I don't know when things went wrong...
> 
> but some where along the line
> [...]

Its the now, now...

https://youtu.be/nRGCZh5A8T4?t=80

;^D

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web