Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #478720 > unrolled thread

The Center of the Universe...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 12:49 -0800
    The Center of the Universe... "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:49 -0800
      Re: The Center of the Universe... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 14:01 -0800
    Re: The Center of the Universe... SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-12-02 12:22 +1100
      Re: The Center of the Universe... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 17:45 -0800
        Re: The Center of the Universe... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 21:07 -0800
          Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-02 12:01 -0800
            Re: The Center of the Universe... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 13:22 -0800
            Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-02 15:49 -0800
              Re: The Center of the Universe... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 19:41 -0800
                Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-02 20:17 -0800
    Re: The Center of the Universe... Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-12-02 20:46 +1100
      Re: The Center of the Universe... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 13:16 -0800
    Re: The Center of the Universe... "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-02 10:52 -0800
    Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-02 13:15 -0800
    Re: The Center of the Universe... casagiannoni@optonline.net - 2018-12-03 07:22 -0500
      Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-03 09:57 -0800
        Re: The Center of the Universe... % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 10:58 -0700
        Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-08 23:32 -0800
          Re: The Center of the Universe... Rich Carpenter <lcug@kigcohc.pa> - 2018-12-09 16:22 +0000
          Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-09 11:51 -0800
            Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-09 12:38 -0800
              Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-10 00:34 -0800
                Re: The Center of the Universe... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 10:31 -0500
                  Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-10 10:18 -0800
                  Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-10 11:59 -0800
                    Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-12 09:42 -0800
                Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-12 20:49 -0800
                  Re: The Center of the Universe... "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-12 21:12 -0800
      Re: The Center of the Universe... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-12-03 19:38 +0100
        Re: The Center of the Universe... Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2018-12-06 20:07 +1100
          Re: The Center of the Universe... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-12-06 16:14 +0100
            Re: The Center of the Universe... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-06 18:51 -0800
            Re: The Center of the Universe... Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2018-12-07 17:05 +1100
              Re: The Center of the Universe... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-12-07 19:12 +0100
                Re: The Center of the Universe... Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2018-12-08 20:25 +1100
                  Re: The Center of the Universe... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-12-08 15:37 +0100
    Re: The Center of the Universe... carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-12-09 10:50 -0800
    Re: The Center of the Universe... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-12 23:49 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#479487

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > >
> > > Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> > > time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> > > any usual sense.
> >
> > if that were true
> > you wouldn't have
> > what yous
> > called...a
> > singularity.
> >
> > Next yous
> > will be saying
> > a black hole
> > has no center.
> >
> >  You simply draw a straight line
> >  from any one star
> >  and draw a line from the direction it
> >  came from.
> >
> >   You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> >
> >  You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> >
> >  You will find that the two lines will meet.
> >
> >  That point
> >    the point of origin
> > where and place it meets is
> >
> >  The Center of the Universe.
> >
> > This is accurate, correct and true information.
> >
> > The only information I post is
> >
> > accurate, correct and true information.
> >
> > 100 percent accuracy
> > 100 percent correct
> > 100 percent true.
> >
> > You cannot fool mother nature.
> >
> > Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> 
> All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> they all have their place in the universe.
> 
> If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.


Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...

and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.


In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.



I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479496

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> > > > time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> > > > any usual sense.
> > >
> > > if that were true
> > > you wouldn't have
> > > what yous
> > > called...a
> > > singularity.
> > >
> > > Next yous
> > > will be saying
> > > a black hole
> > > has no center.
> > >
> > >  You simply draw a straight line
> > >  from any one star
> > >  and draw a line from the direction it
> > >  came from.
> > >
> > >   You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> > >
> > >  You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> > >
> > >  You will find that the two lines will meet.
> > >
> > >  That point
> > >    the point of origin
> > > where and place it meets is
> > >
> > >  The Center of the Universe.
> > >
> > > This is accurate, correct and true information.
> > >
> > > The only information I post is
> > >
> > > accurate, correct and true information.
> > >
> > > 100 percent accuracy
> > > 100 percent correct
> > > 100 percent true.
> > >
> > > You cannot fool mother nature.
> > >
> > > Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> >
> > All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> > they all have their place in the universe.
> >
> > If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
> 
> Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
> 
> and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
> 
> In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
> 
> I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...



It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479516

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> > > > > time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> > > > > any usual sense.
> > > >
> > > > if that were true
> > > > you wouldn't have
> > > > what yous
> > > > called...a
> > > > singularity.
> > > >
> > > > Next yous
> > > > will be saying
> > > > a black hole
> > > > has no center.
> > > >
> > > >  You simply draw a straight line
> > > >  from any one star
> > > >  and draw a line from the direction it
> > > >  came from.
> > > >
> > > >   You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> > > >
> > > >  You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> > > >
> > > >  You will find that the two lines will meet.
> > > >
> > > >  That point
> > > >    the point of origin
> > > > where and place it meets is
> > > >
> > > >  The Center of the Universe.
> > > >
> > > > This is accurate, correct and true information.
> > > >
> > > > The only information I post is
> > > >
> > > > accurate, correct and true information.
> > > >
> > > > 100 percent accuracy
> > > > 100 percent correct
> > > > 100 percent true.
> > > >
> > > > You cannot fool mother nature.
> > > >
> > > > Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> > >
> > > All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> > > they all have their place in the universe.
> > >
> > > If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
> >
> > Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
> >
> > and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
> >
> > In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
> >
> > I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...
> 
> It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
> since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.

For those of yous who don't know what the fourth dimension looks like...

it is very simple..

besides time being in the 4th dimension with space and all the stars...

the universe is divided in 4 dimensions..

like a broken mirror.

A star in one dimension
would have a mirror version
of itself in the other
3 dimensions.

All the stars in the universe
have a mirror version of itself
in all 4 dimensions.

The Big Bang broke the mirror 
into 4 parts.


If you look in the mirror
of the universe at a couple or
few stars...say like the big dipper...




 *   *
           *
                *
                       *
               *
                     *



it would look this in the other dimension


                     *
               *
                       *
                *
           *
 *   *





and upside down in the other two dimensions




i don't know why...it's just the way it is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479526

On 12/10/2018 3:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
>>>>>> time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
>>>>>> any usual sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> if that were true
>>>>> you wouldn't have
>>>>> what yous
>>>>> called...a
>>>>> singularity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Next yous
>>>>> will be saying
>>>>> a black hole
>>>>> has no center.
>>>>>
>>>>>   You simply draw a straight line
>>>>>   from any one star
>>>>>   and draw a line from the direction it
>>>>>   came from.
>>>>>
>>>>>    You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
>>>>>
>>>>>   You then find one another star and do the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>   You will find that the two lines will meet.
>>>>>
>>>>>   That point
>>>>>     the point of origin
>>>>> where and place it meets is
>>>>>
>>>>>   The Center of the Universe.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is accurate, correct and true information.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only information I post is
>>>>>
>>>>> accurate, correct and true information.
>>>>>
>>>>> 100 percent accuracy
>>>>> 100 percent correct
>>>>> 100 percent true.
>>>>>
>>>>> You cannot fool mother nature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, does anybody got a pencil?
>>>>
>>>> All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
>>>> they all have their place in the universe.
>>>>
>>>> If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
>>>
>>> Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
>>>
>>> and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
>>>
>>> In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
>>>
>>> I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...
>>
>> It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
>> since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.
> 
> For those of yous who don't know what the fourth dimension looks like...
> 
> it is very simple..
> 
> besides time being in the 4th dimension with space and all the stars...
> 
> the universe is divided in 4 dimensions..
> 
> like a broken mirror.
> 
> A star in one dimension
> would have a mirror version
> of itself in the other
> 3 dimensions.
> 
> All the stars in the universe
> have a mirror version of itself
> in all 4 dimensions.
> 
> The Big Bang broke the mirror
> into 4 parts.
> 
> 
> If you look in the mirror
> of the universe at a couple or
> few stars...say like the big dipper...
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   *   *
>             *
>                  *
>                         *
>                 *
>                       *
> 
> 
> 
> it would look this in the other dimension
> 
> 
>                       *
>                 *
>                         *
>                  *
>             *
>   *   *
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> and upside down in the other two dimensions
> 
> 
> 
> 
> i don't know why...it's just the way it is.
> 
Hey babbling drooler, how in hell did you ever get so damn dumb?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479546

benj wrote:
> 
> On 12/10/2018 3:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> >>>>>> time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> >>>>>> any usual sense.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if that were true
> >>>>> you wouldn't have
> >>>>> what yous
> >>>>> called...a
> >>>>> singularity.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Next yous
> >>>>> will be saying
> >>>>> a black hole
> >>>>> has no center.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   You simply draw a straight line
> >>>>>   from any one star
> >>>>>   and draw a line from the direction it
> >>>>>   came from.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   You will find that the two lines will meet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   That point
> >>>>>     the point of origin
> >>>>> where and place it meets is
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   The Center of the Universe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is accurate, correct and true information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only information I post is
> >>>>>
> >>>>> accurate, correct and true information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 100 percent accuracy
> >>>>> 100 percent correct
> >>>>> 100 percent true.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You cannot fool mother nature.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> >>>>
> >>>> All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> >>>> they all have their place in the universe.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
> >>>
> >>> Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
> >>>
> >>> and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
> >>>
> >>> In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...
> >>
> >> It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
> >> since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.
> >
> > For those of yous who don't know what the fourth dimension looks like...
> >
> > it is very simple..
> >
> > besides time being in the 4th dimension with space and all the stars...
> >
> > the universe is divided in 4 dimensions..
> >
> > like a broken mirror.
> >
> > A star in one dimension
> > would have a mirror version
> > of itself in the other
> > 3 dimensions.
> >
> > All the stars in the universe
> > have a mirror version of itself
> > in all 4 dimensions.
> >
> > The Big Bang broke the mirror
> > into 4 parts.
> >
> >
> > If you look in the mirror
> > of the universe at a couple or
> > few stars...say like the big dipper...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   *   *
> >             *
> >                  *
> >                         *
> >                 *
> >                       *
> >
> >
> >
> > it would look this in the other dimension
> >
> >
> >                       *
> >                 *
> >                         *
> >                  *
> >             *
> >   *   *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > and upside down in the other two dimensions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > i don't know why...it's just the way it is.
> >
> Hey babbling drooler, how in hell did you ever get so damn dumb?

well...if you want to know the truth...my science teacher told me if
i illustrated a science book he was writing then i wouldn't have to
do anything in his class and he will pass me.

i guess my science teacher saw i was a fuckin genuies...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479559

benj wrote:
> 
> On 12/10/2018 3:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> >>>>>> time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> >>>>>> any usual sense.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if that were true
> >>>>> you wouldn't have
> >>>>> what yous
> >>>>> called...a
> >>>>> singularity.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Next yous
> >>>>> will be saying
> >>>>> a black hole
> >>>>> has no center.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   You simply draw a straight line
> >>>>>   from any one star
> >>>>>   and draw a line from the direction it
> >>>>>   came from.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   You will find that the two lines will meet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   That point
> >>>>>     the point of origin
> >>>>> where and place it meets is
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   The Center of the Universe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is accurate, correct and true information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only information I post is
> >>>>>
> >>>>> accurate, correct and true information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 100 percent accuracy
> >>>>> 100 percent correct
> >>>>> 100 percent true.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You cannot fool mother nature.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> >>>>
> >>>> All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> >>>> they all have their place in the universe.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
> >>>
> >>> Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
> >>>
> >>> and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
> >>>
> >>> In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...
> >>
> >> It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
> >> since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.
> >
> > For those of yous who don't know what the fourth dimension looks like...
> >
> > it is very simple..
> >
> > besides time being in the 4th dimension with space and all the stars...
> >
> > the universe is divided in 4 dimensions..
> >
> > like a broken mirror.
> >
> > A star in one dimension
> > would have a mirror version
> > of itself in the other
> > 3 dimensions.
> >
> > All the stars in the universe
> > have a mirror version of itself
> > in all 4 dimensions.
> >
> > The Big Bang broke the mirror
> > into 4 parts.
> >
> >
> > If you look in the mirror
> > of the universe at a couple or
> > few stars...say like the big dipper...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   *   *
> >             *
> >                  *
> >                         *
> >                 *
> >                       *
> >
> >
> >
> > it would look this in the other dimension
> >
> >
> >                       *
> >                 *
> >                         *
> >                  *
> >             *
> >   *   *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > and upside down in the other two dimensions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > i don't know why...it's just the way it is.
> >
> Hey babbling drooler, how in hell did you ever get so damn dumb?


You mean like...dumb as a rock? I can be your Secretary of State! wat state you live in?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479695

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> benj wrote:
> >
> > On 12/10/2018 3:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> > >>>>>> time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> > >>>>>> any usual sense.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> if that were true
> > >>>>> you wouldn't have
> > >>>>> what yous
> > >>>>> called...a
> > >>>>> singularity.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Next yous
> > >>>>> will be saying
> > >>>>> a black hole
> > >>>>> has no center.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   You simply draw a straight line
> > >>>>>   from any one star
> > >>>>>   and draw a line from the direction it
> > >>>>>   came from.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>    You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   You will find that the two lines will meet.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   That point
> > >>>>>     the point of origin
> > >>>>> where and place it meets is
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   The Center of the Universe.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is accurate, correct and true information.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The only information I post is
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> accurate, correct and true information.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 100 percent accuracy
> > >>>>> 100 percent correct
> > >>>>> 100 percent true.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You cannot fool mother nature.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> > >>>> they all have their place in the universe.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
> > >>>
> > >>> Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
> > >>>
> > >>> and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
> > >>>
> > >>> In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...
> > >>
> > >> It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
> > >> since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.
> > >
> > > For those of yous who don't know what the fourth dimension looks like...
> > >
> > > it is very simple..
> > >
> > > besides time being in the 4th dimension with space and all the stars...
> > >
> > > the universe is divided in 4 dimensions..
> > >
> > > like a broken mirror.
> > >
> > > A star in one dimension
> > > would have a mirror version
> > > of itself in the other
> > > 3 dimensions.
> > >
> > > All the stars in the universe
> > > have a mirror version of itself
> > > in all 4 dimensions.
> > >
> > > The Big Bang broke the mirror
> > > into 4 parts.
> > >
> > >
> > > If you look in the mirror
> > > of the universe at a couple or
> > > few stars...say like the big dipper...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   *   *
> > >             *
> > >                  *
> > >                         *
> > >                 *
> > >                       *
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > it would look this in the other dimension
> > >
> > >
> > >                       *
> > >                 *
> > >                         *
> > >                  *
> > >             *
> > >   *   *
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > and upside down in the other two dimensions
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > i don't know why...it's just the way it is.
> > >
> > Hey babbling drooler, how in hell did you ever get so damn dumb?
> 
> You mean like...dumb as a rock? I can be your Secretary of State! wat state you live in?


Now, if you do a Image search on Google for the word "dumb" my picture doesn't show up first, guess who's picture does show up?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479734

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> > > > > > time ) and without boundaries or limits, it doesn't have a center in
> > > > > > any usual sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > if that were true
> > > > > you wouldn't have
> > > > > what yous
> > > > > called...a
> > > > > singularity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Next yous
> > > > > will be saying
> > > > > a black hole
> > > > > has no center.
> > > > >
> > > > >  You simply draw a straight line
> > > > >  from any one star
> > > > >  and draw a line from the direction it
> > > > >  came from.
> > > > >
> > > > >   You just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> > > > >
> > > > >  You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> > > > >
> > > > >  You will find that the two lines will meet.
> > > > >
> > > > >  That point
> > > > >    the point of origin
> > > > > where and place it meets is
> > > > >
> > > > >  The Center of the Universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is accurate, correct and true information.
> > > > >
> > > > > The only information I post is
> > > > >
> > > > > accurate, correct and true information.
> > > > >
> > > > > 100 percent accuracy
> > > > > 100 percent correct
> > > > > 100 percent true.
> > > > >
> > > > > You cannot fool mother nature.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, does anybody got a pencil?
> > > >
> > > > All stars meet at the same point...the center...they just seem to be spread out randomly, but they are not...
> > > > they all have their place in the universe.
> > > >
> > > > If you look at the universe through 4th dimensional eyes...you can see all the lines are visible.
> > >
> > > Since...thru my observations..of the universe..I can see the universe in it's 4th dimensional state...
> > >
> > > and it appears to me that space, time, exist in the 4th dimension...including Stars.
> > >
> > > In other words, 'Stars' *exist* in the ...4th dimension, along with space and time.
> > >
> > > I don't know if the 'scientific community' have discovered that yet...
> >
> > It's also very possible that Earth exist in the fourth dimension also...and you might not be aware of it, but I cannot say for sure
> > since the earth is too small for me to observe among all these...stars.
> 
> For those of yous who don't know what the fourth dimension looks like...
> 
> it is very simple..
> 
> besides time being in the 4th dimension with space and all the stars...
> 
> the universe is divided in 4 dimensions..
> 
> like a broken mirror.
> 
> A star in one dimension
> would have a mirror version
> of itself in the other
> 3 dimensions.
> 
> All the stars in the universe
> have a mirror version of itself
> in all 4 dimensions.
> 
> The Big Bang broke the mirror
> into 4 parts.
> 
> If you look in the mirror
> of the universe at a couple or
> few stars...say like the big dipper...
> 
>  *   *
>            *
>                 *
>                        *
>                *
>                      *
> 
> it would look this in the other dimension
> 
>                      *
>                *
>                        *
>                 *
>            *
>  *   *
> 
> and upside down in the other two dimensions
> 
> i don't know why...it's just the way it is.



Those of yous with...a little more knowledge than others will probably exclaim that what I am
describing appears very much like a Holographic Universe..but it isn't.

The difference is mines contains...all the information in the 4th dimension...and it is projected to the other three.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479736

The StarSharter sharted 

Those of yous with...a little more knowledge than others will probably exclaim that what I am 
describing appears very much like a Holographic Universe..but it isn't. 

The difference is mines contains...all the information in the 4th dimension...and it is projected to the other three. 

More #BFM Star Sharts 

Incoherent nonsensical Gibberings 

Cretinisms !!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478906

casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
> time ) and without boundaries or limits,

That is as "obvious" as ”red” is “green” and “1 + 1 = 42”.

> it doesn't have a center in any usual sense.

That is true even if it is not infinite because expansion of our universe
is a metric one.

Stop amok-crossposting.

F’up2 sci.physics.relativity (as it pertains to cosmology)

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479170

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 4/12/2018 5:38 AM:
> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
>> time ) and without boundaries or limits,
> 
> That is as "obvious" as ”red” is “green” and “1 + 1 = 42”.

Wrong!! 42 is the meaning of Life, the Universe and Everything!!

> F’up2 sci.physics.relativity (as it pertains to cosmology)
> 
alt.astronomy added back in.

-- 
Daniel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479185

Daniel60 wrote in alt.astronomy and sci.physics.relativity:
^^^^^^^^
Your real name belongs there.

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 4/12/2018 5:38 AM:
>> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
>>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
>>> time ) and without boundaries or limits,
>> That is as "obvious" as ”red” is “green” and “1 + 1 = 42”.
> 
> Wrong!! 42 is the meaning of Life, the Universe and Everything!!

No, according to the eminent researcher Douglas Adams (1952–2001), it is the
“_Answer_ to the _Ultimate Question of_ Life, the Universe, and Everything”.

Unfortunately, as today’s humans are obviously descendants of the
Golgafrinchan middle class (hairdressers, lawyers, telephone sanitisers,
etc.), and Earth will be destroyed just in time to make room for an
hyperspace bypass, the question will remain unknown for at least another
4.6 × 10⁶ years after that ;-)

>> F’up2 sci.physics.relativity (as it pertains to cosmology)
>>
> alt.astronomy added back in.

Since apparently you are new in Usenet, know that it is inappropriate to
crosspost to alt.ALL *and* the Big 8, and in general across top-level
hierarchies, without a good reason.

And if you crosspost you are supposed to set Followup-To *one* newsgroup
in which the subject of discussion is most on-topic.

The proper newsgroup to discuss cosmology within the Big 8, where I am
reading this, is sci.physics.relativity.  Followup-To set accordingly.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479221

Everywhere seems to be its own center...
but that is a clue to the fact that there is none...
Einstein's closed universe; finite yet unbounded...
The higher round spatial 4th dimension or
hypersphere with the universe in its boundary
is the truth in science...


Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479225

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 7/12/2018 2:14 AM:
> Daniel60 wrote in alt.astronomy and sci.physics.relativity:
> ^^^^^^^^
> Your real name belongs there.

Oh!! Does it?? By who's rules??

>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 4/12/2018 5:38 AM:
>>> casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
>>>> Since the universe is obviously infinite in all dimensions ( including
>>>> time ) and without boundaries or limits,
>>> That is as "obvious" as ”red” is “green” and “1 + 1 = 42”.
>>
>> Wrong!! 42 is the meaning of Life, the Universe and Everything!!
> 
> No, according to the eminent researcher Douglas Adams (1952–2001), it is the
> “_Answer_ to the _Ultimate Question of_ Life, the Universe, and Everything”.
> 
> Unfortunately, as today’s humans are obviously descendants of the
> Golgafrinchan middle class (hairdressers, lawyers, telephone sanitisers,
> etc.), and Earth will be destroyed just in time to make room for an
> hyperspace bypass, the question will remain unknown for at least another
> 4.6 × 10⁶ years after that ;-)

But, as Arthur already had the Answer impressed in his brain (as did 
Trilian!), it should not take that long to arrive at the Answer, second 
time around!!

>>> F’up2 sci.physics.relativity (as it pertains to cosmology)
>>>
>> alt.astronomy added back in.
> 
> Since apparently you are new in Usenet,

Yeap!! A newbie, of about twenty years experience!!

>                                         know that it is inappropriate to
> crosspost to alt.ALL *and* the Big 8, and in general across top-level
> hierarchies, without a good reason.
> 
> And if you crosspost you are supposed to set Followup-To *one* newsgroup
> in which the subject of discussion is most on-topic.
> 
> The proper newsgroup to discuss cosmology within the Big 8, where I am
> reading this, is sci.physics.relativity.  Followup-To set accordingly.
> 
As I don't do sci.physics.relativity, I am posting to a group that I do 
read!!

You want to post elsewhere ... go for it!!

alt.astronomy added back in!

-- 
Daniel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479249

Daniel60 wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 7/12/2018 2:14 AM:
>> Daniel60 wrote in alt.astronomy and sci.physics.relativity:
>> ^^^^^^^^
>> Your real name belongs there.
> 
> Oh!! Does it?? By who's rules??

Decency.  If your nickname is indicative of the year of your birth, this
should be a familiar concept for you.

>> Unfortunately, as today’s humans are obviously descendants of the
>> Golgafrinchan middle class (hairdressers, lawyers, telephone sanitisers,
>> etc.), and Earth will be destroyed just in time to make room for an
>> hyperspace bypass, the question will remain unknown for at least another
>> 4.6 × 10⁶ years after that ;-)
> 
> But, as Arthur already had the Answer impressed in his brain (as did 
> Trilian!), it should not take that long to arrive at the Answer, second 
> time around!!

Well, he tried, and it did not work.  Besides, unless something happens in
the books that I have not read yet, he is long dead by now.

>>>> F’up2 sci.physics.relativity (as it pertains to cosmology)
>>> alt.astronomy added back in.
>> Since apparently you are new in Usenet,
> 
> Yeap!! A newbie, of about twenty years experience!!

Maybe in alt.all.  But that is not Usenet.

(It is 18 years for me.)

>>                                         know that it is inappropriate to
>> crosspost to alt.ALL *and* the Big 8, and in general across top-level
>> hierarchies, without a good reason.
>>
>> And if you crosspost you are supposed to set Followup-To *one* newsgroup
>> in which the subject of discussion is most on-topic.
>>
>> The proper newsgroup to discuss cosmology within the Big 8, where I am
>> reading this, is sci.physics.relativity.  Followup-To set accordingly.
>
> As I don't do sci.physics.relativity, I am posting to a group that I do 
> read!!

There is no problem of your posting to another newsgroup.

There is a problem with your posting to *two* newsgroups if what you post
is NOT on-topic in one, if you also NOT suggest a newsgroup where the
discussion *is* on-topic.

And JFYI, discussing “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” is NOT on-topic
in *any* of the newsgroups that you posted to.

> You want to post elsewhere ... go for it!!

Usenet does not work this way.  You are not required to reply.  You are,
however, required to play by the (sometimes unwritten) rules if you want
to be taken seriously.
> alt.astronomy added back in!

Score adjusted.

F’up2 poster

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479312

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 8/12/2018 5:12 AM:
> Daniel60 wrote:
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 7/12/2018 2:14 AM:
>>> Daniel60 wrote in alt.astronomy and sci.physics.relativity:
>>> ^^^^^^^^
>>> Your real name belongs there.
>>
>> Oh!! Does it?? By who's rules??
> 
> Decency.  If your nickname is indicative of the year of your birth, this
> should be a familiar concept for you.

Sorry!! I haven't read the Decency Rules, so cannot/will not comply.

>>> Unfortunately, as today’s humans are obviously descendants of the
>>> Golgafrinchan middle class (hairdressers, lawyers, telephone sanitisers,
>>> etc.), and Earth will be destroyed just in time to make room for an
>>> hyperspace bypass, the question will remain unknown for at least another
>>> 4.6 × 10⁶ years after that ;-)
>>
>> But, as Arthur already had the Answer impressed in his brain (as did
>> Trilian!), it should not take that long to arrive at the Answer, second
>> time around!!
> 
> Well, he tried, and it did not work.

But how do you know?? Did the mice tell you they are still waiting for 
the Question??

>                                      Besides, unless something happens in
> the books that I have not read yet, he is long dead by now.

I've only gotten to book five of the trilogy ... don't know if there are 
any more after that!

And I'm at about the same point in the Radio Plays audio's!!

>>>>> F’up2 sci.physics.relativity (as it pertains to cosmology)
>>>> alt.astronomy added back in.
>>> Since apparently you are new in Usenet,
>>
>> Yeap!! A newbie, of about twenty years experience!!
> 
> Maybe in alt.all.  But that is not Usenet.

alt.all?? Cannot say I've ever heard or read of that one! Nor can I find 
any post in this thread (on alt.astronomy) that was cross-posted to 
alt.all!!

> (It is 18 years for me.)
> 
>>>                                          know that it is inappropriate to
>>> crosspost to alt.ALL *and* the Big 8, and in general across top-level
>>> hierarchies, without a good reason.
>>>
>>> And if you crosspost you are supposed to set Followup-To *one* newsgroup
>>> in which the subject of discussion is most on-topic.
>>>
>>> The proper newsgroup to discuss cosmology within the Big 8, where I am
>>> reading this, is sci.physics.relativity.  Followup-To set accordingly.
>>
>> As I don't do sci.physics.relativity, I am posting to a group that I do
>> read!!
> 
> There is no problem of your posting to another newsgroup.
> 
> There is a problem with your posting to *two* newsgroups if what you post
> is NOT on-topic in one, if you also NOT suggest a newsgroup where the
> discussion *is* on-topic.
> 
> And JFYI, discussing “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” is NOT on-topic
> in *any* of the newsgroups that you posted to.
> 
>> You want to post elsewhere ... go for it!!
> 
> Usenet does not work this way.  You are not required to reply.  You are,
> however, required to play by the (sometimes unwritten) rules if you want
> to be taken seriously.

"(sometimes unwritten) rules" .... sort of makes it real, real, 
difficult for everybody to comply, doesn't it??

>> alt.astronomy added back in!
> 
> Score adjusted.

What "score"?? Is Big Brother watching me, or some such??
> F’up2 poster
> 
Yeap!! Sure!! No worries!!

-- 
Daniel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479330

Daniel60 wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 8/12/2018 5:12 AM:
>> Daniel60 wrote:
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote on 7/12/2018 2:14 AM:
>>>> Daniel60 wrote in alt.astronomy and sci.physics.relativity:
>>>> ^^^^^^^^
>>>> Your real name belongs there.
>>>
>>> Oh!! Does it?? By who's rules??
>>
>> Decency.  If your nickname is indicative of the year of your birth, this
>> should be a familiar concept for you.
> 
> Sorry!! I haven't read the Decency Rules, so cannot/will not comply.
> [reaction of a complete idiot]

Usually one learns decency in one’s upbringing, and does not need any
written rules.  But that is obviously not so in your case.

*PLONK*

F’up2 alt.1d

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479475

                         ... x'=x-vt 
                         ... y'=y 
                         ... z'=z 
                         ... t'=t 

No one in science can disprove them. 


________________________________________________________ 

.ME.......Does the velocity represent Lorentz's px? Since this cite is title special relativity, I assume the velocity is based on SR. These quotes may help, clear things up a bit. 



"the electrodynamic foundation of Lorentz's theory of the electrodynamics of moving bodies is in agreement with the principle of relativity." (Einstein2, § 9, 1905). 



"In most applications p would be the velocity of the earth in its yearly motion." (Lorentz, § 3, 1899). 


"§ 9. Hitherto all quantities of the order p2x /V2  have been neglected. As is well known, these must be taken into account in the discussion of Michelson's experiment, in which two rays of light interfered after having traversed rather long paths, the one parallel to the direction of the earth's motion, and the other perpendicular to it. In order to explain the negative result of this experiment Fitzgerald and myself have supposed that, in consequence of the translation, the dimensions of the solid bodies serving to support the optical apparatus, are altered in a certain ratio." (Lorentz, § 9, 1899). 


Lorentz transformation is based on a constant magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity px but, at the surface of the earth, the magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity vector px that produces the ether wind is not constant.. At 6:00 pm, the magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity px is 462 m/s (fig 11); at 7:00 pm, the magnitude of px increases to 5,077 m/s. At midnight, the earth's tangential velocity vector px  is 30,462 m/s. The earth's tangential velocity vector px that forms the ether wind varies from 462 m/s to 30,462 m/s (6:00 pm - 12:00 am) yet Lorentz's transformation is based on a constant magnitude of the ether wind since a varying magnitude of the ether wind as time increases would result in a shift of the interference effect that would represent a positive result that is not experimentally observed. 






...Time                            velocity 


.._________________________________ 
. 


...6:00 pm                       462 m/s 


...7:00 pm                       5,077 m/s 


...8:00 pm                       10,154 m/s 


...9:00 pm                       15,231 m/s 


...10:00 pm                     20,308 m/s 


...11:00 pm                     25,385 m/s 


...12:00 am                     30,462 m/s 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479738

On 12/1/2018 12:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I don't know where the center of the universe is at...
> 
> but if you believe the center of the universe begins at the
> big bang, then it's simple to determine the
> center of the universe.
> 
> You simply draw a straight line
> from any one star
> and draw a line from the direction it
> came from.
> 
> The tough part is determining which way the star is moving.
> 
> Then you just draw a straight line from the opposite direction it's moving.
> 
> 
> You then find one another star and do the same thing.
> 
> You will find that the two lines will meet.
> 
> 
> That point which it meets is
> 
> 
> 
> The Center of the Universe.

The fractalbation of the local of local localities... Turtles all the 
way down. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web