Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #475347 > unrolled thread

atomic clocks

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2018-10-20 10:42 -0700
Last post2018-10-20 11:04 -0700
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:42 -0700
    Re: atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:54 -0700
      Re: atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 11:26 -0700
    Re: atomic clocks rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 11:04 -0700

#475347 — atomic clocks

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2018-10-20 10:42 -0700
Subjectatomic clocks
Message-ID<5BCB691D.4F1E@ix.netcom.com>
Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.


They are off...


so any calculations

based on your

most accurate clock will be

...wrong.


It will be off.


It will always be wrong.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#475349

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2018-10-20 10:54 -0700
Message-ID<5BCB6BBD.1369@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#475347
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.
> 
> They are off...
> 
> so any calculations
> 
> based on your
> 
> most accurate clock will be
> 
> ...wrong.
> 
> It will be off.
> 
> It will always be wrong.


Lets put it this way...

you're not on the right track.



Don't forget..

you got a bunch of stupid people making, designing and building atomic clocks.



"Hey, go make me another clock!"


"What was wrong with the last one?"



"IT'S FUCKING OFF, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475355

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2018-10-20 11:26 -0700
Message-ID<5BCB7356.4303@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#475349
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.
> >
> > They are off...
> >
> > so any calculations
> >
> > based on your
> >
> > most accurate clock will be
> >
> > ...wrong.
> >
> > It will be off.
> >
> > It will always be wrong.
> 
> Lets put it this way...
> 
> you're not on the right track.
> 
> Don't forget..
> 
> you got a bunch of stupid people making, designing and building atomic clocks.
> 
> "Hey, go make me another clock!"
> 
> "What was wrong with the last one?"
> 
> "IT'S FUCKING OFF, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"


it's only off by a second...


"WELL FUCKIN FIX IT!"


"but, you don't understand...it keeps slipping."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#475352

Fromrotchm <rotchm@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-20 11:04 -0700
Message-ID<546f0ea8-3d1b-4338-88c1-899dbd090007@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#475347
On Saturday, October 20, 2018 at 1:41:42 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.
> 
> 
> They are off...

Then just turn them on, DuH!
 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web