Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #451005 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-02-28 08:32 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-03-16 10:47 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 542 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 08:32 -0800
Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-28 09:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 09:26 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 09:37 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 09:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 10:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 11:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-01 21:00 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 14:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-02 13:27 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ický Bezdrátovì <ikbe@wmkfre.np> - 2018-03-02 12:34 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-02 05:59 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 09:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-02 00:05 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:26 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 09:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 09:50 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 09:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 10:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 12:06 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 12:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-28 13:00 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-28 13:23 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-28 14:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 13:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 13:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 13:44 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 13:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-02-28 19:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-28 10:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 12:13 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-28 13:58 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 14:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-28 15:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 07:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-01 10:00 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 13:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-28 12:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-02-28 21:33 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 13:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 13:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-01 21:42 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 14:23 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 13:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-28 13:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-02-28 14:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 07:40 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-03-01 11:26 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 13:59 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-01 14:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 15:09 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-01 17:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 09:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-03-01 14:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 08:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-03-02 09:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 13:19 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-03-02 18:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 09:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-03-03 09:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-03 10:06 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 10:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-03-03 11:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 18:45 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-02 06:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-01 13:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 08:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-02-28 18:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-01 13:40 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-01 17:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-01 20:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-01 21:44 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-02 11:44 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-02 13:28 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-01 13:18 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-02 00:08 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 08:38 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-01 17:42 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-01 09:13 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-01 09:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-01 13:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 14:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-01 14:24 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-02 07:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 13:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 08:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 10:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 13:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 13:57 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 14:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 15:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-02 15:58 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 08:57 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-03 09:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity dancouriann@gmail.com - 2018-03-03 12:18 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 15:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 09:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity dancouriann@gmail.com - 2018-03-05 09:15 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 10:09 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 18:32 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 10:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 18:47 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 11:15 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 20:21 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 12:29 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 22:54 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 10:51 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 19:00 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 22:41 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 22:56 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-06 15:50 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 12:51 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 23:19 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 13:20 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 21:23 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:39 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:38 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 10:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 13:24 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 14:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-06 14:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:21 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 21:19 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 15:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 09:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 10:06 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 10:27 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-03 10:37 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 10:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 14:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 14:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 09:46 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 11:54 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 15:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 15:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 09:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 09:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-03-05 10:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 23:34 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-04 15:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-03-02 16:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-02 16:45 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-03 08:02 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 14:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-02 14:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 14:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-02 15:03 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-02 23:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-03 08:27 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-03 04:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-03 05:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-03 14:29 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-03 05:50 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-04 18:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-05 05:55 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-04 23:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-05 15:17 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 09:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-05 18:27 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 09:59 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 08:50 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-03-03 08:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 15:44 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 09:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 09:44 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 10:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 10:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 13:59 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 14:38 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 09:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 11:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 14:15 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 22:27 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:46 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 09:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-05 09:40 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:56 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 09:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 10:09 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:40 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 09:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:40 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 01:53 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 13:28 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 09:18 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 11:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 13:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 09:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 09:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-06 09:19 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 22:27 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 20:06 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-04 23:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 11:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 13:29 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-05 23:23 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-05 23:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 01:53 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-01 13:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-01 21:45 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-01 13:54 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-01 14:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 14:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-02 14:01 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 10:06 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-03 14:07 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-03 05:39 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 09:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-04 11:44 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 14:32 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 07:09 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 07:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 15:55 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 08:52 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:40 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 09:29 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:40 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-06 20:19 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-06 20:37 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 06:50 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 06:37 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-07 11:08 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 05:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-07 15:13 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 07:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 07:46 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-07 17:31 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 17:12 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-08 21:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 12:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-09 04:17 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-09 04:52 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-09 11:24 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-09 11:21 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-09 10:31 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-09 02:59 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-09 14:47 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-09 15:49 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-09 18:36 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 09:53 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 02:28 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-08 21:41 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 00:22 +0000
Just more BULL SHIT eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 06:50 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-01 15:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-02 07:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-02 09:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 13:09 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-02 13:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-03 09:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-04 16:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-04 17:38 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-05 07:03 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-05 07:54 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-05 14:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 22:47 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-05 15:07 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 23:14 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 07:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-06 11:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-06 14:18 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 16:33 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:21 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 20:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 16:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:21 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 07:44 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 08:00 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 16:58 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 09:04 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 13:39 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:17 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-08 07:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 15:49 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 15:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 13:50 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:17 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 18:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-05 07:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-02 12:05 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-02 07:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 08:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-01 13:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 14:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-02-28 22:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-28 13:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-01 11:32 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 08:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-02 09:04 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-01 15:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-02 11:43 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 09:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 18:45 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-02 22:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 09:39 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-03 11:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 14:20 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-03 20:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-04 10:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-04 11:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 13:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-04 16:29 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-06 10:40 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-06 11:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-06 17:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-06 22:35 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-04 11:43 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-03 21:13 -0500
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-03 20:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-04 10:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-02 14:13 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-02 14:19 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-02 12:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 20:55 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-03 14:21 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-03 14:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 09:51 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-03 20:44 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-03 14:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-04 11:40 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 10:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-05 08:28 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 08:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:54 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-05 18:05 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-06 11:24 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 13:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:07 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-07 13:11 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 08:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-08 09:10 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 14:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:17 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 21:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-08 06:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 23:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-07 17:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 09:06 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-08 11:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 13:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-08 15:38 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-09 10:56 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-08 15:07 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 09:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-09 11:49 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:01 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 19:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-03 20:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-03 20:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 12:21 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-04 12:27 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-04 12:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 13:03 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 08:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 08:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 09:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 14:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:13 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 15:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 07:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-07 16:46 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 08:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 07:58 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 09:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 09:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 17:35 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 17:40 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:14 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-06 15:43 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 08:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:14 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 16:10 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 08:18 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 08:26 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 09:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 09:50 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 10:15 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-07 12:09 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 12:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 14:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-07 23:18 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 14:47 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:17 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 16:29 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 08:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-08 17:32 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 18:36 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:01 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 15:30 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 09:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 12:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-07 19:09 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-07 08:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:14 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-07 01:42 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-06 20:49 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 08:51 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-04 11:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 15:27 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 13:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 08:43 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-11 06:54 -0700
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-11 07:14 -0700
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-05 17:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 13:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 21:21 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-04 23:33 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:18 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 09:23 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:56 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 10:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 18:09 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 10:34 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 18:45 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 11:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-05 21:20 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-05 22:55 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-06 09:38 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-06 11:06 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 14:15 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-03-06 09:26 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-05 12:35 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-05 23:17 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 14:28 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-01 21:28 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-03-01 09:45 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 18:29 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 09:58 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-04 10:23 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 15:18 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 08:33 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 11:05 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 14:04 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 12:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:07 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 16:29 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:21 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 07:33 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 16:58 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 13:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-03-07 13:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-06 20:06 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 15:58 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-05 14:00 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 21:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 08:40 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-06 12:30 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-06 19:06 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-06 19:10 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 14:22 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-06 20:43 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 08:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 08:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-07 09:50 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 12:00 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:25 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-07 16:55 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 08:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 08:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-08 09:24 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 12:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-08 23:04 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 21:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 21:31 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-09 06:33 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 22:33 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-09 10:41 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 23:02 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 12:27 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-09 04:36 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 15:00 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-09 08:41 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-09 10:44 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 19:30 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 18:36 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-09 11:17 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-09 09:32 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-10 09:59 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-10 23:44 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-08 17:06 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-05 21:29 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-08 17:09 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-05 23:07 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-08 17:12 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-05 17:19 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-06 18:47 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 14:12 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-05 23:24 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-05 16:28 -0600
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 09:46 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 12:52 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-03-06 23:25 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-07 01:36 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:46 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:45 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 12:54 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 19:33 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-06 20:11 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:44 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 12:57 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-03-07 01:39 +0100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-06 20:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:24 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 14:14 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-06 13:14 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-03-06 12:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 23:16 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 17:48 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 17:58 +0000
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 13:01 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 16:53 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 22:39 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 22:57 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:55 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 00:17 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 09:25 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 10:48 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-08 10:49 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 11:08 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-03-08 19:39 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-03-08 15:16 +1100
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-07 20:42 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-03-07 13:13 -0800
Re: Proper Time, Clock Tick Rates and Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 10:47 +0000
Page 16 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 … 28 Next page →
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-02 09:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ec82953d-7a33-424d-b82b-6fda7144e95d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451168 |
On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > Sylvia. Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our VISIBLE universe. I have an illustration of the difference between the Big Bang Universe and the Visible universe in Explanation #7 here: http://oldguynewissues.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-10-dumbest-ideas-in-physics.html The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. I am moving with the earth as it spins on its axis, I am moving with the Earth as it orbits the Sun, and I am moving with the Sun as it orbits the Milky Way Galaxy. So I am definitely not stationary. Time for me is slower than Time at the point of the Big Bang. However, a rocket moving away from the Earth toward Mars at 24,000 mph relative to the Earth is definitely moving faster than I am. The idea that movement is reciprocal says that it can also be argued that I and the Earth are moving away from the rocket at 24,000 mph. That argument is ABSURD, since there IS such a thing as "cause and effect," and PEOPLE CAUSED the rocket to move toward Mars. No one CAUSED Mars to move toward the rocket. Understand? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-02 18:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p7c648$7i7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #451215 |
Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: >>> Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of >>> mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where >>> the Big Bang occurred. >> >> Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was >> devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. >> >> Sylvia. > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence > for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in > the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. That’s not what the Big Bang model says and that is certainly not what the evidence says. > However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the > same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few > moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see > where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our VISIBLE > universe. I have an illustration of the difference between the Big Bang > Universe and the Visible universe in Explanation #7 here: > http://oldguynewissues.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-10-dumbest-ideas-in-physics.html > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the > Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly > distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there > are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves > relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > I am moving with the earth as it spins on its axis, I am moving with the > Earth as it orbits the Sun, and I am moving with the Sun as it orbits the > Milky Way Galaxy. So I am definitely not stationary. Time for me is > slower than Time at the point of the Big Bang. However, a rocket moving > away from the Earth toward Mars at 24,000 mph relative to the Earth is > definitely moving faster than I am. The idea that movement is reciprocal > says that it can also be argued that I and the Earth are moving away from > the rocket at 24,000 mph. That argument is ABSURD, since there IS such a > thing as "cause and effect," and PEOPLE CAUSED the rocket to move toward > Mars. No one CAUSED Mars to move toward the rocket. > > Understand? > > Ed > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-02 22:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9A413E.4C7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451215 |
Ed Lake wrote: > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > Sylvia. > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our VISIBLE > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > Understand? > > Ed The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-03 09:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e2f83399-e0be-419f-a7d9-69d408307c19@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451299 |
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our VISIBLE > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > Ed > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-03 11:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9AF7BF.6F51@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451341 |
Ed Lake wrote: > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our VISI > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > Ed But ...they are Wrong. Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. The slide shows.. http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ the first moment of the big bang.. at the exact center is the light. The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg The Starmaker Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-03 14:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <49531d62-9832-4e55-b8e2-63f6173f978f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451356 |
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our VISI > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > Ed > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > The slide shows.. > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > at the exact center is the light. > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > The Starmaker > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-03 20:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9B7A91.6005@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451370 |
Ed Lake wrote: > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our > > > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > The slide shows.. > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > > > at the exact center is the light. > > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. > > Ed Well it could be the other side of a black hole, but what difference would that make...the principle is still the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 10:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9C3DF8.211A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451370 |
Ed Lake wrote: > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF our > > > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > The slide shows.. > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > > > at the exact center is the light. > > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. > > Ed But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. In other words, a continous creation of matter... that is why in the photo the stars are steady. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg A before and after picture of the big bang. It's simple. The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 11:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9C4381.1519@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451449 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF ou > > > > > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > > > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > > > The slide shows.. > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > > > > > at the exact center is the light. > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > > > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? > > > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. > > > > Ed > > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. > > In other words, a continous creation of matter... > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > A before and after picture of the big bang. > > It's simple. > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I. But I have to admit it is very differcult to obtain a photograph of the before and after the big bang... i didn't stick an attena in the ground at Austrlia...I use different methods. It is differcult to capture all the 'steady state stars' that you see in green, actually there is a thrillion more times stars than you see now in the green area, but what you see is all that I can obtain. You see Red, you see Green but where is the Blue??? The Blue is way before the 'steady state' of the universe. There's nothing there so far.. My observation is now that the big bang is a result of the steady state of the universe became...unsteady. Just too many stars tring to get the oscar... The Starmaker Ever watch a movie that contain too many movie stars???? Very differcult to watch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 13:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7f93f655-9f7f-4360-a844-280fbe169521@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451449 |
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 12:41:15 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. > > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. > > > In other words, a continous creation of matter... > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > A before and after picture of the big bang. > > > It's simple. > > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I. You are misinterpreting something. You're seeing something in the pictures that isn't really there. I don't have time right now to figure out what you're talking about, but, since there was nothing prior to the Big Bang but a clump of extremely dense matter in empty space, no one can take pictures of anything from prior to the Big Bang. I would either be a picture of a clump of matter in total darkness, or it would be a picture of empty space. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 16:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9C8F7D.61E4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451471 |
Ed Lake wrote: > > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 12:41:15 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. > > > > > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. > > > > > > In other words, a continous creation of matter... > > > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > A before and after picture of the big bang. > > > > > > It's simple. > > > > > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I. > > You are misinterpreting something. You're seeing something in the pictures that isn't really there. I don't have time right now to figure out what you're talking about, but, since there was nothing prior to the Big Bang but a clump of extremely dense matter in empty space, no one can take pictures of anything from prior to the Big Bang. I would either be a picture of a clump of matter in total darkness, or it would be a picture of empty space. > > Ed People ask "What came before The Big Bang?". But, I can see further than that....and once 'they' discover what came before the big bang..they are eventually going to ask, what that came before the big bang came before that???? So, either I'm getting way ahead of yous people...or, you're just have to catch up with me. But that is going to take a thousand years... yous can even get pass a simple before and after photograph. I was born to early... I'm witnessing the stone age right now... how did you guys manage to come up with ...fire?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-06 10:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9EE083.2999@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451449 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF ou > > > > > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > > > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > > > The slide shows.. > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > > > > > at the exact center is the light. > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > > > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? > > > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. > > > > Ed > > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. > > In other words, a continous creation of matter... > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > A before and after picture of the big bang. > > It's simple. > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I. The Question is Not.. What Came Before The Big Bang...but what did it look like *Before* The Big bang. My observation tells me...the Red area is the big bang and the green area is what it looked like before the big bang.. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg The answer is..."It's full of Stars!" Now, how many stars existed before the big bang? My observation tells me, look at the night sky and imagine all the dark areas covered with stars...that's a lot of stars! Enough to make a big bang.. This picture shows http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg The Big Bang (a new beginning) and the steady state universe (the end of the steady state universe, before the big bang) I'm missing the Blue part (which is before, before the big bang...before the steady state universe) This is a work in progress...but yous people are still questioning 'what came before the big bang', ...yous got a long way to go. I don't know how to help yous guys. Yous seem to be dependent on...'others' to tell you. If 'they' cannot get pass before the big bang, neither can yous it appears to me. it's lemmings here all the way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-06 11:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9EE82F.1F1D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451709 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE OF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > > > > > The slide shows.. > > > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > > > > > > > at the exact center is the light. > > > > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > > > > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > > > > > > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > > > > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > > > > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > > > > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > > > > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > > > > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? > > > > > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. > > > > > > Ed > > > > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. > > > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. > > > > In other words, a continous creation of matter... > > > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > A before and after picture of the big bang. > > > > It's simple. > > > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I. > > The Question is Not.. What Came Before The Big Bang...but what did it look like *Before* The Big bang. > > My observation tells me...the Red area is the big bang and the green area is what it looked like before the big bang.. > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > The answer is..."It's full of Stars!" > > Now, how many stars existed before the big bang? My observation tells me, look at the night sky and > > imagine all the dark areas covered with stars...that's a lot of stars! Enough to make a big bang.. > > This picture shows > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > The Big Bang (a new beginning) and the steady state universe (the end of the steady state universe, before the big bang) > > I'm missing the Blue part (which is before, before the big bang...before the steady state universe) > > This is a work in progress...but yous people are still questioning 'what came before the big bang', ...yous got a long way to go. > > I don't know how to help yous guys. Yous seem to be dependent on...'others' to tell you. > > If 'they' cannot get pass before the big bang, neither can yous it appears to me. > > it's lemmings here all the way. That which yous call a black hole...if you stand on the other side of a black hole, this is what it looks like: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg Either way, the center of a black hole is the center of the universe...if you're standing on the other side of the black hole. In other words, the universe has a center. All universes has a center. The part where the universe comes from. So, the question is...where is the center of our universe? Well, if you view moments after the big bang, it's right there in the ...center: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg You see in the photograph all the red stars shooting out from the center? That's the center! When NASA illustrates stars, it looks something like this https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/139459main_image_feature_468_ys_full.jpg Stars are illustrated with the white dot in the middle, and two lines crossing each other... https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/139459main_image_feature_468_ys_full.jpg https://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archives/images/wallpaper2/potw1717a.jpg Now, here is not an illustration, but a photograph: (notice the two long crossing lines from the center) http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ If you want to know what the big bang and before the big bang looked like, it's right there in the photograph! http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg Not speculation, ...observation. Question, Why are the red area stars shooting outwards in motion, and the green area stars steady without motion? http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg Have you ever seen a photo like this before?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-06 17:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9F44C1.6907@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451717 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was > > > > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understand? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages." > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But ...they are Wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you.. > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > > > > > > > The slide shows.. > > > > > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > > > > > > > > > the first moment of the big bang.. > > > > > > > > > > at the exact center is the light. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died. > > > > > > > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today. > > > > > > > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang. > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent. > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center. > > > > > > > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then. > > > > > > > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang? > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space! > > > > > > > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!! > > > > > > > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand???? > > > > > > > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it. > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. > > > > > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. > > > > > > In other words, a continous creation of matter... > > > > > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > A before and after picture of the big bang. > > > > > > It's simple. > > > > > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I. > > > > The Question is Not.. What Came Before The Big Bang...but what did it look like *Before* The Big bang. > > > > My observation tells me...the Red area is the big bang and the green area is what it looked like before the big bang.. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > The answer is..."It's full of Stars!" > > > > Now, how many stars existed before the big bang? My observation tells me, look at the night sky and > > > > imagine all the dark areas covered with stars...that's a lot of stars! Enough to make a big bang.. > > > > This picture shows > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > The Big Bang (a new beginning) and the steady state universe (the end of the steady state universe, before the big bang) > > > > I'm missing the Blue part (which is before, before the big bang...before the steady state universe) > > > > This is a work in progress...but yous people are still questioning 'what came before the big bang', ...yous got a long way to go. > > > > I don't know how to help yous guys. Yous seem to be dependent on...'others' to tell you. > > > > If 'they' cannot get pass before the big bang, neither can yous it appears to me. > > > > it's lemmings here all the way. > > That which yous call a black hole...if you stand on the other side of a black hole, > > this is what it looks like: > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > Either way, the center of a black hole is the center of the universe...if you're standing on the other side of the black hole. > > In other words, the universe has a center. > > All universes has a center. The part where the universe comes from. > > So, the question is...where is the center of our universe? > > Well, if you view moments after the big bang, it's right there in the ...center: > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > You see in the photograph all the red stars shooting out from the center? That's the center! > > When NASA illustrates stars, it looks something like this > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/139459main_image_feature_468_ys_full.jpg > > Stars are illustrated with the white dot in the middle, and two lines crossing each other... > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/139459main_image_feature_468_ys_full.jpg > > https://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archives/images/wallpaper2/potw1717a.jpg > > Now, here is not an illustration, but a photograph: (notice the two long crossing lines from the center) > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/ > > If you want to know what the big bang and before the big bang looked like, it's right there in the photograph! > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > Not speculation, ...observation. > > Question, Why are the red area stars shooting outwards in motion, and the green area stars steady without motion? > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > Have you ever seen a photo like this before? Based on observation here... http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg I don't see any evidence of a ...singularity. What I do see is the big bang being the result of a ...tranformation, ..from there to here. In other words, all the matter here today comes from the green area you see here http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg into/transformed to the red area called the big bang...through/from the center. If you want to see the black hole, you need to stand between the green and the red... http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg if you want to know where 'things go' that enter a black hole, you need to stand in front of the red to see it come out.. and as you can see..it looks like a big bang.. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg If you want to go at a different higher level (i don't know if that is possible for yous) it means that Time in the green area tranformed and changed to Time you understand and see today. Times used to be infinite...and it changed to...seconds. Quite possible there was no beginning or end, just a continious tranformation... but I'm missing the Blue... so...all i got is red and green. I looked at the Blue....but there's nothing there! i goota find out wats goin on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-06 22:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9F8840.49D6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451767 |
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ed Lake wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Ed Lake wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 12:31:29 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > Ed Lake wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 6:43:07 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 2/03/2018 10:02 AM, Ed Lake wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do you have any evidence to support that? It's not as if relativity was
> > > > > > > > > > devised in some ivory tower - it was based on experiments.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sylvia.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. The experimental evidence is the experimental evidence for the Big Bang theory. That Red Shift evidence says that everything in the universe is moving away from the spot where the Big Bang occurred. However, we cannot see that spot because light did not originate at the same moment as the Big Bang. Light came into existence some time (a few moments) after the Big Bang. So, in our VISIBLE universe we cannot see where the Big Bang occurred. It occurred OUTSIDE
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The evidence says that Time and Light move fastest at the point where the Big Bang occurred. That is a STATIONARY POINT AND all matter is evenly distributed in all directions from there, making it a point where there are no effects from gravity. Everything in our VISIBLE universe moves relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Understand?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ed
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The light originated at and before the moment of the big bang...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here is a photo of what the big bang looked before and after the big bang...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You see the red shift moving away from from the spot of the big bang in all directions?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have interesting BELIEFS, but the EVIDENCE says that atoms didn't form until some time after the initial Big Bang. And you cannot have light without first having atoms to generate the light.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's a NEW article on the subject: https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/asia/big-bang-first-light-universe-intl/index.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Following the Big Bang, physicists believe there was only darkness in the universe for about 180 million years, a period known by scientists as Cosmic "Dark Ages."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ed
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But ...they are Wrong.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe you didn't understand the photograph I showed you..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The green stars you see are 'steady state' stars..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The slide shows..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the first moment of the big bang..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > at the exact center is the light.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars..
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > which were stars ...before the big bang that simply never died.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eventualy as new stars were born, it simply got too crowded..and there was a need for more...space.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The stars in red is the expansion, in all directions outwards to what you have today.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The red stars come from the center light as clearly shown in the unretouced photograph of the before and after of the big bang.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are looking at a photograph of before and after the big bang...it's transparent.
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is activity in the red shiffting stars moving outwardly in all directions from the center.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And you can see the steady green stars universe undisturbed as it was then.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What else caused the red stars to shoot out like in this photo moments before and after the big bang?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe you don't understand the real world, ...if you have an office or business, and you're growing..you need more space!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you have a wife who is getting ...fatter, she needs a new dress!! She needs more space for that fat ass!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mean, how else can I explain it in terms that you can understand????
> > > > >
> > > > > You can explain it in terms that mean something, not in terms of some PERSON making a decision. Your photos are fantasies. What makes you think they have anything to do with reality? You have to understand natural laws of nature and what experiments and observations show. You're just making stuff up and asking people to believe it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ed
> > > >
> > > > But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation.
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang.
> > > >
> > > > And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang.
> > > >
> > > > In other words, a continous creation of matter...
> > > >
> > > > that is why in the photo the stars are steady.
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one.
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > A before and after picture of the big bang.
> > > >
> > > > It's simple.
> > > >
> > > > The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I.
> > >
> > > The Question is Not.. What Came Before The Big Bang...but what did it look like *Before* The Big bang.
> > >
> > > My observation tells me...the Red area is the big bang and the green area is what it looked like before the big bang..
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > The answer is..."It's full of Stars!"
> > >
> > > Now, how many stars existed before the big bang? My observation tells me, look at the night sky and
> > >
> > > imagine all the dark areas covered with stars...that's a lot of stars! Enough to make a big bang..
> > >
> > > This picture shows
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > The Big Bang (a new beginning) and the steady state universe (the end of the steady state universe, before the big bang)
> > >
> > > I'm missing the Blue part (which is before, before the big bang...before the steady state universe)
> > >
> > > This is a work in progress...but yous people are still questioning 'what came before the big bang', ...yous got a long way to go.
> > >
> > > I don't know how to help yous guys. Yous seem to be dependent on...'others' to tell you.
> > >
> > > If 'they' cannot get pass before the big bang, neither can yous it appears to me.
> > >
> > > it's lemmings here all the way.
> >
> > That which yous call a black hole...if you stand on the other side of a black hole,
> >
> > this is what it looks like:
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > Either way, the center of a black hole is the center of the universe...if you're standing on the other side of the black hole.
> >
> > In other words, the universe has a center.
> >
> > All universes has a center. The part where the universe comes from.
> >
> > So, the question is...where is the center of our universe?
> >
> > Well, if you view moments after the big bang, it's right there in the ...center:
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > You see in the photograph all the red stars shooting out from the center? That's the center!
> >
> > When NASA illustrates stars, it looks something like this
> >
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/139459main_image_feature_468_ys_full.jpg
> >
> > Stars are illustrated with the white dot in the middle, and two lines crossing each other...
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/139459main_image_feature_468_ys_full.jpg
> >
> > https://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archives/images/wallpaper2/potw1717a.jpg
> >
> > Now, here is not an illustration, but a photograph: (notice the two long crossing lines from the center)
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > http://s1114.photobucket.com/user/TheStarmaker1/slideshow/
> >
> > If you want to know what the big bang and before the big bang looked like, it's right there in the photograph!
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > Not speculation, ...observation.
> >
> > Question, Why are the red area stars shooting outwards in motion, and the green area stars steady without motion?
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > Have you ever seen a photo like this before?
>
> Based on observation here...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
>
> I don't see any evidence of a ...singularity.
>
> What I do see is the big bang being the result of a ...tranformation,
> ..from there to here.
>
> In other words, all the matter here today comes from the green area you
> see here
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
>
> into/transformed to the red area called the big bang...through/from the
> center.
>
> If you want to see the black hole, you need to stand between the green
> and the red...
>
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
>
> if you want to know where 'things go' that enter a black hole, you need
> to stand in front of the red to see it come out..
>
> and as you can see..it looks like a big bang..
>
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
>
> If you want to go at a different higher level (i don't know if that is
> possible for yous)
>
> it means that Time in the green area tranformed and changed to Time you
> understand and see today.
>
> Times used to be infinite...and it changed to...seconds.
>
> Quite possible there was no beginning or end, just a continious
> tranformation...
>
> but I'm missing the Blue...
>
> so...all i got is red and green.
>
> I looked at the Blue....but there's nothing there!
>
> i goota find out wats goin on.
In the meantime I'll show you how to find the center of the universe...
You take a piece of chalk
you go to the top
of the universe
and you draw a line down to the bottom
of the universe...
(do you follow me?)
Now you go to the left of the
universe and you draw a straight line to the right
of the universe.
The center of the universe is right where both lines crosses.
__________________|_________________________
|
(please ignore anyone saying there is no boundaries or no south of the south pole...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 11:43 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <fg0tpbFjrf6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451356 |
On 4/03/2018 6:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. There aren't any green stars. A hot black-body radiator never looks green. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-03 21:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rDImC.107927$Cy2.42068@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #451383 |
On 3/3/2018 7:43 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 4/03/2018 6:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > There aren't any green stars. A hot black-body radiator never looks green. > > Sylvia. > Depends if it's made of copper or not Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-03 20:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9B7ADB.5171@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451383 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 4/03/2018 6:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > There aren't any green stars. A hot black-body radiator never looks green. > > Sylvia. In your case it's color coded so that you know the difference of before and after the big bang. What's your dress size?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 10:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5A9C3DD6.9CE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #451402 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > On 4/03/2018 6:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > The green stars you see here are 'steady state' stars.. > > > > There aren't any green stars. A hot black-body radiator never looks green. > > > > Sylvia. > > In your case it's color coded so that you know the difference of before > and after the big bang. > > What's your dress size? But, I look at the photo and use the scientific method and base my information on...observation. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg I see the red stars all shooting from the center outwards towards today from what you call the big bang. And I see in green in the back scene, steady stars...that which is before the big bang. In other words, a continous creation of matter... that is why in the photo the stars are steady. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg What you have here is a perfect example of the steady state theory and the big bang theory all lumped into one. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg A before and after picture of the big bang. It's simple. The picture is as it is, as nature made it...not I.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-02 14:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I5cmC.4474$4j2.4152@fx35.am4> |
| In reply to | #451161 |
Den 02.03.2018 00.02, skrev Ed Lake: > > Clocks do not move "relative to each other" anywhere except in the minds of mathematicians. Everywhere else, they move relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. > > Comparing the rates of moving clocks is not only possible, it's an excellent way to determine which clock is moving faster relative to the point where the Big Bang occurred. The clock that runs slower is the clock that is moving faster. It is as simple as that. Ed, when I measure the apparent rate -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 … 28 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web