Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #450860 > unrolled thread

Prism

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Prism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-26 12:30 -0800
    Prism "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-26 16:17 -0800
    Re: Prism Ninapenda Jibini <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2018-02-27 03:41 +0000
    Re: Prism John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-26 19:49 -0800
      Re: Prism John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-26 20:16 -0800
        Re: Prism John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-26 20:25 -0800
          Re: Prism pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-02-26 20:31 -0800
            Re: Prism John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-26 20:57 -0800
              Re: Prism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-02-27 12:19 +0000
                Re: Prism mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-02-27 04:35 -0800
                Re: Prism Eveline Hurst <rutu@rwsrnlv.ee> - 2018-02-27 17:46 +0000
                  Re: Prism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-02-27 23:34 +0000
                    Re: Prism Ický Bezdrátovì <ikbe@wmkfre.np> - 2018-02-28 12:38 +0000
                      Re: Prism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-02-28 14:40 +0000
      Re: Prism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-26 22:16 -0800
        Re: Prism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-26 22:39 -0800
        Re: Prism John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-28 18:51 -0800
          Re: Prism John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-28 20:00 -0800

#450860 — Prism

There is something wrong with...Prism.

(i cannot seem to figure it out)

The colors are wrong.


It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.


It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...

there should be another color after it...it's missing.


Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#450871

The Prism is A TRIANGLE 

SO it is ILLUMINATI!!

You are not Illuminati so you will Never understand because you are Feeble of Mind because you are the StarSharter 

https://viralpage.gr/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/1-dollar.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450876

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:5A946E5C.3701
@ix.netcom.com:

> (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> 
There's a lot of things you can't figure out. Like how to take your 
meds every single day.

-- 
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450877

On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> There is something wrong with...Prism.
> 
> (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> 
> The colors are wrong.
> 
> 
> It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> 
> 
> It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> 
> there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> 
> 
> Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...

Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450879

On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 9:49:13 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > There is something wrong with...Prism.
> > 
> > (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> > 
> > The colors are wrong.
> > 
> > 
> > It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> > 
> > 
> > It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> > 
> > there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> > 
> > 
> > Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...
> 
> Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.

If light is circular then it cannot belong in the electromagnetic spectrum which is linear.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450880

On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 10:16:48 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 9:49:13 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> > On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > There is something wrong with...Prism.
> > > 
> > > (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> > > 
> > > The colors are wrong.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> > > 
> > > there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...
> > 
> > Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.
> 
> If light is circular then it cannot belong in the electromagnetic spectrum which is linear.

If light does not belong to the electromagnetic spectrum then it is not made up of the same radiation, and; therefore, behaves differently. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450881

On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:25:47 PM UTC-8, John Gogo wrote:

> If light does not belong to the electromagnetic spectrum then it is not made up of the same radiation, and; therefore, behaves differently.

John, you ignoramus, what makes you think that light is not part of the electromagnetic spectrum?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450882

On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 10:31:32 PM UTC-6, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:25:47 PM UTC-8, John Gogo wrote:
> 
> > If light does not belong to the electromagnetic spectrum then it is not made up of the same radiation, and; therefore, behaves differently.
> 
> John, you ignoramus, what makes you think that light is not part of the electromagnetic spectrum?

Because light is like a rainbow- only man, his eyesight, and his instrument are capable of observing it. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450895

John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 10:31:32 PM UTC-6, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:25:47 PM UTC-8, John Gogo wrote:
>> 
>>> If light does not belong to the electromagnetic spectrum then it is not
>>> made up of the same radiation, and; therefore, behaves differently.
>> 
>> John, you ignoramus, what makes you think that light is not part of the
>> electromagnetic spectrum?
> 
> Because light is like a rainbow- only man, his eyesight, and his
> instrument are capable of observing it. 
> 

And dogs. And flies. And cameras.

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450896

On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 13:20:04 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 10:31:32 PM UTC-6, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:25:47 PM UTC-8, John Gogo wrote:
> >> 
> >>> If light does not belong to the electromagnetic spectrum then it is not
> >>> made up of the same radiation, and; therefore, behaves differently.
> >> 
> >> John, you ignoramus, what makes you think that light is not part of the
> >> electromagnetic spectrum?
> > 
> > Because light is like a rainbow- only man, his eyesight, and his
> > instrument are capable of observing it. 
> > 
> 
> And dogs. And flies. And cameras.

Did they tell you, poor idiot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450923

Odd Bodkin wrote:

>>> John, you ignoramus, what makes you think that light is not part of
>>> the electromagnetic spectrum?
>> 
>> Because light is like a rainbow- only man, his eyesight, and his
>> instrument are capable of observing it.
>> 
> And dogs. And flies. And cameras.

And why is that. Why all those are visible light oriented only. What's so 
special with the visible light range, spanning from a 0.7um to how much, 
0.4um wavelength? What's so special with this cca 0.3 - 0.4um bandwidth. 
Relativity has no answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450950

The nymshifting troll, trolling as Eveline Hurst <rutu@rwsrnlv.ee> trolled:

>Odd Bodkin wrote:

>>>> John, you ignoramus, what makes you think that light is not part of
>>>> the electromagnetic spectrum?
>>> 
>>> Because light is like a rainbow- only man, his eyesight, and his
>>> instrument are capable of observing it.
>>> 
>> And dogs. And flies. And cameras.

>And why is that. Why all those are visible light oriented only. What's so 
>special with the visible light range, spanning from a 0.7um to how much, 
>0.4um wavelength?

Not so. Honeybees see into the ultraviolet, and they use that for navigation.
I read how some species see into the near infrared somewhat, but I forget
which ones.

> What's so special with this cca 0.3 - 0.4um bandwidth. 
>Relativity has no answer.

That's not even a question that relativity tries to discuss.
Why not whine that relativity has no answer why the Yankees won more
World Series than any other team?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450982

Michael Moroney wrote:

>>And why is that. Why all those are visible light oriented only. What's
>>so special with the visible light range, spanning from a 0.7um to how
>>much, 0.4um wavelength?
> 
> Not so. Honeybees see into the ultraviolet, and they use that for
> navigation. I read how some species see into the near infrared somewhat,
> but I forget which ones.

It's okay, it's not that important.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450995

The nymshifting troll, now trolling as <ikbe@wmkfre.np> trolls:

>Michael Moroney wrote:

>>>And why is that. Why all those are visible light oriented only. What's
>>>so special with the visible light range, spanning from a 0.7um to how
>>>much, 0.4um wavelength?
>> 
>> Not so. Honeybees see into the ultraviolet, and they use that for
>> navigation. I read how some species see into the near infrared somewhat,
>> but I forget which ones.

>It's okay, it's not that important.

And your point is, nymshifter?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450884

John Gogo wrote:
> 
> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > There is something wrong with...Prism.
> >
> > (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> >
> > The colors are wrong.
> >
> >
> > It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> >
> >
> > It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> >
> > there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> >
> >
> > Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...
> 
> Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.


I was looking for the loop, I couldn't find any round Prisms...i would
have to look at the rainbow instead.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450886

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> John Gogo wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > There is something wrong with...Prism.
> > >
> > > (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> > >
> > > The colors are wrong.
> > >
> > >
> > > It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> > >
> > >
> > > It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> > >
> > > there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...
> >
> > Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.
> 
> I was looking for the loop, I couldn't find any round Prisms...i would
> have to look at the rainbow instead.


it's blue, green and red but the second rainbow color appears to be upside down...

http://wpnature.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/rainbow-flowers-colorful-grass-sky-colors-amazing-beautiful-lovely-slope-clouds-field-spring-mountain-view-landscape-best-wallpapers.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451086

On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 12:16:55 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> John Gogo wrote:
> > 
> > On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > There is something wrong with...Prism.
> > >
> > > (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> > >
> > > The colors are wrong.
> > >
> > >
> > > It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> > >
> > >
> > > It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> > >
> > > there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...
> > 
> > Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.
> 
> 
> I was looking for the loop, I couldn't find any round Prisms...i would
> have to look at the rainbow instead.

I saw it as sunlight showed through my window onto the flat screen of my tv when it was turned off- three times the repetition of the light spectrum and twice red was attached to blue. Violet is a mixture of blue and red!
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451087

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:51:57 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 12:16:55 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > John Gogo wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30:26 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > There is something wrong with...Prism.
> > > >
> > > > (i cannot seem to figure it out)
> > > >
> > > > The colors are wrong.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It starts with Red...and ends in Violet.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It appears to me the color Violet is not correct...
> > > >
> > > > there should be another color after it...it's missing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maybe the Prism shape is incorrect...
> > > 
> > > Actually, if you observe a rainbow its circular- it goes from red to violet and right after violet begins red again, over and over.
> > 
> > 
> > I was looking for the loop, I couldn't find any round Prisms...i would
> > have to look at the rainbow instead.
> 
> I saw it as sunlight showed through my window onto the flat screen of my tv when it was turned off- three times the repetition of the light spectrum and twice red was attached to blue. Violet is a mixture of blue and red!

Orange-red-violet-indigo-blue-green-yellow-orange-red-violet-indigo-blue-green-yellow..............

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web