Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #428088 > unrolled thread

by albert einstein

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 10:32 -0700
    Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-10 11:02 -0700
      Re: by albert einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 11:31 -0700
        Re: by albert einstein Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-10 13:36 -0700
          Re: by albert einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 13:49 -0700
            Re: by albert einstein Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-10 14:07 -0700
              Re: by albert einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 14:35 -0700
                Re: by albert einstein Winfred Tucker <cnt@iiefeer.dc> - 2017-08-10 23:22 +0000
                  Re: by albert einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 16:34 -0700
                    Re: by albert einstein Winfred Tucker <cnt@iiefeer.dc> - 2017-08-10 23:57 +0000
                      Re: by albert einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 19:36 -0700
                Re: by albert einstein Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-10 18:43 -0700
                  Re: by albert einstein Prudence Hofmeister <phow@innfldo.sp> - 2017-08-11 17:34 +0000
                  Re: by albert einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-11 11:37 -0700
                    Re: by albert einstein Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-11 12:43 -0700
                      Re: by albert einstein Prudence Oppenheimer <phow@innfldo.sp> - 2017-08-11 20:00 +0000
      Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 11:46 -0700
        Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-10 16:54 -0700
          Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 19:26 -0700
            Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-10 22:24 -0700
              Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-11 09:41 -0700
                Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-11 11:23 -0700
                  Re: by albert einstein Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-11 13:34 -0500
                  Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-11 12:34 -0700
                    Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-11 15:40 -0700
            Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-11 09:54 -0700
              Re: by albert einstein "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-11 22:07 -0700
            by albert einstein "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-13 07:34 -0700
              Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 12:26 -0700
            Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-13 11:10 -0700
            Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 12:03 -0700
              Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2017-08-13 15:39 -0400
                Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-13 13:11 -0700
                  Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2017-08-13 16:17 -0400
                    Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-13 13:46 -0700
                  Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-08-13 17:04 -0400
                    Re: " the complete enslavement of the individual " -- Albert Einstein. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2017-08-13 19:43 -0400
          Re: by albert einstein Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 08:02 -0700
      Re: by albert einstein Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-12 13:51 +0200
        Re: by albert einstein "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-12 11:25 -0700
          Re: by albert einstein Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-12 22:41 +0200
            Re: by albert einstein "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-12 14:08 -0700
            Re: by albert einstein "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-12 18:01 -0400
              Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-12 18:04 -0700
                Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-12 18:36 -0700
                  Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-12 19:15 -0700
                  Re: by albert einstein "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-12 20:26 -0700
                    Re: by albert einstein "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-12 21:19 -0700
                      Re: by albert einstein "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-12 21:24 -0700
              Re: by albert einstein Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-13 20:32 +0200
                Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 12:16 -0700
              Re: by albert einstein Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-13 21:05 +0200
                Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-14 13:16 -0700
                  Re: by albert einstein Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-15 10:21 +0200
                    Re: by albert einstein Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-15 12:08 -0700
                      Re: by albert einstein "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-15 14:35 -0700
                      Re: by albert einstein Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-16 08:19 +0200
        Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-12 13:06 -0700
    Re: Communist slaves in China have two choices. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2017-08-13 11:20 -0400
      Re: Communist slaves in China have two choices. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-13 10:19 -0700
        Re: Communist slaves in China have two choices. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-13 11:08 -0700
    Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-23 10:42 -0700
      Re: by albert einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-25 12:33 -0700

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#428088 — by albert einstein

https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#428095

"The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com... 

https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/


*** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
penned Obama's two books.

Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on 
the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism 
and has the flowery rhetoric of those carpet baggers.

Einstein fled to Switzerland to escape the encroaching threat
od Hitler's "National Socialism" (NAZI) party and from there
to the US where he stayed for the rest of his life.
You, Starmaker, are a clueless hack.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428096

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 11:02:56 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com... 
> 
> https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
> 
> 
> *** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
> a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
> penned Obama's two books.
> 
> Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
> orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on 
> the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism 

"socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428116

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 12:31:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 11:02:56 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
> > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com... 
> > 
> > https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
> > 
> > 
> > *** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
> > a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
> > penned Obama's two books.
> > 
> > Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
> > orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on 
> > the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism 
> 
> "socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
> nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.
> 
> --
> Jan

“The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428120

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:36:48 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 12:31:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 11:02:56 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
> > > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com... 
> > > 
> > > https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > *** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
> > > a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
> > > penned Obama's two books.
> > > 
> > > Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
> > > orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on 
> > > the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism 
> > 
> > "socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
> > nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.
> > 
> > --
> > Jan
> 
> “The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin

Yes, but it's just something Lenin said. The two are simply totally
different (I lived under communism and visited countries which
implemented socialism to one extent or another). Night and day.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428123

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:49:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
>
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:36:48 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 12:31:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > >
> > > "socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
> > > nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Jan
> > 
> > “The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin
> 
> Yes, but it's just something Lenin said. The two are simply totally
> different (I lived under communism and visited countries which
> implemented socialism to one extent or another). Night and day.
> 
> --
> Jan

Socialism, as practiced in Western European countries isn't truly socialism,
which requires ownership of the means of production by government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looking_Backward

Although Bellamy's "Looking Backward 200-1887" was a utopian novel, the
practical application of socialism seems closer to the USSR experience.
China has done better, but they have allowed some private enterprise to
leaven impact.  Things weren't very nice at the beginning, though.  I
suppose the big difference is actually between free will and forced
implementation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428130

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:07:34 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:49:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:36:48 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 12:31:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
> > > > nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Jan
> > > 
> > > “The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin
> > 
> > Yes, but it's just something Lenin said. The two are simply totally
> > different (I lived under communism and visited countries which
> > implemented socialism to one extent or another). Night and day.
> > 
> > --
> > Jan
> 
> Socialism, as practiced in Western European countries isn't truly socialism,
> which requires ownership of the means of production by government.

No, ownership of the means of production by government is not socialism.
(This is what Lenin said, but Lenin said many amusing things.)

See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism 

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428160

JanPB wrote:

>> Socialism, as practiced in Western European countries isn't truly
>> socialism,
>> which requires ownership of the means of production by government.
> 
> No, ownership of the means of production by government is not socialism.
> (This is what Lenin said, but Lenin said many amusing things.)

Totally nonsense, both of you. Exactly the opposite, that the government, 
unlike capitalist regimes, doesn't own anything. But the people is the 
Owner and the Beneficiary. In capitalism the regime owns the significant 
infrastructure, as the military, police, heavy industry etc.

You two kids, wikipedia freaks, has so much to learn. For instance the 
first man on the Moon, never gave a seminar to talk with people about the 
alleged achievement. Inexplicable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428165

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 4:22:38 PM UTC-7, Winfred Tucker wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
> 
> >> Socialism, as practiced in Western European countries isn't truly
> >> socialism,
> >> which requires ownership of the means of production by government.
> > 
> > No, ownership of the means of production by government is not socialism.
> > (This is what Lenin said, but Lenin said many amusing things.)
> 
> Totally nonsense, both of you. Exactly the opposite, that the government, 
> unlike capitalist regimes, doesn't own anything. But the people is the 
> Owner and the Beneficiary. In capitalism the regime owns the significant 
> infrastructure, as the military, police, heavy industry etc.
> 
> You two kids, wikipedia freaks, has so much to learn. For instance the 
> first man on the Moon, never gave a seminar to talk with people about the 
> alleged achievement. Inexplicable.

Sorry to disappoint but I lived under communism and been to many
countries with varying degrees of socialism. I can assure you that
communism and socialism are two very different things. Like, say,
night and day.

Yes, I know that Soviet satellites and the USSR itself kept calling
themselves "socialist" but it's just a misnomer (like so many things
originating from the USSR).

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428175

JanPB wrote:

>> Totally nonsense, both of you. Exactly the opposite, that the
>> government,
>> unlike capitalist regimes, doesn't own anything. But the people is the
>> Owner and the Beneficiary. In capitalism the regime owns the
>> significant infrastructure, as the military, police, heavy industry
>> etc.
>> 
>> You two kids, wikipedia freaks, has so much to learn. For instance the
>> first man on the Moon, never gave a seminar to talk with people about
>> the alleged achievement. Inexplicable.
> 
> Sorry to disappoint but I lived under communism and been to many
> countries with varying degrees of socialism. I can assure you that
> communism and socialism are two very different things. Like, say, night
> and day.

No seemingly difference. Let me try, those Socialist countries are rather  
National oriented, meanwhile the Communist are inherently international.

But there are no Communist Republics, but only Socialist and Popular. As 
said, you are apparently talking nonsense.
 
> Yes, I know that Soviet satellites and the USSR itself kept calling
> themselves "socialist" but it's just a misnomer (like so many things
> originating from the USSR).

Your acidity. They saved your ass from the germans. Still not good?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428192

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 4:57:39 PM UTC-7, Winfred Tucker wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
> 
> >> Totally nonsense, both of you. Exactly the opposite, that the
> >> government,
> >> unlike capitalist regimes, doesn't own anything. But the people is the
> >> Owner and the Beneficiary. In capitalism the regime owns the
> >> significant infrastructure, as the military, police, heavy industry
> >> etc.
> >> 
> >> You two kids, wikipedia freaks, has so much to learn. For instance the
> >> first man on the Moon, never gave a seminar to talk with people about
> >> the alleged achievement. Inexplicable.
> > 
> > Sorry to disappoint but I lived under communism and been to many
> > countries with varying degrees of socialism. I can assure you that
> > communism and socialism are two very different things. Like, say, night
> > and day.
> 
> No seemingly difference. Let me try, those Socialist countries are rather  
> National oriented, meanwhile the Communist are inherently international.

I was simply pointing out the huge difference between the two. It seems to be
an American peculiarity to confuse them.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428187

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 3:35:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
>
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:07:34 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:49:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:36:48 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 12:31:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
> > > > > nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jan
> > > > 
> > > > “The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin
> > > 
> > > Yes, but it's just something Lenin said. The two are simply totally
> > > different (I lived under communism and visited countries which
> > > implemented socialism to one extent or another). Night and day.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Jan
> > 
> > Socialism, as practiced in Western European countries isn't truly socialism,
> > which requires ownership of the means of production by government.
> 
> No, ownership of the means of production by government is not socialism.

Yes, it is.  Even in your link, it is one form of socialism: "Public
ownership."

> (This is what Lenin said, but Lenin said many amusing things.)

Hey, this what Bellamy said, and his book sparked a huge movement:

"In the United States alone, over 162 "Bellamy Clubs" sprang up to discuss
and propagate the book's ideas.[3] Owing to its commitment to the
nationalization of private property and the desire to avoid use of the term
socialism, this political movement came to be known as Nationalism — not to
be confused with the political concept of nationalism.[4] The novel also
inspired several utopian communities."

> See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism 
> 
> --
> Jan

"Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social
ownership and democratic control of the means of production, as well as
the political theories, and movements associated with them."

Sounds like "government" ownership to me.

"Social ownership may refer to forms of public, collective, or cooperative
ownership, or to citizen ownership of equity.

Cooperatives have been widespread in mid-American farm country.  The old
co-op grocery store in the town where I grew up certainly was NOT socialism,
so I think the wiki article is a bit disingenuous.

> There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition
> encapsulating all of them.[13] Social ownership is the common element
> shared by its various forms.

Yeah, and one variety was called "nationalism" :-)

It would seem that the word "socialism" has lost its meaning over the
years since it now means almost anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428287

Gary Harnagel wrote:

> "Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by
> social ownership and democratic control of the means of production, as
> well as the political theories, and movements associated with them."
> 
> Sounds like "government" ownership to me.

Yes, since you are an imbecile. One of the extreme kind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428297

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 6:43:30 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 3:35:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:07:34 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:49:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:36:48 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 12:31:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "socialism/communism" - the two are very different so it's 
> > > > > > nonsensical to put them together as if they were synonyms.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jan
> > > > > 
> > > > > “The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, but it's just something Lenin said. The two are simply totally
> > > > different (I lived under communism and visited countries which
> > > > implemented socialism to one extent or another). Night and day.
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Jan
> > > 
> > > Socialism, as practiced in Western European countries isn't truly socialism,
> > > which requires ownership of the means of production by government.
> > 
> > No, ownership of the means of production by government is not socialism.
> 
> Yes, it is.  Even in your link, it is one form of socialism: "Public
> ownership."

"Public ownership" is not government ownership.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428311

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 12:38:03 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
>
> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 6:43:30 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 3:35:28 PM UTC-6, JanPB wrote:
> > >
> > > No, ownership of the means of production by government is not socialism.
> > 
> > Yes, it is.  Even in your link, it is one form of socialism: "Public
> > ownership."
> 
> "Public ownership" is not government ownership.
> 
> --
> Jan

It CAN be, thus my statement is correct.  Of course, farmer co-ops are
semi-public.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428312

Gary Harnagel wrote:

>> > Yes, it is.  Even in your link, it is one form of socialism: "Public
>> > ownership."
>> 
>> "Public ownership" is not government ownership. Jan
> 
> It CAN be, thus my statement is correct.  Of course, farmer co-ops are
> semi-public.

You are a waste of time, an idiot. There is nothing there to be own, 
except the Means of Production. But those are Used and Taken Care Of by 
the People. Hence, the capitalist brainwash doctrine, according to which, 
companies, businesses etc, ARE to be "owned" by somebody, is a lie, 
without intrinsic value, other than morons like you exhibit a strong 
believ in.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428097

Hägar wrote:
> 
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com...
> 
> https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
> 
> *** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
> a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
> penned Obama's two books.
> 
> Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
> orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on
> the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism
> and has the flowery rhetoric of those carpet baggers.
> 
> Einstein fled to Switzerland to escape the encroaching threat
> od Hitler's "National Socialism" (NAZI) party and from there
> to the US where he stayed for the rest of his life.
> You, Starmaker, are a clueless hack.


https://monthlyreview.org/product/mr-001-01-1949-05/


I appologize if it wasn't written by Albert Einstein...

can you point to one link that claims that it *wasn't* written by Albert Einstein???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428174

"The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598CA9F0.77EB@ix.netcom.com...

Hägar wrote:
>
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com...
>
> https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
>
> *** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
> a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
> penned Obama's two books.
>
> Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
> orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on
> the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism
> and has the flowery rhetoric of those carpet baggers.
>
> Einstein fled to Switzerland to escape the encroaching threat
> od Hitler's "National Socialism" (NAZI) party and from there
> to the US where he stayed for the rest of his life.
> You, Starmaker, are a clueless hack.


https://monthlyreview.org/product/mr-001-01-1949-05/


I appologize if it wasn't written by Albert Einstein...

can you point to one link that claims that it *wasn't* written by Albert 
Einstein???


*** I'm simply saying why would a man, who is Jewish and had
to relocate twice (Switzerland and the US) to escape the scourge
of Hitler's Socialist regime, pen a letter in its praise ???
Only a screwball like you could believe that. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428190

Hägar wrote:
> 
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598CA9F0.77EB@ix.netcom.com...
> 
> Hägar wrote:
> >
> > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598C989F.148A@ix.netcom.com...
> >
> > https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
> >
> > *** This piece of trash was written not by Einstein, but by
> > a socialist political hack, of the same type than those who
> > penned Obama's two books.
> >
> > Einstein was a scientist and scientists just don't write or
> > orate in the lingo of the socialist ruling class.  Obama, on
> > the other hand, is the epitome of socialism/communism
> > and has the flowery rhetoric of those carpet baggers.
> >
> > Einstein fled to Switzerland to escape the encroaching threat
> > od Hitler's "National Socialism" (NAZI) party and from there
> > to the US where he stayed for the rest of his life.
> > You, Starmaker, are a clueless hack.
> 
> https://monthlyreview.org/product/mr-001-01-1949-05/
> 
> I appologize if it wasn't written by Albert Einstein...
> 
> can you point to one link that claims that it *wasn't* written by Albert
> Einstein???
> 
> *** I'm simply saying why would a man, who is Jewish and had
> to relocate twice (Switzerland and the US) to escape the scourge
> of Hitler's Socialist regime, pen a letter in its praise ???
> Only a screwball like you could believe that.

Sorry, I'm not into politics...

if you wondering what Einstein's politics are:


Einstein was in favour of socialism and in opposition to capitalism, as illustrated by the following quote: 
"I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals.
Political views of Albert Einstein - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_views_of_Albert_Einstein

https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=albert+einstein+politics&oq=albert+einstein+politics&gs_l=psy-ab.12...769.769.0.1985.2.1.0.0.0.0.490.490.4-1.1.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..1.0.0.0.CEwxLUS4RLo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#428199

"The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:598D15F1.6A50@ix.netcom.com...

I bet you also believe that Hillary won and that Trump "stole" the election.
Get a grip, dufus ... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web