Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #427353 > unrolled thread

Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such in 1986-87

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such  in 1986-87 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 10:59 -0700
    Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such   in 1986-87 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 14:55 -0700
    Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such in 1986-87 D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2017-08-05 22:23 +0000

#427353 — Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such in 1986-87

Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> Thank God for Odd!
> 
> > Compare and contrast with Arindam Banerjee who stated "I invented googling".
> 
> As part of my M.Tech thesis in Computer Science from IIT Delhi in 1986.
> Thesis Title: Information Systems based on Partial-Match Retrieval
> 
> Paper: "A New Method for Partial Match Retrievals" International Conference
> on Supercomputing, Santa Clara, 1987
> 
> Abstract:
> This paper presents and analyses a new method for a simple, direct and fast
> solution of the partial-match problem. An algorithm is developed to derive a
> pointer for every partial-match query; this pointer locates a block in the
> address directory which gives a sequence of relative addresses in the only
> relatively ordered database. Extra information in the query, making it a
> "tuning" one, will arrange such records in an ascending or descending order of
> desirability. Investigation is done about the size of the address directory,
> which depends upon the total number of allowable queries (a function of the
> cardinalities of the domains of every partial-match attribute), and also the
> average number of record addresses per query.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee



Google is interested in have the *most* backlinks shown in the world.


If you try to do a search with "", it will cut down on the amount of backlinks shown,
and you will also notice today...Google will try to remove those quotation marks ""
from your searches.


Partial-Match is a death for search engines. 


They (Google) are now removing certain keywords and consolidating it with a bigger keyword to increase backlinks.

So, if you type a small audience keyword, Google will consolidated it to the top keyword of it's catergory.

The result... an increase in income adverting revenue for Google top keywords used.

So, it your trafffic for your top keyword seems to double lately, now you know why.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#427375 — Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such in 1986-87

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > Thank God for Odd!
> >
> > > Compare and contrast with Arindam Banerjee who stated "I invented googling".
> >
> > As part of my M.Tech thesis in Computer Science from IIT Delhi in 1986.
> > Thesis Title: Information Systems based on Partial-Match Retrieval
> >
> > Paper: "A New Method for Partial Match Retrievals" International Conference
> > on Supercomputing, Santa Clara, 1987
> >
> > Abstract:
> > This paper presents and analyses a new method for a simple, direct and fast
> > solution of the partial-match problem. An algorithm is developed to derive a
> > pointer for every partial-match query; this pointer locates a block in the
> > address directory which gives a sequence of relative addresses in the only
> > relatively ordered database. Extra information in the query, making it a
> > "tuning" one, will arrange such records in an ascending or descending order of
> > desirability. Investigation is done about the size of the address directory,
> > which depends upon the total number of allowable queries (a function of the
> > cardinalities of the domains of every partial-match attribute), and also the
> > average number of record addresses per query.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> 
> Google is interested in have the *most* backlinks shown in the world.
> 
> If you try to do a search with "", it will cut down on the amount of backlinks shown,
> and you will also notice today...Google will try to remove those quotation marks ""
> from your searches.
> 
> Partial-Match is a death for search engines.
> 
> They (Google) are now removing certain keywords and consolidating it with a bigger keyword to increase backlinks.
> 
> So, if you type a small audience keyword, Google will consolidated it to the top keyword of it's catergory.
> 
> The result... an increase in income adverting revenue for Google top keywords used.
> 
> So, if your trafffic for your top keyword seems to double lately, now you know why.


You could even be paying double to Google if your small keyword and your
big keyword match in traffic results.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#427378 — Re: Odd, God and my invention of Googling not that it was known as such in 1986-87

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip>

> If you try to do a search with "", it will cut down on the amount of backlinks shown,
> and you will also notice today...Google will try to remove those quotation marks ""
> from your searches.

Sweet. That little hack restores google's IQ up to where it was at
google's inception back in the 1990s. Every hit now contains useful
information again. This makes google worthy enough to become my primary
search engine once more.

If this continues all of those google domains in my DNS blacklist may
one day see the light of day again. Naw. j/k. That's never going to
happen. There are limits after all.

Thank you,

--
Don

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web