Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422736 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-16 10:27 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-06-21 12:54 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:27 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-06-18 00:46 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2017-06-18 14:07 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2017-06-18 12:38 -0400
Re: The Rule Of 72 djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2017-06-18 19:27 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 16:07 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-19 10:46 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-19 20:01 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-20 12:12 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-20 07:28 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-21 12:54 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-21 12:19 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-22 12:28 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-22 08:58 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-23 11:40 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-23 10:11 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-24 11:40 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Valok Planek <lkupuu@kwklewan.oo> - 2017-06-24 11:46 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-25 13:50 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-24 09:12 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-25 13:50 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Jack Fearnley <jack@alcor.concordia.ca> - 2017-06-20 14:54 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-21 12:54 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-25 13:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000552C94BDAFACC@aca403ad.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #423367 |
The Starmaker wrote: > jmfbahciv wrote: >> > Well, I wasn't talking about "numerology" beforehand, ...but since You seem >> to recognize it as "numerology" then you >> > are stating it was ...numerology. >> >> But you were doing numerology in the text which has been elided; it was >> a half-assed numerology rendition. > > I wasn't really aware I was doing numerology...I thought I was doing science > math highly advanced mathematics! I'm not aware of any advanced science math which is dependent on counting the occurrence of numerals in all values. >> No wonder you have problems in this newsgroup's topics. I'm beginning >> to understand how you think. > > > I wasn't really aware I was...thinking. ROTFLMAO. >> >> /BAH > > humbug/ A very old worn-out joke. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jack Fearnley <jack@alcor.concordia.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-20 14:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oibcvt$lg1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #423086 |
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:12:35 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote: > > I'm not talking about numerology. I'm talking about real accounting and > bookkeeping practices. IIRC, one of the "9" tricks helped a bookkeeper > figure out if an imbalance was caused by transposing two numbers. there > were many more little tricks to figure out mistakes. > > /BAH This trick is usually called 'casting out nines'. You can get lots of info if you Google it. Jack Fearnley
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 12:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM0005527805FEB550@aca4471d.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #423130 |
Jack Fearnley wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:12:35 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote: > > >> >> I'm not talking about numerology. I'm talking about real accounting and >> bookkeeping practices. IIRC, one of the "9" tricks helped a bookkeeper >> figure out if an imbalance was caused by transposing two numbers. there >> were many more little tricks to figure out mistakes. >> >> /BAH > > This trick is usually called 'casting out nines'. > > You can get lots of info if you Google it. Ah, thank you. I could not remember what it was called. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web