Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #413318 > unrolled thread

Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-19 00:16 -0800
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 01:20 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-19 09:34 +0100
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-19 01:45 -0700
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 14:34 -0700
            Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-20 14:46 -0700
              Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 15:50 -0700
                Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-21 00:10 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-20 13:40 -0800
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-22 12:14 -0800
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-22 13:32 -0700
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-24 13:27 -0800
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-25 09:51 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."  Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 22:21 -0500
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-20 23:53 -0800
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-26 10:41 -0400
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-26 11:20 -0800
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:11 -0400
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-26 23:08 -0800
            Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-27 23:08 -0400
              Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-27 21:11 -0700
              Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-27 21:16 -0800
                Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-28 08:06 -0400
                  Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-28 09:54 -0700
                  Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-28 23:17 -0800
                    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-04-04 08:53 -0400
                      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-04-04 09:27 -0700
                      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-04 23:16 -0700
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-26 23:14 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-26 12:56 -0700
      Re: Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2017-03-26 16:43 -0400
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-26 19:49 -0800
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-27 00:06 -0700
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-07 22:14 -0700
            Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-04-07 22:22 -0700
              Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." Kabato Koku <uaukaoo@kwkwuao.at> - 2017-04-08 18:21 +0000
                Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-04-08 14:04 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#413318 — Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."

Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:

'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'


http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf

""Why were men of science opposed
to your theory when you first made it
known ?"
"No men of science," he replied, em
phasizing the last'word, "were against
the theory."
"But there was some opposition?"
"Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
was purely political. Even the physi
cists who opposed my theory did so for
 political reasons?in my opinion, o'
 course."
"What do you mean when you say
the opposition was political?"
"Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#413322

On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 12:16:30 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> 
> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> 
> 
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> 
> ""Why were men of science opposed
> to your theory when you first made it
> known ?"
> "No men of science," he replied, em
> phasizing the last'word, "were against
> the theory."
> "But there was some opposition?"
> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> was purely political. Even the physi
> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>  course."
> "What do you mean when you say
> the opposition was political?"
> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

Your paraphrase is wrong.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413324

JanPB wrote:
> Your paraphrase is wrong.

Mr Starmaker is not very good in logic, I noticed that.

By the way, at the same time there were in France intellectuals,
even scientists, rejecting Relativity because Einstein was...
German! German abstract thinking in opposition to French pragmatism,
this kind of sh*t. You may know that, at that time, there were
still chimist rejecting the concept of atoms as idealism...

Later, Nazis will have the same rethoric against "Jew Science".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413327

W dniu niedziela, 19 marca 2017 09:34:19 UTC+1 użytkownik Python napisał:
> JanPB wrote:
> > Your paraphrase is wrong.
> 
> Mr Starmaker is not very good in logic, I noticed that.
> 
> By the way, at the same time there were in France intellectuals,
> even scientists, rejecting Relativity because Einstein was...
> German! German abstract thinking in opposition to French pragmatism,
> this kind of sh*t. You may know that, at that time, there were
> still chimist rejecting the concept of atoms as idealism...

Well, one thing is sure anyway:
WHOEVER OPPOSE OUR BELOVED SHIT IS STUPID REALITY
DYNYING CRANK!!! ANTI-SEMITIST!!! NATIONALIST
FANATIC!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUU!!!
SCIENCE HAS PROVEN IT!!!! UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413485

On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:45:41 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> W dniu niedziela, 19 marca 2017 09:34:19 UTC+1 użytkownik Python napisał:
> > JanPB wrote:
> > > Your paraphrase is wrong.
> > 
> > Mr Starmaker is not very good in logic, I noticed that.
> > 
> > By the way, at the same time there were in France intellectuals,
> > even scientists, rejecting Relativity because Einstein was...
> > German! German abstract thinking in opposition to French pragmatism,
> > this kind of sh*t. You may know that, at that time, there were
> > still chimist rejecting the concept of atoms as idealism...
> 
> Well, one thing is sure anyway:
> WHOEVER OPPOSE OUR BELOVED SHIT IS STUPID REALITY
> DYNYING CRANK!!! ANTI-SEMITIST!!! NATIONALIST
> FANATIC!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUU!!!
> SCIENCE HAS PROVEN IT!!!! UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!

No, that's not a correct paraphrase either. The reason for accepting
relativity is simple: it works (where the phrase "it works" obviously
requires a modicum of knowledge of the subject).

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413486

W dniu poniedziałek, 20 marca 2017 22:34:33 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:45:41 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > W dniu niedziela, 19 marca 2017 09:34:19 UTC+1 użytkownik Python napisał:
> > > JanPB wrote:
> > > > Your paraphrase is wrong.
> > > 
> > > Mr Starmaker is not very good in logic, I noticed that.
> > > 
> > > By the way, at the same time there were in France intellectuals,
> > > even scientists, rejecting Relativity because Einstein was...
> > > German! German abstract thinking in opposition to French pragmatism,
> > > this kind of sh*t. You may know that, at that time, there were
> > > still chimist rejecting the concept of atoms as idealism...
> > 
> > Well, one thing is sure anyway:
> > WHOEVER OPPOSE OUR BELOVED SHIT IS STUPID REALITY
> > DYNYING CRANK!!! ANTI-SEMITIST!!! NATIONALIST
> > FANATIC!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUU!!!
> > SCIENCE HAS PROVEN IT!!!! UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!
> 
> No, that's not a correct paraphrase either.

A lie, as expected from fanatic trash.

> The reason for accepting
> relativity is simple: it works

No, your Shit doesn't work and never will, poor
idiot. It's not the first shit trying to refute
common sense, you know. Refuting common sense 
never works.
But, true, "it works" obviously requires a modicum 
of knowledge of the subject. Instead "syntax 
schmyntax" screams.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413490

On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 2:46:55 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> W dniu poniedziałek, 20 marca 2017 22:34:33 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:45:41 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > > W dniu niedziela, 19 marca 2017 09:34:19 UTC+1 użytkownik Python napisał:
> > > > JanPB wrote:
> > > > > Your paraphrase is wrong.
> > > > 
> > > > Mr Starmaker is not very good in logic, I noticed that.
> > > > 
> > > > By the way, at the same time there were in France intellectuals,
> > > > even scientists, rejecting Relativity because Einstein was...
> > > > German! German abstract thinking in opposition to French pragmatism,
> > > > this kind of sh*t. You may know that, at that time, there were
> > > > still chimist rejecting the concept of atoms as idealism...
> > > 
> > > Well, one thing is sure anyway:
> > > WHOEVER OPPOSE OUR BELOVED SHIT IS STUPID REALITY
> > > DYNYING CRANK!!! ANTI-SEMITIST!!! NATIONALIST
> > > FANATIC!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUU!!!
> > > SCIENCE HAS PROVEN IT!!!! UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!
> > 
> > No, that's not a correct paraphrase either.
> 
> A lie, as expected from fanatic trash.
> 
> > The reason for accepting
> > relativity is simple: it works
> 
> No, your Shit doesn't work and never will, poor
> idiot. It's not the first shit trying to refute
> common sense, you know. Refuting common sense 
> never works.
> But, true, "it works" obviously requires a modicum 
> of knowledge of the subject. Instead "syntax 
> schmyntax" screams.

Don't bother answering my posts, save your time They are
never intended for you to read them. 

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413512

W dniu poniedziałek, 20 marca 2017 23:50:40 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 2:46:55 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > W dniu poniedziałek, 20 marca 2017 22:34:33 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:45:41 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > > > W dniu niedziela, 19 marca 2017 09:34:19 UTC+1 użytkownik Python napisał:
> > > > > JanPB wrote:
> > > > > > Your paraphrase is wrong.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mr Starmaker is not very good in logic, I noticed that.
> > > > > 
> > > > > By the way, at the same time there were in France intellectuals,
> > > > > even scientists, rejecting Relativity because Einstein was...
> > > > > German! German abstract thinking in opposition to French pragmatism,
> > > > > this kind of sh*t. You may know that, at that time, there were
> > > > > still chimist rejecting the concept of atoms as idealism...
> > > > 
> > > > Well, one thing is sure anyway:
> > > > WHOEVER OPPOSE OUR BELOVED SHIT IS STUPID REALITY
> > > > DYNYING CRANK!!! ANTI-SEMITIST!!! NATIONALIST
> > > > FANATIC!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!! UUUUUUUUU!!!
> > > > SCIENCE HAS PROVEN IT!!!! UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!
> > > 
> > > No, that's not a correct paraphrase either.
> > 
> > A lie, as expected from fanatic trash.
> > 
> > > The reason for accepting
> > > relativity is simple: it works
> > 
> > No, your Shit doesn't work and never will, poor
> > idiot. It's not the first shit trying to refute
> > common sense, you know. Refuting common sense 
> > never works.
> > But, true, "it works" obviously requires a modicum 
> > of knowledge of the subject. Instead "syntax 
> > schmyntax" screams.
> 
> Don't bother answering my posts, save your time They are
> never intended for you to read them. 

Don't bother answering my posts, save your time They are
never intended for you to read them, poor idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413480

Quadibloc wrote:
> 
> From your posts, we can see that he was correct at least in your case.
> 
> John Savard


I'm not ...political. I'm not into ...politics. 





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> 
> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> 
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> 
> ""Why were men of science opposed
> to your theory when you first made it
> known ?"
> "No men of science," he replied, em
> phasizing the last'word, "were against
> the theory."
> "But there was some opposition?"
> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> was purely political. Even the physi
> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>  course."
> "What do you mean when you say
> the opposition was political?"
> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413760

In other words...

To get political, and use political words like calling someone "Anti-Semitism," simply because that person
disagrees or opposes a "theory" of theirs,  is a 'despicable' person. 





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Quadibloc wrote:
> >
> > From your posts, we can see that he was correct at least in your case.
> >
> > John Savard
> 
> I'm not ...political. I'm not into ...politics.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >
> > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> >
> > ""Why were men of science opposed
> > to your theory when you first made it
> > known ?"
> > "No men of science," he replied, em
> > phasizing the last'word, "were against
> > the theory."
> > "But there was some opposition?"
> > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> > was purely political. Even the physi
> > cists who opposed my theory did so for
> >  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
> >  course."
> > "What do you mean when you say
> > the opposition was political?"
> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413768

"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
 > In other words...
 > To get political, and use political words like calling someone
>  "Anti-Semitism," simply because that person disagrees or
> opposes a "theory" of theirs,  is a 'despicable' person.
>
hanson wrote:
That is what Kikes who have whored this nation down
routinely do. How and why is articulated superbly by
the eminent Jewish Scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal
||R:|| in his epic
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
wherein it says (amidst LOTS of other facts):
||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim

|R:|| Through our Jew propaganda Xtians believe the LIE
||R:|| that Jews are the 'chosen people'. We Jews laugh
||R:|| about our five major falsehoods that we spread:
||R:|| Anytime this truth comes forth which exposes us, we
||R:|| Jews simply rally our forces -- the ignorant Christians,
||R:|| the goyim, whom we have brainwashed totally, and
||R:|| into whom we Jews have placed a guilt complex
||R:|| which makes you afraid to criticize Jewry openly.

||R:|| In much of Europe we enacted laws which throw you
||R:|| Goys in prison if you do not believe or doubt what we
||R:|| Jews say or you say unflattering things about us Jews.
||R:|| We even sacrificed some Jews so that our "persecution"
||R:|| propaganda & cries of "Anti-Semite/ism" can continue,

>
=================================

> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Quadibloc wrote:
>> >
>> > From your posts, we can see that he was correct at least in your case.
>> >
>> > John Savard
>>
>> I'm not ...political. I'm not into ...politics.
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own
>> > words' he said:
>> >
>> > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>> >
>> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
>> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
>> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
>> >
>> > ""Why were men of science opposed
>> > to your theory when you first made it
>> > known ?"
>> > "No men of science," he replied, em
>> > phasizing the last'word, "were against
>> > the theory."
>> > "But there was some opposition?"
>> > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
>> > was purely political. Even the physi
>> > cists who opposed my theory did so for
>> >  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>> >  course."
>> > "What do you mean when you say
>> > the opposition was political?"
>> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
>> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414045

Kevrob wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 3:14:31 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > In other words...
> >
> > To get political, and use political words like calling someone "Anti-Semitism," simply because that person
> > disagrees or opposes a "theory" of theirs,  is a 'despicable' person.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Quadibloc wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From your posts, we can see that he was correct at least in your case.
> > > >
> > > > John Savard
> > >
> > > I'm not ...political. I'm not into ...politics.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> > > >
> > > > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> 
> OK "Starmaker."  This tears it.  It isn't enough that you make
> stupid, off-topic posts tinged with your monomania about Einstein,
> Judaism and the atomic bomb.  Now we have the real, crude bigots
> invading the groups.  This "hanson" fellow, for example.
> 
> Knock it the f*** off.  It isn't funny.  It is far from clever.
> 
> Kevin R


I appologizes if my post ignited your anti-semetic impulses, you need to control yourself...

but who is talking about...Judaism???


Einstein didn't say he was Jewish, or of the Jewish religion what you call Judaism.

> > "What do you mean when you say
> > the opposition was political?"
> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

Einstein said..."Because I am a Jew."


There is a BIG difference of being a Jew and being Jewish. 




Jew is a race, and Jewish is a religion.



Learn to keep your anti-semetic impulses in check and you might be able to read clearly.


> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >
> > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> >
> > ""Why were men of science opposed
> > to your theory when you first made it
> > known ?"
> > "No men of science," he replied, em
> > phasizing the last'word, "were against
> > the theory."
> > "But there was some opposition?"
> > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> > was purely political. Even the physi
> > cists who opposed my theory did so for
> >  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
> >  course."
> > "What do you mean when you say
> > the opposition was political?"
> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414088

Hey Stermacher, no need for any apologies from you.
Stermacher, post the whole handle of this Kevrob, cuz
he sounds like poster "Anon Y.Mouse"dreck, the
criminal Identity thief from gioia.aioe.org>

>
The real fun comes from the deranged poster Kike &
Swine Kevin Robovski who cranked himself when
one points out  that Full Swine Jew Glazier threatens
people with Glazier Shitting into their mouth and
\Glazier hating Gentiles even post mortem and pissing
on their graves.

Bigot Jew Robovski does not wanna hear unflattering
news about his ilk. Pity ... but .... ROTFL:MAO!

Bigot Jew Robovski is one of those Kikes that the
eminent Jewish Scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal
pointed out in his epic
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
to have whored this nation down.
>
Robovski is like the bigotted, filthy and deranged kike
below, that is in the News right now:
>
NEW YORK - Jewish groups had pointed to scores of bomb threats against their
communities as the most dramatic example of what they considered a surge in
anti-Semitism. Now, an Israeli Jew is arrested for the harassment.
>
Israeli police said the man was arrested Thursday
But Israeli police say the Jew is the primary suspect in the more
than 150 bomb threats in North America since early January.
>
Jewish Center Bomb Threat Suspect Is Arrested in Israel - The New ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/us/jcc-bomb-threats.html
American and Israeli officials refused to say how many of those
threats the suspect was accused of making. And some recent anti-Semitic a
>
JCC bomb threats: Suspect arrested in Israel - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2017/03/23/.../israeli-american-teen-arrested-jcc-bomb-threats/
A Jew was arrested Thursday in connection with a
series of bomb threats that ... Police arrest Israeli-American Jew
>
 American-Israeli Jew arrested in JCC bomb threats - The ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/.../eighteen-year-old-american-israeli-jew-behind-most...
Israeli authorities report that they have arrested an
American Jew who moved to Israel in connection with the series
of threats to ...

Israeli Jew Arrested For String Of JCC Bomb Threats | The Daily Caller
dailycaller.com/.../israeli-american-jew-arrested-for-jewish-community-center-bomb-t...
Israeli police have arrested a Jewish Israeli American
from Ashkelon for his suspected role behind a slew of bomb threats
made ...
>
American-Israeli arrested for wave of bomb threats against ...
www.vox.com/.../3/.../jewish-community-center-jcc-suspect-arrest-bomb-threat-israel-...
Israeli police have arrested an Jewish man with dual
American-Israeli citizenship as the main suspect in hundreds of bomb threats
...
>
>
____________________________________

"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
 in message news:58D58F4A.4D6D@ix.netcom.com...
> Kevrob wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 3:14:31 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > In other words...
>> >
>> > To get political, and use political words like calling someone
>> > "Anti-Semitism," simply because that person
>> > disagrees or opposes a "theory" of theirs,  is a 'despicable' person.
>> >
>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Quadibloc wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > From your posts, we can see that he was correct at least in your
>> > > > case.
>> > > >
>> > > > John Savard
>> > >
>> > > I'm not ...political. I'm not into ...politics.
>> > >
>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own
>> > > > words' he said:
>> > > >
>> > > > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>
Kike & Swine Kevin Romanovski wrote:
>> OK "Starmaker."  This tears it.  It isn't enough that you make
>> stupid, off-topic posts tinged with your monomania about Einstein,
>> Judaism and the atomic bomb.  Now we have the real, crude bigots
>> invading the groups.  This "hanson" fellow, for example.
>>
>> Knock it the f*** off.  It isn't funny.  It is far from clever.
>>
>> Kevin R
>
>
> I appologizes if my post ignited your anti-semetic impulses, you need to
> control yourself...
>
> but who is talking about...Judaism???
>
>
> Einstein didn't say he was Jewish, or of the Jewish religion what you call
> Judaism.
>
>> > "What do you mean when you say
>> > the opposition was political?"
>> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
>> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""
>
> Einstein said..."Because I am a Jew."
>
>
> There is a BIG difference of being a Jew and being Jewish.
>
>
>
>
> Jew is a race, and Jewish is a religion.
>
>
>
> Learn to keep your anti-semetic impulses in check and you might be able to
> read clearly.
>
>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own
>> > words' he said:
>> >
>> > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>> >
>> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
>> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
>> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
>> >
>> > ""Why were men of science opposed
>> > to your theory when you first made it
>> > known ?"
>> > "No men of science," he replied, em
>> > phasizing the last'word, "were against
>> > the theory."
>> > "But there was some opposition?"
>> > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
>> > was purely political. Even the physi
>> > cists who opposed my theory did so for
>> >  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>> >  course."
>> > "What do you mean when you say
>> > the opposition was political?"
>> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
>> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413505

On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:16:59 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Einstein: 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'

Sometimes I wonder where you dig up the horseshit you post.  Dementia is
rarely so prolific.

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413510

Lofty Goat wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:16:59 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >Einstein: 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> 
> Sometimes I wonder where you dig up the horseshit you post.  Dementia is
> rarely so prolific.

I don't understand your "wonder" question..I posted where I dig it up:

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf


from a newpaper article. Whats to wonder????




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> 
> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> 
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> 
> ""Why were men of science opposed
> to your theory when you first made it
> known ?"
> "No men of science," he replied, em
> phasizing the last'word, "were against
> the theory."
> "But there was some opposition?"
> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> was purely political. Even the physi
> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>  course."
> "What do you mean when you say
> the opposition was political?"
> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414166

On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>
> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'

It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If 
you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."

First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only 
non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.

Then he states that political (not scientific) opposition was often from 
anti-semitic people, stating that those people, already anti-semitic, 
oppose his theories just because he was a Jew.


> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
>
> ""Why were men of science opposed
> to your theory when you first made it
> known ?"
> "No men of science," he replied, em
> phasizing the last'word, "were against
> the theory."
> "But there was some opposition?"
> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> was purely political. Even the physi
> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>  course."
> "What do you mean when you say
> the opposition was political?"
> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414174

Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> 
> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >
> > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> 
> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
> 
> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.


What does this comment mean to you? 

"Even the physi
cists who opposed my theory did so for
political reasons"







> 
> Then he states that political (not scientific) opposition was often from
> anti-semitic people, stating that those people, already anti-semitic,
> oppose his theories just because he was a Jew.
> 
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> >
> > ""Why were men of science opposed
> > to your theory when you first made it
> > known ?"
> > "No men of science," he replied, em
> > phasizing the last'word, "were against
> > the theory."
> > "But there was some opposition?"
> > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> > was purely political. Even the physi
> > cists who opposed my theory did so for
> >  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
> >  course."
> > "What do you mean when you say
> > the opposition was political?"
> > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414197

On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>
>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>>
>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>
>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>>
>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>
>
> What does this comment mean to you?
>
> "Even the physi
> cists who opposed my theory did so for
> political reasons"

It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose 
him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the 
physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific 
reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of 
science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political 
reason certainly isn't science.

Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my 
theories, you're anti-semitic."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414203

Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> 
> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >>>
> >>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >>
> >> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
> >> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
> >>
> >> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
> >> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
> >
> >
> > What does this comment mean to you?
> >
> > "Even the physi
> > cists who opposed my theory did so for
> > political reasons"
> 
> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
> reason certainly isn't science.
> 
> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
> theories, you're anti-semitic."

i didn't use ...quotes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414305

On 3/27/2017 3:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>
>> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>>>>
>>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>>>
>>>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
>>>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>>>>
>>>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
>>>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>>>
>>>
>>> What does this comment mean to you?
>>>
>>> "Even the physi
>>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>>> political reasons"
>>
>> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
>> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
>> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
>> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
>> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
>> reason certainly isn't science.
>>
>> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
>> theories, you're anti-semitic."
>
> i didn't use ...quotes.
>

Yes you did.

In article with Message-ID: <58CE3E7B.997@ix.netcom.com> you wrote 
(using the single quote mark):

>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>
>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>

Liar.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web