Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400956 > unrolled thread

Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:42 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 15:24 -0800
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:30 -0700
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 17:54 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 08:59 -0700
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 15:40 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 15:59 -0700
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:10 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:22 -0700
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:54 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 14:27 -0700
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 12:39 -0800
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 22:58 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 00:02 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:15 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:24 -0700
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:44 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 13:40 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 03:32 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-11 21:33 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 23:05 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:05 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> - 2016-12-12 13:15 +0000
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 11:02 -0800
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 11:10 -0700
                      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:26 -0800
                        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:30 -0800
                          The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:53 -0800
                            Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:59 -0800
                            Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 23:08 -0800
                            Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-15 20:39 -0800
                              Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 10:50 -0800
                                Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-16 10:56 -0800
                        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:36 -0700
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-06 17:25 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-12-09 15:45 -0500
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 20:22 -0500
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-12-11 17:17 +0000
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:15 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#401355

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:36:16 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> edprochak@gmail.com wrote:

> Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb????
> 
> The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent...
> the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG

In other words, you have cut and paste together a complete fabrication.
Why do you lie so much? 

Patent available at uspto.gov
http://tinyurl.com/jgva7os
Wikipedia article on the Einstein–Szilard refrigerator 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401442

Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:36:16 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb????
> >
> > The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent...
> > the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> 
> In other words, you have cut and paste together a complete fabrication.

It's not a cut and paste "fabrication, it's a illustrating the comparison.


> Why do you lie so much?
> 
> Patent available at uspto.gov
> http://tinyurl.com/jgva7os
> Wikipedia article on the Einstein–Szilard refrigerator
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator


Now here Ladies and Gentlemen is a perfect example of
the Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog's people of the world...

the 'scientific community' like the above poster come in two types...
the uninformed, and the misinformed (there is no informed among them).

He points a link...(a fraudulent link) of a fraudulent patent...

First here is the actual real patent on Google Patent search engine:

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/33ae7c90ab316ba29555/US1781541.pdf
https://patents.google.com/patent/US1781541A/en


Now Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog points to a fraudulent patent...

notice that someone added to the original Einstein patent in calligraphy, the words:

Einstein Refrigerator
Patent number in calligraphy, and the date in calligraphy. 

Here is the FRAUDULENT patent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png


and here is the REAL patent:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/33ae7c90ab316ba29555/US1781541.pdf
https://patents.google.com/patent/US1781541A/en




*They*, want you to 'believe' it's a refrigerator (Einstein NEVER said it was a refrigerator)

but it's not a refrigerator. 

It is exactly what it reads on top of Einstein's Patent: REFRIGERATION


now, those of yous who don't understand what REFRIGERATION means:


Refrigeration is a process of moving heat from one location to another in controlled conditions. 
The work of heat transport is traditionally driven by mechanical work, but can 
also be driven by heat, magnetism, electricity, laser, or other means.
https://www.google.com/#q=define+REFRIGERATION



It is a 'process', not a household appliance.



Don't tell me, I wrote the fuckin book!
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


Any questions?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401451

On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:33:31 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:

Besides posting a falsified image of the Einstein patent,
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG

you also post an image of a book with an fake ISBN:
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

Why do you lie so much?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401454

Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:33:31 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> 
> Besides posting a falsified image of the Einstein patent,
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG

What part is fasified??? You cannot point it out because you're...always wrong.



> 
> you also post an image of a book with an fake ISBN:
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


It's not a fake ISBN, it's called a mock-up cover of a e-book in progress.

http://www.newdesignfile.com/postpic/2011/08/free-3d-book-cover-template-photoshop_235775.jpg



You're actually reading the contents now...thank you for your ...contribution.


Show your children Einstein's fridge. We need more stupid kids in the world..



> 
> Why do you lie so much?


you're projecting.


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:36:16 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb????
> > >
> > > The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent...
> > > the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> >
> > In other words, you have cut and paste together a complete fabrication.
> 
> It's not a cut and paste "fabrication, it's a illustrating the comparison.
> 
> > Why do you lie so much?
> >
> > Patent available at uspto.gov
> > http://tinyurl.com/jgva7os
> > Wikipedia article on the Einstein–Szilard refrigerator
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator
> 
> Now here Ladies and Gentlemen is a perfect example of
> the Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog's people of the world...
> 
> the 'scientific community' like the above poster come in two types...
> the uninformed, and the misinformed (there is no informed among them).
> 
> He points a link...(a fraudulent link) of a fraudulent patent...
> 
> First here is the actual real patent on Google Patent search engine:
> 
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/33ae7c90ab316ba29555/US1781541.pdf
> https://patents.google.com/patent/US1781541A/en
> 
> Now Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog points to a fraudulent patent...
> 
> notice that someone added to the original Einstein patent in calligraphy, the words:
> 
> Einstein Refrigerator
> Patent number in calligraphy, and the date in calligraphy.
> 
> Here is the FRAUDULENT patent
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png
> 
> and here is the REAL patent:
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/33ae7c90ab316ba29555/US1781541.pdf
> https://patents.google.com/patent/US1781541A/en
> 
> *They*, want you to 'believe' it's a refrigerator (Einstein NEVER said it was a refrigerator)
> 
> but it's not a refrigerator.
> 
> It is exactly what it reads on top of Einstein's Patent: REFRIGERATION
> 
> now, those of yous who don't understand what REFRIGERATION means:
> 
> Refrigeration is a process of moving heat from one location to another in controlled conditions.
> The work of heat transport is traditionally driven by mechanical work, but can
> also be driven by heat, magnetism, electricity, laser, or other means.
> https://www.google.com/#q=define+REFRIGERATION
> 
> It is a 'process', not a household appliance.
> 
> Don't tell me, I wrote the fuckin book!
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> Any questions?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401469

Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> writes:

>On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:33:31 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:

>Besides posting a falsified image of the Einstein patent,
>> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG

>you also post an image of a book with an fake ISBN:
>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

>Why do you lie so much?

Not even the right number of digits...

Barcode looks totally bogus, too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401516

Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:33:31 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> 
> >Besides posting a falsified image of the Einstein patent,
> >> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> 
> >you also post an image of a book with an fake ISBN:
> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> >Why do you lie so much?
> 
> Not even the right number of digits...
> 
> Barcode looks totally bogus, too.

Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:33:31 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> 
> >Besides posting a falsified image of the Einstein patent,
> >> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> 
> >you also post an image of a book with an fake ISBN:
> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> >Why do you lie so much?
> 
> Not even the right number of digits...
> 
> Barcode looks totally bogus, too.


It's not a fake ISBN oor bogus barcodes, it's called a mock-up cover of a e-book in progress.

http://www.newdesignfile.com/postpic/2011/08/free-3d-book-cover-template-photoshop_235775.jpg


It's an EBOOK. The contents exist in electronic format...online only. I problably already got over 600 pages if printed,
not including https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein 

You're actually reading the contents now of the book...thank you for your ...contributions.


Did you see my science magazine?

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg



Now about about that bogus .wikipedia page and the whole content???? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator


No comments on that fraudulent page calligraphy fruad?
Einstein Refrigerator
Patent number in calligraphy, and the date in calligraphy??? Or you girls just look the other way...pussies.


P-U-S-S-I-E-S!


-----------------------------
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:36:16 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb????
> > >
> > > The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent...
> > > the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> >
> > In other words, you have cut and paste together a complete fabrication.
> 
> It's not a cut and paste "fabrication, it's a illustrating the comparison.
> 
> > Why do you lie so much?
> >
> > Patent available at uspto.gov
> > http://tinyurl.com/jgva7os
> > Wikipedia article on the Einstein–Szilard refrigerator
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator
> 
> Now here Ladies and Gentlemen is a perfect example of
> the Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog's people of the world...
> 
> the 'scientific community' like the above poster come in two types...
> the uninformed, and the misinformed (there is no informed among them).
> 
> He points a link...(a fraudulent link) of a fraudulent patent...
> 
> First here is the actual real patent on Google Patent search engine:
> 
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/33ae7c90ab316ba29555/US1781541.pdf
> https://patents.google.com/patent/US1781541A/en
> 
> Now Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog points to a fraudulent patent...
> 
> notice that someone added to the original Einstein patent in calligraphy, the words:
> 
> Einstein Refrigerator
> Patent number in calligraphy, and the date in calligraphy.
> 
> Here is the FRAUDULENT patent
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png
> 
> and here is the REAL patent:
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/33ae7c90ab316ba29555/US1781541.pdf
> https://patents.google.com/patent/US1781541A/en
> 
> *They*, want you to 'believe' it's a refrigerator (Einstein NEVER said it was a refrigerator)
> 
> but it's not a refrigerator.
> 
> It is exactly what it reads on top of Einstein's Patent: REFRIGERATION
> 
> now, those of yous who don't understand what REFRIGERATION means:
> 
> Refrigeration is a process of moving heat from one location to another in controlled conditions.
> The work of heat transport is traditionally driven by mechanical work, but can
> also be driven by heat, magnetism, electricity, laser, or other means.
> https://www.google.com/#q=define+REFRIGERATION
> 
> It is a 'process', not a household appliance.
> 
> Don't tell me, I wrote the fuckin book!
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> Any questions?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401518

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584EF44D.51C@ix.netcom.com: 

> It's not a fake ISBN oor bogus barcodes, 

Yes, it is exactly that.

> It's an EBOOK. 

("Mocked up" to look like a paper book. Dumbass.)

Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other. This isn't 
one. Nor will anything you write ever have one, since they're not 
free, and Mommy won't let you use her credit card to buy a block.

You're not only mentally retarded, and probably mentally ill, you're 
also also a pathetic loser with no life, and no chance of ever 
getting one.

I'm guessing usenet is literally the *only* human contact you get, 
because even your own mother won't let you out of the basement for 
dinner.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401874

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> 
> Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
> news:08f59f18-7745-4017-a6e5-7746a6da69dd@googlegroups.com:
> 
> > On Monday, 12 December 2016 22:00:57 UTC, Lawrence Watt-Evans
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:22:28 -0700, Gutless Umbrella Carrying
> >> Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> wrote in
> >> >news:8u0u4cpb67q0vh51upff9bbenr30o62c70@reader80.eternal-septem
> >> >ber. org:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:10:45 -0700, Gutless Umbrella
> >> >> Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> >> >>>news:584EF44D.51C@ix.netcom.com:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> It's not a fake ISBN oor bogus barcodes,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Yes, it is exactly that.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> It's an EBOOK.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>("Mocked up" to look like a paper book. Dumbass.)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.
> >> >>
> >> >> Not necessarily.
> >> >
> >> >They don't always get them, no, but if they do, it's a
> >> >standard ISBN, not the retarded fake that dumbass faked on his
> >> >fake "mockup" of a fake ebook that looks like a fake printed
> >> >book.
> >>
> >> Oh, I didn't waste time actually looking at that.
> >
> > To point out: you're being cross-posted in sci.physics.
> > I think I'm not because Google doesn't do it.
> >
> > If I've understood correctly - which seems not worth
> > the trouble - the book isn't finished.  And it's a
> > collection of sm's posts on Usenet.  And possibly
> > also the replies.  In which case, I call sm a
> > poopie head and I demand a royalty of $100 per copy
> > of his book containing this comment.
> >
> > I'm sceptical that there is even an act of collection
> > being performed; however, the previous sentence stands.
> >
> Even if there is, he's too fucking stupid to ever get it into a
> form that can be shared with others.


The stupidity of yous people dumbfounds me! 

Now I have to waste my time explaining to yos what an "ebook" is...


e-book 

     

Definition of e–book

    :  a book composed in or converted to digital format for display on a computer screen or handheld device
'https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/e%E2%80%93book


This book...
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

is a book
composed in
digital format for 
display on a computer screen.


The contents of this book is in
digital format...called Usenet.

It exist only on digital format..
can be read
on a computer screen
(like yous reading now stupid!)

It is posted on Usenet, a digital format
communication system
 that are posted to servers on a worldwide network.


It is not a ebook like you find on Amazon with extentions like epub, mobi, ...

it is...a Usenet worldwide network publication.



Capice? Comprende?? 


Next year I'm going to have to come back and kick some ass around here...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401876

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22the+man+who+built+the+atomic+bomb%22&biw=1280&bih=871&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlgcbMyPXQAhXHgVQKHYSIDKIQ_AUIBygC&dpr=1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401878 — The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

In 1905 Albert Einstein did clearly state that mass and energy were equivalent and sug-gested that proof of this
equivalence might be found by the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report 




http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html





In 1905 
 Albert Einstein
did clearly state
that mass and energy were equivalent and
sug-gested that proof 
sug-gested that proof 
of this
equivalence
might be found by 
the study of radioactive substances.


the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report 


the study
 of 
radioactive 
substances.


"the study
 of 
radioactive 
substances."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401879 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> In 1905 Albert Einstein did clearly state that mass and energy were equivalent and sug-gested that proof of this
> equivalence might be found by the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> In 1905
>  Albert Einstein
> did clearly state
> that mass and energy were equivalent and
> sug-gested that proof
> sug-gested that proof
> of this
> equivalence
> might be found by
> the study of radioactive substances.
> 
> the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report
> 
> the study
>  of
> radioactive
> substances.
> 
> "the study
>  of
> radioactive
> substances."


"A noticeable decrease of mass should occur in the case of radium." Albert Einstein


"energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2 ." --Albert Einstein




L = radiation.."in the case of radium"...radium comes from URANIUM


It's all about URANIUM
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first

to complete the building of the atomic bomb:
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401880 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
 http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/faces-of-project-y/


everybody else seems to be there...
http://www.lanl.gov/about/history-innovation/badges.php


except for leo szilard and........albert einstein?


Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?



You will not be able to answer the question correctly unless you read

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html



It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...


Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401993 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!


like I said: "It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions..." You failed to answer both questions. 


> It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
>  http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/faces-of-project-y/
> 
> everybody else seems to be there...
> http://www.lanl.gov/about/history-innovation/badges.php
> 
> except for leo szilard and........albert einstein?
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?
> 
> You will not be able to answer the question correctly unless you read
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#402043 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!
> 
> like I said: "It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions..." You failed to answer both questions.
> 
> > It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> > Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> >  http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/faces-of-project-y/
> >
> > everybody else seems to be there...
> > http://www.lanl.gov/about/history-innovation/badges.php
> >
> > except for leo szilard and........albert einstein?
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> > Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?
> >
> > You will not be able to answer the question correctly unless you read
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> >
> > It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> > Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?


But you stated: "I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!"

And everyone here KNOWS what your "...for a very good reason!" actually is..

it's misinformation. You all have it! You all have the same....misinformation!

Yous don't have 'documented proof', you just have ...heresay misinformation.


I'm here to fix that.

But, there's more!!!!


All that aside...
what i don't understand is that 
yous people are suppose to be...'scientifically aware'..
meaning...you should at least think for yourselves and
see if you see what scientist see....Patterns.

Let me give you an example...(i know this won't help because your misinformation has been ingrained in your heads)


Take for example...Albert Einstein. 

He suppose to be a genuis.
He spent around ten years working at a patent office.

Yet, this thing yous misinformed people call a refridgerator
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png

was never built!

Now, how does a genuis who spent years working at a patent office never built his...socalled refridgerator???

But wait a minute...we need a pattern here. Another example of a patent by Albert Einstein not created to the market place...

I bet a million dollars that yous people think this is a woman's blouse!

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/USD101756-0.png
https://www.google.com/patents/USD101756


another patent without being made???


I see a pattern here...



It is not a refridgerator, it's not a woman's blouse...

they are both designs for the making, building and manufacturing of the atomic bomb.


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html




The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#402046 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

Ahhhhhh !!!
StarSharter is Sharting again !!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401926

A nice healing lotion, Timmy. It'll reduce the chafing.

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58523794.6972@ix.netcom.com: 

> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> 
>> Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>> news:08f59f18-7745-4017-a6e5-7746a6da69dd@googlegroups.com:
>> 
>> > On Monday, 12 December 2016 22:00:57 UTC, Lawrence Watt-Evans
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:22:28 -0700, Gutless Umbrella
>> >> Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> wrote in
>> >> >news:8u0u4cpb67q0vh51upff9bbenr30o62c70@reader80.eternal-sep
>> >> >tem ber. org:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:10:45 -0700, Gutless Umbrella
>> >> >> Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> >> >>>news:584EF44D.51C@ix.netcom.com:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> It's not a fake ISBN oor bogus barcodes,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Yes, it is exactly that.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> It's an EBOOK.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>("Mocked up" to look like a paper book. Dumbass.)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Not necessarily.
>> >> >
>> >> >They don't always get them, no, but if they do, it's a
>> >> >standard ISBN, not the retarded fake that dumbass faked on
>> >> >his fake "mockup" of a fake ebook that looks like a fake
>> >> >printed book.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, I didn't waste time actually looking at that.
>> >
>> > To point out: you're being cross-posted in sci.physics.
>> > I think I'm not because Google doesn't do it.
>> >
>> > If I've understood correctly - which seems not worth
>> > the trouble - the book isn't finished.  And it's a
>> > collection of sm's posts on Usenet.  And possibly
>> > also the replies.  In which case, I call sm a
>> > poopie head and I demand a royalty of $100 per copy
>> > of his book containing this comment.
>> >
>> > I'm sceptical that there is even an act of collection
>> > being performed; however, the previous sentence stands.
>> >
>> Even if there is, he's too fucking stupid to ever get it into a
>> form that can be shared with others.
> 
> 
> The stupidity of yous people dumbfounds me! 
> 
> Now I have to waste my time explaining to yos what an "ebook"
> is... 
> 
> 
> e-book 
> 
>      
> 
> Definition of e–book
> 
>     :  a book composed in or converted to digital format for
>     :  display on a computer screen or handheld device 
> 'https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/e%E2%80%93book
> 
> 
> This book...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_
> The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html 
> 
> is a book
> composed in
> digital format for 
> display on a computer screen.
> 
> 
> The contents of this book is in
> digital format...called Usenet.
> 
> It exist only on digital format..
> can be read
> on a computer screen
> (like yous reading now stupid!)
> 
> It is posted on Usenet, a digital format
> communication system
>  that are posted to servers on a worldwide network.
> 
> 
> It is not a ebook like you find on Amazon with extentions like
> epub, mobi, ... 
> 
> it is...a Usenet worldwide network publication.
> 
> 
> 
> Capice? Comprende?? 
> 
> 
> Next year I'm going to have to come back and kick some ass
> around here... 
> 



-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#400984

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 8:42:44 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:

> Albert says:

> "However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> air."
 
> Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????

Apparently you have no knowledge of the definition of the word "might". There is nothing incorrect about that quote of yours, no matter who *might* have said it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401220

And what exactly is the point of your profound observation.

I think he was only recognizing that very heavy fissile material would
be involved and that the yield would be very vastly greater than
conventional bombs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401243

In article <jm5m4cdjqcd7hs06jq1gp6cl012foccnql@
4ax.com>, casagiannoni@optonline.net says...
> 
> And what exactly is the point of your profound observation.
> 
> I think he was only recognizing that very heavy fissile material would
> be involved and that the yield would be very vastly greater than
> conventional bombs.

And in point of fact the bombs used in WWII 
could _not_ be carried in aircraft that were 
available when he was writing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401379

J. Clarke wrote:
> In article <jm5m4cdjqcd7hs06jq1gp6cl012foccnql@
> 4ax.com>, casagiannoni@optonline.net says...
>>
>> And what exactly is the point of your profound observation.
>>
>> I think he was only recognizing that very heavy fissile material
>> would be involved and that the yield would be very vastly greater
>> than conventional bombs.
>
> And in point of fact the bombs used in WWII
> could _not_ be carried in aircraft that were
> available when he was writing.

True.  And before the US had the B-29, there was serious consideration given 
to borrowing a few British Lancaster bombers which could carry single bombs 
of around 5 tonnes.

-- 
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web