Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #401343 > unrolled thread

Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-11 00:29 -0800
    Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-12-11 09:56 +0100
    Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-12-11 08:07 -0500
      Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-12-11 09:58 -0600
        Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-12-11 17:10 +0000
          Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb Estrella Batey <yeaetl@sryeaet.org> - 2016-12-11 19:11 +0000
          Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 09:58 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-11 09:17 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-11 10:58 -0800
          Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb Estrella Batey <yeaetl@sryeaet.org> - 2016-12-11 19:22 +0000
          Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 18:39 -0800
          Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-12 18:19 -0500
            Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-12 17:52 -0800
      Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-12-11 09:07 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-11 11:55 -0800
    Re: Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb lal_truckee <lal_truckee@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-11 14:01 -0800

#401343 — Without Einstein, there would be no atomic bomb

I know 
this is 
very differcult 
for you people 
to understand...

Without Albert Einstein
there would be no atomic bombs
or nuclear bombs in existence
today.

No E=mc2, no atomic bombs.

I know 
this is 
very differcult 
for you people 
to understand...
because you don't
understand how
the world works
and how the 
direction of
the future is
created.

No Einstein
No E=mc2
No atomic bombs.


so nevermind...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#401348

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 00:29:53 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>I know 
>this is 
>very differcult 
>for you people 
>to understand...
>
>Without Albert Einstein
>there would be no atomic bombs
>or nuclear bombs in existence
>today.
>
>No E=mc2, no atomic bombs.
>
>I know 
>this is 
>very differcult 
>for you people 
>to understand...
>because you don't
>understand how
>the world works
>and how the 
>direction of
>the future is
>created.
>
>No Einstein
>No E=mc2
>No atomic bombs.
>
>
>so nevermind...

You are in contradiction with all the other
anti-einsteinians, who say e=mcc was already known
before E. was even born and that he only stole it.
so nevermind...

w.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401356

With all the ongoing advances in science and theoretical physics, e.g.
particle accelrators and colliders, ejectronics, there is little doubt
that essentially all of E's stuff would have been way realized by now.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401372

On 12/11/16 12/11/16   7:07 AM, SteveGG wrote:
> With all the ongoing advances in science and theoretical physics, e.g.
> particle accelrators and colliders, ejectronics, there is little doubt
> that essentially all of E's stuff would have been way realized by now.

You put the cart before the horse. Without Einstein, or someone else discovering 
the same theories, much of modern technology would be impossible. Remember his 
Nobel Prize was for his explanation of the photoelectric effect, not for 
relativity. Einstein was INSTRUMENTAL in the foundations of quantum mechanics, 
and of course relativity, BOTH of them were needed to develop the technologies 
you mention.

Tom Roberts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401377

Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 12/11/16 12/11/16   7:07 AM, SteveGG wrote:
>> With all the ongoing advances in science and theoretical physics,
>> e.g. particle accelrators and colliders, ejectronics, there is
>> little doubt that essentially all of E's stuff would have been way
>> realized by now.
>
> You put the cart before the horse. Without Einstein, or someone else
> discovering the same theories, much of modern technology would be
> impossible. Remember his Nobel Prize was for his explanation of the
> photoelectric effect, not for relativity. Einstein was INSTRUMENTAL
> in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and of course relativity,
> BOTH of them were needed to develop the technologies you mention.
>
> Tom Roberts

Einstein developed four theories that could have won Nobel Prizes: the 
photoelectric effect, special relativity, general relativity, and (in my 
opinion) stimulated emission of atomic radiation (Einstein A and B 
coefficients).  At the time of his award for the explanation of the 
photoelectric effect, relativity was still highly controversial among the 
older generation of physicists, and there was a darker streak of 
antisemitism in this as well.  Although relativity was his best known 
contribution, it was probably agreed that an award for the photoelectric 
effect would be uncontroversial.

-- 
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401384

Mike Dworetsky wrote:

> Einstein developed four theories that could have won Nobel Prizes: the
> photoelectric effect, 

aHmmm?? I understood he just made it obvious, whatever he made obvious. 
Not "developed". Since it was sitting there already developed.

> special relativity, 

I smell a rat here also. He made it obvious here as well.

> general relativity, 

good friends

> and (in my
> opinion) stimulated emission of atomic radiation (Einstein A and B

Tell me more about it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401505

On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-6, Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> Tom Roberts wrote:
> > On 12/11/16 12/11/16   7:07 AM, SteveGG wrote:
> >> With all the ongoing advances in science and theoretical physics,
> >> e.g. particle accelrators and colliders, ejectronics, there is
> >> little doubt that essentially all of E's stuff would have been way
> >> realized by now.
> >
> > You put the cart before the horse. Without Einstein, or someone else
> > discovering the same theories, much of modern technology would be
> > impossible. Remember his Nobel Prize was for his explanation of the
> > photoelectric effect, not for relativity. Einstein was INSTRUMENTAL
> > in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and of course relativity,
> > BOTH of them were needed to develop the technologies you mention.
> >
> > Tom Roberts
> 
> Einstein developed four theories that could have won Nobel Prizes: the 
> photoelectric effect, special relativity, general relativity, and (in my 
> opinion) stimulated emission of atomic radiation (Einstein A and B 
> coefficients).  At the time of his award for the explanation of the 
> photoelectric effect, relativity was still highly controversial among the 
> older generation of physicists, and there was a darker streak of 
> antisemitism in this as well.  Although relativity was his best known 
> contribution, it was probably agreed that an award for the photoelectric 
> effect would be uncontroversial.

My opinion: The 1935 EPR paper has in recent years become the most cited of
Einstein's works, even more so than his doctoral dissertation "A New
Determination of Molecular Dimensions." Einstein's philosophical intuitions may
have misled him, so that you frequently hear EPR described only in terms of
"Einstein was wrong" etc.; but the true fact is, Einstein put his finger on a
fundamental issue in QM ("spooky action at a distance") *LONG* before any of his 
colleagues did. Exploration of the consequences of entanglement has spearheaded
the Second Quantum Revolution. More even than Planck, Einstein was the true
father of the old quantum theory, and he anticipated much of the new.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401378

W dniu niedziela, 11 grudnia 2016 16:58:07 UTC+1 użytkownik tjrob137 napisał:

> You put the cart before the horse. Without Einstein, or someone else discovering 
> the same theories, much of modern technology would be impossible. Remember his 
> Nobel Prize was for his explanation of the photoelectric effect, not for 
> relativity. Einstein was INSTRUMENTAL in the foundations of quantum mechanics, 
> and of course relativity, BOTH of them were needed to develop the technologies 
> you mention.

Blah, blah, blah.
Just another similiarity between The Shit
and communism - they both were historically 
necessary.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401383

"Tom Roberts" Einstein Dingleberry <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>  Without Einstein, or someone else discovering the same theories, 
>
hanson wrote:
Theories are NOT discovered. Theories are made up, conjured up
models, brain farts and models of how reality SHOULD be in the
mind of story tellers, who fashion to call and label themselves as
Theoretical Physicists.... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.... 
>
"someone else discovered the same theories"...yes very much so
and long before AE plagiarized them, from Max Planck, Pretto,
Hasenoehrl, Mosengeil and a slew of others... Check it out, TJ.
>
TJ start accepting the fact that the German Zionist Diaspora Jew
Return Movement was in high gear early 1900'a. They needed 
a posterboy, which they found in Einstein who agreed with them 
to be put into the limelight & get fame.
Einstein paid them back by him going on a world tour for them,
in 1921, to promote Zionism.... 

SR/GR are political tools, without any sci/tech value! ...  DUH!
>
ED-TJ wrote:
much of modern technology would be impossible. Einstein was
INSTRUMENTAL in the foundations of quantum mechanics, 
and of course relativity, BOTH of them were needed to develop
the technologies.
> 
hanson wrote:
...  which one?.. NOT even a single one!.. None, nada, zero!
___ All technology is trial & error driven____  Duh!
>
ED-TJ wrote
Remember his Nobel Prize was for his explanation of 
the photoelectric effect, not for relativity.
>
hanson wrote:
... and there, down the drain, goes ED-TJ's promulgation
of  relativity, which Einstein himself already denied & 
recanted 60+ years ago (and wanted to be a plumber) 
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR>
who concluded that: _ SR is short for STUPID RANT __
& _ GR being nothing but a GULLIBLE RANT_.... LOL
>
... and the PhotEl effect was discovered in 1887 by 
the German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz, not by
Einstein. AE stole & plagiarized that one too, Duh!
>
ED-TJ wrote
> Tom Roberts, Enstein Dingleberry, 
> ... during his worship of Albert's Sphincter
>
Virdy Mahipal" mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote (in part):
Albert Einstein discovered E=mcc... in THE LITERATURE!
Albert Einstein explained the PEe... from THE LITERATURE
>
Albert Einstein is to Physics what Forrest Gump was in the 
movie that pr vides the blueprint on how revisionists plagiarize.
>
The Zionists assigned Albert undue credit for everything, incl.
AE's blatant Plagiarism, which was so bad that AE publicly
apologized for the theft of intellectual property in 1907, which
was insisted on by Mileva Maric, the Xtian wife of wife-beater AE
who was arrested in 1906 twice for wifebeating with 31'200 hit
on Google... 
>
Hey, Robert's,..  are you a wifebeater too that you feel such
empathy and understanding for your fellow wife-beater?
>
Thanks for the laughs, TJ, and watch now all your fellow ED's
jump up & down, full of hatred & anger .....ahahahahahanson
>
  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401385

hanson wrote:

> was insisted on by Mileva Maric, the Xtian wife of wife-beater AE who
> was arrested in 1906 twice for wifebeating with 31'200 hit on Google...

This obviously is incorrect. You can't beat your wife just like that. You 
have to have a good reason.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401425

On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 12:59:14 PM UTC-6, hanson wrote:

> The Zionists assigned Albert undue credit for everything, incl.
> AE's blatant Plagiarism, which was so bad that AE publicly
> apologized for the theft of intellectual property in 1907, which
> was insisted on by Mileva Maric, the Xtian wife of wife-beater AE
> who was arrested in 1906 twice for wifebeating with 31'200 hit
> on Google... 

The stories about Einstein beating his wife and having an arrest record ALL
originate from the following satirical website:
https://nelmezzodel.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/einstein-arrested-twice-in-1906-for-domestic-violence/
Other "top stories" from this website include:
-Dylan Pokes Eye Out With Carrot
-Obama Admits to Smoking Weed Daily
-427-Pound Man Wins Marathon
-New Apple Marketing Campaign: Jesus Would Have Had an iPhone
-Armless, Eyeless Woman Crowned Miss Rhode Island
-Tiger Woods Announces Intent to Renew Pact with Devil
-Probable Gay, Probable Lesbian Enter into Relationship
-Hillel, Pan-Arab Student Association Battle for Space in Student Activities Center
-Acclaimed Poet Covers Poem, Accused of Plagiarism
-LAPD Stumped in Search for 7 Foot Tall Rape Suspect
-New Gospel Found in Egypt Suggests Jesus, Judas Were Lovers

You have been told this before. Please to not promulgate this fake story as if
it were truth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401556

On 12/11/2016 1:58 PM, hanson wrote:
> "Tom Roberts" Einstein Dingleberry <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>  Without Einstein, or someone else discovering the same theories,
> hanson wrote:
> Theories are NOT discovered. Theories are made up, conjured up
> models, brain farts and models of how reality SHOULD be in the
> mind of story tellers, who fashion to call and label themselves as
> Theoretical Physicists.... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA....
>>
> "someone else discovered the same theories"...yes very much so
> and long before AE plagiarized them, from Max Planck, Pretto,
> Hasenoehrl, Mosengeil and a slew of others... Check it out, TJ.
>>
> TJ start accepting the fact that the German Zionist Diaspora Jew
> Return Movement was in high gear early 1900'a. They needed a posterboy,
> which they found in Einstein who agreed with them to be put into the
> limelight & get fame.
> Einstein paid them back by him going on a world tour for them,
> in 1921, to promote Zionism....
> SR/GR are political tools, without any sci/tech value! ...  DUH!
>>
> ED-TJ wrote:
> much of modern technology would be impossible. Einstein was
> INSTRUMENTAL in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and of course
> relativity, BOTH of them were needed to develop
> the technologies.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> ...  which one?.. NOT even a single one!.. None, nada, zero!
> ___ All technology is trial & error driven____  Duh!
>>
> ED-TJ wrote
> Remember his Nobel Prize was for his explanation of the photoelectric
> effect, not for relativity.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> ... and there, down the drain, goes ED-TJ's promulgation
> of  relativity, which Einstein himself already denied & recanted 60+
> years ago (and wanted to be a plumber)
> <http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR>
> who concluded that: _ SR is short for STUPID RANT __
> & _ GR being nothing but a GULLIBLE RANT_.... LOL
>>
> ... and the PhotEl effect was discovered in 1887 by the German physicist
> Heinrich Rudolf Hertz, not by
> Einstein. AE stole & plagiarized that one too, Duh!
>>
> ED-TJ wrote
>> Tom Roberts, Enstein Dingleberry, ... during his worship of Albert's
>> Sphincter
>>
> Virdy Mahipal" mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote (in part):
> Albert Einstein discovered E=mcc... in THE LITERATURE!
> Albert Einstein explained the PEe... from THE LITERATURE
>>
> Albert Einstein is to Physics what Forrest Gump was in the movie that pr
> vides the blueprint on how revisionists plagiarize.
>>
> The Zionists assigned Albert undue credit for everything, incl.
> AE's blatant Plagiarism, which was so bad that AE publicly
> apologized for the theft of intellectual property in 1907, which
> was insisted on by Mileva Maric, the Xtian wife of wife-beater AE
> who was arrested in 1906 twice for wifebeating with 31'200 hit
> on Google...
>>
> Hey, Robert's,..  are you a wifebeater too that you feel such
> empathy and understanding for your fellow wife-beater?
>>
> Thanks for the laughs, TJ, and watch now all your fellow ED's
> jump up & down, full of hatred & anger .....ahahahahahanson

Hanson is obviously a major bigot and nutjob, but that is no reason to 
ignore what he is saying. Hanon KNOWS SOMETHING!

People like to say relativity is wrong and Einstein was a plagiarist. 
Nonsense on both counts. True story is Relativity is not wrong. And 
furthermore Relativity was proposed first by Galileo for mechanical 
actions.  By Einstein's time the big question was did relativity also 
apply to light and electromagnetics. There was accumulating evidence at 
that time that this was true. So in effect, Einstein wrote a review 
paper gathering all the evidence and ideas together. That is hardly 
plagiarism. On the other hand, one does not usually get a Nobel prize 
for papers published in "reviews of modern physics" does one?

As for all the Jewish media Hype of Einstein being the greatest 
intellect the cosmos has ever seen (Just read his biography if you doubt 
these claims have been made) is obviously something political at it's 
core. Hanson probably has nailed it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401568

"benj" Jacoby <benj@nobody.net>   the Yiddish Apostate wote:
>
> hanson wrote:
"Tom Roberts" Einstein Dingleberry <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>  Without Einstein, or someone else discovering the same theories, 
>
hanson wrote:
Theories are NOT discovered. Theories are made up, conjured up
models, brain farts and models of how reality SHOULD be in the
mind of story tellers, who fashion to call and label themselves as
Theoretical Physicists.... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.... 
>
"someone else discovered the same theories"...yes very much so
and long before AE plagiarized them, from Max Planck, Pretto,
Hasenoehrl, Mosengeil and a slew of others... Check it out, TJ.
>
TJ start accepting the fact that the German Zionist Diaspora Jew
Return Movement was in high gear early 1900'a. They needed 
a posterboy, which they found in Einstein who agreed with them 
to be put into the limelight & get fame.
Einstein paid them back by him going on a world tour for them,
in 1921, to promote Zionism.... 

SR/GR are political tools, without any sci/tech value! ...  DUH!
>
ED-TJ wrote:
much of modern technology would be impossible. Einstein was
INSTRUMENTAL in the foundations of quantum mechanics, 
and of course relativity, BOTH of them were needed to develop
the technologies.
> 
hanson wrote:
...  which one?.. NOT even a single one!.. None, nada, zero!
___ All technology is trial & error driven____  Duh!
>
ED-TJ wrote
Remember his Nobel Prize was for his explanation of 
the photoelectric effect, not for relativity.
>
hanson wrote:
... and there, down the drain, goes ED-TJ's promulgation
of  relativity, which Einstein himself already denied & 
recanted 60+ years ago (and wanted to be a plumber) 
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR>
who concluded that: _ SR is short for STUPID RANT __
& _ GR being nothing but a GULLIBLE RANT_.... LOL
>
... and the PhotEl effect was discovered in 1887 by 
the German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz, not by
Einstein. AE stole & plagiarized that one too, Duh!
>
ED-TJ wrote
> Tom Roberts, Enstein Dingleberry, 
> ... during his worship of Albert's Sphincter
>
Virdy Mahipal" mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote (in part):
Albert Einstein discovered E=mcc... in THE LITERATURE!
Albert Einstein explained the PEe... from THE LITERATURE
>
Albert Einstein is to Physics what Forrest Gump was in the 
movie that pr vides the blueprint on how revisionists plagiarize.
>
The Zionists assigned Albert undue credit for everything, incl.
AE's blatant Plagiarism, which was so bad that AE publicly
apologized for the theft of intellectual property in 1907, which
was insisted on by Mileva Maric, the Xtian wife of wife-beater AE
who was arrested in 1906 twice for wifebeating with 31'200 hit
on Google... 
>
Hey, Robert's,..  are you a wifebeater too that you feel such
empathy and understanding for your fellow wife-beater?
>
Thanks for the laughs, TJ, and watch now all your fellow ED's
jump up & down, full of hatred & anger .....ahahahahahanson
>
>
Major bigot and nutjacoby "benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> Hanson is obviously a major bigot and nutjob, but that is no 
> reason to ignore what he is saying. Hanon KNOWS SOMETHING!
> 
> People like to say relativity is wrong and Einstein was a plagiarist. 
> Nonsense on both counts. True story is Relativity is not wrong. And 
> furthermore Relativity was proposed first by Galileo for mechanical 
> actions.  By Einstein's time the big question was did relativity also 
> apply to light and electromagnetics. There was accumulating evidence at 
> that time that this was true. So in effect, Einstein wrote a review 
> paper gathering all the evidence and ideas together. That is hardly 
> plagiarism. On the other hand, one does not usually get a Nobel prize 
> for papers published in "reviews of modern physics" does one?
> 
> As for all the Jewish media Hype of Einstein being the greatest 
> intellect the cosmos has ever seen (Just read his biography if you doubt 
> these claims have been made) is obviously something political at it's 
> core. Hanson probably has nailed it.
>
hanson wrote:
Benj, the Jewish Apostate who has "been there", done that &
even got a brown T-shirt... from Glazier... is flip flopping between
agreeing with hanson and then with Ben himself.  Ben was also
told by his G-d, & by the eminent Jewish scholar Harold Wallace 
Rosenthal to use the nail for _trepanning_ himself, as detailed in
in the  epic <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
So Ben, "Get the picture" or "Go figure". "O ya"hahahaha...
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401376

In article <4gjq4cld5qoa0a1jcdm42iukr6jq5ka7oe@4ax.com>,
 SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> wrote:

> With all the ongoing advances in science and theoretical physics, e.g.
> particle accelrators and colliders, ejectronics, there is little doubt
> that essentially all of E's stuff would have been way realized by now.

It was being realised a century ago. Einstein was the first one to publish the 
assumed measured speed of light would be the same, but others were working up to 
it. Michealson-Morley, Lorentz, Maxwell, black body radiation, photoelectric 
effect were leading physicsists in the same direction. The only question is who 
would put all the pieces together first. If not Einstein, someone else would 
have done it within a few years.

Nuclear fission was discoverred by three other Germans. Matter-energy 
equivalence explained away the mass discrepancy they found.

-- 
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401388

je suis charly wrote:
> 
> In article <4gjq4cld5qoa0a1jcdm42iukr6jq5ka7oe@4ax.com>,
>  SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> wrote:
> 
> > With all the ongoing advances in science and theoretical physics, e.g.
> > particle accelrators and colliders, ejectronics, there is little doubt
> > that essentially all of E's stuff would have been way realized by now.
> 
> It was being realised a century ago. Einstein was the first one to publish the
> assumed measured speed of light would be the same, but others were working up to
> it. Michealson-Morley, Lorentz, Maxwell, black body radiation, photoelectric
> effect were leading physicsists in the same direction. The only question is who
> would put all the pieces together first. If not Einstein, someone else would
> have done it within a few years.
> 
> Nuclear fission was discoverred by three other Germans. Matter-energy
> equivalence explained away the mass discrepancy they found.


Please, don't insult my intelligence..
it takes a lot more than
"three other Germans" to
manufacture an atomic bomb.


In other words...
you have to be an 'Einstein'
to manufacture an atomic bomb.


man·u·fac·ture
?man(y)?'fak(t)SH?r/
noun
noun: manufacture

    1.
    the making of articles on a large scale using machinery.
    "the manufacture of armored vehicles"
    synonyms:	production, making, manufacturing, mass-production, construction, building, assembly, creation, fabrication, prefabrication, processing


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html



Albert Einstein had and idea..
to build an atomic bomb.

While he spent ten years
working at the patent office
looking and learning how
people contruct things..

he figured it out.

So, first he started to ...teach,
his students...How To Build an Atomic Bomb.

A student asked him..
"What do you need to make this happen?"

Einstein responded, "You start with Radium."


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401397

On 12/11/16 12:29 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Without Albert Einstein
> there would be no atomic bombs

When it's time to railroad, things blow up.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web