Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400956 > unrolled thread

Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:42 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 15:24 -0800
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:30 -0700
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 17:54 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 08:59 -0700
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 15:40 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 15:59 -0700
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:10 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:22 -0700
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:54 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 14:27 -0700
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 12:39 -0800
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 22:58 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 00:02 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:15 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:24 -0700
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:44 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 13:40 -0800
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 03:32 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-11 21:33 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 23:05 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:05 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> - 2016-12-12 13:15 +0000
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 11:02 -0800
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 11:10 -0700
                      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:26 -0800
                        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:30 -0800
                          The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:53 -0800
                            Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:59 -0800
                            Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 23:08 -0800
                            Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-15 20:39 -0800
                              Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 10:50 -0800
                                Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-16 10:56 -0800
                        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:36 -0700
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-06 17:25 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-12-09 15:45 -0500
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 20:22 -0500
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-12-11 17:17 +0000
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:15 -0800

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#400956 — Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????

In this blueprint for making atomic bombs Albert Einstein wrote:
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


"This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,

and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-

ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this

type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy

the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,

such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

air." --Albert Einstein


In the last sentence Albert says:


"However,

such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

air."


Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????


If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by air transportation?



What size bomb was Albert Einstein thinking of? Or what weight did Albert Einstein did he had in mind or figured out?


can be carried by boat but not by plane???  This guy sounds like he designs airplanes for Germans...



Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact.



The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#400976

Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> 
> >In the last sentence Albert says:
> 
> >"However,
> 
> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> 
> >air."
> 
> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
> 
> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by air transportation?
> 
> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he figured out a fission
> explosion was possible but didn't know what it would take to trigger it (nobody
> knew at the time).  He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes
> of the time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of
> the bombs.


Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg


Do you wanna see more?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#400977

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com: 

> Michael Moroney wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> 
>> >In the last sentence Albert says:
>> 
>> >"However,
>> 
>> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
>> >transportation by 
>> 
>> >air."
>> 
>> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
>> 
>> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by
>> >air transportation? 
>> 
>> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
>> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
>> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time).  He
>> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the
>> time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual
>> design of the bombs.
> 
> 
> Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> 
> 
> Do you wanna see more?
> 
Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like 
something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same 
stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on 
that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he 
may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source, 
given how mentally ill you seem to be).

But in the end, all that really matters is that you're a racist 
loon who masturbates *way* too much. If you take a break, the 
friction burns will heal, and you'll be a lot less cranky.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#400985

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com:
> 
> > Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> >>
> >> >In the last sentence Albert says:
> >>
> >> >"However,
> >>
> >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
> >> >transportation by
> >>
> >> >air."
> >>
> >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
> >>
> >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by
> >> >air transportation?
> >>
> >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
> >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
> >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time).  He
> >> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the
> >> time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual
> >> design of the bombs.
> >
> >
> > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> >
> >
> > Do you wanna see more?
> >
> Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like
> something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same
> stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on
> that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he
> may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source,
> given how mentally ill you seem to be).

The comment the original poster made is:
"After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs."

It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb is he refering too?

I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed.


Do you wanna see more???? bombs?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401024

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58476BD2.C7B@ix.netcom.com: 

> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com:
>> 
>> > Michael Moroney wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> >In the last sentence Albert says:
>> >>
>> >> >"However,
>> >>
>> >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
>> >> >transportation by
>> >>
>> >> >air."
>> >>
>> >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
>> >>
>> >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered
>> >> >by air transportation?
>> >>
>> >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
>> >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
>> >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). 
>> >> He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes
>> >> of the time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with
>> >> the actual design of the bombs.
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
>> >
>> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you wanna see more?
>> >
>> Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks
>> like something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking
>> the same stupid question one too many times, I don't see any
>> dimensions on that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long
>> after the comment he may or may not have actually made (you
>> aren't a credible source, given how mentally ill you seem to
>> be). 
> 
> The comment the original poster made is:
> "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design
> of the bombs." 
> 
> It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb
> is he refering too? 
> 
> I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed.

That isn't a design. That's a cartoon.

Much like yourself.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401063

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> news:58476BD2.C7B@ix.netcom.com:
> 
> > Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> >> news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com:
> >>
> >> > Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In the last sentence Albert says:
> >> >>
> >> >> >"However,
> >> >>
> >> >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
> >> >> >transportation by
> >> >>
> >> >> >air."
> >> >>
> >> >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
> >> >>
> >> >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered
> >> >> >by air transportation?
> >> >>
> >> >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
> >> >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
> >> >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time).
> >> >> He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes
> >> >> of the time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with
> >> >> the actual design of the bombs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> >> >
> >> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Do you wanna see more?
> >> >
> >> Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks
> >> like something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking
> >> the same stupid question one too many times, I don't see any
> >> dimensions on that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long
> >> after the comment he may or may not have actually made (you
> >> aren't a credible source, given how mentally ill you seem to
> >> be).
> >
> > The comment the original poster made is:
> > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design
> > of the bombs."
> >
> > It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb
> > is he refering too?
> >
> > I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed.
> 
> That isn't a design. That's a cartoon.

I mean, i don't get it...this is the way physics draw on the manhattan project.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Los_Alamos_Primer_assembly_methods.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project#/media/File:Los_Alamos_Primer_assembly_methods.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project


they doodle


they didn't go to art skool, they went to science skool.


i just don't get it

You think just because they got a high IQ, they can ...automatically know how to draw?

Believe it or not...these people have to learn just like everybody else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401064

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58489DD2.6D60@ix.netcom.com: 
 
> i just don't get it
> 
We've noticed. On *so* many subjects.

A nice, scented lotion. It will really help the chafing.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401030

edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 8:54:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> > > news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com:
> > >
> > > > Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > > >>
> > > >> >In the last sentence Albert says:
> > > >>
> > > >> >"However,
> > > >>
> > > >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
> > > >> >transportation by
> > > >>
> > > >> >air."
> > > >>
> > > >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
> > > >>
> > > >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by
> > > >> >air transportation?
> > > >>
> > > >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
> > > >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
> > > >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time).  He
> > > >> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the
> > > >> time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual
> > > >> design of the bombs.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you wanna see more?
> > > >
> > > Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like
> > > something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same
> > > stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on
> > > that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he
> > > may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source,
> > > given how mentally ill you seem to be).
> >
> > The comment the original poster made is:
> > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs."
> >
> > It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb is he refering too?
> >
> there were two dropped on Japan, and others tested before that.
> he designed NONE of them.


The original poster did not mentioned about "dropped", he simply said ...bombs, meaning more than one.

"After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs."


Albert Einstein was the *architect* of the Manhattan Project and the atomic bomb...down to the last equation...e=mc2.


HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS. 







> 
> > I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed.
> >
> >
> > Do you wanna see more???? bombs?
> 
> No.


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg


you welcome.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401032

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com: 
> 
> HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS. 
> 
You masturbated while you typed that, didn't you? I know Jews make 
you sexually aroused.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401038

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> news:584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com:
> >
> > HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS.
> >
> You masturbated while you typed that, didn't you? I know Jews make
> you sexually aroused.


Well, the majority prostitues were Jewish girls during Capone days.
According to police arrest statistics..



but Albert Einstein was brought up...Catholic.



So, you've been subjected to a lot of...Fake News.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401059

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in 
news:58485AEC.30FA@ix.netcom.com:

> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> news:584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com:
>> >
>> > HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS.
>> >
>> You masturbated while you typed that, didn't you? I know Jews make
>> you sexually aroused.
> 
> 
> Well, the majority prostitues were Jewish girls during Capone days.
> According to police arrest statistics..
> 
> 
> 
> but Albert Einstein was brought up...Catholic.
> 
> 
> 
> So, you've been subjected to a lot of...Fake News.
> 
I suggest you get a high quality lotion with healing aloe, to reduce 
teh friction burns. Or mastrubate less, but we both know that's not 
going to happen.

And leave the cat alone. Pervert.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401053

edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:11:02 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 8:54:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> []
> > > > The comment the original poster made is:
> > > > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs."
> > > >
> > > > It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb is he refering too?
> > > >
> > > there were two dropped on Japan, and others tested before that.
> > > he designed NONE of them.
> >
> >
> > The original poster did not mentioned about "dropped",
> > he simply said ...bombs, meaning more than one.
> 
> let's see what are you complaining about here?
> 1 I merely pointed out there were multiple bombs, tested and deployed.
> 2 I think the person you are trying to refer to was Michael.
> 3 Well the original poster to this thread way YOU:
> "On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:42:46 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> "> In this blueprint for making atomic bombs Albert Einstein wrote..."
> 
> >
> >
> > Albert Einstein was the *architect* of the Manhattan Project
> > and the atomic bomb...down to the last equation...e=mc2.
> 
> A.E. was not allowed to work on the Manhattan project.
> Learn some history.
> >
> >
> > HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS.
> 
> He made/built/designed/supervised no bombs (atomic or otherwise)
> 
> > > > I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed.
> 
> yeah. so what's your point?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you wanna see more???? bombs?
> > >
> > > No.
> >
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg
> >
> >
> > you welcome.
> 
> No thank you.
> Boring, you get so repetitious.
> ed


It's not repetitious, it's bomb number 2


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg


the other one was bomb number one...

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg



where is the repetition?


Here is bomb number 3

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb3.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#400991

Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> 
> >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> 
> >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> 
> >Do you wanna see more?
> 
> Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by
> Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all
> of three seconds to do.


I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people criticizing his..art? It's not art,
it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead. 

He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what difference does it make if it looks like
a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#400992

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> >
> > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> >
> > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> >
> > >Do you wanna see more?
> >
> > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by
> > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all
> > of three seconds to do.
> 
> I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people criticizing his..art? It's not art,
> it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead.
> 
> He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what difference does it make if it looks like
> a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.


Here is a letter Einstein wrote with his same style designs

http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315520

http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315523


it's just the way he draws...


bombs.
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401031

Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> 
> >The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> >> >
> >> > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> >> >
> >> > >Do you wanna see more?
> >> >
> >> > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by
> >> > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all
> >> > of three seconds to do.
> 
> >> He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what difference does it make if it looks like
> >> a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.
> 
> Now it's just an "idea for a bomb", not a "design". At least you're moving
> in the right direction as you walk it back.
> 
> >Here is a letter Einstein wrote with his same style designs
> 
> >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315520
> 
> >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315523
> 
> >it's just the way he draws...
> 
> More scribblings, nothing that could be considered any sort of "design".
> Plus the date is 1913, before the discovery of fission and when we didn't
> really understand the atom yet, also before GR.
> 
> Remember, it took the best scientists in the US (except Einstein) four
> years to design and build the Bomb, it's not something that can be
> scribbled in three seconds that looks like it was done by some kid.

I'm back to giving English lessons...

to make a drawing, pattern, or sketch of
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/design

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401033

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584851B9.7922@ix.netcom.com: 

> Michael Moroney wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> 
>> >The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Michael Moroney wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
>> >> >
>> >> > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
>> >> >
>> >> > >Do you wanna see more?
>> >> >
>> >> > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design
>> >> > of a bomb by Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a
>> >> > kid's drawing that took all of three seconds to do.
>> 
>> >> He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what
>> >> difference does it make if it looks like a 3 year old drew
>> >> it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing. 
>> 
>> Now it's just an "idea for a bomb", not a "design". At least
>> you're moving in the right direction as you walk it back.
>> 
>> >Here is a letter Einstein wrote with his same style designs
>> 
>> >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315520
>> 
>> >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315523
>> 
>> >it's just the way he draws...
>> 
>> More scribblings, nothing that could be considered any sort of
>> "design". Plus the date is 1913, before the discovery of
>> fission and when we didn't really understand the atom yet, also
>> before GR. 
>> 
>> Remember, it took the best scientists in the US (except
>> Einstein) four years to design and build the Bomb, it's not
>> something that can be scribbled in three seconds that looks
>> like it was done by some kid. 
> 
> I'm back to giving English lessons...
> 
> to make a drawing, pattern, or sketch of
> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/design
> 
mo·ron

/'môr?än/

noun
informal

noun: moron; plural noun: morons

a stupid person.

synonyms: fool, idiot, ass, blockhead, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, 
imbecile, cretin, dullard, simpleton, clod; 

See also: Starmaker

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401035

mo·ron 

/'môr?än/ 

noun 
informal 

noun: moron; plural noun: morons 

a stupid person. 

synonyms: fool, idiot, ass, blockhead, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, 
imbecile, cretin, dullard, simpleton, clod; 

See also: StarSharter  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401036

mo·ron 

/'môr?än/ 

noun 
informal 

noun: moron; plural noun: morons 

a stupid person. 

synonyms: fool, idiot, ass, blockhead, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, 
imbecile, cretin, dullard, simpleton, clod; 

See also: StarSharter   

Shart 

noun. an attempt at only flatulence, but in which there is an an anal release of air and non-air (whether liquid or solid.) From "shit" + "fart". You better go check your underwear because that one sounded like a shart.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401034

edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:57:51 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > >
> > > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> > >
> > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> > >
> > > >Do you wanna see more?
> > >
> > > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by
> > > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all
> > > of three seconds to do.
> >
> >
> > I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people
> > criticizing his..art? It's not art,
> > it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead.
> >
> 
> You were criticizing him for a mistaken estimate of the weight
> of an atomic bomb.
> 
> SM: "Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact."
> 
> You posted the image presumably to show he was involved in the design.
> 
> > He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea,
> > what difference does it make if it looks like
> > a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.
> 
> No one criticized his drawing. We criticized your posting of it.
> If your point was not a criticism of his estimation of the design
> of the first atomic bombs, then what's your point?
> 
> ed


The original poster wrote: bombs, meaning more than one bombs

"After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of
the bombs."


I posted one design of bombs Albert Einstein was involved in...


Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb????

The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent...
the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG


The rest below is for reference...

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/1-s2.0-S0172219005001742-gr1.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/AtomReactorCutawayLarge-aaa.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Lpage1.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Nuclear.jpg



any questions?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#401057

edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:36:17 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:57:51 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> > > > >
> > > > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > >Do you wanna see more?
> > > > >
> > > > > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by
> > > > > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all
> > > > > of three seconds to do.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people
> > > > criticizing his..art? It's not art,
> > > > it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You were criticizing him for a mistaken estimate of the weight
> > > of an atomic bomb.
> > >
> > > SM: "Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact."
> > >
> > > You posted the image presumably to show he was involved in the design.
> > >
> > > > He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea,
> > > > what difference does it make if it looks like
> > > > a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.
> > >
> > > No one criticized his drawing. We criticized your posting of it.
> > > If your point was not a criticism of his estimation of the design
> > > of the first atomic bombs, then what's your point?
> > >
> > > ed
> >
> >
> > The original poster wrote: bombs, meaning more than one bombs
> >
> > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of
> > the bombs."
> >
> >
> > I posted one design of bombs Albert Einstein was involved in...
> >
> >
> > Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb????
> >
> > The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent...
> > the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> >
> 
> A nuclear reactor is not a bomb.


You just don't get it...


Albert Einstein built the atomic bomb. That means *everything* that goes into the making of an atomic bomb. Including
the nucleur reactor, the men of the manhattan project, all that  was needed to build an atomic bomb was was designed by Albert Einstein.

Here you have Albert Einstein's secret design  patent of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb

 The top part is a cut out of Einstein's secret nucleur reactor patent...
 the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design
 http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG


In other words, all nucleur reactors are based on Albert Einstein secret patent design disguised as a refrideration process.


The rest below is for reference...

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/1-s2.0-S0172219005001742-gr1.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/AtomReactorCutawayLarge-aaa.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Lpage1.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Nuclear.jpg



any questions?

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html



> >
> > The rest below is for reference...
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/1-s2.0-S0172219005001742-gr1.jpg
> 
> You call this heat exchanger design a pattern for making a bomb?
> No name on the image, so we do not know who did it.
> 
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/AtomReactorCutawayLarge-aaa.jpg
> 
> A cartoon of a nuclear power plant (looks like circa 1950'a).
> Not signed, but I don't think Einstein made this one.
> 
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Lpage1.jpg
> 
> An image from a patent fro a refrigeration design.
> Not a bomb design.
> 
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Nuclear.jpg
> 
> High level concept of nuclear plant. Again not evidence of the origin.
> 
> No bombs in any of these images.
> 
> > any questions?
> 
> none I expect you to be able to answer.
> ed


Now you're showing your stupidity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web