Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #395380 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-11 00:02 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-12 19:18 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
AI (artificial intelligence) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-11 00:02 -0700
Re: AI (artificial intelligence) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-12 12:53 -0700
Re: AI (artificial intelligence) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-12 16:08 -0700
AI (artificial intelligence) John Gogo <jfgogo22@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 19:18 -0700
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-11 00:02 -0700 |
| Subject | AI (artificial intelligence) |
| Message-ID | <57FC8E7F.1C51@ix.netcom.com> |
I've been looking at the AI (artificial intelligence) industry... and there seems to be a direction that they want to head to, AI...human. I looked at their AI source code and I can tell they are headed in the wrong direction. You cannot make AI Human using the codes yous currently are using... It takes two lines of code which creates by itself a 3d code. For example: you take the first lines of codes 1-10,000 lines of codes... then you start again with another 1-10,000 lines of separate codes... then you have to meld/work both together but keep them separate. That will create the a 3d code...the human. But you cannot do it with just one line of code from a Left side 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem. 2 final: Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me. 3 quit: bye 4 quit: goodbye 5 quit: quit 6 pre: dont don't 7 pre: cant can't 8 pre: wont won't 9 pre: recollect remember 10pre: dreamt dreamed 11 12 13 14 15 . . . 1000 .. .. . . 10,000 key: alike 10 decomp: * reasmb: In what way ? reasmb: What resemblence do you see ? reasmb: What does that similarity suggest to you ? reasmb: What other connections do you see ? reasmb: What do you suppose that resemblence means ? reasmb: What is the connection, do you suppose ? reasmb: Could here really be some connection ? reasmb: How ? key: like 10 decomp: * @be *like * reasmb: goto alike This is just the Left side? Where is the Right side?? You have the zero but you don't have the one. Between the 0,1 there is a small code that explodes to create the human code. Here is an example how it should look... 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem. 0 initial: What the fuck you want. Don't tell me your problems.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 12:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57FE94D0.52D7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #395380 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > I've been looking at the AI (artificial intelligence) industry... > > and there seems to be a direction that they want to head to, > > AI...human. > > I looked at their AI source code and I can tell > they are headed in the wrong direction. > > You cannot make AI Human using the > codes yous currently are using... > > It takes two lines of code which > creates by itself a 3d code. > > For example: > > you take the first lines of codes > 1-10,000 lines of codes... > then you start again > with another > 1-10,000 lines of separate codes... > then you have to meld/work both > together but keep them separate. > > That will create the a 3d code...the human. > > But you cannot do it with just one line of code > from a Left side > > 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem. > 2 final: Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me. > 3 quit: bye > 4 quit: goodbye > 5 quit: quit > 6 pre: dont don't > 7 pre: cant can't > 8 pre: wont won't > 9 pre: recollect remember > 10pre: dreamt dreamed > 11 > 12 > 13 > 14 > 15 > > . > . > . > 1000 > .. > > .. > . > . > 10,000 > key: alike 10 > decomp: * > reasmb: In what way ? > reasmb: What resemblence do you see ? > reasmb: What does that similarity suggest to you ? > reasmb: What other connections do you see ? > reasmb: What do you suppose that resemblence means ? > reasmb: What is the connection, do you suppose ? > reasmb: Could here really be some connection ? > reasmb: How ? > key: like 10 > decomp: * @be *like * > reasmb: goto alike > > This is just the Left side? Where is the Right side?? > > You have the zero but you don't have the one. > > Between the 0,1 there is a small code that explodes > to create the human code. > > Here is an example how it should look... > > 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem. 0 initial: What the fuck you want. Don't tell me your problems. First of all.. if you look at AI like the Eliza.. and you look at today there is no progress! there is no advancement! And they build women robots.. Where is the Intelligence in that????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 16:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57FEC252.1EEE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #395500 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > I've been looking at the AI (artificial intelligence) industry... > > > > and there seems to be a direction that they want to head to, > > > > AI...human. > > > > I looked at their AI source code and I can tell > > they are headed in the wrong direction. > > > > You cannot make AI Human using the > > codes yous currently are using... > > > > It takes two lines of code which > > creates by itself a 3d code. > > > > For example: > > > > you take the first lines of codes > > 1-10,000 lines of codes... > > then you start again > > with another > > 1-10,000 lines of separate codes... > > then you have to meld/work both > > together but keep them separate. > > > > That will create the a 3d code...the human. > > > > But you cannot do it with just one line of code > > from a Left side > > > > 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem. > > 2 final: Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me. > > 3 quit: bye > > 4 quit: goodbye > > 5 quit: quit > > 6 pre: dont don't > > 7 pre: cant can't > > 8 pre: wont won't > > 9 pre: recollect remember > > 10pre: dreamt dreamed > > 11 > > 12 > > 13 > > 14 > > 15 > > > > . > > . > > . > > 1000 > > .. > > > > .. > > . > > . > > 10,000 > > key: alike 10 > > decomp: * > > reasmb: In what way ? > > reasmb: What resemblence do you see ? > > reasmb: What does that similarity suggest to you ? > > reasmb: What other connections do you see ? > > reasmb: What do you suppose that resemblence means ? > > reasmb: What is the connection, do you suppose ? > > reasmb: Could here really be some connection ? > > reasmb: How ? > > key: like 10 > > decomp: * @be *like * > > reasmb: goto alike > > > > This is just the Left side? Where is the Right side?? > > > > You have the zero but you don't have the one. > > > > Between the 0,1 there is a small code that explodes > > to create the human code. > > > > Here is an example how it should look... > > > > 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem. 0 initial: What the fuck you want. Don't tell me your problems. > > First of all.. > if you look at > AI > like the Eliza.. > and you look at today > there is no progress! > there is no advancement! > > And they build women robots.. > > Where is the Intelligence in that???? It's just a blowup doll that talks! I'l give you a different angle... http://ucmas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Left_Vs_Right_Brain.gif Yous have these 'coders' who are all left brainded creating left brained code, left column.. What you need is Right brained coders creating a right column of code that intergrates with the left column code. In the process, the human would be created.. but right now all you have is a bunch of retards writing left brain code and the right brain is missing. You're creating an industry of AI (artificial intelligence) Retards. http://ucmas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Left_Vs_Right_Brain.gif I mean, if you're only working with a half a brain...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gogo <jfgogo22@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 19:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b2379228-8fdf-4567-b391-af6115994179@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395380 |
I would say that the difference between 1 and zero is what does zero magnitude or magnification mean? It means that opaque objects are more zero and more reflective objects tend toward one.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web