Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #395380 > unrolled thread

AI (artificial intelligence)

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-10-11 00:02 -0700
Last post2016-10-12 19:18 -0700
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  AI (artificial intelligence)  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-11 00:02 -0700
    Re: AI (artificial intelligence) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-12 12:53 -0700
      Re: AI (artificial intelligence) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-12 16:08 -0700
    AI (artificial intelligence) John Gogo <jfgogo22@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 19:18 -0700

#395380 — AI (artificial intelligence)

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-10-11 00:02 -0700
SubjectAI (artificial intelligence)
Message-ID<57FC8E7F.1C51@ix.netcom.com>
I've been looking at the AI (artificial intelligence) industry...

and there seems to be a direction that they want to head to,

AI...human.

I looked at their AI source code and I can tell
they are headed in the wrong direction.

You cannot make AI Human using the
codes yous currently are using...

It takes two lines of code which
creates by itself a 3d code.

For example:

you take the first lines of codes
1-10,000 lines of codes...
then you start again
with another
1-10,000 lines of separate codes...
then you have to meld/work both
together but keep them separate.

That will create the a 3d code...the human.

But you cannot do it with just one line of code
from a Left side

1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem.
2 final: Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me.
3 quit: bye
4 quit: goodbye
5 quit: quit
6 pre: dont don't
7 pre: cant can't
8 pre: wont won't
9 pre: recollect remember
10pre: dreamt dreamed
11
12
13
14
15

.
.
.
1000
..

..
.
.
10,000
key: alike 10
decomp: *
reasmb: In what way ?
reasmb: What resemblence do you see ?
reasmb: What does that similarity suggest to you ?
reasmb: What other connections do you see ?
reasmb: What do you suppose that resemblence means ?
reasmb: What is the connection, do you suppose ?
reasmb: Could here really be some connection ?
reasmb: How ?
key: like 10
decomp: * @be *like *
reasmb: goto alike

This is just the Left side? Where is the Right side??


You have the zero but you don't have the one.

Between the 0,1 there is a small code that explodes
to create the human code.


Here is an example how it should look...



1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem.     0 initial: What the fuck you want. Don't tell me your problems.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#395500

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-10-12 12:53 -0700
Message-ID<57FE94D0.52D7@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#395380
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I've been looking at the AI (artificial intelligence) industry...
> 
> and there seems to be a direction that they want to head to,
> 
> AI...human.
> 
> I looked at their AI source code and I can tell
> they are headed in the wrong direction.
> 
> You cannot make AI Human using the
> codes yous currently are using...
> 
> It takes two lines of code which
> creates by itself a 3d code.
> 
> For example:
> 
> you take the first lines of codes
> 1-10,000 lines of codes...
> then you start again
> with another
> 1-10,000 lines of separate codes...
> then you have to meld/work both
> together but keep them separate.
> 
> That will create the a 3d code...the human.
> 
> But you cannot do it with just one line of code
> from a Left side
> 
> 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem.
> 2 final: Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me.
> 3 quit: bye
> 4 quit: goodbye
> 5 quit: quit
> 6 pre: dont don't
> 7 pre: cant can't
> 8 pre: wont won't
> 9 pre: recollect remember
> 10pre: dreamt dreamed
> 11
> 12
> 13
> 14
> 15
> 
> .
> .
> .
> 1000
> ..
> 
> ..
> .
> .
> 10,000
> key: alike 10
> decomp: *
> reasmb: In what way ?
> reasmb: What resemblence do you see ?
> reasmb: What does that similarity suggest to you ?
> reasmb: What other connections do you see ?
> reasmb: What do you suppose that resemblence means ?
> reasmb: What is the connection, do you suppose ?
> reasmb: Could here really be some connection ?
> reasmb: How ?
> key: like 10
> decomp: * @be *like *
> reasmb: goto alike
> 
> This is just the Left side? Where is the Right side??
> 
> You have the zero but you don't have the one.
> 
> Between the 0,1 there is a small code that explodes
> to create the human code.
> 
> Here is an example how it should look...
> 
> 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem.     0 initial: What the fuck you want. Don't tell me your problems.




First of all..
if you look at
AI
like the Eliza..
and you look at today
there is no progress!
there is no advancement!

And they build women robots..

Where is the Intelligence in that????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#395524

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-10-12 16:08 -0700
Message-ID<57FEC252.1EEE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#395500
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I've been looking at the AI (artificial intelligence) industry...
> >
> > and there seems to be a direction that they want to head to,
> >
> > AI...human.
> >
> > I looked at their AI source code and I can tell
> > they are headed in the wrong direction.
> >
> > You cannot make AI Human using the
> > codes yous currently are using...
> >
> > It takes two lines of code which
> > creates by itself a 3d code.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > you take the first lines of codes
> > 1-10,000 lines of codes...
> > then you start again
> > with another
> > 1-10,000 lines of separate codes...
> > then you have to meld/work both
> > together but keep them separate.
> >
> > That will create the a 3d code...the human.
> >
> > But you cannot do it with just one line of code
> > from a Left side
> >
> > 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem.
> > 2 final: Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me.
> > 3 quit: bye
> > 4 quit: goodbye
> > 5 quit: quit
> > 6 pre: dont don't
> > 7 pre: cant can't
> > 8 pre: wont won't
> > 9 pre: recollect remember
> > 10pre: dreamt dreamed
> > 11
> > 12
> > 13
> > 14
> > 15
> >
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > 1000
> > ..
> >
> > ..
> > .
> > .
> > 10,000
> > key: alike 10
> > decomp: *
> > reasmb: In what way ?
> > reasmb: What resemblence do you see ?
> > reasmb: What does that similarity suggest to you ?
> > reasmb: What other connections do you see ?
> > reasmb: What do you suppose that resemblence means ?
> > reasmb: What is the connection, do you suppose ?
> > reasmb: Could here really be some connection ?
> > reasmb: How ?
> > key: like 10
> > decomp: * @be *like *
> > reasmb: goto alike
> >
> > This is just the Left side? Where is the Right side??
> >
> > You have the zero but you don't have the one.
> >
> > Between the 0,1 there is a small code that explodes
> > to create the human code.
> >
> > Here is an example how it should look...
> >
> > 1 initial: How do you do. Please tell me your problem.     0 initial: What the fuck you want. Don't tell me your problems.
> 
> First of all..
> if you look at
> AI
> like the Eliza..
> and you look at today
> there is no progress!
> there is no advancement!
> 
> And they build women robots..
> 
> Where is the Intelligence in that????

It's just a blowup doll that talks! 


I'l give you a different angle...
http://ucmas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Left_Vs_Right_Brain.gif
Yous have these 'coders' who are all left brainded creating
left brained code, left column..

What you need is Right brained coders creating
a right column of code that intergrates with
the left column code.

In the process, the human would be created..

but right now all you have is a bunch of retards
writing left brain code and the right brain is missing.

You're creating an industry of AI (artificial intelligence) Retards.
http://ucmas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Left_Vs_Right_Brain.gif

I mean, if you're only working with a half a brain...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#395535

FromJohn Gogo <jfgogo22@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-12 19:18 -0700
Message-ID<b2379228-8fdf-4567-b391-af6115994179@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#395380
I would say that the difference between 1 and zero is what does zero magnitude or magnification mean? It means that opaque objects are more zero and more reflective objects tend toward one.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web