Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391483 > unrolled thread

Red, Blue and Green

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 13:18 -0700
    Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 14:57 -0700
      Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:01 -0700
        Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-04 12:46 -0700
          Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 23:22 -0700
    Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:03 -0700
      Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:06 -0700
        Re: Red, Blue and Green pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-09-19 17:37 -0700
          Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 -0700
            Re: Red, Blue and Green pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-09-22 11:28 -0700
    Re: Red, Blue and Green Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-04 08:06 +0200
      Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-05 22:49 -0700
        Re: Red, Blue and Green Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-07 00:40 +0200
          Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-06 16:49 -0700
            Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 10:01 -0700
              Re: Red, Blue and Green Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:12 -0700
            Re: Red, Blue and Green Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-11 05:46 +0200
              Re: Red, Blue and Green mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-20 01:59 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 09:47 -0700
                  Re: Red, Blue and Green mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-20 23:09 -0700
                    Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-21 21:48 -0700
      Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-05 22:59 -0700
    Re: Red, Blue and Green astrofoton@interia.pl - 2016-09-07 13:17 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#393290

mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
> 
> W dniu wtorek, 20 września 2016 18:46:32 UTC+2 użytkownik The Starmaker napisał:
> > mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
> > >
> > > W dniu niedziela, 11 września 2016 05:46:23 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas Heger napisał:
> > >
> > > > So 'primary colour' stems from the construction of the human eye and is
> > > > not really a physical question.
> > >
> > > It sometimes takes so much blahblahblahblahblah
> > > to reach the conclusion you have nothing to say.
> >
> >
> >
> > you mean a con artist?
> 
> I mean Thomas.

you mean he double talks..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#391599

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 03.09.2016 22:18, schrieb The Starmaker:
> 
> >>>>>   1.
> >>>>> Art. a color, as red, yellow, or blue, that in mixture yields other colors.
> >>>>> Compare complementary color (def 1), secondary color, tertiary color.
> >>>>> 2.
> >>>>> Optics. any of a set of monochromatic colors, as red, green, and blue, that are added to match or specify the chromaticity of a stimulus or sample.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There above are Two primary colors
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1.red, yellow, and blue
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2.red, green, and blue
> >>>>>
> ...
> >>>>> My question is...why are there two "primary" colors on earth?
> 
> Answer:
> 1.) subtractive mixture of colours above a white surface
> 2.) additive mixture of light of different colour on a black background
> 
> You can easily see the difference on your computer screen, if you use a
> strong magnifying lens.
> 
> Then you would see tiny dots in red, blue and green, which together
> create the impression of white.
> 
> If you subtract the colours, you use the opposite colours called yellow,
> magenta and cyan, (which is roughly yellow red and blue).
> 
> ...
> >
> > If you buy a jar of White paint, (Red, Blue and Green mixed) and you add Blue...you get White.
> 
> Definitely not !!!
> 
> If you mix white and blue paint you get light blue.
> 
> TH


You need to understand the defintion of "Primary Color"
There is no mention that the primary colors are subtractive or secondary.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/primary%20color
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/primary-colors.html

This is the defintion of "secondary color"
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/secondary-colour

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#391724

W dniu sobota, 3 września 2016 22:17:41 UTC+2 użytkownik The Starmaker napisał:

> If you try and paint a picture, using Red, Blue and Green (which mixed will be White) and you add Red to make pink...you'll get White instead!

You are stupid.

The white + red = bright red.

You used limited luminosity, like in the monitors:

r, g, b = 0..255,

(255,255,255) = white (maximally bright by assumption);

then:
white + red = ((255,255,255) + (0,0,45) = (255,255,300) - bright red,
but due to the hardware limit to the 255 you get:
(255,255,255) = white.
 
> If you buy a jar of White paint, (Red, Blue and Green mixed) and you add Blue...you get White.

Bright blue... 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web