Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #386031 > unrolled thread

FAITH

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-06-17 00:33 -0700
Last post2016-06-21 14:06 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 98 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-17 00:33 -0700
    Re: FAITH mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-06-17 04:37 -0700
    Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-17 11:47 +0000
      Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-17 08:14 -0400
        Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-17 05:23 -0700
          Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-17 08:33 -0400
            Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-17 05:41 -0700
              Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-17 09:04 -0400
                Re: FAITH bilgat@m.nu - 2016-06-17 10:36 -0500
                Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-17 18:26 -0700
                  Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-17 23:17 -0400
                    Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-17 20:42 -0700
                      Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-17 23:47 -0400
                        Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-17 20:58 -0700
                          Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-18 08:30 -0400
                            Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-18 06:23 -0700
                              Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-18 09:48 -0400
                                Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-18 12:17 -0700
                                Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-18 15:01 -0700
                                  Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-18 20:08 -0400
                                    Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-18 18:21 -0600
                                      Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-18 20:38 -0400
                                        Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-18 21:11 -0600
                                          Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 03:03 -0400
                                        Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-18 20:16 -0700
                                          Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 03:06 -0400
                                            Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-19 00:53 -0700
                                              Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 03:57 -0400
                                      Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-18 20:16 -0700
                                        Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-18 20:24 -0700
                                          Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-18 23:14 -0700
                                            Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-19 08:37 +0100
                                        Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 03:11 -0400
                                          Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-19 00:57 -0700
                                            Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 04:03 -0400
                                    Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-18 20:15 -0700
                                      Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 03:25 -0400
                                        Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-19 00:58 -0700
                                          Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-19 04:05 -0400
                                  Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-18 23:05 -0700
              Re: FAITH Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-17 13:54 -0500
              Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-17 19:46 +0000
            Re: FAITH bilgat@m.nu - 2016-06-17 10:34 -0500
        Re: FAITH bilgat@m.nu - 2016-06-17 10:33 -0500
      Re: FAITH mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-06-17 05:14 -0700
      Re: FAITH duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-06-17 17:41 -0500
        Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-18 02:03 +0000
          Re: FAITH duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-06-18 11:10 -0500
    Re: FAITH Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:54 +0000
      Re: FAITH djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-18 03:12 +0000
    Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-18 12:51 -0700
    Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-20 07:14 -0700
      Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-20 19:51 +0000
        Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-20 21:59 +0100
          Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-21 00:55 +0000
            Re: FAITH Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-20 20:26 -0500
              Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-21 08:08 +0100
              Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-21 11:01 +0000
        Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-20 17:53 -0700
          Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-21 08:05 +0100
            Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 00:51 -0700
              Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-22 10:56 +0100
                Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 23:52 -0700
                  Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-23 14:33 +0100
                  Re: FAITH Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-06-23 11:22 -0600
                    Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-24 00:19 +0000
                  Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-24 00:24 +0000
      Re: FAITH WangoTango <Asgard24@mindspring.com> - 2016-06-21 14:10 -0400
        Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-21 15:09 -0700
          Re: FAITH Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-21 20:57 -0500
            Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-21 19:21 -0700
          Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-22 08:09 +0100
          Re: FAITH mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-06-22 00:32 -0700
            Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 01:07 -0700
              Re: FAITH mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-06-22 03:03 -0700
              Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 23:44 -0700
                Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-23 11:24 -0600
                  Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-23 22:54 -0700
                    Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 09:07 -0600
                      Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 11:14 -0700
                        Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 12:51 -0600
                          Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 13:38 -0700
                            Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 16:45 -0600
                              Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 16:44 -0700
                                Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 18:03 -0600
    Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-20 11:09 -0700
      Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-20 19:55 +0000
        Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-20 18:16 -0700
          Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-21 11:04 +0000
            Re: FAITH Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-21 05:10 -0700
              Re: FAITH Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-21 22:00 -0400
              Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 00:56 -0700
            Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 00:54 -0700
              Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-22 10:58 +0100
                Re: FAITH Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-22 12:29 +0000
                Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 23:55 -0700
                  Re: FAITH Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-23 14:16 +0100
    Re: FAITH WangoTango <Asgard24@mindspring.com> - 2016-06-21 14:06 -0400

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →


#386086

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2016-06-17 13:54 -0500
Message-ID<kqh8mb1acbd7n965ku6m63q6ocu5askghk@4ax.com>
In reply to#386048
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:41:24 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <ccr7mb5l74dv2f295oh28l7lg0on1iq324@4ax.com>,
> Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:23:07 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <77q7mb5dlj4lg60vgb84g3at41j6l863eq@4ax.com>,
>> > Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >Science doesn't need faith, it has ....evidence.
>> >> 
>> >> Why would one look for evidence if they didn't have faith that
>> >> evidence might be found? 
>> >
>> >Who says they have any such faith?
>> 
>> Who says they don't?
>> 
>> Do you look for your keys on the roof if you lost them in the
>> basement?
>> 
>> Without faith that the results might be better in one place than
>> another, why not pick a spot at random to start the search?
>
>Because the evidence you already have points you in the direction you 
>try.

Whoooosh....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386088

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-06-17 19:46 +0000
Message-ID<nk1k23$1a1n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#386048
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:41:24 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:

> In article <ccr7mb5l74dv2f295oh28l7lg0on1iq324@4ax.com>,
>  Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:23:07 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <77q7mb5dlj4lg60vgb84g3at41j6l863eq@4ax.com>,
>> > Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >Science doesn't need faith, it has ....evidence.
>> >> 
>> >> Why would one look for evidence if they didn't have faith that
>> >> evidence might be found?
>> >
>> >Who says they have any such faith?
>> 
>> Who says they don't?
>> 
>> Do you look for your keys on the roof if you lost them in the basement?
>> 
>> Without faith that the results might be better in one place than
>> another, why not pick a spot at random to start the search?
> 
> Because the evidence you already have points you in the direction you
> try.

It's a "Where's Wally" ["Where's Waldo" in the US] puzzle.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386061

Frombilgat@m.nu
Date2016-06-17 10:34 -0500
Message-ID<d368mbl3ob0ilufs312aib0jolpr50ul1r@4ax.com>
In reply to#386046
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:33:05 -0400, Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:23:07 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>
>>In article <77q7mb5dlj4lg60vgb84g3at41j6l863eq@4ax.com>,
>> Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler wrote:
>>> 
>>> >Science doesn't need faith, it has ....evidence.
>>> 
>>> Why would one look for evidence if they didn't have faith that
>>> evidence might be found? 
>>
>>Who says they have any such faith?
>
>Who says they don't?
>
>Do you look for your keys on the roof if you lost them in the
>basement?
>
>Without faith that the results might be better in one place than
>another, why not pick a spot at random to start the search?

as I was saying retarded...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386060

Frombilgat@m.nu
Date2016-06-17 10:33 -0500
Message-ID<f168mbpuc8adfd7qi77qati7ooln0i1c5h@4ax.com>
In reply to#386043
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:14:04 -0400, Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler wrote:
>
>>Science doesn't need faith, it has ....evidence.
>
>Why would one look for evidence if they didn't have faith that
>evidence might be found? 


we can all have faith that you are intelligent, however until you
prove it you are still retarded

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386044

Frommlwozniak@wp.pl
Date2016-06-17 05:14 -0700
Message-ID<6eba4501-33f3-44fd-9ffe-b641877cdbb1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#386039
W dniu piątek, 17 czerwca 2016 13:47:47 UTC+2 użytkownik Smiler napisał:
> 
> Science doesn't need faith, it has ....evidence.

Science needs faith that it doesn't need faith
and that it has evidence.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386098

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-06-17 17:41 -0500
Message-ID<c4v8mb1mbpeqk64066ci75fp6a81mehq6j@4ax.com>
In reply to#386039
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:33:26 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> Faith
>> 
>> faith
>> 
>> 
>> noun: faith
>> 
>>     1.
>>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
>> 
>> 
>> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Like for example...
>> 
>> Science has faith that there is water on Mars.
>
>Nope. No faith needed when there is evidence.

At one time, it was faith only.  Not the evidence solidifies the faith.


the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386110

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-06-18 02:03 +0000
Message-ID<nk2a5d$5cj$8@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#386098
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:41:55 -0500, duke wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:33:26 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> Faith
>>> 
>>> faith
>>> 
>>> noun: faith
>>> 
>>>     1.
>>>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
>>> 
>>> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
>>>
>>> Like for example...
>>> 
>>> Science has faith that there is water on Mars.
>>
>>Nope. No faith needed when there is evidence.
> 
> At one time, it was faith only.  Not the evidence solidifies the faith.

Was that supposed to be English?

> the dukester, American-American
> 
> *****
> "Mass hysteria is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386142

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-06-18 11:10 -0500
Message-ID<risambd1s9qvpqa9vum07fnp2n2bhjiloe@4ax.com>
In reply to#386110
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 02:03:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:41:55 -0500, duke wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:44 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:33:26 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Faith
>>>> 
>>>> faith
>>>> 
>>>> noun: faith
>>>> 
>>>>     1.
>>>>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
>>>>
>>>> Like for example...
>>>> 
>>>> Science has faith that there is water on Mars.
>>>
>>>Nope. No faith needed when there is evidence.
>> 
>> At one time, it was faith only.  Not the evidence solidifies the faith.
>
>Was that supposed to be English?

Yes, now.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386111

FromTed&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-18 02:54 +0000
Message-ID<VJ29z.2035$gr1.1061@fx10.iad>
In reply to#386031
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Faith
> 
> faith
> 
> 
> noun: faith
> 
>     1.
>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
> 
> 
> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
> 
> 
> 
> Like for example...
> 
> Science has faith that there is water on Mars.
> 
> Science have a complete trust, they are confident there is water on Mars.
> They just have to keep the faith, and keep looking. 
> 
> 
> Science has faith that there is Life on other planets somewhere in the universe.
> 
> 
> Science doesn't need evidence, they have ....Faith.
> 
> 
> Deep in the heart of all science is faith...science is based on faith.
> 
> 
> Religion too is based on faith.
> 
> 
> Faith in God? Sounds ...reasonable.

We have evidence rather than faith, e.g. you've just provided us ample
evidence that you're an idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386113

Fromdjheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
Date2016-06-18 03:12 +0000
Message-ID<o8y695.1MC6@kithrup.com>
In reply to#386111
In article <VJ29z.2035$gr1.1061@fx10.iad>,
Ted&Alice  <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> Faith
>> 
>> faith
>> 
>> 
>> noun: faith
>> 
>>     1.
>>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
>> 
>> 
>> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Like for example...
>> 
>> Science has faith that there is water on Mars.
>> 
>> Science have a complete trust, they are confident there is water on Mars.
>> They just have to keep the faith, and keep looking. 
>> 
>> 
>> Science has faith that there is Life on other planets somewhere in the
>universe.
>> 
>> 
>> Science doesn't need evidence, they have ....Faith.
>> 
>> 
>> Deep in the heart of all science is faith...science is based on faith.
>> 
>> 
>> Religion too is based on faith.
>> 
>> 
>> Faith in God? Sounds ...reasonable.
>
>We have evidence rather than faith, e.g. you've just provided us ample
>evidence that you're an idiot.

well, be fair; sometimes we have hypotheses, which on the
presentation of evidence sometimes have to be discarded.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386156

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-06-18 12:51 -0700
Message-ID<5765A652.2D31@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#386031
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Faith
> 
> faith
> 
> noun: faith
> 
>     1.
>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
> 
> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
> 
> Like for example...
> 
> Science has faith that there is water on Mars.
> 
> Science have a complete trust, they are confident there is water on Mars.
> They just have to keep the faith, and keep looking.
> 
> Science has faith that there is Life on other planets somewhere in the universe.
> 
> Science doesn't need evidence, they have ....Faith.
> 
> Deep in the heart of all science is faith...science is based on faith.
> 
> Religion too is based on faith.
> 
> Faith in God? Sounds ...reasonable.


The science fiction people have Faith that aliens exist on other planets...otherwise how
could they come up with all those stupid books? Certaintly not based on any evidence...

And what about that stupid girl spending fifty years listening for flying saucers at S.E.T.I?


You have to have ...Faith.


Atheist have faith that there is no God...certaintly not based on evidence that they have. Based on faith, and faith alone.


The heart of Atheism is faith.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386287

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-06-20 07:14 -0700
Message-ID<5767FA52.2C4@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#386031
Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.

They believe or claim there is no God, but they have no evidence to back them up that no Gos exist.

Yet they seem confident they are right without any evidence, so they must have FAITH
there is no God.

So you have the religious people who believe in God, but have no evidence.
You have the 'science guys' don't want to mention God because they have no evidence either way.
And you have the atheist who claim there is no God, but feel they don't need evidence to prove it.

The atheist are certaintly the craziest of the bunch.


They remind me of that movie "The Treasure of Sierra Madre"...



 "Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqomZQMZQCQ



"I don't have to show you any stinking badges." The Atheist People




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Faith
> 
> faith
> 
> noun: faith
> 
>     1.
>     complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
> 
> https://www.google.com/#q=define+faith
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386320

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-06-20 19:51 +0000
Message-ID<nk9hgq$264$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#386287
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.

Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386328

FromLes Hellawell <les@shant.tell>
Date2016-06-20 21:59 +0100
Message-ID<k7mgmbt5dmho17o8ndmch7gu3dfajovls6@4ax.com>
In reply to#386320
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.
>
>Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.

Somebody who does not rob banks or expensive jewelly shops?

Les Hellawell
Greeting from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County

Martin Luther wrote:
"Faith must trample underfoot all sense, reason and understanding

Which means that if Luther practised what he preached
nothing he ever said made any sense

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386345

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-06-21 00:55 +0000
Message-ID<nka39f$qto$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#386328
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:59:57 +0100, Les Hellawell wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.
>>
>>Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.
> 
> Somebody who does not rob banks or expensive jewelly shops?

Shhhh! Cough! Hatton Garden Safe Deposit. Cough!

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386351

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2016-06-20 20:26 -0500
Message-ID<vt5hmbhoc5cr2e7of4kochb702ao61d4qn@4ax.com>
In reply to#386345
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:55:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:59:57 +0100, Les Hellawell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.
>>>
>>>Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.
>> 
>> Somebody who does not rob banks or expensive jewelly shops?
>
>Shhhh! Cough! Hatton Garden Safe Deposit. Cough!

Did they ever catch the perps?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386367

FromLes Hellawell <les@shant.tell>
Date2016-06-21 08:08 +0100
Message-ID<2vphmb92bmri0pkpt6sm9dr7p3i39rk07e@4ax.com>
In reply to#386351
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:26:40 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:55:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:59:57 +0100, Les Hellawell wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.
>>>>
>>>>Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.
>>> 
>>> Somebody who does not rob banks or expensive jewelly shops?
>>
>>Shhhh! Cough! Hatton Garden Safe Deposit. Cough!
>
>Did they ever catch the perps?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35315472

Les Hellawell
Greeting from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County

Martin Luther wrote:
"Faith must trample underfoot all sense, reason and understanding

Which means that if Luther practised what he preached
nothing he ever said made any sense

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386371

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-06-21 11:01 +0000
Message-ID<nkb6q6$ahv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#386351
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:26:40 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:55:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:59:57 +0100, Les Hellawell wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.
>>>>
>>>>Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.
>>> 
>>> Somebody who does not rob banks or expensive jewelly shops?
>>
>>Shhhh! Cough! Hatton Garden Safe Deposit. Cough!
> 
> Did they ever catch the perps?

Yes, but not the ring-leader.
All those caught were in their 60s and 70s.
It was supposed to be their last 'big job' before 'retirement'.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386344

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-06-20 17:53 -0700
Message-ID<57688FEE.664B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#386320
Smiler wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.
> 
> Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.


It is very differcult to write the werd atheist when it contains "theist" in the word..a contradiction in itself. Whose stupid idea was that????


Couldn't yous call yourselves Adevil or something like that? It sounds more appropiate...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#386366

FromLes Hellawell <les@shant.tell>
Date2016-06-21 08:05 +0100
Message-ID<slnhmb1ib1m5o0okfgrld8tf3psk5esb7l@4ax.com>
In reply to#386344
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:53:02 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Smiler wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 07:14:42 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> > Then you have the strangest lot of them all...The Aheists People.

>> 
>> Thank goodness I'm not an Aheists, whatever one of those is.

Somebody who is not a theist where a theist believes there are gods
(for some strange reason. )
>
>
>It is very differcult to write the werd atheist when it contains "theist" in the word..a contradiction in itself. Whose stupid idea was that????

Dictionary compilers who tell us that the prefix qualifer a- means
'not'

If you prefer you can just call us 'not theist'. We will be quite
happy with that

Better still just call us 'normal' people. After all we are not born
theist it is character flaw that is usually adopted in adolescence
and in my country the practising theists are in a small minority
anyway making it an abnormal (ie not normal) activity


>Couldn't yous call yourselves Adevil or something like that? It sounds more appropiate...

not a devil = adevil

Are you not a devil? After all you do act in devilish ways sometimes

Les Hellawell
Greeting from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County

Martin Luther wrote:
"Faith must trample underfoot all sense, reason and understanding

Which means that if Luther practised what he preached
nothing he ever said made any sense






[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web