Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #384420 > unrolled thread

Is Something Missing?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 10:23 -0700
    Re: Is Something Missing? Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 18:29 +0100
    Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-27 18:08 +0000
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 12:06 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-27 14:44 -0500
          Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 13:49 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:53 -0700
              Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 17:42 -0700
                Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 17:50 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-27 21:27 +0000
          Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 15:50 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-28 00:26 +0000
              Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 17:39 -0700
                Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 18:08 -0700
                  Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-27 20:12 -0500
                Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-28 01:05 +0000
    Re: Is Something Missing? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:33 -0500
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 12:16 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 22:13 -0700
          Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-28 07:21 -0500
          Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 05:56 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 05:59 -0700
              Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 06:39 -0700
                Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 07:03 -0700
          Re: Is Something Missing? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 08:40 -0500
            Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 07:07 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 07:14 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-28 13:25 -0700
    Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-27 14:11 -0500
    Is Something Missing? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 12:28 -0700
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 17:40 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#384420 — Is Something Missing?

I'm not good at math..

but when I see this:

E=Mc2


it always looks like something is missing.

What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?


What I mean is...

there's usually a bunch of numbers
on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.


Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
lead to E=Mc2? 

Where is it?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#384421

The Starmaker wrote:
> I'm not good at math..
>
> but when I see this:
>
> E=Mc2
>
>
> it always looks like something is missing.
>
> What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
>
>
> What I mean is...
>
> there's usually a bunch of numbers
> on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.
>
>
> Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
> lead to E=Mc2?

E=mc^2 is a consequence of the special theory of relativity.  See 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence#Background 
for example, or the numerous references and links therein.
>
> Where is it?
>


-- 
A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers
least fitted to bring children into the world.... Some are of low
intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely
to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the
consistent combination of love and firmness.... They are producing
problem children.... The balance of our human stock, is threatened...
		Sir Keith Joseph

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384428

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I'm not good at math..

You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.

> but when I see this:
> 
> E=Mc2
> 
> 
> it always looks like something is missing.

Such as an education.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384435

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > I'm not good at math..
> 
> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.

wats a signle?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384442

On 5/27/2016 2:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not good at math..
>>
>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>
> wats a signle?
>


signle = sig + nle

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384453

Sergio wrote:
> 
> On 5/27/2016 2:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>> I'm not good at math..
> >>
> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >
> > wats a signle?
> >
> 
> signle = sig + nle


I already stated "I'm not good at math", ...

i don't understand these highly complex math terms like signle = sig +
nle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384455

Single 

sin·gle
ˈsiNGɡəl/
adjective
1.
only one; not one of several.
"a single red rose"
synonyms:	one (only), sole, lone, solitary, by itself/oneself, unaccompanied, alone
"a single red rose"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384468

David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> 
> Single
> 
> sin·gle
> ˈsiNGɡəl/
> adjective
> 1.
> only one; not one of several.
> "a single red rose"
> synonyms:       one (only), sole, lone, solitary, by itself/oneself, unaccompanied, alone
> "a single red rose"


it's Friday..shouldn't single you be finding a girl to get drunk?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384470

The Starmaker wrote:
David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote: 
> Single


it's Friday..shouldn't single you be finding a girl to get drunk? 

Their Brains have been filled with propaganda, materialism, years of consumerist indoctrination and belief in magic and 2+2=5. 

Being on the spectrum, thier emotional requirements & cues are most always not met or recognized. 

 

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384456

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > I'm not good at math..
>> 
>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> 
> wats a signle?

If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
doubt.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384460

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > I'm not good at math..
> >>
> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >
> > wats a signle?
> 
> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> doubt.
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


your spel checker couldn't figure it out...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384465

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > I'm not good at math..
>> >>
>> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>> >
>> > wats a signle?
>> 
>> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>> doubt.
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> your spel checker couldn't figure it out...

Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384466

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> > I'm not good at math..
> >> >>
> >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >> >
> >> > wats a signle?
> >>
> >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> >> doubt.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
> 
> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384472

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >
> > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > I'm not good at math..
> > >> >>
> > >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> > >> >
> > >> > wats a signle?
> > >>
> > >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> > >> doubt.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jim Pennino
> > >
> > >
> > > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
> >
> > Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
> >
> > --
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?


I think I'm coming down with a cold...GO FIND A FUCKIN CURE FOR THE COMMON COLD! 


I think I'm going to have a headache...GO MAKE ME A FUKING ASPRIN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!!


I think I got cancer...GO FIND A FUCKING CURE!!



Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?


I don't like this planet anymore...GO ON A FUCKIN ROCKET AND FIND ME ANOTHER FUCKIN PLANET!!!


I DON'T CARE YOU GUYS BLOW UP LOOKING FOR ONE. TAKE THOSE STUPID TEACHERS WITH YOU ON A ROCKET...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384473

On 5/27/2016 8:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm not good at math..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wats a signle?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>>>>> doubt.

>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim Pennino
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
>>>
>>> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Pennino
>>
>> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?
>
>
> I think I'm coming down with a cold...GO FIND A FUCKIN CURE FOR THE COMMON COLD!
>

> I think I'm going to have a headache...GO MAKE ME A FUKING ASPRIN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!!
>
>
> I think I got cancer...GO FIND A FUCKING CURE!!
>
>
>
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?
>
>
> I don't like this planet anymore...GO ON A FUCKIN ROCKET AND FIND ME ANOTHER FUCKIN PLANET!!!
>
>
> I DON'T CARE YOU GUYS BLOW UP LOOKING FOR ONE. TAKE THOSE STUPID TEACHERS WITH YOU ON A ROCKET...
>

as Sylvester Stallone would say,

"You are the disease, and I am the cure. "

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384474

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > I'm not good at math..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>> >> >
>> >> > wats a signle?
>> >>
>> >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>> >> doubt.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jim Pennino
>> >
>> >
>> > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
>> 
>> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

Not hardly.

If you are looking for help, and you should be, search for someone with
the words "clinical psychology" in their title.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384430

On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?


   Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
   http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

   More: Why Does E=mc2?: (And Why Should We Care?)
   http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-Should-Care/dp/0306818760

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384437

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
> 
>    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
>    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf



If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes
by L/c2.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf



So, L
stands for
radiation and radium?


and he changed the L to E, to read E=Mc2..


so it is a formula to make atomic bombs, right?


(if i read it correctly)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384479

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
> >
> >    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
> >    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
> If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes
> by L/c2.
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
> So, L
> stands for
> radiation and radium?
> 
> and he changed the L to E, to read E=Mc2..
> 
> so it is a formula to make atomic bombs, right?
> 
> (if i read it correctly)

Now, I don't want to go off subject on bombs..

My question was "What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?"

Looking at the math in this file...it looks very familiar..
that math...I've seen it somewhere else...

Is that Isaics Newton's math????
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf


Did the math originated from...Newton?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#384493

> Now, I don't want to go off subject on bombs..
>
> My question was "What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?"
>
> Looking at the math in this file...it looks very familiar..
> that math...I've seen it somewhere else...
>
> Is that Isaics Newton's math????
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
>
>
> Did the math originated from...Newton?
>

1. E=Mc2  is incorrect, it should be E = m*c^2
2. if you do not recognize it as math, leave all math alone
3. Isaics Newton never existed, but Isaac Newton knew maths well.
4. Newton Gingrich may be channeling this maths to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web