Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #381739 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-15 11:27 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-18 15:26 -0700 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-15 11:27 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 13:38 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-15 13:33 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:51 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-16 13:58 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-16 14:08 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 16:43 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 23:01 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-16 19:12 -0400
Re: The end of a black hole... Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 14:39 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-17 03:43 -0400
Re: The end of a black hole... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-16 17:17 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-16 18:01 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-16 23:55 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 00:02 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 13:19 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:51 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:55 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 14:17 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 16:24 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 15:21 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-19 08:48 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-04-20 21:31 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-20 21:20 -0700
Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:00 -0500
Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 15:26 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 15:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57155DF9.77C6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #381917 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED > > THIS!!! > > > > Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter > clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding > the concept? > all you did was change "rotation" to "rotating"...which is it, is it rotation clockwise or rotating colockwise?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 08:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf5d0s$lbf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381920 |
On 4/18/2016 5:21 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> >>> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED >>> THIS!!! >>> >> >> Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter >> clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding >> the concept? >> > > > all you did was change "rotation" to "rotating"...which is it, is it > rotation clockwise or rotating colockwise? > rotating kookwise, you know, that way =>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 21:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf9dru$vo6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #381917 |
On 4/18/2016 4:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED >> THIS!!! >> > > Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter > clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding > the concept? > Chuckle.... Sam you're arguing with an IDIOT only another idiot would do so hmmm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 21:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <571854F0.4636@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #382018 |
David Staup wrote: > > On 4/18/2016 4:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> > >> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED > >> THIS!!! > >> > > > > Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter > > clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding > > the concept? > > > Chuckle.... > > Sam you're arguing with an IDIOT > > only another idiot would do so > > hmmm ain't you arguing with an idiot?? Which makes you..hmmm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-21 16:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0MWdnfGOZNj8ooTKnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #382026 |
>> On 4/18/2016 4:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> >>> Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter >>> clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding >>> the concept? >>> -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 15:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57155F0E.46B2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #381878 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > i looked at the end > > of a black hole.. > > there isn't anything there. > > > > if you go inside a > > black hole in outer space.. > > there isn't anything there > > on the other side.. > > > > there is no other side. > > > > it's just a hole that leads nowhere. > > > > i don't know what > > everybodys been telling you.. > > > > a black hole is no different > > from a tornado...defcon 5. > > > > whats on the other > > edge of a tornado? > > > > nothing! > > > > i don't know what > > everybodys been telling you.. > > > > maybe you need > > a complete explaination > > of what is a black hole, > > and how are they formed. > > > > and i'm the only one that can give it to you. > > > > but i'm not sure you're ready for it... > > > > to put it simply.. > > > > black holes are formed by the curvature of space. > > > > it's the reason why the earth revolves around the sun.. > > In other words... > > the force of a black hole > turns a solar system either > clockwise or counter clockwise. > > That which you believe to be > gravitional waves are actually.. > black hole waves. > > The waves push and pull. > > If the earth would > fall into a black hole.. > it just comes out intact > on the other side. > > The only force > a black hole has > is the same force > of a tornado or > a > > http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=whirlpool&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=whirlpool&sc=8-9&sp=-1&sk= In other words....when a star burns out it creates a whirlpool in space... in other words...space is a pool.. and the earth is simply floating on a pool.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web