Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380248 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 457 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-27 16:37 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 13:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-27 23:36 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 16:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 13:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 17:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-01 22:44 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-02 06:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 12:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 18:20 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 05:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 11:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-21 12:51 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-15 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-21 19:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 08:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? A Nony Mouse <abc@cef.ghi> - 2016-04-28 10:07 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 10:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 15:44 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 05:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-29 07:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 08:24 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-29 12:07 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 13:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:58 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 20:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 11:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 12:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-03 16:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 19:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 23:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 16:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jane <Jane@....> - 2016-05-08 06:52 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-07 15:44 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 14:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-07 17:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-17 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:21 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-18 03:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 17:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:44 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-24 14:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-24 15:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-25 15:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-26 04:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-24 18:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-24 14:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-24 15:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-25 15:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-26 04:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-24 14:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-24 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-25 15:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-26 04:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-18 15:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
(no, he doesnÂ’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-21 17:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-01 15:34 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Page 7 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 23 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4072gbt7hs3ftpvq7lepjd3uoscl6atnd8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #380771 |
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>>>>>> judged by God >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>> moving forward. >>>>> >>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>> >>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>> >>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>What help would I need if I were black? >> >> Either way, it's going to burn off. > >What's going to burn off and how? Well, I've never been there to report back, but satan says his ways are lock solid punishment. >>>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>>> >>>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >>> >>>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. >> >> You're still a monkey. > >Do you imagine that is an insult? Not any more than you said I was a protocell. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndriku$j3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #380813 |
On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>><snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't >>>>>>>>> be judged by God >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>> >>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>> >>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>> >>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>> >>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >> >>What's going to burn off and how? > > Well, I've never been there to report back, Then how can you know? > but satan says Thanks for again admitting your Satanism. > his ways are lock solid punishment. A hippy destroying your aura would be as much punishment. >>>>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >>>> >>>>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. >>> >>> You're still a monkey. >> >>Do you imagine that is an insult? > > Not any more than you said I was a protocell. A few billion years ago, we all would have been protocells, moron. > ***** > "The Satanic Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q8c5gbt4mjco6c2qsv96sgm7k3k40giu1l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #380828 |
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't >>>>>>>>>> be judged by God >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>> >>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>> >>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>> >>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>> >>>What's going to burn off and how? >> >> Well, I've never been there to report back, > >Then how can you know? God told us. >> but satan says >Thanks for again admitting your Satanism. >> his ways are lock solid punishment. >A hippy destroying your aura would be as much punishment. A hippy can't pain you more than the way you're going. > >>>>>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >>>>> >>>>>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. >>>> >>>> You're still a monkey. >>> >>>Do you imagine that is an insult? >> >> Not any more than you said I was a protocell. > >A few billion years ago, we all would have been protocells, moron. > >> ***** >> "The Satanic Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndv1si$1hj6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #380901 |
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>> >>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>> >>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>> >>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>> >>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >> >>Then how can you know? > > God told us. Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>> but satan says >>Thanks for again admitting your Satanism. >>> his ways are lock solid punishment. >>A hippy destroying your aura would be as much punishment. > > A hippy can't pain you more than the way you're going. You know this how, Satanist boi? Did the supposed Satan tell you? > ***** > "The Satanic Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <966de386-396a-452d-a5bc-62b28837fbf6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #380917 |
On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. True, however, here's the paper published by McDougall in "American Medicine": http://www.ghostweb.com/soul.html He performed the experiment on six patients but two were unsuccessful because they were not set up properly. His scale sensitivity was 0.2 ounce (about 5.7 grams). These are his readings, including a conversion to grams: Trial Ounces Grams Error (v-mean)^2 1 0.75 21.3 6.21 38.60 2 0.5 14.2 0.89 0.79 3 0.5 14.2 0.89 0.79 - 0.00 5 0.375 10.65 4.44 19.69 - Sum: 60.35 12.43 59.86 Average: 15.1 4.1 4.47 Xcel says that the one-sided confidence interval for 95% confidence is 4.38, which means that the probability that the "true" value is lower than 10.7 grams is 5%. Xcel also says that the CI for 99.9% confidence is 7.35, which is still much greater than zero. Although the sample size is small and the experiment has not been replicated, it still is evidence that the soul exists. Is it not logical that if the soul exists then God must exist too?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57036432.3AD4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #380920 |
Gary Harnagel wrote: > > On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > i already provided evidence of this "supposed god charater"... Here are the primary colors: https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/971/flashcards/906971/jpg/colorwheel1332981174115.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gle4L58ROCE/UXFqxbF32vI/AAAAAAAAAFM/dUbIf1uLyAU/s1600/primarycolors.gif Notice that there are not one primary colors, but two primary colors. The primary colors are red, blue and green. The other primary colors are red, blue, and yellow. There are two primary colors...right? Not one, two, right? That is evidence of this "supposed god charater"...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <570367EE.482A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #380930 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > > > > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > > > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > > > > i already provided evidence of this "supposed god charater"... > > Here are the primary colors: > > https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/971/flashcards/906971/jpg/colorwheel1332981174115.jpg > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gle4L58ROCE/UXFqxbF32vI/AAAAAAAAAFM/dUbIf1uLyAU/s1600/primarycolors.gif > > Notice that there are not one primary colors, but two primary colors. > > The primary colors are red, blue and green. > > The other primary colors are red, blue, and yellow. > > There are two primary colors...right? Not one, two, right? > > That is evidence of this "supposed god charater"... In order to understand the evidence of this "supposed god charater"... you first have to understand...Why there are Two primary colors?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5709961C.21AE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #380930 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > > > > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > > > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > > > > i already provided evidence of this "supposed god charater"... > > Here are the primary colors: > > https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/971/flashcards/906971/jpg/colorwheel1332981174115.jpg > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gle4L58ROCE/UXFqxbF32vI/AAAAAAAAAFM/dUbIf1uLyAU/s1600/primarycolors.gif > > Notice that there are not one primary colors, but two primary colors. > > The primary colors are red, blue and green. > > The other primary colors are red, blue, and yellow. > > There are two primary colors...right? Not one, two, right? > > That is evidence of this "supposed god charater"... There is a reason Why there are two primary colors. It might be too differcult to understand... even people in the 'scientific community' don't know or understand Why there are Two Primary Colors. Can you describe the color difference between Blue and Red????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vkf7gb12obe3f8shvil8mp5h9ubptikamq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #380917 |
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>> >>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>> >>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>> >>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>> >>>Then how can you know? >> >> God told us. > >Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? >Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. Neither are your false beliefs. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne10id$svn$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #380956 |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>> >>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>> >>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>> >>>>Then how can you know? >>> >>> God told us. >> >>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>it? What, no evidence? >>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > > Neither are your false beliefs. What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? > ***** > "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne8on6$7s6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #380988 |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: > On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>> >>>>>Then how can you know? >>>> >>>> God told us. >>> >>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>it? > > What, no evidence? > >>>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >> >> Neither are your false beliefs. > > What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? > >> ***** >> "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** Again, asking for evidence, makes the theist run away. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0cvfgb92bu92ovohfd16u3l5usadm1pb8o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381148 |
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: > >> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>> >>>>>>Then how can you know? >>>>> >>>>> God told us. >>>> >>>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>it? >> >> What, no evidence? >> >>>>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>> >>> Neither are your false beliefs. >> >> What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? >> >>> ***** >>> "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>> Pope Paul VI ***** > >Again, asking for evidence, makes the theist run away. Creation, without which there is no existence. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nebjko$1dsa$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381166 |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Then how can you know? >>>>>> >>>>>> God told us. >>>>> >>>>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>it? >>> >>> What, no evidence? Still no evidence? >>>>>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>> >>>> Neither are your false beliefs. >>> >>> What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? No answer, liar earl? >>>> ***** >>>> "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>>> Pope Paul VI ***** >> >>Again, asking for evidence, makes the theist run away. > > Creation, without which there is no existence. Not evidence, merely your stupid unevidenced belief. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kiokgblv4jnltnu3q8cb6oe39juj0jf2ha@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381236 |
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Then how can you know? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> God told us. >>>>>> >>>>>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>>it? >>>> >>>> What, no evidence? > >Still no evidence? Given to you so many times already. If you don't get it, why repeat it? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <333349660481991798.938806ted.smasher-gmail.com@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #381265 |
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>> What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then how can you know? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> God told us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> What, no evidence? >> >> Still no evidence? > > Given to you so many times already. If you don't get it, why repeat it? > Lol. You're such a liar. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nualgbloe000p5fcj95g2n1p0j4hojp07q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381267 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC), Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> wrote: >duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Then how can you know? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> God told us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> What, no evidence? >>> >>> Still no evidence? >> >> Given to you so many times already. If you don't get it, why repeat it? >> > >Lol. You're such a liar. :) Obviously you haven't been paying attention, or you're a newbie. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndjmrj$641$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #380553 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to >>>>>>>>>>your way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying >>>>>>>to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>> >>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>> >>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>time? >>> >>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be >>>condemned to hell for it. >>> >>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. > > You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be > judged by God That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > for your support of murdering The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. > the human unborn. They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? > ***** > "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dt4rfbl4en3msb7it74a70amg959tuj8pd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #380553 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <nv4qfblnb6f9tnf2rfmc60ch8a4h28dh22@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>> >>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>> >>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>time? >>> >>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >>>to hell for it. >>> >> >>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. > >You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >for your support of murdering the human unborn. > As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s6qtfb1pueel5llf85k8292kv5b43ggvsr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #380580 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:17:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><nv4qfblnb6f9tnf2rfmc60ch8a4h28dh22@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>>> >>>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>>> >>>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>>time? >>>> >>>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >>>>to hell for it. >>>> >>> >>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >> >>You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >>for your support of murdering the human unborn. >> > >As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean >nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. They are not threats. They are promises from God. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <queufb970qfk8slsfshrupv29uvpqpkjda@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #380694 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:32:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <s6qtfb1pueel5llf85k8292kv5b43ggvsr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >>>for your support of murdering the human unborn. >>> >> >>As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean >>nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. > >They are not threats. They are promises from God. Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and should be ignored. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web