Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #378878 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 21 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 16:33 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:07 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 06:29 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:08 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:00 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 12:00 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> - 2016-03-14 11:06 +0000
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:04 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 11:37 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-03-14 17:50 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:17 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 20:19 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800 |
| Subject | The Theory of Everything..... |
| Message-ID | <56E5F635.3B61@ix.netcom.com> |
The Theory of Everything.....is God. Isn't it?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 16:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E606E4.5CB3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #378878 |
Greywolf wrote: > > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:22:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > > > Isn't it? > > ________ > > Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts? > > What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is? I just asked a question... The Theory of Everything is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of the universe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of the universe???? If not God, then Who?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dkn44rFc8hmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378887 |
_ >> >> Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts? >> >> What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is? > > > I just asked a question... > > The Theory of Everything > is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical > framework of > physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of > the universe > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything > > > Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects > of the universe???? > > > > If not God, then Who? Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the universe works. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 22:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nc9tcr$96q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378910 |
On 14/03/2016 7:30, Thomas Heger wrote: > _ >>> >>> Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting >>> belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is >>> *demonstrably* false in critical parts? >>> >>> What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow >>> you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship >>> of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST >>> newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is? >> >> >> I just asked a question... >> >> The Theory of Everything >> is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical >> framework of >> physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of >> the universe >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything >> >> >> Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects >> of the universe???? >> >> >> >> If not God, then Who? > > Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as > well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the > universe works. > > TH If HE did do that, you wouldn't believe the messenger anyway, when he explains you how the universe works like mustard seed. See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it. Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high or more! Great things grow from small beginnings. The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you." So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender & Prepare Silver or else...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 06:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dks994FmaluU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #379131 |
Am 15.03.2016 22:07, schrieb Warhol: >> Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as >> well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the >> universe works. >> >> TH > > > If HE did do that, you wouldn't believe the messenger anyway, when he > explains you how the universe works like mustard seed. > > See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever > seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your > hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it. > Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when > it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds > can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have > read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high > or more! > > Great things grow from small beginnings. > > The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size > of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to > there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you." > > So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender & > Prepare Silver or else... Well, maybe the mountain will move if you drop a mustard seed... But I can't tell you that, but how the universe works: https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 This is actually my own version of an explanation. The idea is to connect GR with QM from the GR side. To find the connection is similar to find a path through the jungle in very rough terrain, from which you only know it does exist, but not where. So you need to identify a possible starting point and follow then the path. Since MANY tried the start at QM (and failed), I have chosen the other possibility to start at GR. That DOES work, but it's quite difficult to understand to results. So, in case you interested, you can have a look at my 'book'. It's not really a book, but still a google.doc presentation (of about 150 pages). TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 15:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ncbp6o$6as$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #379178 |
On 16/03/2016 6:29, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 15.03.2016 22:07, schrieb Warhol: > >>> Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as >>> well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the >>> universe works. >>> >>> TH >> >> >> If HE did do that, you wouldn't believe the messenger anyway, when he >> explains you how the universe works like mustard seed. >> >> See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever >> seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your >> hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it. >> Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when >> it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds >> can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have >> read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high >> or more! >> >> Great things grow from small beginnings. >> >> The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size >> of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to >> there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you." >> >> So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender & >> Prepare Silver or else... > > Well, maybe the mountain will move if you drop a mustard seed... > > > > TH Do you have reading comprehension problem??? https://youtu.be/4bY0vcg2F-I
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 12:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E71845.18C8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #378887 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Greywolf wrote: > > > > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:22:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > > > > > > Isn't it? > > > > ________ > > > > Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts? > > > > What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is? > > I just asked a question... > > The Theory of Everything > is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical > framework of > physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of > the universe > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything > > Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects > of the universe???? > > If not God, then Who? In other words... a single all-encompassing that fully explains and links together all the physical aspects of the universe... Is God! Someone, removed the word God, and replace it with the words "The Theory of Everything". A rose by any other name...? You know these guys.. these people of the 'scientific community'.. are always tryin to explain away God, and steal His work. And put it in their name. What a bunch of fuckin theives...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 12:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E869D4.489D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #378972 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Greywolf wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:22:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > > > > > > > > > Isn't it? > > > > > > ________ > > > > > > Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts? > > > > > > What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is? > > > > I just asked a question... > > > > The Theory of Everything > > is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical > > framework of > > physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of > > the universe > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything > > > > Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects > > of the universe???? > > > > If not God, then Who? > > In other words... > > a single > all-encompassing > that fully explains > and links together > all the physical aspects of > the universe... > Is God! > > Someone, removed the word God, and replace it with the words "The Theory of Everything". > > A rose by any other name...? > > You know these guys.. > these people > of the > 'scientific community'.. > are always tryin to explain away God, > and steal His work. > > And put it in their name. > > What a bunch of fuckin theives... Here you have a well known Atheist, Stephen Hawking...who wrote books.. "The Theory of Everything" by Stephen Hawking and then writes another book "The Grand Design" by Stephen Hawking Everyone knows The Grand Design is the universe by a Grand Designer named God. Wats this obsession with God??? Any other books with a suggestion of God besides "God Created The Integers" by Stephen Hawking How about "The Big Bang And Black Holes" by Stephen Hawking Is Stephen Hawking suggestion that God is having sex with Black women??? (or am i just reading into it?) How about "Black Holes and Baby Universes" by Stephen Hawking?? Is he suggesting that He got some chick pregnant??? (or am i just reading into it?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 11:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <part1of1.1.rls4nCbkgou2LQ@ue.ph> |
| In reply to | #378878 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > >Isn't it? Not so much a theory as a way of avoiding any responsibility to understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 21:04 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nc6cmt$gkr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378878 |
On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > Isn't it? > The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein? -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.3-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:48:01 up 9 days 54 min 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 11:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E712EA.103@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #378934 |
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > > On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > Isn't it? > > > > The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein? The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein was only about electricty and gravity, not about everything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 17:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <c6ceebhtc3t8agrr1gvmi2tgcfhmmgbhn6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #378967 |
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:37:14 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: >> >> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > The Theory of Everything.....is God. >> > Isn't it? >> > >> >> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein? You mean "Dr. Einstein." He did have a doctorate, you know. >The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein was only about electricty and >gravity, not about everything else. That's *electromagnetism* and gravity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:17 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ncbinp$c5t$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378993 |
On 3/15/2016 5:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote: > > You mean "Dr. Einstein." He did have a doctorate, you know. > He's still a Mr. not a Ms. or Mrs.! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ncbioe$c5t$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #379199 |
On 3/16/2016 8:17 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 3/15/2016 5:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote: >> >> You mean "Dr. Einstein." He did have a doctorate, you know. >> > > He's still a Mr. not a Ms. or Mrs.! :) > Grammar: He's still a Mr. not a Ms. nor Mrs.! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dktpu0F48qgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378993 |
Am 14.03.2016 22:50, schrieb Vincent Maycock: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:37:14 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: >>> >>> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> The Theory of Everything.....is God. >>>> Isn't it? >>>> >>> >>> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein? > > You mean "Dr. Einstein." He did have a doctorate, you know. He was also Professor of theoretical Physics. This professorship he received through a decree of the Austrian King Franz Joseph I, who made him professor in Prague. (Prague was at that time part of the Austrian Empire). He was also citizen of several nations: born in Germany then Swiss citizen then (additional) Austrian then German again (until the Nazis revoked his citizenship) then US-citizen (additional to Swiss) Possibly he was also citizen of Israel (don't know), since they asked him, if he would like to become president. (what he didn't) TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E718C2.11E0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #378878 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > Isn't it? If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E84357.6B62@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #378973 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > Isn't it? > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. and that includes 'the scientific methods' also. And those who require...evidence a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie) material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty) something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also! Now, that I threw out all the garbage... Where do you start?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E85D78.4139@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #379065 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > > > Isn't it? > > > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > > and that includes 'the scientific methods' also. > > And those who require...evidence > > a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie) > > material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty) > > something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means) > > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence > > throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also! > > Now, that I threw out all the garbage... > > Where do you start? i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of man... Do you know any girls who are logical??? They are certaintly known to be...irrational. Let me rephrase... i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of mEn...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ncbirt$c5t$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378973 |
On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc! BTW, there is actually a compression method called "arc", program named PKARC! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56EA5FCC.4C9C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #379202 |
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > > On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > > > > WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate > rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc! rationalism is just a small part...it is not everything. for example...are your dreams rational?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web