Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #378878 > unrolled thread

The Theory of Everything.....

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
Last post2016-03-18 22:04 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 21 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 16:33 -0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:07 +0100
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 06:29 +0100
            Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:08 +0100
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:00 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 12:00 -0800
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> - 2016-03-14 11:06 +0000
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:04 +0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 11:37 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-03-14 17:50 -0400
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:17 +0800
            Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 20:19 +0100
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →


#378878 — The Theory of Everything.....

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
SubjectThe Theory of Everything.....
Message-ID<56E5F635.3B61@ix.netcom.com>
The Theory of Everything.....is God.


Isn't it?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#378887

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-13 16:33 -0800
Message-ID<56E606E4.5CB3@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#378878
Greywolf wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:22:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> >
> >
> > Isn't it?
> 
> ________
> 
> Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts?
> 
> What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is?


I just asked a question...

The Theory of Everything
is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical
framework of 
physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of
the universe 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything


Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects
of the universe????



If not God, then Who?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378910

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
Message-ID<dkn44rFc8hmU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#378887
  _
>>
>> Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts?
>>
>> What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is?
>
>
> I just asked a question...
>
> The Theory of Everything
> is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical
> framework of
> physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of
> the universe
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything
>
>
> Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects
> of the universe????
>
>
>
> If not God, then Who?

Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as 
well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the 
universe works.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379131

FromWarhol <molarh@hotmail.com>
Date2016-03-15 22:07 +0100
Message-ID<nc9tcr$96q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#378910
On 14/03/2016 7:30, Thomas Heger wrote:
>   _
>>>
>>> Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting
>>> belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is
>>> *demonstrably* false in critical parts?
>>>
>>> What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow
>>> you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship
>>> of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST
>>> newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is?
>>
>>
>> I just asked a question...
>>
>> The Theory of Everything
>> is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical
>> framework of
>> physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of
>> the universe
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything
>>
>>
>> Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects
>> of the universe????
>>
>>
>>
>> If not God, then Who?
>
> Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as
> well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the
> universe works.
>
> TH


If HE did do that, you wouldn't believe the messenger anyway, when he 
explains you how the universe works like mustard seed.

See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever 
seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your 
hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it. 
Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when 
it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds 
can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have 
read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high 
or more!

Great things grow from small beginnings.

The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size 
of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to 
there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you."

So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender & 
Prepare Silver or else...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379178

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2016-03-16 06:29 +0100
Message-ID<dks994FmaluU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#379131
Am 15.03.2016 22:07, schrieb Warhol:

>> Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as
>> well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the
>> universe works.
>>
>> TH
>
>
> If HE did do that, you wouldn't believe the messenger anyway, when he
> explains you how the universe works like mustard seed.
>
> See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever
> seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your
> hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it.
> Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when
> it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds
> can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have
> read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high
> or more!
>
> Great things grow from small beginnings.
>
> The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size
> of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to
> there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you."
>
> So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender &
> Prepare Silver or else...

Well, maybe the mountain will move if you drop a mustard seed...

But I can't tell you that, but how the universe works:

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6

This is actually my own version of an explanation. The idea is to 
connect GR with QM from the GR side.

To find the connection is similar to find a path through the jungle in 
very rough terrain, from which you only know it does exist, but not where.

So you need to identify a possible starting point and follow then the 
path. Since MANY tried the start at QM (and failed), I have chosen the 
other possibility to start at GR.

That DOES work, but it's quite difficult to understand to results.

So, in case you interested, you can have a look at my 'book'.

It's not really a book, but still a google.doc presentation (of about 
150 pages).


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379210

FromWarhol <molarh@hotmail.com>
Date2016-03-16 15:08 +0100
Message-ID<ncbp6o$6as$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#379178
On 16/03/2016 6:29, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 15.03.2016 22:07, schrieb Warhol:
>
>>> Possibly the creator of the universe would have created a mesenger as
>>> well, who is able to speak to the wolrd and tell people, how the
>>> universe works.
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>>
>> If HE did do that, you wouldn't believe the messenger anyway, when he
>> explains you how the universe works like mustard seed.
>>
>> See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever
>> seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your
>> hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it.
>> Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when
>> it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds
>> can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have
>> read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high
>> or more!
>>
>> Great things grow from small beginnings.
>>
>> The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size
>> of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to
>> there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you."
>>
>> So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender &
>> Prepare Silver or else...
>
> Well, maybe the mountain will move if you drop a mustard seed...
>

>
>
> TH


Do you have reading comprehension problem???

https://youtu.be/4bY0vcg2F-I

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378972

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-14 12:00 -0800
Message-ID<56E71845.18C8@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#378887
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Greywolf wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:22:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> > >
> > >
> > > Isn't it?
> >
> > ________
> >
> > Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts?
> >
> > What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is?
> 
> I just asked a question...
> 
> The Theory of Everything
> is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical
> framework of
> physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of
> the universe
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything
> 
> Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects
> of the universe????
> 
> If not God, then Who?


In other words...

a single
all-encompassing
that fully explains
and links together 
all the physical aspects of
the universe...
Is God!


Someone, removed the word God, and replace it with the words "The Theory of Everything".


A rose by any other name...?


You know these guys..
these people
of the
'scientific community'..
are always tryin to explain away God,
and steal His work.

And put it in their name.


What a bunch of fuckin theives...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379100

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-15 12:00 -0800
Message-ID<56E869D4.489D@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#378972
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Greywolf wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:22:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Isn't it?
> > >
> > > ________
> > >
> > > Let me ask you a serious question: Why on EARTH are you promoting belief in a "God" that created very evil itself and a Bible that is *demonstrably* false in critical parts?
> > >
> > > What is going on in that brainwashed head of yours that doesn't allow you to see how stupid it is to try and promote adoration and worship of a hideously malevolent "God" in of all places--an ATHEIST newsgroup? Do you really not see how utterly retarded that is?
> >
> > I just asked a question...
> >
> > The Theory of Everything
> > is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical
> > framework of
> > physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of
> > the universe
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything
> >
> > Isn't it God that fully explains and links together all physical aspects
> > of the universe????
> >
> > If not God, then Who?
> 
> In other words...
> 
> a single
> all-encompassing
> that fully explains
> and links together
> all the physical aspects of
> the universe...
> Is God!
> 
> Someone, removed the word God, and replace it with the words "The Theory of Everything".
> 
> A rose by any other name...?
> 
> You know these guys..
> these people
> of the
> 'scientific community'..
> are always tryin to explain away God,
> and steal His work.
> 
> And put it in their name.
> 
> What a bunch of fuckin theives...



Here you have a well known Atheist, Stephen Hawking...who wrote books..

"The Theory of Everything" by Stephen Hawking

and then writes another book


"The Grand Design" by Stephen Hawking


Everyone knows The Grand Design is the universe by a Grand Designer named God.


Wats this obsession with God??? 


Any other books with a suggestion of God besides "God Created The Integers" by Stephen Hawking


How about "The Big Bang And Black Holes" by Stephen Hawking


Is Stephen Hawking suggestion that God is having sex with Black women??? (or am i just reading into it?)

How about "Black Holes and Baby Universes"  by Stephen Hawking??


Is he suggesting that He got some chick pregnant???



(or am i just reading into it?)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378924

FromMalcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk>
Date2016-03-14 11:06 +0000
Message-ID<part1of1.1.rls4nCbkgou2LQ@ue.ph>
In reply to#378878
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>The Theory of Everything.....is God.
>
>
>Isn't it?

Not so much a theory as a way of avoiding any responsibility to understand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378934

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-14 21:04 +0800
Message-ID<nc6cmt$gkr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#378878
On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> Isn't it?
>

The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein?

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.3-300.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   20:48:01 up 9 days 54 min 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378967

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-14 11:37 -0800
Message-ID<56E712EA.103@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#378934
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> 
> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> > Isn't it?
> >
> 
> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein?



The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein was only about electricty and
gravity, not about everything else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378993

FromVincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com>
Date2016-03-14 17:50 -0400
Message-ID<c6ceebhtc3t8agrr1gvmi2tgcfhmmgbhn6@4ax.com>
In reply to#378967
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:37:14 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>> 
>> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
>> > Isn't it?
>> >
>> 
>> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein?

You mean "Dr. Einstein."   He did have a doctorate, you know. 

>The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein was only about electricty and
>gravity, not about everything else.

That's *electromagnetism* and gravity. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379199

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-16 20:17 +0800
Message-ID<ncbinp$c5t$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#378993
On 3/15/2016 5:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
>
> You mean "Dr. Einstein."   He did have a doctorate, you know.
>

He's still a Mr. not a Ms. or Mrs.! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379200

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
Message-ID<ncbioe$c5t$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#379199
On 3/16/2016 8:17 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 3/15/2016 5:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
>>
>> You mean "Dr. Einstein."   He did have a doctorate, you know.
>>
>
> He's still a Mr. not a Ms. or Mrs.! :)
>

Grammar:

He's still a Mr. not a Ms. nor Mrs.! :)


-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379255

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2016-03-16 20:19 +0100
Message-ID<dktpu0F48qgU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#378993
Am 14.03.2016 22:50, schrieb Vincent Maycock:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:37:14 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>  wrote:
>
>> Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> The Theory of Everything.....is God.
>>>> Isn't it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein?
>
> You mean "Dr. Einstein."   He did have a doctorate, you know.

He was also Professor of theoretical Physics.

This professorship he received through a decree of the Austrian King 
Franz Joseph I, who made him professor in Prague. (Prague was at that 
time part of the Austrian Empire).

He was also citizen of several nations:

born in Germany
then Swiss citizen
then (additional) Austrian
then German again
(until the Nazis revoked his citizenship)
then US-citizen (additional to Swiss)

Possibly he was also citizen of Israel (don't know), since they asked 
him, if he would like to become president. (what he didn't)

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#378973

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
Message-ID<56E718C2.11E0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#378878
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> 
> Isn't it?


If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379065

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
Message-ID<56E84357.6B62@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#378973
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> >
> > Isn't it?
> 
> If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.


and that includes 'the scientific methods' also.



And those who require...evidence


a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie)


material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty)

something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means) 


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence


throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also!



Now, that I threw out all the garbage...



Where do you start?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379086

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
Message-ID<56E85D78.4139@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#379065
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> > >
> > > Isn't it?
> >
> > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
> 
> and that includes 'the scientific methods' also.
> 
> And those who require...evidence
> 
> a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie)
> 
> material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty)
> 
> something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means)
> 
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence
> 
> throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also!
> 
> Now, that I threw out all the garbage...
> 
> Where do you start?


i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of man...



Do you know any girls who are logical??? They are certaintly known to be...irrational.


Let me rephrase...

i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of mEn...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379202

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
Message-ID<ncbirt$c5t$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#378973
On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
>

WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate 
rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc!

BTW, there is actually a compression method called "arc", program named 
PKARC! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#379301

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
Message-ID<56EA5FCC.4C9C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#379202
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> 
> On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
> >
> 
> WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate
> rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc!


rationalism is just a small part...it is not everything.

for example...are your dreams rational?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web