Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376696 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-22 14:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 222 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 15:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 15:40 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Neac <gnn.net> - 2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 09:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 09:55 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:50 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
[OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-05 10:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 12:43 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 14:38 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 10:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 12:00 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 11:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-19 12:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 21:20 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 09:33 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 09:58 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 11:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-02-21 21:09 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-26 19:54 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jstaredits@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 11:22 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 11:09 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:41 +0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 04:57 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). throbbingsausage@gmail.com - 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:38 +0000
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 07:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-26 15:30 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-02-26 14:19 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:47 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-27 09:09 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 20:21 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 19:24 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mara H. <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 13:38 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 23:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 18:22 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-13 19:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-15 09:29 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-22 14:59 -0700
Page 7 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 12 Next page →
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 12:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <e59f9d81-7e6e-4253-952f-12b11ee866d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #379541 |
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 12:29:57 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. It is unscientific to require "proof" as no such thing exists. An observation either confirms or refutes a concept (or a theory or a belief). For example, the GPS experience refuted the beliefs of those who thought that gravitational time dilation didn't exist. Now consider the belief in a God. One subset of that is a belief in a "soul" (could such exist without a God?) So take for example, the experiments of Dr. Duncan McDougall that people claim resulted in a weight loss on death of 21 grams upon death (actually, it looks to me that the average value was about half that, but the sigma still made the lowest probability greater than zero). That means that the probability of the existence of a "soul" is twice as much as the probability that there is none. And then there are the investigations of Dr. Raymond Moody and many others who have interviewed those who have had near-death experiences: http://www.amazon.com/Life-After-Investigation-Phenomenon-Survival-Bodily/dp/0062517392 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real I had an atheist friend who claimed that atheists must do an extensive, comprehensive STUDY before they can become an atheist. The problem with this is that it is impossible to KNOW that one has done a sufficient study, and I think that most so-called atheists have not made any such a comprehensive study, which is impossible considering what we know today about the wonders of the universe. > The unborn cannot be murdered. Wow! So you believe that it isn't a person one minute before birth? How about an hour? A day? Babies have been born prematurely, you know. I think you'd better check your morality chip. > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > > -- > Smiler, The godless one. Actually, you have ZERO evidence to support your assertion, but I have presented observations that God does exist. > Gods are all tailored to order. They are made > to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer. Certainly there is evidence for that, but it doesn't refute the REAL God's existence. All it does is demonstrate that when humans are devoid of knowledge of the REAL God, they will manufacture their own. All you have "proved" is that humans have some built-in need to worship something. Perhaps your not having that need means you're not quite human? Or maybe you DO worship something: "He is a self-made man and worships his creator." - John Bright Let's hope that's not the case. You probably believe that you're more "evolved" than the rest of humanity. Would one who believes that think it's proper to denigrate those less fortunate? :-) Gary
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-459DEE.15334519032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #379541 |
In article <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> > >>wrote: > > <snip> > > >>>You never did. > >> > >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > > > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your > > life style. > > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > > > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the > > human unborn. > > The unborn cannot be murdered. > > >>>>>It speaks for itself. > >>> > >>>>Wrong. > >>> > >>>Your funeral. > >>It isn't my superstition. > > > > God will still judge you. > > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. And if it turns out to be real, we'll deal with that when it happens. Only an idiot would worry about it before then. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <56EE2297.17B2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #379564 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > > > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > > >>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> > > >>wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > >>>You never did. > > >> > > >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > > > > > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your > > > life style. > > > > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > > > > > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the > > > human unborn. > > > > The unborn cannot be murdered. > > > > >>>>>It speaks for itself. > > >>> > > >>>>Wrong. > > >>> > > >>>Your funeral. > > >>It isn't my superstition. > > > > > > God will still judge you. > > > > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > > And if it turns out to be real, we'll deal with that when it happens. > Only an idiot would worry about it before then. no reason to buy car insurance...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <ncmvd1$8be$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #379574 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:09:59 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: > Jeanne Douglas wrote: >> >> In article <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: >> > >> > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> > >>alt.atheism with message-id >> > >><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >> > >>wrote: >> > >> > <snip> >> > >> > >>>You never did. >> > >> >> > >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >> > > >> > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by >> > > your life style. >> > >> > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. >> > >> > > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human >> > > unborn. >> > >> > The unborn cannot be murdered. >> > >> > >>>>>It speaks for itself. >> > >>> >> > >>>>Wrong. >> > >>> >> > >>>Your funeral. >> > >>It isn't my superstition. >> > > >> > > God will still judge you. >> > >> > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >> And if it turns out to be real, we'll deal with that when it happens. >> Only an idiot would worry about it before then. > > no reason to buy car insurance... Only if you don't want to have your car crushed and a fine when you're caught. But accidents are known to happen frequently, not so much your supposed god character. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <k2eteble4c5bcl27km311m43i7tbingjrp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379541 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>>wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>You never did. >>> >>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >> >> You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your >> life style. > >Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. Hint: it's your funeral. >> That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the >> human unborn. > >The unborn cannot be murdered. Then you're saying they cannot be killed. My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <ncmvpe$9la$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #379602 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>>>wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>You never did. >>>> >>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>> >>> You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your >>> life style. >> >>Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > > Hint: it's your funeral. Your meaningless threats have no effect on me. >>> That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human >>> unborn. >> >>The unborn cannot be murdered. > > Then you're saying they cannot be killed. Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. A person has to have been born to be murdered. > My niece is about 5 months > pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. > ***** > "Stupidity is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <893uebdqcppc1lepvn1vu7uv1qd8biferc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379628 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>>>>wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>You never did. >>>>> >>>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>>> >>>> You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your >>>> life style. >>> >>>Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. >> >> Hint: it's your funeral. > >Your meaningless threats have no effect on me. > >>>> That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human >>>> unborn. >>> >>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >> >> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >A person has to have been born to be murdered. Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >> My niece is about 5 months >> pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. >Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <ncp9gf$ab2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #379634 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: <snip> >>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>> >>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. > >>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>A person has to have been born to be murdered. > > Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. > That's why accidents > are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the > human unborn, and you will pay dearly. > >>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>> baby sucking it's thumb. > >>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. > > Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain > waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-E8396B.17544021032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #379705 |
In article <ncp9gf$ab2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > > <snip> > > >>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. > >>> > >>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. > > > >>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. > >>A person has to have been born to be murdered. > > > > Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. > > To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. > A foetus is not a person. > > > That's why accidents > > are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the > > human unborn, and you will pay dearly. > > > >>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her > >>> baby sucking it's thumb. > > > >>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. > > > > Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain > > waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. > > I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. First trimester fetuses don't have thumbs to suck and certainly no legs big or strong enough to kick. They're only tiny blobs about the size of a peanut or a little bit larger. But I see that poor poor dukie is using the disgusting fallacy that abortions all take place in the 3rd trimester. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 21:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <12a74af0-b4fd-4e37-a78e-94b82d04758f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #379781 |
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 6:54:42 PM UTC-6, Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > But I see that poor poor dukie is using the disgusting fallacy that > abortions all take place in the 3rd trimester. Nice straw man argument. Congratulations. YOUR fallacy is that some DO take place in the third trimester, which you are trying to pretend don't exist. Sophistry is unbecoming of an honest person.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <s5d2fbl88nnmku6os7e2jl7h6oj3hflta7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379705 |
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>> >>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >> >>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >> >> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. > >To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. >A foetus is not a person. Is it a rat? >> That's why accidents >> are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the >> human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >> >>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>>> baby sucking it's thumb. >> >>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. >> >> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. > >I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. And that's a death sentence for you. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <ncsbpf$17sp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #379819 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>> >>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>> >>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>> >>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >> >>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. > > Is it a rat? No, but you are. >>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>> >>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>>>> baby sucking it's thumb. >>> >>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>born. >>> >>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >> >>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > > If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > And that's a death sentence for you. Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. > ***** > "Empty threats are the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-D1A3CA.15524822032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #379889 |
In article <ncsbpf$17sp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>>>> wrote: > >> > >><snip> > >> > >>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. > >>>>> > >>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. > >>> > >>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. > >>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. > >>> > >>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. > >> > >>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. > > > > Is it a rat? > > No, but you are. > > >>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly > >>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. > >>> > >>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her > >>>>> baby sucking it's thumb. > >>> > >>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's > >>>>born. > >>> > >>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain > >>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. > >> > >>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > > > > If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. > > LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is > NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > > > And that's a death sentence for you. > > Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. This one is especially stupid since every person has a death sentence. Eventually. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <ncsin1$1ibl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #379896 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:52:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote: > In article <ncsbpf$17sp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: < snip> >> > And that's a death sentence for you. >> >> Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. > > This one is especially stupid since every person has a death sentence. > Eventually. Indeed. We are all born to die. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <kd15fbhbcq7keom3tto7ru403s2mfd26jn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379889 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>>> >>>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>>> >>>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >>> >>>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. >> >> Is it a rat? > >No, but you are. Not me. I was a growing and developing human being form the moment of conception. How could you be a rat? >>>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>>> >>>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>>>>> baby sucking it's thumb. >>>> >>>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>>born. >>>> >>>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >>> >>>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. >> If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. >LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is >NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, you are done. >> And that's a death sentence for you. >Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <ncul3b$plq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #379912 |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >>>> >>>>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a >>>>person. >>> >>> Is it a rat? >> >>No, but you are. > > Not me. I was a growing and developing human being form the moment of > conception. But not a person. > How could you be a rat? > >>>>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>>>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>>>> >>>>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of >>>>>>> her baby sucking it's thumb. >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>>>born. >>>>> >>>>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>>>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >>>> >>>>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > >>> If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. > >>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is >>NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > > Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, Nope. A born person. > you are done. Only in your imagination. >>> And that's a death sentence for you. >>Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <8hgreb1103u57k42p7f6pqvojobasvdb1c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379517 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>> >>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>> >>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>> >>>You never did. >> >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > >You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. > >>> >>>>>It speaks for itself. >>> >>>>Wrong. >>> >>>Your funeral. >>It isn't my superstition. > >God will still judge you. > According to your superstition. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <26eteb5e2i9v6ktkqnp9i24ibmuhcmm9gk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379558 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:20:03 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>>> >>>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>>> >>>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>>> >>>>You never did. >>> >>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >> >>You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >>style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. > >That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to >you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. You don't seem to understand that God will judge you as a supporter of murder of the human unborn. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <speteb5hb6ma4esh77qpfchh2e8vp132pp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379603 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:51:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <26eteb5e2i9v6ktkqnp9i24ibmuhcmm9gk@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:20:03 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>>>> >>>>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>>>> >>>>>You never did. >>>> >>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>> >>>You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >>>style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. >> >>That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to >>you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. > >You don't seem to understand that God will judge you as a supporter of murder of >the human unborn. > You don't seem to understand I don't give a rat's ass about whatever you try to threaten me with that involves your peculiar superstition. After all, it has no supporting evidence and no verification in anything it says. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? |
| Message-ID | <1d3ueb1p55blul4ova2sfdq6b1v0obkbb1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #379604 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:03:36 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:51:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><26eteb5e2i9v6ktkqnp9i24ibmuhcmm9gk@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:20:03 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>>>>> >>>>>>You never did. >>>>> >>>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>>> >>>>You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >>>>style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. >>> >>>That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to >>>you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. >> >>You don't seem to understand that God will judge you as a supporter of murder of >>the human unborn. >> > >You don't seem to understand I don't give a rat's ass about whatever >you try to threaten me with that involves your peculiar superstition. Interesting. We now know you were a rat before you were born. >After all, it has no supporting evidence and no verification in >anything it says. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web