Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376696 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-22 14:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 222 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 15:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 15:40 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Neac <gnn.net> - 2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 09:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 09:55 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:50 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
[OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-05 10:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 12:43 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 14:38 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 10:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 12:00 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 11:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-19 12:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 21:20 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 09:33 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 09:58 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 11:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-02-21 21:09 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-26 19:54 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jstaredits@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 11:22 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 11:09 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:41 +0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 04:57 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). throbbingsausage@gmail.com - 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:38 +0000
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 07:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-26 15:30 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-02-26 14:19 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:47 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-27 09:09 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 20:21 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 19:24 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mara H. <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 13:38 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 23:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 18:22 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-13 19:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-15 09:29 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-22 14:59 -0700
Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56D0B4A4.5DF9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #377261 |
bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > >>> > >>> Are you bullying? :) > >>> > >> > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that > >> suggest that fairies may be real > >> > > > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. I don't know what you're talking about.... I live in Los Angeles, California.. on Santa Monica Blvd there are lots of fairies! I also understand there are a lot of fairies living in San Francisco... fairies come from all over... I won't be surprised if there are a few fairies here somewhere lurking in these newsgroups. You might even be a fairy...God knows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ffc2db10d9tpc6hiilrrnigmemr7sm7o7r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #377263 |
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:25:08 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >> >>> >> >>> Are you bullying? :) >> >>> >> >> >> >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that >> >> suggest that fairies may be real >> >> >> > >> >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) >> >> Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the >> same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally >> ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you >> believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. > > >I don't know what you're talking about.... >I live in Los Angeles, California.. >on Santa Monica Blvd there are lots of fairies! > >I also understand there are a lot of fairies living in San Francisco... > >fairies come from all over... > > >I won't be surprised if there are a few fairies here somewhere lurking in these newsgroups. > > >You might even be a fairy...God knows. oh ok good now I know who all the idiot fucking sock puppets are, Now I can ignore all of them. that shouold mean something to you, the reason you have so many different sock puppets is because you dont get enough attention with one name, let that be a clue, you are a moron and noone likes you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 15:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <582cd022-593c-4202-8697-39f05b41cae6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #377261 |
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 1:16:51 PM UTC-7, bil...@m.nu wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > > > Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. Straw man argument completely full of baloney. You cannot equate two concepts without defining said concepts, which you have failed to do. > they both require the same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually > uneducated, mentally ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural > are real, if you believe in either of the two you must believe that both > exist. You are continuing the straw man illogic based on false premises.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56D13BE6.7EAB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #377261 |
Robert Carnegie wrote: > > On Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16:53 UTC, bil...@m.nu wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > >>> > > >>> Are you bullying? :) > > >>> > > >> > > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that > > >> suggest that fairies may be real > > >> > > > > > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the > > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally > > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you > > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. > > My impression is that gods usually want more of your > attention than fairies do. And aren't local. Your > neighbourhood fairy probably just wants to be allowed > to interfere with your livestock (if they're the kind > that do that). Now, wait a minute here... if you look at images of faires it's usually a creature with wings. It's something that flies in the sky. There are Atheist that believe in Flying Saucers. Flying Saucers are simply an updated version of a ...fairy. Flying Saucers are modern day fairies. People in the old days believed it fairies... they replaced faries with flying saucers. Since there are atheist who believe in flying saucers...it's the exact same thing as believing in...fairies. Flying saucers are aliens who travel in a spaceship from another planet. If you believe in aliens from another planet, then you believe in fairies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56D1C9AB.39C0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #377315 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Robert Carnegie wrote: > > > > On Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16:53 UTC, bil...@m.nu wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > > >>> > > > >>> Are you bullying? :) > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that > > > >> suggest that fairies may be real > > > >> > > > > > > > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > > > > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the > > > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally > > > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you > > > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. > > > > My impression is that gods usually want more of your > > attention than fairies do. And aren't local. Your > > neighbourhood fairy probably just wants to be allowed > > to interfere with your livestock (if they're the kind > > that do that). > > Now, wait a minute here... > > if you look at images of faires > it's usually a creature with wings. > > It's something that flies in the sky. > > There are Atheist that believe in Flying Saucers. > > Flying Saucers are simply an updated version of a ...fairy. > > Flying Saucers are modern day fairies. > > People in the old days believed it fairies... > they replaced faries with flying saucers. > > Since there are atheist who believe in flying saucers...it's the exact same thing > as believing in...fairies. > > Flying saucers are aliens who travel in a spaceship from another planet. > > If you believe in aliens from another planet, then you believe in fairies. Cause faries and aliens from other planets are just made up things flying around in the sky. That means, if you ask all Atheist "Are We Alone?" they will all answer Yes, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56D1E4A8.2DF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #377348 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Robert Carnegie wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16:53 UTC, bil...@m.nu wrote: > > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > > > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > > > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Are you bullying? :) > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that > > > > >> suggest that fairies may be real > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > > > > > > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the > > > > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally > > > > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you > > > > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. > > > > > > My impression is that gods usually want more of your > > > attention than fairies do. And aren't local. Your > > > neighbourhood fairy probably just wants to be allowed > > > to interfere with your livestock (if they're the kind > > > that do that). > > > > Now, wait a minute here... > > > > if you look at images of faires > > it's usually a creature with wings. > > > > It's something that flies in the sky. > > > > There are Atheist that believe in Flying Saucers. > > > > Flying Saucers are simply an updated version of a ...fairy. > > > > Flying Saucers are modern day fairies. > > > > People in the old days believed it fairies... > > they replaced faries with flying saucers. > > > > Since there are atheist who believe in flying saucers...it's the exact same thing > > as believing in...fairies. > > > > Flying saucers are aliens who travel in a spaceship from another planet. > > > > If you believe in aliens from another planet, then you believe in fairies. > > Cause faries and aliens from other planets are just made up things flying around in the sky. > > That means, if you ask all Atheist "Are We Alone?" they will all answer Yes, right? Now, wait a minute... the majority of people in the 'scientific community' are in fact...Atheist. And they believe in aliens from another planet exist somewhere...flying around maybe in a flying saucer. Yet, none exist. People in the old days believed in flying gods.. then a few thousand years pass by and they believed in flying fairies and flying witches on a broom stick. That fairy and witch was replaced in the 50's with ...flying saucers. So, Atheist believe in Fairies. End of story! Fin. Kaput.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nasfn6$h5p$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377261 |
On 2/27/2016 4:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. > I can only say they are of different classes of power and statues. -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 23:33:01 up 10 days 14:31 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313ba02042f8075d989fb5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #377343 |
In article <nasfn6$h5p$1@dont-email.me>, toylet.toylet@gmail.com says... > > On 2/27/2016 4:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> > >> Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) > > > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the > > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally > > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you > > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist. > > > > I can only say they are of different classes of power and statues. This is true--statues of gods tend to be ancient artifacts of great value, statues of fairies tend to be Disney souvenirs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nb730c$ng0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377352 |
On 2/28/2016 1:00 AM, J. Clarke wrote: > > This is true--statues of gods tend to be ancient artifacts of great > value, statues of fairies tend to be Disney souvenirs. > God is about hope, not miseries! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.2-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 00:03:01 up 1 day 1:18 0 users load average: 1.01 1.03 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 14:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ae9de66f-dd36-4931-ab56-7d64cc576ac8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #376696 |
W dniu niedziela, 21 lutego 2016 00:14:29 UTC+1 użytkownik The Starmaker napisał: > If you ask people > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > You either going to get > a Yes or No answer. > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > His answer would be... > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." I have more advanced question: do you belive the pussy really exist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56D122A1.749F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #377282 |
alsor@interia.pl wrote: > > W dniu niedziela, 21 lutego 2016 00:14:29 UTC+1 użytkownik The Starmaker napisał: > > If you ask people > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > You either going to get > > a Yes or No answer. > > > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > > > His answer would be... > > > > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." > > I have more advanced question: > do you belive the pussy really exist? if pussy didn't exist, would you be here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 23:47 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nasg9f$mk0$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377282 |
On 2/27/2016 6:19 AM, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > > I have more advanced question: > do you belive the pussy really exist? > Is your life about sex only? It's fine, not surprising. :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 23:33:01 up 10 days 14:31 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 09:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <62a3ee5f-a594-4dc0-878d-00af53d855c4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #376696 |
On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 4:14:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > If you ask people > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > You either going to get > a Yes or No answer. > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > His answer would be... > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." If the religionist idiots keep spamming this topic to the head of this group, I'll flag it as such.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 20:21 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nauohv$r1g$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377353 |
On 2/28/2016 1:09 AM, David Waite wrote: > > If the religionist idiots keep spamming this topic to the head of this group, I'll flag it as such. > Indeed. Terrorists love to talk about Gods, to lure and find victims that could be converted into suicidal bombs! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:12:02 up 11 days 11:10 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nc4cct$2cis$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #376696 |
just the fact of the opposites tell you there is. Anyone that does not believe that, has to be nuts. black and white. He even did tell you in His Holy Scriptures what was next, and it has happened. Not to mention, that everyone wants a sign. So you see, He has covered all of it, And you ding dongs that cannot think between the eyes still believe in the little g backwards self made god.... Wow, just cannot believe you would even ask such a question, and think you would get a yes or no answer from me? Why don't you try to study with a real bible, instead of a fake one. And just maybe, you will find the twin towers that the devil took down inside it.... http://www.truecarpentry.org/tccwww/cathwww/dogma/catholicbooks/HolyBible/titlepg.htm On 2/20/2016 3:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > If you ask people > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > You either going to get > a Yes or No answer. > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > His answer would be... > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 19:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nc4eq5$a09$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378859 |
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 11:43:48 -0700, tesla sTinker wrote: > just the fact of the opposites tell you there is. How so? > Anyone that does not believe that, has to be nuts. Merely your worthless opinion. > black and white. > He even did tell you in His Holy Scriptures what was next, and it has > happened. Your evidence for that belief is what? > Not to mention, that everyone wants a sign. I'll give you one using my fingers. > So you see, He has covered all of it, Only in your stupid beliefs. > And you ding dongs that cannot think between the eyes still believe in > the little g backwards self made god.... Nope. It's a man-made god, as are all of them. > Wow, just cannot believe you > would even ask such a question, and think you would get a yes or no > answer from me? We didn't expect a sensible answer from you, and we weren't disappointed. > Why don't you try to study with a real bible, instead of a fake one. Since when has reading been believing? <bible babble snipped> -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mara H. <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 13:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <0cgbebdt39hc17fvbg42j951vk0ijpei8r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #378863 |
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:24:53 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >Nope. It's a man-made god, as are all of them. And you can back this up how? > >> Wow, just cannot believe you >> would even ask such a question, and think you would get a yes or no >> answer from me? > >We didn't expect a sensible answer from you, and we weren't disappointed. <TINW>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 23:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nc4suv$tve$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378864 |
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:38:06 -0600, Mara H. wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:24:53 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >>Nope. It's a man-made god, as are all of them. > > And you can back this up how? I've no need to back up "I don't believe you." -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 18:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0cf43064-4cff-4317-a7e9-500e3026ae9e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378885 |
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 5:26:33 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:38:06 -0600, Mara H. wrote: > > > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:24:53 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > > wrote: > > > > >Nope. It's a man-made god, as are all of them. > > > > And you can back this up how? > > I've no need to back up "I don't believe you." But that's not what you claimed: you ASSERTED that all gods are man-made. That requires back up. "You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion." -- Harlan Ellison So where is the information that justifies your assertion? Gary
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 19:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <dkmj8gF8ijoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378859 |
tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> wrote:
>Why don't you try to study with a real
>bible, instead of a fake one. And just maybe,
>you will find the twin towers that the devil took down
>inside it....
>
>http://www.truecarpentry.org/tccwww/cathwww/dogma/catholicbooks/HolyBible/titlepg.htm
While I acknowledge your recommendation of a suitable book for the
Science Fiction group, I feel that I may be unlikely to read much more
of it than I already did. I read a chapter ("book" in the internal
terminology) and a couple of chapters of the sequel, and it wasn't to
my liking. I'm more into the SF than Fantasy books.
--
We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web