Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376151 > unrolled thread

I'm seriously disappointed

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  I'm seriously disappointed Dan Tilque <dtilque@frontier.com> - 2016-02-12 22:11 -0800
    Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 14:45 -0800
      Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 14:46 -0800
        Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 16:28 -0800
          Re: I'm seriously disappointed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:43 -0500
            Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-15 08:52 -0800
              Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-15 23:09 -0800
                Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0800
                  Re: I'm seriously disappointed Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-02-18 08:55 +0800
                    Re: I'm seriously disappointed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:27 -0500
      Re: I'm seriously disappointed Dan Tilque <dtilque@frontier.com> - 2016-02-15 17:48 -0800
    Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 23:41 -0800

#376151 — I'm seriously disappointed

I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational 
wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written, 
which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still 
disappointed he didn't post it here.

Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!

-- 
Dan Tilque

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#376243

Dan Tilque wrote:
> 
> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
> which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
> disappointed he didn't post it here.
> 
> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> 
> --
> Dan Tilque


In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.


Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.



I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...


I don't disparage that which I already discovered..



The Starmaker



You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376244

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Dan Tilque wrote:
> >
> > I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> > wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
> > which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
> > disappointed he didn't post it here.
> >
> > Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> >
> > --
> > Dan Tilque
> 
> In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
> 
> Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.
> 
> I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...
> 
> I don't disparage that which I already discovered..
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?


electrogravity
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.arts.sf.written/12gvbjCbEQ0/myQHpiDOaQgJ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376246

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Dan Tilque wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> > > wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
> > > which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
> > > disappointed he didn't post it here.
> > >
> > > Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dan Tilque
> >
> > In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
> >
> > Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.
> >
> > I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...
> >
> > I don't disparage that which I already discovered..
> >
> > The Starmaker
> >
> > You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?
> 
> electrogravity
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.arts.sf.written/12gvbjCbEQ0/myQHpiDOaQgJ



...most people don't understand the relationship between electricity and gravity.


both act like charges..like light waves..photons.

Light comes from gravity...not the sun.


The sun maunfactures light, but gets it source from gravity.

Gravity keep the speed of light from going faster than the speed of light.


If an apple hits you on the head, what controls the speed of the apple from the tree to your head? The same thing that controls the speed of light, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376252

On 02/14/2016 07:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan Tilque wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
>>>> wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
>>>> which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
>>>> disappointed he didn't post it here.
>>>>
>>>> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dan Tilque
>>>
>>> In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
>>>
>>> Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.
>>>
>>> I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...
>>>
>>> I don't disparage that which I already discovered..
>>>
>>> The Starmaker
>>>
>>> You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?
>>
>> electrogravity
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.arts.sf.written/12gvbjCbEQ0/myQHpiDOaQgJ
>
>
>
> ...most people don't understand the relationship between electricity and gravity.
>
>
> both act like charges..like light waves..photons.
>
> Light comes from gravity...not the sun.
>
>
> The sun maunfactures light, but gets it source from gravity.
>
> Gravity keep the speed of light from going faster than the speed of light.
>
>
> If an apple hits you on the head, what controls the speed of the apple from the tree to your head? The same thing that controls the speed of light, right?
>

Starfaker you are seriously an idiot. Have you been stealing "theories" 
from Glazier again?

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376272

benj wrote:
> 
> On 02/14/2016 07:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dan Tilque wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> >>>> wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
> >>>> which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
> >>>> disappointed he didn't post it here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dan Tilque
> >>>
> >>> In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
> >>>
> >>> Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...
> >>>
> >>> I don't disparage that which I already discovered..
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker
> >>>
> >>> You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?
> >>
> >> electrogravity
> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.arts.sf.written/12gvbjCbEQ0/myQHpiDOaQgJ
> >
> >
> >
> > ...most people don't understand the relationship between electricity and gravity.
> >
> >
> > both act like charges..like light waves..photons.
> >
> > Light comes from gravity...not the sun.
> >
> >
> > The sun maunfactures light, but gets it source from gravity.
> >
> > Gravity keep the speed of light from going faster than the speed of light.
> >
> >
> > If an apple hits you on the head, what controls the speed of the apple from the tree to your head? The same thing that controls the speed of light, right?
> >
> 
> Starfaker you are seriously an idiot. Have you been stealing "theories"
> from Glazier again?


I understand your 'drive-by' answers...it shows you don't know much about anything.


Gravity determines what the speed of light should be..to the exact decimal.

Gravity also makes it rain...


with me, the Science I know.. contain no mysteries.

Without mystery...your Science ...would end the continuing supply
funds.


So, your Science.. depends on creating mystery where none exist...to ensure the continuing supply
of funds.



Without mystery, you guys would be selling hot dogs..to ensure the continuing supply
of funds.

Try attending a hamburger university..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376310

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> benj wrote:
> >
> > On 02/14/2016 07:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Dan Tilque wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> > >>>> wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
> > >>>> which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
> > >>>> disappointed he didn't post it here.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Dan Tilque
> > >>>
> > >>> In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't disparage that which I already discovered..
> > >>>
> > >>> The Starmaker
> > >>>
> > >>> You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?
> > >>
> > >> electrogravity
> > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.arts.sf.written/12gvbjCbEQ0/myQHpiDOaQgJ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ...most people don't understand the relationship between electricity and gravity.
> > >
> > >
> > > both act like charges..like light waves..photons.
> > >
> > > Light comes from gravity...not the sun.
> > >
> > >
> > > The sun maunfactures light, but gets it source from gravity.
> > >
> > > Gravity keep the speed of light from going faster than the speed of light.
> > >
> > >
> > > If an apple hits you on the head, what controls the speed of the apple from the tree to your head? The same thing that controls the speed of light, right?
> > >
> >
> > Starfaker you are seriously an idiot. Have you been stealing "theories"
> > from Glazier again?
> 
> I understand your 'drive-by' answers...it shows you don't know much about anything.
> 
> Gravity determines what the speed of light should be..to the exact decimal.
> 
> Gravity also makes it rain...


I forgot to add...Gravity also controls the flow of time. 


Gravity keeps Time from moving too quickly...


Have you ever seen Gravity used in clocks????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376382

Quadibloc wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 12:09:11 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > Have you ever seen Gravity used in clocks????
> 
> Yes. The kind with a pendulum.
> 
> John Savard



I was thinking of those glass clocks with sand in it, you turn upside down and gravity starts the time mechanism.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376423

On 17/02/2016 2:33 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
> Quadibloc wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 12:09:11 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> Have you ever seen Gravity used in clocks????
>>
>> Yes. The kind with a pendulum.
>>
>> John Savard
>
>
>
> I was thinking of those glass clocks with sand in it, you turn upside down and gravity starts the time mechanism.
>

The batteries don't usually last more than an hour or so. I used to have 
one that only lasted 3 minutes. Badly underpowered.

-- 
Robert B. born England a long time ago;
Western Australia since 1972

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376433

On 02/17/2016 07:55 PM, Robert Bannister wrote:
> On 17/02/2016 2:33 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Quadibloc wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 12:09:11 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have you ever seen Gravity used in clocks????
>>>
>>> Yes. The kind with a pendulum.
>>>
>>> John Savard
>>
>>
>>
>> I was thinking of those glass clocks with sand in it, you turn upside
>> down and gravity starts the time mechanism.
>>
>
> The batteries don't usually last more than an hour or so. I used to have
> one that only lasted 3 minutes. Badly underpowered.

Isn't it amazing that chaos can be used as a clock?



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376300

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> 
> In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
> 
> 
> Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.

but it rarely votes in elections.

-- 
Dan Tilque

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376256

Dan Tilque wrote:
> 
> Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > On Saturday, 13 February 2016 06:12:43 UTC, Dan Tilque  wrote:
> >> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> >> wave discovery. ...
> >>
> >> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> >
> > You missed it.  Title, "Whoop."
> 
> Yes, I did miss that. Title was too vague.
> 
> >
> > There isn't the usual blank-verse commentary - if you don't
> > count the subject line itself.
> 
> Very anemic on his part. Come on man, if you're going to be an
> anti-science head-in-the-sand Luddite, put a little effort into it.
> 
> --
> Dan Tilque


Isn't  rec.arts.sf.written anti-science???? ...with a little effort into
it.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web