Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #371586 > unrolled thread

There Is No Edge To The Universe

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
Last post2016-01-06 15:12 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 123 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:17 +0000
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:54 -0500
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:57 +0000
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-08 19:15 -0600
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:27 -0600
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 07:20 +0100
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:56 -0600
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-09 15:11 +0000
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:38 +0000
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:41 -0600
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:51 +0000
                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:54 -0600
                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 17:00 +0000
                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:35 -0600
                          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 18:52 +0000
                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 13:01 -0600
                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 22:15 +0100
                                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 15:35 -0600
                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 21:55 +0000
                                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 15:59 -0600
                                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 22:13 +0000
                                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 20:35 -0600
                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-10 15:33 +0000
                                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 01:20 -0500
                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-10 08:37 +0100
                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 16:07 -0600
                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800
                                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600
                                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800
                                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:51 -0600
                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 22:06 -0800
                                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-09 22:51 -0800
                                          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 00:04 -0800
                                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:32 -0600
                                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:29 -0800
                                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:02 -0800
                                                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-11 07:48 +0100
                                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-11 13:54 -0800
                                                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:55 -0600
                                                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 07:54 +0100
                                                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 09:16 -0600
                                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 19:47 +0100
                                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-12-13 09:06 +0100
                                                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 07:01 -0500
                                                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-13 19:16 -0800
                                                          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-14 06:35 +0100
                                                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-14 09:09 -0800
                                                              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-15 04:25 +0100
                                                                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-19 07:14 -0800
                                                                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 06:03 +0100
                                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
                                                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800
                                                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-12 17:46 -0800
                                                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-17 18:31 -0800
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:26 -0600
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:38 +0000
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:40 -0600
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:44 +0000
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:52 -0600
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 17:27 +0000
                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:37 -0600
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-18 06:45 -0600
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0800
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:35 -0800
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 16:12 -0600
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 14:28 -0600
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 17:42 -0800
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800
                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800
                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600
                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:47 -0600
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:40 +0000
    There Is No Edge To The Universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-09 09:38 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 12:26 -0600
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 09:52 -0600
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-10 16:01 +0000
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-10 08:51 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-10 17:31 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-11 17:12 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800
      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 23:14 -0800
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 07:57 -0600
          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 11:00 -0800
            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 22:13 -0800
              Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 16:52 -0800
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-20 16:54 -0800
                Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-25 08:40 -0800
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 23:01 -0800
                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:20 -0800
                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 12:31 -0600
                        Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 11:31 -0800
                          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 14:19 -0600
                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 13:37 -0800
                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-29 21:46 +0000
                          Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-29 13:13 -0800
                            Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 13:34 -0800
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 18:14 -0800
                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-03 22:52 -0800
                      Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 13:28 -0800
                  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-06 12:23 -0800
                    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:12 -0600

Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  Next page →


#372276

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
Message-ID<5673532F.2DD8@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372273
The Starmaker wrote:

> 
> Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> 
> Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> Nobody!
> 
> Why is that?
> 
> Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> 
> My IQ must be in the trillions...


I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html




Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg



This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!


You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!



it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!


You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.

You have no idea.


I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!! 


I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.

I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.


You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.


There is a reason why I'm...


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372292

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
Message-ID<5673AE92.23F9@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372276
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> >
> > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> >
> > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > Nobody!
> >
> > Why is that?
> >
> > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> >
> > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> 
> I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> 
> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> 
> Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> 
> You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> 
> it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> 
> You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> 
> You have no idea.
> 
> I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> 
> I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> 
> I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> 
> You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> 
> There is a reason why I'm...
> 
> The Starmaker





I'll help some of yous out here...

If you go to Google
then click Images
then click the camera icon in the search bar
then
Paste image URL

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg

You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.

(even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)



The Starmaker



I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.

What you see here is...
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg


what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
less time than that.



Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372293

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-17 23:14 -0800
Message-ID<5673B241.1ED6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372292
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > >
> > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > Nobody!
> > >
> > > Why is that?
> > >
> > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > >
> > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> >
> > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> >
> > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> >
> > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> >
> > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> >
> > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> >
> > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> >
> > You have no idea.
> >
> > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> >
> > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> >
> > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> >
> > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> >
> > There is a reason why I'm...
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> I'll help some of yous out here...
> 
> If you go to Google
> then click Images
> then click the camera icon in the search bar
> then
> Paste image URL
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> 
> (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> 
> What you see here is...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> less time than that.
> 
> Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'



I look
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg

and I see many things...

I see a center..

a center of a universe

and I see an edge...
every star at the edge is complete and uncropped.

I see 4 dimensions...

I wonder what those green stars are? (i'm still working on it)

There are some mysteries I'm still working on....
there is something ...'quantum' about the green stars...

in other words...the green stars would not let me take a picture of it...
so, i had to find a work around...but that is just meaningless details i don't want to bother you with...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372306

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-18 07:57 -0600
Message-ID<kbOdnbGuV7JOjenLnZ2dnUU7-XednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#372292
On 12/18/15 12:58 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.


   Then you should at least try to get the physics correct.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372323

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-18 11:00 -0800
Message-ID<567457D3.3882@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372292
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > >
> > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > Nobody!
> > >
> > > Why is that?
> > >
> > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > >
> > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> >
> > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> >
> > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> >
> > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> >
> > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> >
> > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> >
> > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> >
> > You have no idea.
> >
> > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> >
> > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> >
> > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> >
> > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> >
> > There is a reason why I'm...
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> I'll help some of yous out here...
> 
> If you go to Google
> then click Images
> then click the camera icon in the search bar
> then
> Paste image URL
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> 
> (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> 
> What you see here is...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> less time than that.
> 
> Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'


Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg


One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.


But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....


there is an edge
beyond the dark

and beyond that
dark edge
is
light...

very similar
to what a fish
sees if he 
leaves his
ocean floor...
another world.




The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372347

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-18 22:13 -0800
Message-ID<5674F587.1881@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372323
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > >
> > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Nobody!
> > > >
> > > > Why is that?
> > > >
> > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > >
> > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > >
> > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > >
> > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > >
> > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > >
> > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > >
> > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > >
> > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > >
> > > You have no idea.
> > >
> > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > >
> > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > >
> > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > >
> > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > >
> > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> >
> > I'll help some of yous out here...
> >
> > If you go to Google
> > then click Images
> > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > then
> > Paste image URL
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> >
> > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> >
> > The Starmaker
> >
> > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> >
> > What you see here is...
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > less time than that.
> >
> > Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> 
> Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> 
> But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> 
> there is an edge
> beyond the dark
> 
> and beyond that
> dark edge
> is
> light...
> 
> very similar
> to what a fish
> sees if he
> leaves his
> ocean floor...
> another world.
> 
> The Starmaker


In other words to make it clearer...

beyond the night sky 

surrounding the stars

if you go past

the dark night sky

there lies

the mechanism

to what makes

stars.


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372470

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-20 16:52 -0800
Message-ID<567745D2.74FB@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372347
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > Nobody!
> > > > >
> > > > > Why is that?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > >
> > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > >
> > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > >
> > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > >
> > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > >
> > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > >
> > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > >
> > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > >
> > > > You have no idea.
> > > >
> > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > >
> > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > >
> > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > >
> > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > >
> > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > >
> > > If you go to Google
> > > then click Images
> > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > then
> > > Paste image URL
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > >
> > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > >
> > > What you see here is...
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > less time than that.
> > >
> > > Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> >
> > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> >
> > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> >
> > there is an edge
> > beyond the dark
> >
> > and beyond that
> > dark edge
> > is
> > light...
> >
> > very similar
> > to what a fish
> > sees if he
> > leaves his
> > ocean floor...
> > another world.
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> In other words to make it clearer...
> 
> beyond the night sky
> 
> surrounding the stars
> 
> if you go past
> 
> the dark night sky
> 
> there lies
> 
> the mechanism
> 
> to what makes
> 
> stars.
> 
> The Starmaker



Now, it's pretty far away....
really far away,,
hard to catch up with
since it's probably
moving faster than the speed of light..

but, once you get past the ocean edge of
space...
you will find
another world.

No different from what a fish sees.

But, what you need is...proof.

Otherwise, everything I tell you 
you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.


Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg

Have you've seen anything like it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372471

FromJohn Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com>
Date2015-12-20 16:54 -0800
Message-ID<c9b86b76-a8f1-4dc5-becc-5966d93faac5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#372470
On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 6:52:03 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nobody!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why is that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > > >
> > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > > >
> > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > > >
> > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > > >
> > > > > You have no idea.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > > >
> > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > > >
> > > > If you go to Google
> > > > then click Images
> > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > > then
> > > > Paste image URL
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > > >
> > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > > >
> > > > What you see here is...
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > > less time than that.
> > > >
> > > > Carl Sagan -- 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> > >
> > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> > >
> > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> > >
> > > there is an edge
> > > beyond the dark
> > >
> > > and beyond that
> > > dark edge
> > > is
> > > light...
> > >
> > > very similar
> > > to what a fish
> > > sees if he
> > > leaves his
> > > ocean floor...
> > > another world.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > 
> > In other words to make it clearer...
> > 
> > beyond the night sky
> > 
> > surrounding the stars
> > 
> > if you go past
> > 
> > the dark night sky
> > 
> > there lies
> > 
> > the mechanism
> > 
> > to what makes
> > 
> > stars.
> > 
> > The Starmaker
> 
> 
> 
> Now, it's pretty far away....
> really far away,,
> hard to catch up with
> since it's probably
> moving faster than the speed of light..
> 
> but, once you get past the ocean edge of
> space...
> you will find
> another world.
> 
> No different from what a fish sees.
> 
> But, what you need is...proof.
> 
> Otherwise, everything I tell you 
> you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.
> 
> 
> Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> Have you've seen anything like it?

At great distances, c will not be able to represent curvature.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372747

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-25 08:40 -0800
Message-ID<567D718E.72A5@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372470
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nobody!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why is that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > > >
> > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > > >
> > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > > >
> > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > > >
> > > > > You have no idea.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > > >
> > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > > >
> > > > If you go to Google
> > > > then click Images
> > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > > then
> > > > Paste image URL
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > > >
> > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > > >
> > > > What you see here is...
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > > less time than that.
> > > >
> > > > Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> > >
> > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> > >
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> > >
> > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> > >
> > > there is an edge
> > > beyond the dark
> > >
> > > and beyond that
> > > dark edge
> > > is
> > > light...
> > >
> > > very similar
> > > to what a fish
> > > sees if he
> > > leaves his
> > > ocean floor...
> > > another world.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> >
> > In other words to make it clearer...
> >
> > beyond the night sky
> >
> > surrounding the stars
> >
> > if you go past
> >
> > the dark night sky
> >
> > there lies
> >
> > the mechanism
> >
> > to what makes
> >
> > stars.
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> Now, it's pretty far away....
> really far away,,
> hard to catch up with
> since it's probably
> moving faster than the speed of light..
> 
> but, once you get past the ocean edge of
> space...
> you will find
> another world.
> 
> No different from what a fish sees.
> 
> But, what you need is...proof.
> 
> Otherwise, everything I tell you
> you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.
> 
> Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> Have you've seen anything like it?


By using my WMAP/CMB
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg

all your unanswered questions are...answered.


For example...

This unanswered question of What Is The Dark Matter?

I'll answer it, correctly...

By using my WMAP/CMB
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg

dark matter
is simply
a REFRIDGERATION.

It is designed
to
absorb the heat and light
from the universe...
from the stars.

The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372830

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-27 23:01 -0800
Message-ID<5680DE5A.7E74@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372747
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why is that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have no idea.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > > > >
> > > > > If you go to Google
> > > > > then click Images
> > > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > > > then
> > > > > Paste image URL
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > > > >
> > > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > > > >
> > > > > What you see here is...
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > > > less time than that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> > > >
> > > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> > > >
> > > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> > > >
> > > > there is an edge
> > > > beyond the dark
> > > >
> > > > and beyond that
> > > > dark edge
> > > > is
> > > > light...
> > > >
> > > > very similar
> > > > to what a fish
> > > > sees if he
> > > > leaves his
> > > > ocean floor...
> > > > another world.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > In other words to make it clearer...
> > >
> > > beyond the night sky
> > >
> > > surrounding the stars
> > >
> > > if you go past
> > >
> > > the dark night sky
> > >
> > > there lies
> > >
> > > the mechanism
> > >
> > > to what makes
> > >
> > > stars.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> >
> > Now, it's pretty far away....
> > really far away,,
> > hard to catch up with
> > since it's probably
> > moving faster than the speed of light..
> >
> > but, once you get past the ocean edge of
> > space...
> > you will find
> > another world.
> >
> > No different from what a fish sees.
> >
> > But, what you need is...proof.
> >
> > Otherwise, everything I tell you
> > you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.
> >
> > Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > Have you've seen anything like it?
> 
> By using my WMAP/CMB
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> all your unanswered questions are...answered.
> 
> For example...
> 
> This unanswered question of What Is The Dark Matter?
> 
> I'll answer it, correctly...
> 
> By using my WMAP/CMB
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> dark matter
> is simply
> a REFRIDGERATION.
> 
> It is designed
> to
> absorb the heat and light
> from the universe...
> from the stars.
> 
> The Starmaker


In other words...your WMAP/CMB analysis is wrong.

The reason why the raditation background  heat is evenly distributed throught 
out the universe is Not bcause it is evenly distributed throught 
out the universe...(giving the appearance of no center)..
but because... 
 By using my WMAP/CMB
 http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
it is simply a REFRIDGERATION cooling system that ABSORBS the heat by the dark matter mechanism.


The heat from the center of the universe has been absorbed by the dark matter (refridgeration) 'cooling system', as
well as all the other heat source of the universe.




The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372893

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-29 10:20 -0800
Message-ID<5682CEEF.583C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372830
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nobody!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why is that?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have no idea.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you go to Google
> > > > > > then click Images
> > > > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > > > > then
> > > > > > Paste image URL
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What you see here is...
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > > > > less time than that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> > > > >
> > > > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > > > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> > > > >
> > > > > there is an edge
> > > > > beyond the dark
> > > > >
> > > > > and beyond that
> > > > > dark edge
> > > > > is
> > > > > light...
> > > > >
> > > > > very similar
> > > > > to what a fish
> > > > > sees if he
> > > > > leaves his
> > > > > ocean floor...
> > > > > another world.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > In other words to make it clearer...
> > > >
> > > > beyond the night sky
> > > >
> > > > surrounding the stars
> > > >
> > > > if you go past
> > > >
> > > > the dark night sky
> > > >
> > > > there lies
> > > >
> > > > the mechanism
> > > >
> > > > to what makes
> > > >
> > > > stars.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > Now, it's pretty far away....
> > > really far away,,
> > > hard to catch up with
> > > since it's probably
> > > moving faster than the speed of light..
> > >
> > > but, once you get past the ocean edge of
> > > space...
> > > you will find
> > > another world.
> > >
> > > No different from what a fish sees.
> > >
> > > But, what you need is...proof.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, everything I tell you
> > > you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.
> > >
> > > Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > Have you've seen anything like it?
> >
> > By using my WMAP/CMB
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > all your unanswered questions are...answered.
> >
> > For example...
> >
> > This unanswered question of What Is The Dark Matter?
> >
> > I'll answer it, correctly...
> >
> > By using my WMAP/CMB
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > dark matter
> > is simply
> > a REFRIDGERATION.
> >
> > It is designed
> > to
> > absorb the heat and light
> > from the universe...
> > from the stars.
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> In other words...your WMAP/CMB analysis is wrong.
> 
> The reason why the raditation background  heat is evenly distributed throught
> out the universe is Not bcause it is evenly distributed throught
> out the universe...(giving the appearance of no center)..
> but because...
>  By using my WMAP/CMB
>  http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> it is simply a REFRIDGERATION cooling system that ABSORBS the heat by the dark matter mechanism.
> 
> The heat from the center of the universe has been absorbed by the dark matter (refridgeration) 'cooling system', as
> well as all the other heat source of the universe.
> 
> The Starmaker



In other words...

95 percent of the universe is one big fuckin refridgerator!!!


That is how science classes should be taught!

A nucleaur reactor without a cooling system will not work...ask Einstein.


When you have a big bang....you're going to need a big fuckin refridgerator!


You cannot wait for it to cool off...no fuckin way, class.

No    fuckin    way

Throw your WMAP/CMB into the garbage can!

It is missing an important component....REFRIDGERATION!



Not a trillion years of waiting to cool off...you turn on the air condition and it get's cool.


It's as simple as that!


Do I got to publish another True Science Magazine????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372896

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-29 12:31 -0600
Message-ID<L_-dnVQD-bf7TB_LnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#372893
On 12/29/15 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> When you have a big bang....you're going to need a big fuckin refridgerator!


   Expansion cools just fine. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above
   absolute zero.  Pretty cool, huh?


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372898

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-29 11:31 -0800
Message-ID<5682DF9E.7897@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372896
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 12/29/15 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > When you have a big bang....you're going to need a big fuckin refridgerator!
> 
>    Expansion cools just fine. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above
>    absolute zero.  Pretty cool, huh?
> 



if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not
cooler.


you just don't understand...physics.


you've been cutting classes...


You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372900

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-29 14:19 -0600
Message-ID<97ednQAJ3qZ-dx_LnZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#372898
On 12/29/15 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not
> cooler.


   Too bad about your rubber band -- Expansion of the universe cools it.
   We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero.  Pretty cool,
   huh?


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372905

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-12-29 13:37 -0800
Message-ID<5682FD05.1DD4@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372900
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 12/29/15 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not
> > cooler.
> 
>    Too bad about your rubber band -- Expansion of the universe cools it.
>    We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero.  Pretty cool,
>    huh?


The universe is not expanding, space is expanding.


> you just don't understand...physics.
> 
> you've been cutting classes...
> 
> You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F.


You just failed my physics class, again! I'm giving you two F's. 



The universe is the REFRIDGERATION!



Don't come back to class, ...go to Hamburger University.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372906

FromWaye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net>
Date2015-12-29 21:46 +0000
Message-ID<n5uuun$gao$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#372900
Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 12/29/15 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not
>> cooler.
> 
>    Too bad about your rubber band -- Expansion of the universe cools it.
>    We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero.  Pretty cool,
>    huh?

Are you just suggesting that the expansion induces a suction? Only a 
suction decreases temperatures in a chamber

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#372904

FromGary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
Date2015-12-29 13:13 -0800
Message-ID<5a54a8bd-e7c6-459f-a604-8a4c8c73994e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#372898
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 12:31:37 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> > 
> > On 12/29/15 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> >    Expansion cools just fine. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above
> >    absolute zero.  Pretty cool, huh?
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not
> cooler.
> 
> 
> you just don't understand...physics.
> 
> 
> you've been cutting classes...
> 
> 
> You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F.

You should study how your supposed refrigerator works:  It works by
EXPANSION of the refrigerant.  A grade of F from you gets a student into
the best colleges.  A grade of A from you doesn't even get a "sorry"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#373647

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-01-10 13:34 -0800
Message-ID<5692CE53.483E@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#372904
Gary Harnagel wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 12:31:37 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > >
> > > On 12/29/15 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > >    Expansion cools just fine. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above
> > >    absolute zero.  Pretty cool, huh?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not
> > cooler.
> >
> >
> > you just don't understand...physics.
> >
> >
> > you've been cutting classes...
> >
> >
> > You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F.
> 
> You should study how your supposed refrigerator works:  It works by
> EXPANSION of the refrigerant.  A grade of F from you gets a student into
> the best colleges.  A grade of A from you doesn't even get a "sorry"


Did I mentioned anything about a refrigerator????


I wrote in big capitol letters: REFRIDGERATION.

There is a big difference between REFRIDGERATION, and a refrigerator.

I wrote REFRIDGERATION in capitol letters because i knows yous guys don't know
what means...REFRIDGERATION.

If I wrote refrigerator anywhere it is only because i had to go down to your level so that you have some kind of ...understanding.

Not that it would help.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#373108

FromJohn Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com>
Date2016-01-01 18:14 -0800
Message-ID<be461c24-2e7d-4c47-8b80-3ebe29658604@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#372747
On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 10:40:49 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why is that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have no idea.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > > > >
> > > > > If you go to Google
> > > > > then click Images
> > > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > > > then
> > > > > Paste image URL
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > > > >
> > > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > > > >
> > > > > What you see here is...
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > > > less time than that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carl Sagan -- 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> > > >
> > > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> > > >
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> > > >
> > > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> > > >
> > > > there is an edge
> > > > beyond the dark
> > > >
> > > > and beyond that
> > > > dark edge
> > > > is
> > > > light...
> > > >
> > > > very similar
> > > > to what a fish
> > > > sees if he
> > > > leaves his
> > > > ocean floor...
> > > > another world.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > In other words to make it clearer...
> > >
> > > beyond the night sky
> > >
> > > surrounding the stars
> > >
> > > if you go past
> > >
> > > the dark night sky
> > >
> > > there lies
> > >
> > > the mechanism
> > >
> > > to what makes
> > >
> > > stars.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > 
> > Now, it's pretty far away....
> > really far away,,
> > hard to catch up with
> > since it's probably
> > moving faster than the speed of light..
> > 
> > but, once you get past the ocean edge of
> > space...
> > you will find
> > another world.
> > 
> > No different from what a fish sees.
> > 
> > But, what you need is...proof.
> > 
> > Otherwise, everything I tell you
> > you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.
> > 
> > Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > 
> > Have you've seen anything like it?
> 
> 
> By using my WMAP/CMB
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> all your unanswered questions are...answered.
> 
> 
> For example...
> 
> This unanswered question of What Is The Dark Matter?
> 
> I'll answer it, correctly...
> 
> By using my WMAP/CMB
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> 
> dark matter
> is simply
> a REFRIDGERATION.
> 
> It is designed
> to
> absorb the heat and light
> from the universe...
> from the stars.
> 
> The Starmaker

I like to think of it as masses that are forming that have not been ignited yet.  I think that forming universes fundamentally go from a "dark" organism, into a organism of "light".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#373254

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-01-03 22:52 -0800
Message-ID<568A16C9.7835@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#373108
John Gogo wrote:
> 
> On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 10:40:49 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center.
> > > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nobody!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why is that?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have no idea.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is a reason why I'm...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll help some of yous out here...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you go to Google
> > > > > > then click Images
> > > > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar
> > > > > > then
> > > > > > Paste image URL
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What you see here is...
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe
> > > > > > less time than that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carl Sagan -- 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic.
> > > > >
> > > > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or
> > > > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night....
> > > > >
> > > > > there is an edge
> > > > > beyond the dark
> > > > >
> > > > > and beyond that
> > > > > dark edge
> > > > > is
> > > > > light...
> > > > >
> > > > > very similar
> > > > > to what a fish
> > > > > sees if he
> > > > > leaves his
> > > > > ocean floor...
> > > > > another world.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > In other words to make it clearer...
> > > >
> > > > beyond the night sky
> > > >
> > > > surrounding the stars
> > > >
> > > > if you go past
> > > >
> > > > the dark night sky
> > > >
> > > > there lies
> > > >
> > > > the mechanism
> > > >
> > > > to what makes
> > > >
> > > > stars.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > Now, it's pretty far away....
> > > really far away,,
> > > hard to catch up with
> > > since it's probably
> > > moving faster than the speed of light..
> > >
> > > but, once you get past the ocean edge of
> > > space...
> > > you will find
> > > another world.
> > >
> > > No different from what a fish sees.
> > >
> > > But, what you need is...proof.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, everything I tell you
> > > you'll dismiss as...pure speculation.
> > >
> > > Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will..
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > >
> > > Have you've seen anything like it?
> >
> >
> > By using my WMAP/CMB
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > all your unanswered questions are...answered.
> >
> >
> > For example...
> >
> > This unanswered question of What Is The Dark Matter?
> >
> > I'll answer it, correctly...
> >
> > By using my WMAP/CMB
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > dark matter
> > is simply
> > a REFRIDGERATION.
> >
> > It is designed
> > to
> > absorb the heat and light
> > from the universe...
> > from the stars.
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> I like to think of it as masses that are forming that have not been ignited yet.  I think that forming universes fundamentally go from a "dark" organism, into a organism of "light".


On the other side of the edge of the universe, they call it...Light
Matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web