Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #369933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-14 04:45 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-11-22 12:42 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 04:45 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 05:05 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:22 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:56 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:01 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 06:04 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:19 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 06:50 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:41 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:11 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:21 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:41 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:56 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:17 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:32 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:27 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:04 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:08 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:31 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:59 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 19:27 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:14 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:39 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:48 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:09 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 18:37 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:51 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-14 12:21 -0800
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:25 +0000
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:22 -0500
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:04 -0600
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-16 18:56 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:17 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:22 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:08 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:21 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:59 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:16 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:27 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 10:20 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:47 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 12:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:11 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:12 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:27 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 14:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 18:17 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 15:46 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 06:13 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 06:26 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 05:45 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:23 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:42 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 21:07 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:09 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 22:17 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:30 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 22:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 18:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:13 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:30 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:47 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 10:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 19:42 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 13:44 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 12:00 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 16:24 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:55 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:30 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 19:11 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 01:25 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 01:28 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 20:56 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 08:29 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:42 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:13 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:51 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 10:13 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:22 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:32 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:36 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 11:15 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 09:10 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-17 13:55 +1100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-16 22:06 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 19:31 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 06:44 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 06:15 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:24 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 09:36 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 20:33 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-22 05:06 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-22 05:18 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 14:22 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 09:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 19:56 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 20:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 20:45 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 23:01 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 15:31 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 17:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 20:38 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-23 17:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-24 02:55 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:23 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-24 05:23 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-24 10:53 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 07:28 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 04:57 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:54 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-25 08:29 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 10:17 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 08:54 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 19:42 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 13:21 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 05:06 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 04:17 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-26 04:25 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 04:48 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-26 05:25 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 07:07 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 20:56 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-28 08:02 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:47 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 18:57 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 12:43 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-28 07:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-07 17:53 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 03:57 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 20:11 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 07:45 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 04:31 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 21:35 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 13:57 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 04:02 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 19:38 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 05:24 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-29 21:09 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 07:40 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-24 19:37 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 12:06 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-24 21:03 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-30 05:14 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:53 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-11-29 12:42 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:49 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:51 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-02 16:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-02 15:57 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-12 17:21 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 10:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 10:10 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 22:07 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-24 23:29 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-25 01:39 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-25 02:04 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-25 06:04 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:27 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 11:22 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 12:42 -0800
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? |
| Message-ID | <n2d2b2$dd3$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370034 |
On 11/14/2015 2:21 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > "Ty_Knotts", Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting, > how should I indentify your posts ? > > Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? > The nym-shifter spends at least twelve clicks to create a new nym. It takes me one click to filter it out. I say let him waste his time. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 18:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? |
| Message-ID | <n2d8sh$ude$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370204 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał: > On 11/14/2015 2:21 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> "Ty_Knotts", Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting, >> how should I indentify your posts ? >> >> Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? >> > The nym-shifter spends at least twelve clicks to create a new nym. It > takes me one click to filter it out. I say let him waste his time. No idea what you two are talking about, but listen, your stupidity is sort of impossible to filter out, No matter how much try to click.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fp8f4b1jn8489dbucapt8as4vbv3ipiff3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370027 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:11:01 +0000 (UTC), Ty Knotts
<TyKnotts@hotmail.org> wrote:
>W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik kefischer napisal:
>
>>>> DM disqualifies you by its own.
>>>
>>>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still
>>>be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that
>>>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is
>>>exactly what my Divergent Matter says.
>>>
>>>You are peripheral, or rather not even.
>>
>> Somebody should ty knots in you neck,
>> you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll.
>
>What do you mean by "insincere"?? Anything but that, young man. Why this
>much oppressively oriented? You are not going to say that my theory, The
>Theory, is false, are you?
Your theory is not "The Theory", you don't
even have a theory, all you have is muddled
brain waves, trying to hide your identity behind
stupid synonym names.
>In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt of
>an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.
Meet me in Strasbourg, and you will
see what quarrelsome can be.
And changing your nym won't help.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 21:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n288na$pv3$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370048 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał: >>In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt >>of an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral. > > Meet me in Strasbourg, and you will > see what quarrelsome can be. You are such of an argumentative, only. I cant maintain a sober Scientific discussion with you. Your level appears choleric, pugnacious and dissentious, but still ways too low.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 18:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27pll$t0u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369981 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:39 Y napsal(a): > > I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, colors could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in detail and "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light. > The fact colours are subjective human dependent attributes do not exclude the fact the plants reflect the green light . As green light is human conventions based on majority subjective opinions. Being green has nothing to do directly with wavelength. All what is needed is stimulation of RGB sensitive cells in ratiosperceived as green, with being monochromatic or not. There is nothing green in the light itself. It is green in our brain only. And not always. >> Also, different humans, different evaluation, >> as it depends on eyes and on brains. > > > It doesn't have to. Only if you manage unified non ageing eyes and brains to all humans. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 09:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <29f4033f-4470-4cda-bc71-86f71d803e5e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #369987 |
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:08:17 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > > It doesn't have to. > > Only if you manage unified non ageing eyes and brains to all humans. I disagree. Since the quantification wouldn't come from light with infinite resolution on the wave in time and space. The quantification of color would come from the discrete finite arrangements of atomic lattices and their combinations. What this entails is that there are only a finite number of colors which can be reflected from a system using EM radiation (visible or non-visible). It has bugger all to do with human brains Poutski. -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5647709A.8090707@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #369990 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 18:21 Y napsal(a): > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:08:17 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > >>> It doesn't have to. >> >> Only if you manage unified non ageing eyes and brains to all humans. > > I disagree. > > Since the quantification wouldn't come from light with infinite resolution on the wave in time and space. The quantification of color would come from the discrete finite arrangements of atomic lattices and their combinations. Variability is good enough for every person to have different eyes and different brain. > What this entails is that there are only a finite number of colors which can be reflected from a system using EM radiation (visible or non-visible). It has bugger all to do with human brains Poutski. > Finite number of colours that human brain and eyes can distinguish is *many* orders lower than physical limits of variability the EM spectrum in 400-760 nm can have. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 17:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n27rj2$pde$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369995 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Poutnik napisał: > Finite number of colours that human brain and eyes can distinguish is > *many* orders lower than physical limits of variability the EM spectrum > in 400-760 nm can have. You just said that thing is "subjective", pout. Is it or not, pout.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27r6q$3qg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369990 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 18:21 Y napsal(a): > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:08:17 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > >>> It doesn't have to. >> >> Only if you manage unified non ageing eyes and brains to all humans. > > I disagree. > > Since the quantification wouldn't come from light with infinite resolution on the wave in time and space. The quantification of color would come from the discrete finite arrangements of atomic lattices and their combinations. Variability is good enough for every person to have different eyes and different brain. > What this entails is that there are only a finite number of colors which can be reflected from a system using EM radiation (visible or non-visible). It has bugger all to do with human brains Poutski. > Finite number of colours that human brain and eyes can distinguish is *many* orders lower than physical limits of variability the EM spectrum in 400-760 nm can have. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 08:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4236befe-4227-47de-9e91-169685ff19e4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #369979 |
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:31:40 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > Plants do not care about our human colour schema, do they ? Exactly ! Yet all plants seem to agree on what green is. All plants are communicating green information. Anyway, enough talking philosophy. Lets ignore that debate for now because I have something more interesting for you. There are a finite table of elements, and presumably, all of these have cosmologically evolved (independent of their impurities - let's just ignore impurities), specific objective colors. One for each of the elements. Meaning to say, the elements reflect those EM energies that they are not adapted to absorbing. In fact, where we can manage the purity of a material to an atomic level, we should also therefore be able to produce a perfect uniformity in reflected color. I'm getting to a point here. My hypothesis is that given knowledge of atomic lattices and combinations of atomic lattices, there should be ways to objectively categorize color, i.e. what combinations of elements and the way they are arranged will reflect what colors. btw - I looked everywhere for reasons why plants are green, and everything I find relates to Chlorophyll. Nothing says "It's because the ocean and sky reflect blue, that the oceans absorb primarily red" This was an original thought of mine, and I cannot find a paper describing this anywhere. Has anyone read something like this before ? -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 09:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <49a36699-ecde-4353-b66b-fe2d8562d1cb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #369986 |
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:59:57 AM UTC+10, Y wrote: > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:31:40 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > > > Plants do not care about our human colour schema, do they ? > > > Exactly ! Yet all plants seem to agree on what green is. All plants are communicating green information. Anyway, enough talking philosophy. Lets ignore that debate for now because I have something more interesting for you. > > > There are a finite table of elements, and presumably, all of these have cosmologically evolved (independent of their impurities - let's just ignore impurities), specific objective colors. One for each of the elements. Meaning to say, the elements reflect those EM energies that they are not adapted to absorbing. In fact, where we can manage the purity of a material to an atomic level, we should also therefore be able to produce a perfect uniformity in reflected color. > > > I'm getting to a point here. My hypothesis is that given knowledge of atomic lattices and combinations of atomic lattices, there should be ways to objectively categorize color, i.e. what combinations of elements and the way they are arranged will reflect what colors. > > btw - I looked everywhere for reasons why plants are green, and everything I find relates to Chlorophyll. Nothing says > > "It's because the ocean and sky reflect blue, that the oceans absorb primarily red" > > This was an original thought of mine, and I cannot find a paper describing this anywhere. Has anyone read something like this before ? > > -y Oh there was another thing I forgot to mention, and it relates to my initial question. "Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ?" The reason I think gravitation is colorless, is because all matter can absorb it. There also do not seem to be differences in the way differently colored elements absorb this energy. Now supposing that a gravitational force carrier, were something like a virtual photon, I imagine that groups of these would not behave as waves. It's possible that gravitational waves are not possible, but I still think that gravitational force carriers move at c. This would both describe success of GR, and why we haven't found g-waves. But moreover, it may be necessary that gravitation has no wavelength, and no frequency - therefore interacting uniformly with everything. -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 18:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27qqb$224$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369989 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 18:16 Y napsal(a): > > > Oh there was another thing I forgot to mention, and it relates to my initial question. > > "Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ?" > > The reason I think gravitation is colorless, is because all matter can absorb it. There also do not seem to be differences in the way differently colored elements absorb this energy. > > Now supposing that a gravitational force carrier, were something like a virtual photon, I imagine that groups of these would not behave as waves. > What sense is in bringing colours to hypothetical spectrum of gravitational waves ? As it has no relation to EM waves nor human light perception, enough is to talk about possible variability of energy / frequency / wavelength spectra. Do we talk about spectrum of colours of gamma rays from pulsars ? No, we do not, even if it is closer to light. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 10:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cf2e2600-f45b-472d-9fad-ba1f52464be1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #369989 |
On Saturday, November 14, 2015 at 10:17:02 AM UTC-7, Y wrote: > > "Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ?" > > The reason I think gravitation is colorless, is because all matter can > absorb it. There also do not seem to be differences in the way > differently colored elements absorb this energy. Again, you are conflating gravity with its variation. Electric charge isn't the same as e/m radiation. > Now supposing that a gravitational force carrier, were something like a > virtual photon, I imagine that groups of these would not behave as waves. > > It's possible that gravitational waves are not possible, but I still think > that gravitational force carriers move at c. This would both describe > success of GR, and why we haven't found g-waves. Non sequitur. If GR is truly successful, then g-waves exist. > But moreover, it may be necessary that gravitation has no wavelength, > and no frequency - therefore interacting uniformly with everything. > > -y Again you conflate etc. Gary
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 14:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ho3f4blvt0q15utj4v6o55muepm37mni7l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #369989 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:16:58 -0800 (PST), Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:59:57 AM UTC+10, Y wrote:
>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:31:40 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote:
>>
>> > Plants do not care about our human colour schema, do they ?
>>
>>
>> Exactly ! Yet all plants seem to agree on what green is. All plants are communicating green information. Anyway, enough talking philosophy. Lets ignore that debate for now because I have something more interesting for you.
>>
>>
>> There are a finite table of elements, and presumably, all of these have cosmologically evolved (independent of their impurities - let's just ignore impurities), specific objective colors. One for each of the elements. Meaning to say, the elements reflect those EM energies that they are not adapted to absorbing. In fact, where we can manage the purity of a material to an atomic level, we should also therefore be able to produce a perfect uniformity in reflected color.
>>
>>
>> I'm getting to a point here. My hypothesis is that given knowledge of atomic lattices and combinations of atomic lattices, there should be ways to objectively categorize color, i.e. what combinations of elements and the way they are arranged will reflect what colors.
>>
>> btw - I looked everywhere for reasons why plants are green, and everything I find relates to Chlorophyll. Nothing says
>>
>> "It's because the ocean and sky reflect blue, that the oceans absorb primarily red"
>>
>> This was an original thought of mine, and I cannot find a paper describing this anywhere. Has anyone read something like this before ?
>>
>> -y
>
>
>
>Oh there was another thing I forgot to mention, and it relates to my initial question.
>
>"Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ?"
>
>The reason I think gravitation is colorless, is because all matter can absorb it. There also do not seem to be differences in the way differently colored elements absorb this energy.
>
>Now supposing that a gravitational force carrier, were something like a virtual photon, I imagine that groups of these would not behave as waves.
>
>
>It's possible that gravitational waves are not possible, but I still think that gravitational force carriers move at c. This would both describe success of GR, and why we haven't found g-waves.
>
>
>But moreover, it may be necessary that gravitation has no wavelength, and no frequency - therefore interacting uniformly with everything.
>
>-y
You are really talking goofy, there is nothing
to be absorbed, if there was, gravity could be shielded.
What is it you don't understand, the effects
of gravity are identical to inertia in every way,
that means the process of gravitation is just
acceleration and relative motion, period,
no particles or fields needed.
Get a textbook on gravity and inertia,
will ya.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 12:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2f8e13b9-aacd-42f4-947f-e9055b65be84@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #370016 |
On Saturday, November 14, 2015 at 12:47:50 PM UTC-7, kefischer wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:16:58 -0800 (PST), Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > But moreover, it may be necessary that gravitation has no wavelength, > > and no frequency - therefore interacting uniformly with everything. > > > > -y > > You are really talking goofy, there is nothing > to be absorbed, if there was, gravity could be shielded. Non sequitur. > What is it you don't understand, the effects > of gravity are identical to inertia in every way, > that means the process of gravitation is just > acceleration and relative motion, period, > no particles or fields needed. > > Get a textbook on gravity and inertia, will ya. If he did, he would certainly find the evidence that refutes DuMb.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n88f4b9tp3vuk0j8k32rts8ktu7ev85m37@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370021 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), Gary Harnagel
<hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Saturday, November 14, 2015 at 12:47:50 PM UTC-7, kefischer wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:16:58 -0800 (PST), Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > But moreover, it may be necessary that gravitation has no wavelength,
>> > and no frequency - therefore interacting uniformly with everything.
>> >
>> > -y
>>
>> You are really talking goofy, there is nothing
>> to be absorbed, if there was, gravity could be shielded.
>
>Non sequitur.
Nonsense, your irrelevant remarks made,
not as to the issue at hand, are obviously made
just as hostility to anything I say.
>> What is it you don't understand, the effects
>> of gravity are identical to inertia in every way,
>> that means the process of gravitation is just
>> acceleration and relative motion, period,
>> no particles or fields needed.
>>
>> Get a textbook on gravity and inertia, will ya.
>
>If he did, he would certainly find the evidence that refutes DuMb.
See, diversion from the issue at hand,
all good texts on gravitation include sections
on inertia.
If the effects of gravity are identical
to inertia in every way, that is a very useful
clue to the mystery of gravitation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 21:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n28816$nhd$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370042 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał: >>> You are really talking goofy, there is nothing >>> to be absorbed, if there was, gravity could be shielded. >> >>Non sequitur. > > Nonsense, your irrelevant remarks made, > not as to the issue at hand, are obviously made just as hostility to > anything I say. Ever wonder why? Now honestly, why do you think it is like that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1n9f4bp9564n7l4fn9c21i4ocstmrbtlbv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370046 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Ty Knotts
<TyKnotts@hotmail.org> wrote:
>W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik kefischer napisal:
>
>>>> You are really talking goofy, there is nothing
>>>> to be absorbed, if there was, gravity could be shielded.
>>>
>>>Non sequitur.
>>
>> Nonsense, your irrelevant remarks made,
>> not as to the issue at hand, are obviously made just as hostility to
>> anything I say.
>
>Ever wonder why? Now honestly, why do you think it is like that?
Because he is half as stupid as you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 21:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n289cu$qv8$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370055 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał: >>>>> You are really talking goofy, there is nothing >>>>> to be absorbed, if there was, gravity could be shielded. >>>> >>>>Non sequitur. >>> >>> Nonsense, your irrelevant remarks made, >>> not as to the issue at hand, are obviously made just as hostility to >>> anything I say. >> >>Ever wonder why? Now honestly, why do you think it is like that? > > Because he is half as stupid as you. I probably will agree. Let me think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 21:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n28840$nhd$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370042 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał: > See, diversion from the issue at hand, > all good texts on gravitation include sections on inertia. Name a few. Or at least one out of the many good. > If the effects of gravity are identical > to inertia in every way, that is a very useful clue to the mystery of > gravitation. I dont even understand, probably not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web