Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #364403 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-17 12:04 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-09-18 02:33 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 35 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 12:04 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 14:07 -0500
Re: The Fourth Dimension Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:55 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 13:31 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:58 -0500
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 14:40 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 01:05 -0400
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 22:42 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 23:01 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:40 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 23:59 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 10:28 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-18 01:51 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:23 -0500
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:41 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 10:56 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:20 -0500
Re: The Fourth Dimension mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-17 23:28 -0700
The Fourth Dimension fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-17 14:49 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:46 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:48 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-17 20:14 -0400
Re: The Fourth Dimension JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 19:50 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-17 22:37 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:22 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 12:01 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:00 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-18 03:00 -0400
Re: The Fourth Dimension mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-18 01:09 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 10:33 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 07:56 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-17 23:30 -0700
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:20 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 11:19 +0200
Re: The Fourth Dimension mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-18 02:33 -0700
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 12:04 -0700 |
| Subject | The Fourth Dimension |
| Message-ID | <55FB0EB5.2316@ix.netcom.com> |
Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 14:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mtf32k$u6j$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #364403 |
On 9/17/2015 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > Al Gore.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 12:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d0c3e4db-2ef3-415d-8ac5-785e5d9b9ab5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #364403 |
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 12:04:28 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Machine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 13:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FB230C.60AE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #364412 |
Koobee Wublee wrote: > > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 12:04:28 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells > > In > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Machine Are you saying that Albert Einstein got his relativity Time and Fourth Dimension idea from reading a ...science fiction book????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 15:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <I_ydnQojWpfotGbInZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #364403 |
On 9/17/15 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > Nature is the way she is, and we humans are, through observation and experiment discovering how she works. Three spacial and one temporal dimension fit the observations. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 14:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FB3351.546B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #364417 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 9/17/15 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > > > > Nature is the way she is, and we humans are, through observation and > experiment discovering how she works. Three spacial and one temporal > dimension fit the observations. > Sorry, I'm not aware of any "observation and experiment" of Three spacial and one temporal dimension fit *any* observations or experiments. Are you gettin your info from...a science fiction story? I didn't read the book The Time Machine. I saw it on teevee..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 01:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bYMKx.29498$7S1.14732@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #364418 |
On 09/17/2015 05:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 9/17/15 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it?
>>>
>>
>> Nature is the way she is, and we humans are, through observation and
>> experiment discovering how she works. Three spacial and one temporal
>> dimension fit the observations.
>>
>
>
> Sorry, I'm not aware of any "observation and experiment" of Three
> spacial and one temporal
> dimension fit *any* observations or experiments.
>
>
> Are you gettin your info from...a science fiction story? I didn't read
> the book The Time Machine. I saw it on teevee..
It's true "Starmaker". A rotating umbrella can make you travel time!
Go read the book "flatland" and then come back here and discuss dimensions.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 22:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FBA456.3D12@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #364432 |
benj wrote: > > On 09/17/2015 05:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 9/17/15 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > >>> > >> > >> Nature is the way she is, and we humans are, through observation and > >> experiment discovering how she works. Three spacial and one temporal > >> dimension fit the observations. > >> > > > > > > Sorry, I'm not aware of any "observation and experiment" of Three > > spacial and one temporal > > dimension fit *any* observations or experiments. > > > > > > Are you gettin your info from...a science fiction story? I didn't read > > the book The Time Machine. I saw it on teevee.. > > It's true "Starmaker". A rotating umbrella can make you travel time! > > Go read the book "flatland" and then come back here and discuss dimensions. Haven't you heard, i don't read 'science fiction' books...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 23:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FBA8C1.6A94@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #364432 |
benj wrote: > > On 09/17/2015 05:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 9/17/15 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > >>> > >> > >> Nature is the way she is, and we humans are, through observation and > >> experiment discovering how she works. Three spacial and one temporal > >> dimension fit the observations. > >> > > > > > > Sorry, I'm not aware of any "observation and experiment" of Three > > spacial and one temporal > > dimension fit *any* observations or experiments. > > > > > > Are you gettin your info from...a science fiction story? I didn't read > > the book The Time Machine. I saw it on teevee.. > > It's true "Starmaker". A rotating umbrella can make you travel time! > > Go read the book "flatland" and then come back here and discuss dimensions. It's about only three dimensions, not a fourth and Time. Go read the book "flatland" and then come back here ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mtgbi7$h1l$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #364441 |
Dne 18/09/2015 v 08:01 The Starmaker napsal(a): > > It's about only three dimensions, not a fourth and Time. > Where did you come to 4 dimensions and time ? where are they used ? -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 23:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FBB641.76D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #364451 |
Poutnik wrote: > > Dne 18/09/2015 v 08:01 The Starmaker napsal(a): > > > > > It's about only three dimensions, not a fourth and Time. > > > Where did you come to 4 dimensions and time ? > where are they used ? > I asked the question: Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that Time is in it? The reason why I asked is because timeline wise, the earliest mentioned was H.G. Wells in his science fiction book The Time Machine, 1895. The, next in the timeline is Albert Einstein relativity ten lears later 1905. Now, I'm wondering timeline wise, who was before H.G. Wells? Or, is it a fact this whole "4 dimensions and time" the foundation is just ...science fiction. In other words, 4 dimensions and time is not Science, it's science fiction. Unelss of course you can come up with '4 dimensions and time' before H.G. Wells. Who invented 4 dimensions and time? I'll repeat the original question: "Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it?" Was it H.G Wells, or was it somebody before him?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 10:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mtghs6$5v5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #364452 |
On 09/18/2015 08:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Poutnik wrote: >> >>> >> Where did you come to 4 dimensions and time ? >> where are they used ? > > I asked the question: Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that Time is in it? what exactly do you mean by "fourth dimension and that Time is in it" > > In other words, 4 dimensions and time is not Science, it's science fiction. I agree, it's science fiction that neither SR nor GR uses. SR/GR uses 4 dimensions, when the fourth dimension is time, recalculated to path length of the light in vacuum. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes a great man humble, but a small man arrogant. Eventual Wikipedia articles are provided with intention of a convenient reference, not as an evidence, argument, and usually not as a primary source of my knowledge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 01:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e30e8bc-367b-4824-8ca6-20b36d8f1823@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #364459 |
On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:28:43 AM UTC+2, Poutnik wrote: > SR/GR uses 4 dimensions, when the fourth dimension is time, SR shit does. GR shit doesn't use any dimension, just yell, that they are mere, unsignificant, human created labels. Ask your fellow idiot Jan about it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 08:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_7WdnV7U8PiqjWHInZ2dnUU7-QMAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #364452 |
On 9/18/15 1:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Wells in his science fiction book The Time Machine, 1895. Just hold on a minute -- you said in an earlier posting that you don't read science fiction books. Which is it, do you or don't you? -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 15:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mth46p$9lc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #364473 |
On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 9/18/15 1:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Wells in his science fiction book The Time Machine, 1895. > > Just hold on a minute -- you said in an earlier posting that you don't > read science fiction books. > > Which is it, do you or don't you? > Perhaps he does not, but he did. :-) -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes a great man humble, but a small man arrogant. Eventual Wikipedia articles are provided with intention of a convenient reference, not as an evidence, argument, and usually not as a primary source of my knowledge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 10:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FC504A.33EB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #364473 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 9/18/15 1:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Wells in his science fiction book The Time Machine, 1895. > > Just hold on a minute -- you said in an earlier posting that you don't > read science fiction books. > > Which is it, do you or don't you? I don't read sceince fiction books or any fiction books for that matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 08:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_7WdnV_U8PgBkmHInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #364418 |
On 9/17/15 4:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sorry, I'm not aware of any "observation and experiment" of Three > spacial and one temporal dimension fit*any* observations or > experiments. I so sorry, I should have pointed out that GPS receivers measure and spit out values for three spacial and one temporal dimension. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 23:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b39ffd58-065e-49f7-93af-e5cfc176edc7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #364417 |
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 10:58:31 PM UTC+2, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 9/17/15 2:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? > > > > Nature is the way she is, and we humans are, through observation and > experiment discovering how she works. Nature is the way she is. It doesn't work and never did. And science is an application constructed for human brain to work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 14:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62d1354c-9c11-4754-9bf8-d41d9560a794@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #364403 |
Yes there is only two dimensions. Space & Time http://www.msri.org/publications/sgp/jim/geom/level/library/triper2/imag/P.jpg Truncated Octahedron Tessellation of Space causes Admittance of time
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6056368-409c-4bb5-b58d-cf926ead1d5f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #364403 |
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 12:04:28 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > Who invented this thing called the fourth dimension and that time is in it? A good mathematical description I'd say 19th century (Hamilton, Riemann, a bit later the Italian school, etc.) Earlier attempts by Gauss. The idea was implicitly present in Descartes' analytical geometry (I don't know if he called it out explicitly). In analytical(*) mechanics time can be frequently treated as an extra coordinate. In some contexts time coordinate is treated simply as space (since the mathematical formulas involved don't see any difference), for example in lens design the optical aberrations are most economically(**) studied by using Hamiltonian mechanics with the optical axis playing the role of the time axis. In that context Einstein's consideration of time as one of the available degrees of freedom (dimensions) was nothing new. What was new was describing its _geometry_ in terms of _energy-momentum_. Other spaces involving time coordinate like the extended phase space of Hamilton were not about their geometry so much but focused more on other properties: volumes, characteristics, and so on. H. G. Wells was the first novelist of note to use the concept. (*) "analytical mechanics" means "the mechanics of Lagrange and Hamilton" everywhere in the world except in American textbooks it seems. Other uniquely American weirdities [sic] are: "Lorentz gauge" instead of the correct "Lorenz gauge" and "arctanh" (etc.) instead of the correct "artanh" (etc.). And of course using feet in aviation just drives me nuts. (**) still a lot of work. But just _try_ to calculate aberrations using plain Snell's law! It's a calculational hyper-nightmare. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web