Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358441 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 230 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12 Next page →
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mpp2l72o9t@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #359569 |
On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: > Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye > witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, > etc. And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359581 |
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >> etc. > >And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mprqcr2f2g@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #359643 |
On 08/04/2015 01:02 PM, duke wrote: > On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>> >> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>> >> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>> >> etc. >> > >> >And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. > What 3rd party verification. I gave an example. France got involved in the war between the US and UK, and their intervention at sea in the Chesapeake Bay region led to our victory at Saratoga. Your gospels have no attestation outside of the self-same gospels.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359668 |
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:54:49 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 08/04/2015 01:02 PM, duke wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>> >> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>> >> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>> >> etc. >>> > >>> >And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >> What 3rd party verification. > >I gave an example. France got involved in the war between the US and >UK, and their intervention at sea in the Chesapeake Bay region led to >our victory at Saratoga. Your gospels have no attestation outside of >the se But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mptpri32t8g@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #359750 |
On 08/05/2015 11:57 AM, duke wrote: > On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:54:49 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >On 08/04/2015 01:02 PM, duke wrote: >>> >> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >> >>>>> >>> >On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> >> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>> >>>> >> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>> >>>> >> etc. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>> >> What 3rd party verification. >> > >> >I gave an example. France got involved in the war between the US and >> >UK, and their intervention at sea in the Chesapeake Bay region led to >> >our victory at Saratoga. Your gospels have no attestation outside of >> >the se > But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just > spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. Soliphism much?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mq0qgb$9le$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #359757 |
In article <mptpri32t8g@news6.newsguy.com>, talishi <talishi@example.net> said: On 08/05/2015 11:57 AM, duke wrote: > >> But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. >> You're just spouting the same quality of support that I have for >> Jesus Christ. > > Soliphism much? Mash-up of 'sophism' and 'solipsism'? :-) -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mq0v2213ua@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #359862 |
On 08/06/2015 04:27 PM, William December Starr wrote: > In article <mptpri32t8g@news6.newsguy.com>, > talishi <talishi@example.net> said: > > On 08/05/2015 11:57 AM, duke wrote: >> >>> But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. >>> You're just spouting the same quality of support that I have for >>> Jesus Christ. >> >> Soliphism much? > > Mash-up of 'sophism' and 'solipsism'? :-) It's whatever I say it is. Everything is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mq1tc4$ftt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #359864 |
On 8/6/2015 8:44 PM, talishi wrote: > >>>> But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. >>>> You're just spouting the same quality of support that I have for >>>> Jesus Christ. >>> >>> Soliphism much? >> >> Mash-up of 'sophism' and 'solipsism'? :-) > > It's whatever I say it is. Everything is. That would depend on what your definition of 'is' is. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mo9asadvjenj8dr36m9o0m31rsa2ktvbuo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359757 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:56:48 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 08/05/2015 11:57 AM, duke wrote: >> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:54:49 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >On 08/04/2015 01:02 PM, duke wrote: >>>> >> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> >> >>>>>> >>> >On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>> >>>> >> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>> >>>> >> etc. >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> >And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>> >> What 3rd party verification. >>> > >>> >I gave an example. France got involved in the war between the US and >>> >UK, and their intervention at sea in the Chesapeake Bay region led to >>> >our victory at Saratoga. Your gospels have no attestation outside of >>> >the se >> But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >> spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >Soliphism much? Just the truth, ma'am, just the truth. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4j86salhh0g9al2cpskboc8hhovft4om60@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359750 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even approached. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359795 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: > >>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >approached. 20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. And the have given us the same quality of testament that you have for any worldly event before 125 years ago after the last eye witness has died. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8aebsa9ue0t4df15bkq6rq19invk8rkvkh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359962 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:26 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. > >>Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >>themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >>accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >>provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >>approached. > >20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. Perhaps they did or perhaps they didn't. There is no verified evidence he even existed. >And the have given us the same quality of testament that you have for any >worldly event before 125 years ago after the last eye witness has died. Accounts personally recorded by the witnesses themselves? Separate accounts, each from his own viewpoint, and unrelated to any other accounts? Or to your book of myths? I think not. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6shcsat1a9u0pjn0sj1u5td2192penksnr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359991 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:12:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:26 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>>>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >> >>>Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >>>themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >>>accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >>>provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >>>approached. >> >>20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. > >Perhaps they did or perhaps they didn't. There is no verified >evidence he even existed. No war of Independence against England, eh? >>And the have given us the same quality of testament that you have for any >>worldly event before 125 years ago after the last eye witness has died. > >Accounts personally recorded by the witnesses themselves? Separate >accounts, each from his own viewpoint, and unrelated to any other >accounts? Or to your book of myths? > >I think not. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp4esahr9qirg2ho0b7qpmj8d1lbu42v7p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360030 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:17:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <6shcsat1a9u0pjn0sj1u5td2192penksnr@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:12:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:26 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>>>>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >>> >>>>Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >>>>themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >>>>accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >>>>provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >>>>approached. >>> >>>20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. >> >>Perhaps they did or perhaps they didn't. There is no verified >>evidence he even existed. > >No war of Independence against England, eh? Sorry. A preponderance of evidence supports the fact that there actually was such a war, and this independent and verified evidence is available for anyone to inspect. > >>>And the have given us the same quality of testament that you have for any >>>worldly event before 125 years ago after the last eye witness has died. >> >>Accounts personally recorded by the witnesses themselves? Separate >>accounts, each from his own viewpoint, and unrelated to any other >>accounts? Or to your book of myths? >> >>I think not. > Thanks for admitting there is nothing to verify your book of myths. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qdpesa5mc2n8uu8gronilsqjnm4gtipr0h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360079 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:48:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:17:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><6shcsat1a9u0pjn0sj1u5td2192penksnr@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:12:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:26 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>>>>>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >>>> >>>>>Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >>>>>themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >>>>>accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >>>>>provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >>>>>approached. >>>> >>>>20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. >>> >>>Perhaps they did or perhaps they didn't. There is no verified >>>evidence he even existed. >> >>No war of Independence against England, eh? > >Sorry. A preponderance of evidence supports the fact that there >actually was such a war, and this independent and verified evidence is >available for anyone to inspect. What evidence, and how is it qualitatively any different than what we have for the events of the life of the Son of God. You can look at a musket ball all day, and maybe find the place of manufacture in England. Maybe it was dropped by someone. You can look at a document, a painting and I can look at a document and a painting. >>>>And the have given us the same quality of testament that you have for any >>>>worldly event before 125 years ago after the last eye witness has died. >>> >>>Accounts personally recorded by the witnesses themselves? Separate >>>accounts, each from his own viewpoint, and unrelated to any other >>>accounts? Or to your book of myths? >>> >>>I think not. >> > >Thanks for admitting there is nothing to verify your book of myths. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3iqgsapije3umd2pe8sqfb1ar8f2vsi2gm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360106 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:41:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <qdpesa5mc2n8uu8gronilsqjnm4gtipr0h@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:48:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:17:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><6shcsat1a9u0pjn0sj1u5td2192penksnr@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:12:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:26 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>>>>>>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >>>>>>themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >>>>>>accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >>>>>>provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >>>>>>approached. >>>>> >>>>>20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. >>>> >>>>Perhaps they did or perhaps they didn't. There is no verified >>>>evidence he even existed. >>> >>>No war of Independence against England, eh? >> >>Sorry. A preponderance of evidence supports the fact that there >>actually was such a war, and this independent and verified evidence is >>available for anyone to inspect. > >What evidence, and how is it qualitatively any different than what we have for >the events of the life of the Son of God. You can look at a musket ball all >day, and maybe find the place of manufacture in England. Maybe it was dropped >by someone. You can look at a document, a painting and I can look at a document >and a painting. Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional discussion is possible. Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an true and accurate account of actual events. > >>>>>And the have given us the same quality of testament that you have for any >>>>>worldly event before 125 years ago after the last eye witness has died. >>>> >>>>Accounts personally recorded by the witnesses themselves? Separate >>>>accounts, each from his own viewpoint, and unrelated to any other >>>>accounts? Or to your book of myths? >>>> >>>>I think not. >>> >> >>Thanks for admitting there is nothing to verify your book of myths. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360195 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:11:55 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:41:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><qdpesa5mc2n8uu8gronilsqjnm4gtipr0h@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:48:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:17:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><6shcsat1a9u0pjn0sj1u5td2192penksnr@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:12:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:49:26 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><iq9asat3ku79p9q8ptsfluttuu4i85f37h@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:04:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><22n4satiop92a281p5ck7j3pncamg96pqb@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But you're only relating hearsay as the last eye witness is dead. You're just >>>>>>>>spouting the same quality of support that I have for Jesus Christ. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Nope. Direct personal accounts written by the actual eyewitnesses >>>>>>>themselves and which agree in detail with thousands of similar >>>>>>>accounts written by other direct witnesses who were directly involved >>>>>>>provide a level of authenticity no religious text has ever even >>>>>>>approached. >>>>>> >>>>>>20,000+ witnessed the biblical accounts of the life and times of Jesus Christ. >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps they did or perhaps they didn't. There is no verified >>>>>evidence he even existed. >>>> >>>>No war of Independence against England, eh? >>> >>>Sorry. A preponderance of evidence supports the fact that there >>>actually was such a war, and this independent and verified evidence is >>>available for anyone to inspect. >> >>What evidence, and how is it qualitatively any different than what we have for >>the events of the life of the Son of God. You can look at a musket ball all >>day, and maybe find the place of manufacture in England. Maybe it was dropped >>by someone. You can look at a document, a painting and I can look at a document >>and a painting. >Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >discussion is possible. Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. >Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >true and accurate account of actual events. No reason to believe that. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <epslsa5p14mbg6e8uhl366os3s7agdgb40@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360354 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:51:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> wrote: >>Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >>source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >>discussion is possible. > >Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. See? You prove my point. > >>Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >>true and accurate account of actual events. > >No reason to believe that. As much reason as there is to believe any of the drivel in your book of superstitions. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v9rusapp79p6e91o4qhe3esapag5fgaest@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360434 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:19:26 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:51:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >>>source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >>>discussion is possible. >> >>Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. > >See? You prove my point. I know I did mine. >>>Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >>>true and accurate account of actual events. >> >>No reason to believe that. >As much reason as there is to believe any of the drivel in your book >of superstitions. The skin off your ass, not mine. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oog0tap9ok2mnejpjs5o2nvmh2sll1h11n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360896 |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:48:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <v9rusapp79p6e91o4qhe3esapag5fgaest@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:19:26 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:51:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >>>>source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >>>>discussion is possible. >>> >>>Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. >> >>See? You prove my point. > >I know I did mine. You have only proven how brainwashed you are. > >>>>Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >>>>true and accurate account of actual events. >>> >>>No reason to believe that. > >>As much reason as there is to believe any of the drivel in your book >>of superstitions. > >The skin off your ass, not mine. > That doesn't bother me in the slightest. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web