Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #353834 > unrolled thread

Near True

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-21 13:11 -0700
    Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-05 19:01 -0700
      Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:22 -0700
        Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 14:26 -0700
        Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 10:52 -0700
          Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-10 22:41 -0500
        Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 23:10 -0700
          Re: Near True benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 03:00 -0400
            Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-14 11:34 -0500
    Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-10 19:41 -0700
      Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-10 19:43 -0700
        Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-12 21:45 -0700
          Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 12:11 -0700
          Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 15:53 -0700
            Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 22:48 -0700
              Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-14 10:47 -0500
                Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-14 10:34 -0700
                Re: Near True HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 07:14 -0400
            Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 13:55 -0700
              Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 20:52 -0700
                Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-29 11:48 -0700
              Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 23:54 -0700
                Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 00:57 -0700
                  Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 12:37 -0700
                    Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 14:04 -0700
                      Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 17:35 -0700
    Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-10 22:37 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#359030

pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 8:52:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 1:55:38 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 3:53:11 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > False color means...meant to deceive. incorrect, not according with truth or fact.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do you have a different dictionary?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How NASA uses the term:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question20.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_color
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, yours user-edited website reads:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A false-color image is an image that depicts an object in colors that differ from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show.
> > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_color
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, can you translate that into...English? Or do i have to translate it for you?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.google.com/#q=define+differ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dif搭er
> > > > > > 'dif?r/
> > > > > > verb
> > > > > > verb: differ; 3rd person present: differs; past tense: differed; past participle: differed; gerund or present participle: differing
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     be unlike or dissimilar.
> > > > > >     "the second set of data differed from the first"
> > > > > >     synonyms: contrast with, be different from, be dissimilar to, be unlike, vary from, diverge from, deviate from, conflict with, run counter to, be incompatible with, be at odds with, go against, contradict
> > > > > >     "the second set of data differed from the first"
> > > > > >     antonyms: resemble
> > > > > >         disagree.
> > > > > >         "he differed from his contemporaries in ethical matters"
> > > > > >         synonyms:     disagree, conflict, be at variance, be at odds, be in dispute, not see eye to eye
> > > > > >         "the two sides differed over this issue"
> > > > > >         antonyms:     agree
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.google.com/#q=define+differ
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In other words...False_color
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A false-color image is an image that depicts an object in colors that 'unlike' from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A false-color image is an image that depicts an object in colors that 'disagree' from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A false-color image is an image that depicts an object in colors that 'conflict' from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't see any difference....it's still 'meant to deceive, incorrect, not according with truth or fact.'
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'unlike' from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's truly false...
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course people who aren't imbeciles know that the purpose of false color images isn't deception.  Even a 5-year-old knows that "false" doesn't always mean "deceptive".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/#q=define+false
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > appearing to be the thing denoted; deliberately made or meant to
> > > > deceive.
> > >
> > > Again you prove that you are so stupid that you can't even use a dictionary properly.
> > > Like many other words, "false" has several meanings.  You pick one of them and insist that it must apply to all circumstances.  You are an idiot.
> >
> >
> >
> > No, I didn't pick or cheery pick a meaning to fit my bias, I picked the meaning that NASA meant to do, ...to deliberately deceive.
> >
> >
> > deliberately
> > deceive
> >
> > period.
> 
> Liar.



Is that the same thing as...Near True?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#359385 — Near True2

okay
I'll look at it and give you my findings...

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10


but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#359386 — Re: Near True2

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> okay
> I'll look at it and give you my findings...
> 
> http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637
> http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10
> 
> but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals...



didn't take too long to figure out what it is...



That's it!


http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg



it's damaged.

those ain't red streaks...it's magneta damaged color...


forget about the red streaks..
look at the
craters at the left with light blueish rings
and all that yellow and green stuff....

it looks like
one of those
red, green, blue
cellophane people
use to put
on their black and white tv sets
to see Bonanza in color.


is this all they got for us????


damaged goods?



the worse photograph by NASA ever taken!

not even near true color....more like near broken color.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#359397 — Re: Near True2

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > okay
> > I'll look at it and give you my findings...
> >
> > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637
> > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> > http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10
> >
> > but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals...
> 
> didn't take too long to figure out what it is...
> 
> That's it!
> 
> http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> 
> it's damaged.
> 
> those ain't red streaks...it's magneta damaged color...
> 
> forget about the red streaks..
> look at the
> craters at the left with light blueish rings
> and all that yellow and green stuff....
> 
> it looks like
> one of those
> red, green, blue
> cellophane people
> use to put
> on their black and white tv sets
> to see Bonanza in color.
> 
> is this all they got for us????
> 
> damaged goods?
> 
> the worse photograph by NASA ever taken!
> 
> not even near true color....more like near broken color.

I figured out who is doing NASA's color processing....Stevie Wonder!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#359461 — Re: Near True2

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > okay
> > > I'll look at it and give you my findings...
> > >
> > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637
> > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> > > http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10
> > >
> > > but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals...
> >
> > didn't take too long to figure out what it is...
> >
> > That's it!
> >
> > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> >
> > it's damaged.
> >
> > those ain't red streaks...it's magneta damaged color...
> >
> > forget about the red streaks..
> > look at the
> > craters at the left with light blueish rings
> > and all that yellow and green stuff....
> >
> > it looks like
> > one of those
> > red, green, blue
> > cellophane people
> > use to put
> > on their black and white tv sets
> > to see Bonanza in color.
> >
> > is this all they got for us????
> >
> > damaged goods?
> >
> > the worse photograph by NASA ever taken!
> >
> > not even near true color....more like near broken color.
> 
> I figured out who is doing NASA's color processing....Stevie Wonder!


And the problem is of course with NASA's management...
they should never let that photo reach the media..
they obviously don't have 'quality control' setup.

I have this program...
what this program does is
enhances all the colors
except one color...Red.

It's used
for people who take a color photo
and want to enhance all the color
in the photo except the Red color.

So...
I run it through...
and guess what happen?

The opposite happen!
The Red got enhanced and all the
other colors remain the same!!?!

Now, how is that possible?

I always use this program
when I want to enhance all
the colors except Red..
always..

and all of a sudden
all the RED gets enhanced!

All the other colors remain
un enhanced!?

How is this possible?

The only answer is..
those are not Red streaks!

They are Blue. 

Shadow blue.


The red streaks are shadows
which in color photos show up as dark blue.


https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=871&q=night+photos+of+mountains&oq=night+photos+of+mountains&gs_l=img.3...2987.12344.0.12696.25.25.0.0.0.0.152.2044.23j2.25.0..2..0...1.1.64.img..7.18.1542.i8ZXvFPWbVE



Just do a Google Image search of "night photos of mountains" and you'll see what color are shadows.


Obvisouly, quality control is on....vacation.


And Stevie Wonder is working there part-time.


Don't send any rockets up in July.



The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#359472 — Re: Near True2

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > okay
> > > > I'll look at it and give you my findings...
> > > >
> > > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637
> > > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> > > > http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10
> > > >
> > > > but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals...
> > >
> > > didn't take too long to figure out what it is...
> > >
> > > That's it!
> > >
> > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg
> > >
> > > it's damaged.
> > >
> > > those ain't red streaks...it's magneta damaged color...
> > >
> > > forget about the red streaks..
> > > look at the
> > > craters at the left with light blueish rings
> > > and all that yellow and green stuff....
> > >
> > > it looks like
> > > one of those
> > > red, green, blue
> > > cellophane people
> > > use to put
> > > on their black and white tv sets
> > > to see Bonanza in color.
> > >
> > > is this all they got for us????
> > >
> > > damaged goods?
> > >
> > > the worse photograph by NASA ever taken!
> > >
> > > not even near true color....more like near broken color.
> >
> > I figured out who is doing NASA's color processing....Stevie Wonder!
> 
> And the problem is of course with NASA's management...
> they should never let that photo reach the media..
> they obviously don't have 'quality control' setup.
> 
> I have this program...
> what this program does is
> enhances all the colors
> except one color...Red.
> 
> It's used
> for people who take a color photo
> and want to enhance all the color
> in the photo except the Red color.
> 
> So...
> I run it through...
> and guess what happen?
> 
> The opposite happen!
> The Red got enhanced and all the
> other colors remain the same!!?!
> 
> Now, how is that possible?
> 
> I always use this program
> when I want to enhance all
> the colors except Red..
> always..
> 
> and all of a sudden
> all the RED gets enhanced!
> 
> All the other colors remain
> un enhanced!?
> 
> How is this possible?
> 
> The only answer is..
> those are not Red streaks!
> 
> They are Blue.
> 
> Shadow blue.
> 
> The red streaks are shadows
> which in color photos show up as dark blue.
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=871&q=night+photos+of+mountains&oq=night+photos+of+mountains&gs_l=img.3...2987.12344.0.12696.25.25.0.0.0.0.152.2044.23j2.25.0..2..0...1.1.64.img..7.18.1542.i8ZXvFPWbVE
> 
> Just do a Google Image search of "night photos of mountains" and you'll see what color are shadows.
> 
> Obvisouly, quality control is on....vacation.
> 
> And Stevie Wonder is working there part-time.
> 
> Don't send any rockets up in July.
> 
> The Starmaker

"The red arcs must be geologically young because they cut across older features like impact craters, but we don't know their age in years," 
Paul Helfenstein from Cornell University, 
a Cassini imaging scientist who assisted in the planning of this mission, said. 


Helfenstein??? Cornell University??? A lot of dummies the universities are producing, ain't they??


imaging scientist???? 

I've seen their ...images. Garbage!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#356683

On 6/21/2015 3:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> What does "Near True" mean?
>

follow the logic;

Near True => There True

Near True => Not There True

Near True => There False

Near True => Their False

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web