Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #356756 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-11 11:57 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-12 21:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 9 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Two Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-11 11:57 -0700
Re: Two Earths Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-11 16:01 -0500
Re: Two Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-12 15:46 -0700
Re: Two Earths Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-12 21:34 -0500
Re: Two Earths Mike Duffy <see_website@signature.block> - 2015-07-12 22:49 -0400
Re: Two Earths benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 01:00 -0400
Re: Two Earths Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-13 00:24 -0500
Re: Two Earths Mike Duffy <see_website@signature.block> - 2015-07-13 11:07 -0400
Re: Two Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-12 21:51 -0700
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-11 11:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Two Earths |
| Message-ID | <55A1670D.1FFA@ix.netcom.com> |
There is a reason why there is only one Earth in our solar system.. if there were two we would be too occupied with killing them all. Or they would be too occupied with eating us all.. alive. Or...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-11 16:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mns09c$ltq$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #356756 |
On 7/11/2015 1:57 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > There is a reason why > there is only one Earth > in our solar system.. > if there were two > we would be > too occupied > with killing them all. > > Or they would be > too occupied > with eating us all.. > alive. > > Or... > there is another identical Earth orbiting exactly opposite the sun, so we can not see it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-12 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55A2EE45.3B4D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #356756 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > There is a reason why > there is only one Earth > in our solar system.. > if there were two > we would be > too occupied > with killing them all. > > Or they would be > too occupied > with eating us all.. > alive. > > Or... If I was God, I could't think of a reason Why to have a second Earth. There is simply no reason to. Not only is there no good reason to have a second earth in our solar system... but not in any other solar system...or anywhere else in the universe. There is simply no good reason. I cannot think of any...and I know better than the rest of yous. The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-12 21:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mnv841$tnk$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #356912 |
On 7/12/2015 5:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> There is a reason why >> there is only one Earth >> in our solar system.. >> if there were two >> we would be >> too occupied >> with killing them all. >> >> Or they would be >> too occupied >> with eating us all.. >> alive. >> >> Or... > > > If I was God, I could't think of a reason Why to have a second Earth. > > There is simply no reason to. > > > Not only is there no good reason to have a second earth in our solar system... > but not in any other solar system...or anywhere else in the universe. > > > > There is simply no good reason. > > > I cannot think of any...and I know better than the rest of yous. > > > The Starmaker > well, you admit you are not a god, the real question is why did god put an exact duplicate Earth, exactly on the opposite side of the sun from us?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Duffy <see_website@signature.block> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-12 22:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m2hmbnvr3tnu.dlg@mduffy.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #356923 |
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:34:40 -0500, Simoen wrote: > well, you admit you are not a god, the real question is why did god put > an exact duplicate Earth, exactly on the opposite side of the sun from us? It cannot be an exact duplicate of this Earth, because this one follows well-established gravitational attraction laws regarding its orbital positioning. Any planet exactly opposite our position would violate known gravitational laws. (i.e. Kepler's etc.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-13 01:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fCHox.245232$Pb6.206033@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #356925 |
On 07/12/2015 10:49 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:34:40 -0500, Simoen wrote:
>
>> well, you admit you are not a god, the real question is why did god put
>> an exact duplicate Earth, exactly on the opposite side of the sun from us?
>
> It cannot be an exact duplicate of this Earth, because this one follows
> well-established gravitational attraction laws regarding its orbital
> positioning.
>
> Any planet exactly opposite our position would violate known gravitational
> laws. (i.e. Kepler's etc.)
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion
HVAC believes that there is a duplicate Earth on the other side of the
sun. Most writers believe that. It's simply plausible.
Anyway Kepler's Laws are no proof because they've never been proven
valid for the solar system. Cripes.Nobody has ever been able to show
even that the solar system is stable, using Kepler's laws!
In science if you believe something is true, that is sufficient proof
that it IS true!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-13 00:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mnvi2c$d9r$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #356925 |
On 7/12/2015 9:49 PM, Mike Duffy wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:34:40 -0500, Simoen wrote: > >> well, you admit you are not a god, the real question is why did god put >> an exact duplicate Earth, exactly on the opposite side of the sun from us? > > It cannot be an exact duplicate of this Earth, because this one follows > well-established gravitational attraction laws regarding its orbital > positioning. > > Any planet exactly opposite our position would violate known gravitational > laws. (i.e. Kepler's etc.) > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion > keplers laws apply to two body systems, the earth/sun/earth is two, two body systems not sure how that would really work out, probably not, go unstable and eventually earth 1 would wack earth 2..... came from that movie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Duffy <see_website@signature.block> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-13 11:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1p5jtuok68pvt$.dlg@mduffy.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #356936 |
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:24:26 -0500, Simoen wrote: > Keplers laws apply to two body systems, the earth/sun/earth is > two, two body systems. > > not sure how that would really work out, You are correct. I mis-identified the appropriate "law". Newton's law (and ultimately Einsteinian relativity) describe gravitation. As you point out, Kepler's equations are only the restricted two-body description which solves Newtonian gravity to yield a time-based prediction of a planetary orbit. Orbital perturbation theory is very complex. Orbital positions of three or more bodies are impossible to solve analytically, but we can make generalizations for how major orbital elements will evolve over time when one object in the system (i.e. the Sun) is much more massive than the planets, as is the case with the solar system. Orbits of all planets are affected by other ones. But changes to orbital elements will be much more pronounced in the smaller planets. If there were a duplicate Earth exactly opposite us in our orbit, the time humans have been observing planets would have been sufficient for its orbit to be perturbed by Jupiter and Saturn to the point where we would be able to see it by now. -- http://pages.videotron.com/duffym/index.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-12 21:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55A343BF.7D8A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #356923 |
Simoen wrote: > > On 7/12/2015 5:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> There is a reason why > >> there is only one Earth > >> in our solar system.. > >> if there were two > >> we would be > >> too occupied > >> with killing them all. > >> > >> Or they would be > >> too occupied > >> with eating us all.. > >> alive. > >> > >> Or... > > > > > > If I was God, I could't think of a reason Why to have a second Earth. > > > > There is simply no reason to. > > > > > > Not only is there no good reason to have a second earth in our solar system... > > but not in any other solar system...or anywhere else in the universe. > > > > > > > > There is simply no good reason. > > > > > > I cannot think of any...and I know better than the rest of yous. > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > well, you admit you are not a god, the real question is why did god put > an exact duplicate Earth, exactly on the opposite side of the sun from us? I didn't admit I'm not a god, ...i wrote: "If I was God". Meaning, if I was God, the creator of Earth... I din't create the earth as far as I can remember.... and I have no knowledge of any other earths....hiding.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web