Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #367643 > unrolled thread

Are there any time capsules on the Moon?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-20 11:48 -0700
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-20 12:25 -0700
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-20 19:50 -0700
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-21 10:30 -0500
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-10-22 09:08 +0800
        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-21 20:25 -0700
          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-22 13:28 -0700
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-22 23:32 -0700
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-22 23:48 -0700
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-23 00:08 -0700
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-21 14:43 +1100
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-21 22:43 -0600
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 04:10 -0700
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-24 14:26 -0700
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:31 -0600
        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-30 18:59 +0100
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-31 11:49 -0800
        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-10-31 18:53 +0000
          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-31 19:11 +0000
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-10-31 20:01 +0000
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-31 23:52 +0000
                Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 14:47 +0000
                  Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-01 10:09 -0500
                    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 15:30 +0000
                      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-01 17:14 +0000
                      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-01 12:44 -0500
                        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 17:50 +0000
                    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 15:43 +0000
                      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 15:51 +0000
                    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 17:47 +0000
                      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-01 15:30 -0500
                  Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-01 17:13 +0000
          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-31 15:58 -0400
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-10-31 20:02 +0000
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-31 20:11 -0400

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#368751

In sci.physics Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>>> What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind".
>>> Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure
>>> reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?
>> 
>> I guess you weren't grown up enough when it happened to understand the
>> global politics of the time.
>> 
>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
> 
> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag is 
> to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.

In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.

The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
missions.

Like I said, you weren't grown up enough when it happened to understand the
global politics of the time.

http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/history/flag/flag.htm

http://theapollo11.weebly.com/political-impact.html

http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1409/1

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5380736/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/secret-formula-going-moon/#.VjVTqKeaPqg


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368783

jimp wrote:

>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>> 
>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
> 
> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.
> 
> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
> missions.

You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar 
soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all, stop 
spreading lies.

http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/

"Luna 2
Successful lunar impactor (CCCP)
Launched: September 12, 1959
Lunar impact: September 14, 1959
Luna 2 was the first spacecraft to land on another celestial body. |The 
spacecraft impacted on the Moon's surface just east of the Sea of Serenity 
near the craters Aristides, Archimedes, and Autolycus. The spacecraft did 
not detect a magnetic field around the Moon."

"Luna 16
Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
Launched: September 12, 1970
Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970
Luna 16 was the first robotic mission to land on the Moon, collect samples 
of dust and rock, and return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the 
first spacecraft to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in 
the Sea of Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the 
spacecraft was launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to 
Earth with a soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368791

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:47:26 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>jimp wrote:
>
>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>> 
>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>> 
>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.
>> 
>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>> missions.
>
>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar 
>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all, stop 
>spreading lies.
>
>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/

        Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
the difference between "land" and "impact".

        It isn't a language problem, it a brain
deficiency.

        Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
Union had advanced rocket technology was
because they enslaved the population with
war material production at the expense of
domestic products badly needed.



>"Luna 2
>Successful lunar impactor (CCCP)
>Launched: September 12, 1959
>Lunar impact: September 14, 1959
>Luna 2 was the first spacecraft to land on another celestial body. |The 
>spacecraft impacted on the Moon's surface just east of the Sea of Serenity 
>near the craters Aristides, Archimedes, and Autolycus. The spacecraft did 
>not detect a magnetic field around the Moon."
>
>"Luna 16
>Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
>Launched: September 12, 1970
>Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
>Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970
>Luna 16 was the first robotic mission to land on the Moon, collect samples 
>of dust and rock, and return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the 
>first spacecraft to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in 
>the Sea of Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the 
>spacecraft was launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to 
>Earth with a soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368795

kefischer wrote:

> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> 
>>jimp wrote:
>>
>>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>>> 
>>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>>> 
>>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is
>>> USSR.
>>> 
>>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>>> missions.
>>
>>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar
>>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all,
>>stop spreading lies.
>>
>>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
> 
>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
> the difference between "land" and "impact".

You sounds like a stupid piano mechanic. Can't you read carefully the 
quotes given? The brought Lunar Soil home, you stupid mechanic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368800

In sci.physics Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> kefischer wrote:
> 
>> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>jimp wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>>>> 
>>>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is
>>>> USSR.
>>>> 
>>>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>>>> missions.
>>>
>>>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar
>>>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all,
>>>stop spreading lies.
>>>
>>>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
>> 
>>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
>> the difference between "land" and "impact".
> 
> You sounds like a stupid piano mechanic. Can't you read carefully the 
> quotes given? The brought Lunar Soil home, you stupid mechanic.

They didn't bring any humans home, did they?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368803

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 15:30:39 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>kefischer wrote:
>
>> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>jimp wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>>>> 
>>>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is
>>>> USSR.
>>>> 
>>>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>>>> missions.
>>>
>>>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar
>>>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all,
>>>stop spreading lies.
>>>
>>>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
>> 
>>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
>> the difference between "land" and "impact".
>
>You sounds like a stupid piano mechanic. Can't you read carefully the 
>quotes given? The brought Lunar Soil home, you stupid mechanic.

        Not in 1959, stupid moron troll, and
never landed men on the moon at all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368806

kefischer wrote:

>         Not in 1959, stupid moron troll, and
> never landed men on the moon at all.

Right, this due to those obvious difficulties. Today they dominate space 
exploration, if I'm not very mistaken at all. Why did you brought it up, 
that thing with "landing men on Moon"? Any evidences? If not, good bye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368796

kefischer wrote:

>         Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
> Union had advanced rocket technology was because they enslaved the
> population with war material production at the expense of domestic
> products badly needed.

Just stop talking about enslavement, you stupid mechanical piano mover. No 
one is more enslaved than those believing they are not enslaved.

Speaking the witch, you had regularly 3 or more jobs at that time,  just 
to make a reasonable living. Meanwhile in CCCP you had 
  
    8 hours work
    8 hours free (entertainment)
    8 hour sleep 

GUARANTEED by the constitution. Beside affordable goods, high living 
standards and more. You may just dream, but you NEVER will achieve such 
standard.

You know nothing about Divergent Matter, and that you know, you know it 
wrong.

Film: See YUGOSLAVIA (CBS 1986 - must see) 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYLpDH8lQ1o

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368797

Wayne Olmstead wrote:

> kefischer wrote:
> 
>>         Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
>> Union had advanced rocket technology was because they enslaved the
>> population with war material production at the expense of domestic
>> products badly needed.
> 
> Just stop talking about enslavement, you stupid mechanical piano mover.
> No one is more enslaved than those believing they are not enslaved.
> 
> Speaking the witch, you had regularly 3 or more jobs at that time,  just
> to make a reasonable living. Meanwhile in CCCP you had
>   
>     8 hours work 8 hours free (entertainment)
>     8 hour sleep
> 
> GUARANTEED by the constitution. Beside affordable goods, high living
> standards and more. You may just dream, but you NEVER will achieve such
> standard.
> 
> You know nothing about Divergent Matter, and that you know, you know it
> wrong.
> 
> Film: See YUGOSLAVIA (CBS 1986 - must see)
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYLpDH8lQ1o

hahaha, watch this kefisher, lol

"Houston, we have a problem!" (Yugoslavian space program) trailer 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfJiNPZ38kY

Even the yugoslavs were on Moon before. This explain alot, immeasurable 
many things.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368804

Mahipal wrote:

>> >"Luna 16 Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
>> >Launched: September 12, 1970 Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
>> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970 Luna 16 was the first robotic
>> >mission to land on the Moon, collect samples of dust and rock, and
>> >return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the first spacecraft
>> >to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in the Sea of
>> >Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the spacecraft was
>> >launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to Earth with a
>> >soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."
> 
> Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
> disposition.
> When they win their football, they're World Champions. Nevermind nobody
> country really else plays their version of Football.
> 
> Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
> Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
> trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!

If I'm not very mistaken, before Nicola Tesla, an Yugoslavian, America was 
a capitalist 3rd world country. Tesla brought electricity, factory 
machinery and sanitation. Then he died very poor.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368818

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>Mahipal wrote:
>
>>> >"Luna 16 Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
>>> >Launched: September 12, 1970 Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
>>> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970 Luna 16 was the first robotic
>>> >mission to land on the Moon, collect samples of dust and rock, and
>>> >return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the first spacecraft
>>> >to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in the Sea of
>>> >Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the spacecraft was
>>> >launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to Earth with a
>>> >soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."
>> 
>> Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
>> disposition.
>> When they win their football, they're World Champions. Nevermind nobody
>> country really else plays their version of Football.
>> 
>> Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
>> Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
>> trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!
>
>If I'm not very mistaken, before Nicola Tesla, an Yugoslavian, America was 
>a capitalist 3rd world country. Tesla brought electricity, factory 
>machinery and sanitation. Then he died very poor.

        Too bad he was fixated on wireless power,
it ain't gonna happen, ever.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368799

In sci.physics Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>> 
>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>> 
>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.
>> 
>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>> missions.
> 
> You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar 
> soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all, stop 
> spreading lies.
> 
> http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
> 
> "Luna 2
> Successful lunar impactor (CCCP)
> Launched: September 12, 1959
> Lunar impact: September 14, 1959
> Luna 2 was the first spacecraft to land on another celestial body. |The 
> spacecraft impacted on the Moon's surface just east of the Sea of Serenity 
> near the craters Aristides, Archimedes, and Autolycus. The spacecraft did 
> not detect a magnetic field around the Moon."
> 
> "Luna 16
> Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
> Launched: September 12, 1970
> Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
> Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970
> Luna 16 was the first robotic mission to land on the Moon, collect samples 
> of dust and rock, and return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the 
> first spacecraft to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in 
> the Sea of Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the 
> spacecraft was launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to 
> Earth with a soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."

Once again, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union in the English
alphabet is USSR.

There is a huge difference between impacting, or even landing, a probe
somewhere and landing and returning human beings.

You did not read any of the links I provided, did you?

You were not old enough to understand global politics and the Cold War
at the time of Apollo, were you?

You have not bothered to read the political history of the times, have you?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368742

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> It would have been much much better if they simply left a copy of
>> Playboy magazine lying there. "Take me to your Playboy mansion!"
>
>What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind". 
>Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure 
>reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368744

kefischer wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> 
>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> It would have been much much better if they simply left a copy of
>>> Playboy magazine lying there. "Take me to your Playboy mansion!"
>>
>>What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind".
>>Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure
>>reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?
> 
> http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html

Intriguing, thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#368752

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 20:02:38 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>kefischer wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
>> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would have been much much better if they simply left a copy of
>>>> Playboy magazine lying there. "Take me to your Playboy mansion!"
>>>
>>>What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind".
>>>Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure
>>>reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?
>> 
>> http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html
>
>Intriguing, thanks.

        Giant  LEAP.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web