Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425054 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 19:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:34 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:49 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-07-16 12:24 +1000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:18 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 12:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:24 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:41 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:34 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:27 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:47 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:43 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:06 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:15 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 03:42 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:29 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 17:27 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 00:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 21:20 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 01:41 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 09:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 21:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d3903$0$53051$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425354 |
On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>> Serg io wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>> >>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>> >>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>> >>> >>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >> >> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >> correct your posts become. > > You can not plate solder. > > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > the copper. > Non Sequitur.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2lvv3e-kri.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425394 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>> >>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>> >>>> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You can not plate solder. >> >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. >> > Non Sequitur. The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d7388$0$11353$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425406 |
On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>> >>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>> correct your posts become. >>> >>> You can not plate solder. >>> >>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>> the copper. >>> >> Non Sequitur. > > The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: > > "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" > > Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cvd04e-5ck.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425417 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>> correct your posts become. >>>> >>>> You can not plate solder. >>>> >>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>> the copper. >>>> >>> Non Sequitur. >> >> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >> >> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >> >> > Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp? The troll continues the ad hominems in the desparate search for attention. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596ff361$1$41305$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425425 |
On 7/18/2017 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>>> >>>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>>> correct your posts become. >>>>> >>>>> You can not plate solder. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>>> the copper. >>>>> >>>> Non Sequitur. >>> >>> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >>> >>> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >>> >>> >> Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp? > > The troll continues the ad hominems in the desparate search for attention. > Senile Chimp is stuck in a dementia loop and can't get up!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2oc54e-lg7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425637 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/18/2017 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>>>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>>>> correct your posts become. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can not plate solder. >>>>>> >>>>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>>>> the copper. >>>>>> >>>>> Non Sequitur. >>>> >>>> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >>>> >>>> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >>>> >>>> >>> Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp? >> >> The troll continues the ad hominems in the desparate search for attention. >> > Senile Chimp <snip> Yet more ad hominem from the pathetic troll. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oklfah$1hql$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425354 |
jimp wrote: > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > the copper. Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oklh39$1p6n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425492 |
On 7/18/2017 12:08 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > > > All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. > wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a water-based organic compound. Or it could be ENIG Gold has poor solderability, so it is not use on areas to be soldered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oklhe0$1p75$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425498 |
Serg io wrote: >> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. > > wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, > That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components with a hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oklhk5$1q4i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425500 |
On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >> >> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a > > Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into > your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components with a > hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. > nope, google "purple plague" well known in the industry and a major reason not to use gold.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okli0q$1qih$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425503 |
Serg io wrote: > On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >> >>>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >>> >>> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >>> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a >> >> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look >> into your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major >> components with a >> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. > > nope, google "purple plague" well known in the industry and a major > reason not to use gold. Mee to google?? the globalist google is googling MEE, young man. You are tootaly unemployable in any civilized country, no offence. You almost, not even, former half-engineers stick together like hyenas. Never learning anything. Talk to somebody else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596ff86a$0$42074$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425503 |
On 7/18/2017 1:47 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >> >>>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >>> >>> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >>> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a >> >> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into >> your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components >> with a >> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. >> > > nope, google "purple plague" > > well known in the industry and a major reason not to use gold. > > > Sergio why do you bother with this level of ignorance? He's not even fun to bait like Bert or ARchiepoo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okp409$1ga9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425639 |
On 7/19/2017 7:25 PM, benj wrote: > On 7/18/2017 1:47 PM, Serg io wrote: >> On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: >>> Serg io wrote: >>> >>>>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >>>> >>>> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >>>> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a >>> >>> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look >>> into >>> your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components >>> with a >>> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. >>> >> >> nope, google "purple plague" >> >> well known in the industry and a major reason not to use gold. >> >> >> > Sergio why do you bother with this level of ignorance? He's not even fun > to bait like Bert or ARchiepoo. yea, the dude is rather bland, perhaps he is just tired, like he is only revved up 30%.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596ff7c1$0$42074$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425500 |
On 7/18/2017 1:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >> >> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a > > Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into > your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components with a > hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. > Oh look Muffy! Here is a moron who isn't as smart as his "smart phone". Total ignorance. He must desperately crave attention so badly that he's willing to look like a moron to get it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okqnaq$2e4$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425638 |
benj wrote: >> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look >> into your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major >> components with a >> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. >> > Oh look Muffy! Here is a moron who isn't as smart as his "smart phone". > > Total ignorance. He must desperately crave attention so badly that he's > willing to look like a moron to get it. jUST do what he said, so you have your proof. You are stupid like a door.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pit14e-49p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425492 |
In sci.physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. > > Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below 0201 > components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are today gold > plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okli2j$1qih$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425502 |
jimp wrote: > In sci.physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>> the copper. >> >> Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below >> 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are >> today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. > > Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. chimp doesn't even know what a 0201 stands for, thank you very moch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oklrh3$dfq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425508 |
On 7/18/2017 12:55 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> wrote: >>> jimp wrote: >>> >>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>> the copper. >>> >>> Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below >>> 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are >>> today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. >> >> Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. > > chimp doesn't even know what a 0201 stands for, thank you very moch. > 0201 is the Medical Billing Code for diagnosis of yo-yo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oklv0c$il5$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425530 |
Serg io wrote: >>>> Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below >>>> 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are >>>> today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. >>> >>> Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. >> >> chimp doesn't even know what a 0201 stands for, thank you very moch. > > 0201 is the Medical Billing Code for diagnosis of yo-yo. You might have been hearing it, from some other guy. You are entirely unemployable in any civilized country around the free world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okof0o$gj0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425530 |
Serg io wrote: >>>> Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below >>>> 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are >>>> today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. >>> >>> Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. >> >> chimp doesn't even know what a 0201 stands for, thank you very moch. >> > 0201 is the Medical Billing Code for diagnosis of yo-yo. How about 01005, or you are too stupid?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web