Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #398592 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-16 00:09 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-11-17 04:37 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 81 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 00:09 -0800
Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 10:52 +0100
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 02:41 -0800
Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 11:43 +0100
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 03:49 -0800
Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 13:18 +0100
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 04:48 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 21:54 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:19 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 23:32 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:38 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:14 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 00:38 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:37 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 22:36 -0800
Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-16 10:26 -0600
Re: This is your guru Kieth Staudt <KiethS@StaudtInstitute.info> - 2016-11-16 18:12 +0000
Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 19:28 +0100
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 21:57 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:34 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:23 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 03:37 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:39 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 22:50 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 23:52 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-18 00:53 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 12:28 -0800
Re: This is your guru Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-11-19 10:07 +0100
Re: This is your guru Marion Vanriper <Marion@Vanriper.info> - 2016-11-26 09:30 +0000
Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-17 10:09 -0600
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 12:11 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:14 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 23:35 -0800
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:52 -0800
Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:25 -0800
Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 03:59 -0800
Re: This is your guru "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-11-17 12:12 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-18 05:07 +0100
Re: This is your guru "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-11-18 10:02 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-18 22:13 +0100
Re: This is your guru "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:46 -0800
Re: This is your guru "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-11-19 09:30 +0100
Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-19 10:01 -0600
Re: This is your guru "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-19 08:07 -0800
Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-19 16:37 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-20 09:37 -0800
Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-20 20:32 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-20 15:54 -0800
Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-21 15:00 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-21 19:16 -0800
Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-22 10:39 +0000
Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 03:16 -0800
Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-22 11:24 +0000
Re: This is your guru Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-11-22 12:13 +0000
Re: This is your guru benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:37 -0500
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-22 22:57 -0800
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 13:37 +0000
Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 06:04 -0800
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 14:27 +0000
Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 06:44 -0800
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 14:56 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-23 10:46 -0800
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-23 23:21 +0100
Re: This is your guru Bob Goodman <bobg@boobgodman.info> - 2016-11-23 22:58 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 20:00 +0100
Re: This is your guru Bernardo Dearmond <bnard@dearmond.org> - 2016-11-25 21:46 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 22:56 +0100
Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 20:13 -0800
Re: This is your guru Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:24 -0600
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 15:33 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-23 23:23 +0100
Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 20:15 -0800
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 20:05 +0100
Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-25 14:57 -0800
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 18:28 +0000
Re: This is your guru Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 19:37 +0100
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 18:39 +0000
Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-21 22:40 -0800
Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-19 10:47 -0600
Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-19 17:20 +0000
Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 04:37 -0800
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 00:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1ccd7dc1-bded-48cc-9525-d29c8af6a1de@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398661 |
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:34:36 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 06:57:49 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > > If, on the other hand, ds^2 is the line element, then there is no nomenclature > > > convention, no bold text, no tensor-product symbols, and ds, dx, and dy are all > > > ordinary differentials along some (unspecified) path of integration. > > > > Yes. > > > > > In only the second case is ds^2 the square of some quantity. > > > > Yes. > > So, now, poor idiot - take a look at your > problem. No bold text, right? no tensor-product > symbols, right? Too bad. That's because nobody ever writes tensor product signs for symmetric products. Knowing this sort of thing is a prerequisite to even understand the question. OK, here is a quick tutorial on tensor product signs: 1. tensor product - "x" in a circle, 2. symmetric tensor product - nothing (99% of the time) (*) 3. antisymmetric tensor product - a "wedge", i.e. "/\". (*) when there is a potential for confusion (extremely rare in typical situations) then symmetric product is sometimes denoted either by a dot "." in a circle or by an inverted wedge "\/". > Stop pretending. Even your fellow idiot knows, > what ds is and what ds^2 is. Leave fellow idiots out of it. Your challenge is to answer, not to comment on irrelevancies. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 03:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e3e56dbd-0db5-44f7-b564-7841c76f14e4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398669 |
W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 09:23:14 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:34:36 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 06:57:49 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > > > > If, on the other hand, ds^2 is the line element, then there is no nomenclature > > > > convention, no bold text, no tensor-product symbols, and ds, dx, and dy are all > > > > ordinary differentials along some (unspecified) path of integration. > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > In only the second case is ds^2 the square of some quantity. > > > > > > Yes. > > > > So, now, poor idiot - take a look at your > > problem. No bold text, right? no tensor-product > > symbols, right? Too bad. > > That's because nobody ever writes Jan, poor idiot, take a look above. Tom wrote: when no bold ds^2 it means (ordinary differential)^2. You wrote "yes". Stop waving arms, stop your desperate tries to change the subject, just tell me: your ds^2 - was it bold or not?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 10:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c80ba303-19ba-4fa9-bbe9-48ae7b79e861@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398677 |
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 3:38:00 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 09:23:14 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:34:36 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 06:57:49 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If, on the other hand, ds^2 is the line element, then there is no nomenclature > > > > > convention, no bold text, no tensor-product symbols, and ds, dx, and dy are all > > > > > ordinary differentials along some (unspecified) path of integration. > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > In only the second case is ds^2 the square of some quantity. > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > So, now, poor idiot - take a look at your > > > problem. No bold text, right? no tensor-product > > > symbols, right? Too bad. > > > > That's because nobody ever writes > > Jan, poor idiot, take a look above. Tom wrote: > when no bold ds^2 it means (ordinary differential)^2. > You wrote "yes". > Stop waving arms, stop your desperate tries to > change the subject, just tell me: your ds^2 - was > it bold or not? Not even worth responding to. There is nothing left to discuss on this thread. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 22:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <986e9a1c-edc4-435b-86df-79daf5facae4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398708 |
W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 19:39:42 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 3:38:00 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 09:23:14 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:34:36 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 06:57:49 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > If, on the other hand, ds^2 is the line element, then there is no nomenclature > > > > > > convention, no bold text, no tensor-product symbols, and ds, dx, and dy are all > > > > > > ordinary differentials along some (unspecified) path of integration. > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > In only the second case is ds^2 the square of some quantity. > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > So, now, poor idiot - take a look at your > > > > problem. No bold text, right? no tensor-product > > > > symbols, right? Too bad. > > > > > > That's because nobody ever writes > > > > Jan, poor idiot, take a look above. Tom wrote: > > when no bold ds^2 it means (ordinary differential)^2. > > You wrote "yes". > > Stop waving arms, stop your desperate tries to > > change the subject, just tell me: your ds^2 - was > > it bold or not? > > Not even worth responding to. Of course. This is your guru. He screams, he waves arms, but he doesn't even know what ds^2 is square of. Poor, puffed, mumbling halfbrain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 23:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <931686a2-a645-48f6-a9b0-981e7387e606@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398762 |
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 10:50:18 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 19:39:42 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 3:38:00 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 09:23:14 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:34:36 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 06:57:49 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If, on the other hand, ds^2 is the line element, then there is no nomenclature > > > > > > > convention, no bold text, no tensor-product symbols, and ds, dx, and dy are all > > > > > > > ordinary differentials along some (unspecified) path of integration. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > In only the second case is ds^2 the square of some quantity. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > So, now, poor idiot - take a look at your > > > > > problem. No bold text, right? no tensor-product > > > > > symbols, right? Too bad. > > > > > > > > That's because nobody ever writes > > > > > > Jan, poor idiot, take a look above. Tom wrote: > > > when no bold ds^2 it means (ordinary differential)^2. > > > You wrote "yes". > > > Stop waving arms, stop your desperate tries to > > > change the subject, just tell me: your ds^2 - was > > > it bold or not? > > > > Not even worth responding to. > > Of course. > This is your guru. He screams, he waves arms, > but he doesn't even know what ds^2 is square of. > Poor, puffed, mumbling halfbrain. You haven't answered a simple question meant to test your credibility. You've failed that test. (You have also made the false claim that the metric tensor was a square. It isn't. Get over it.) End of conversation. And now you are doing what you do every time someone corners you: attacks, lies, and non-sequiturs. And good luck finding that square root of metric tensor. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 00:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c3f6e7d0-c36a-4fba-a645-9154503f11d7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398764 |
W dniu piątek, 18 listopada 2016 08:52:20 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > You haven't answered a simple question meant to test your credibility. You've failed that test. You're too stupid to write a question testing anything. Besides, you have answered incorrectly a simple question meant to test your credibility. You've failed that test. > (You have also made the false claim that the metric tensor was a square. It isn't. Get over it.) A lie. Never said anything similiar. It's just your moronic belief that ds^2 is denoting a tensor. It isn't. Get over it. And now you are doing what you do every time someone corners you: attacks, lies, and non-sequiturs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 12:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d539dd11-52c7-4040-9717-d9f7f72d625d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398769 |
On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:53:22 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu piątek, 18 listopada 2016 08:52:20 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > You haven't answered a simple question meant to test your credibility. You've failed that test. > > You're too stupid to write a question testing anything. Sorry but that's irrelevant. Point is you couldn't answer it. > Besides, you have answered incorrectly a simple question meant to test your credibility. You've failed that test. And this you've just made up. > > (You have also made the false claim that the metric tensor was a square. It isn't. Get over it.) > > A lie. Never said anything similiar. You did. And now you're retreating. Whatever. Someone has already marked this thread as spam and I don't blame them. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-19 10:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <o0p4q3$s12$1@node1.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #398819 |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:d539dd11-52c7-4040-9717-d9f7f72d625d@googlegroups.com... On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:53:22 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu piątek, 18 listopada 2016 08:52:20 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > You haven't answered a simple question meant to test your credibility. > > You've failed that test. > > You're too stupid to write a question testing anything. |Sorry but that's irrelevant. Point is you couldn't answer it. No. Point is it was not any test, just some mumble of a moron you are. > Besides, you have answered incorrectly a simple question meant to test > your credibility. You've failed that test. |And this you've just made up. A lie. Do you want a quoting? > > (You have also made the false claim that the metric tensor was a square. > > It isn't. Get over it.) > > A lie. Never said anything similiar. |You did. And now you're retreating. No, I didn't. You're imagini ng. I was only trying to explain you, that ds^2=ds^2. But you're too stupid even for that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marion Vanriper <Marion@Vanriper.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 09:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o1bkmp$9di$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #398899 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > "Bernardo Dearmond" wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> Steven decided to credit Dr. Maryann >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> ROTFL! >>> >>>> in his lectures in Universities. >>> >>> Steven has confirmed to me via e-mail that he knew he was feeding you, >>> but that he found it worthwhile to post this anyway – *for other* >>> subscribers*. >> >> [gibberish] You are afraid and not answering the question, Pointy. A cretin and a liar. Why should Dr. Steven be taking advices from an not even half- engineer like you. You are not gonna teach Dr. Steven in his international lectures at Universities around the world, that he was wrong in admitting that Dr. Maryann was right?? Although, many international physicists already said Dr. Maryann is right, and have decided to credit her individually in their lectures. We already know what you are afraid of, pointy. You are insufficient. “It doesn't help to change your name, the trolling idiot is recognized anyway. One can but wonder what kind of mental disturbance [makes] a person constantly change [their] name and write nonsense only.” *PLONK*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 10:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VaadnRNpFuKtS7DFnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #398654 |
On 11/16/16 11/16/16 - 11:57 PM, JanPB wrote: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote: >>[...] > Of course all this will go right over Maciej's head. Dirt on the floor will go right over Maciej's head. Of course I was responding to Melzzzzz, who pointed out the important truth that equations require an explanation of their symbols, so I thought he deserved an explanation. Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 12:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <413d8f37-7172-4a55-aa79-3693b8ca583f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398592 |
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 > > > > > > > > ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. > > > > > > So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . > > > > This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was > > a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this > > some sort of a secret now? > > > > BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being > > not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. Not even wrong. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 23:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <adfa0c4c-71c6-4b04-b87c-ab855c9f1ede@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398630 |
W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 21:11:21 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 > > > > > > > > > > ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. > > > > > > > > So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . > > > > > > This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was > > > a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this > > > some sort of a secret now? > > > > > > BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being > > > not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? > > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > Not even wrong. This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms and he doesn't know, what a differential is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 23:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c436a2c5-e58b-4cd9-9cc5-7abaf73fab62@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398658 |
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:14:51 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 21:11:21 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 > > > > > > > > > > > > ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. > > > > > > > > > > So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . > > > > > > > > This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was > > > > a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this > > > > some sort of a secret now? > > > > > > > > BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being > > > > not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? > > > > > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > > > Not even wrong. > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. You are making this up just to divert attention from the fact you now cannot answer TWO simple test questions. All you do when cornered is yell that your opponent "cannot" do something, the more unrelated the better. (Of course I do know what differential is but this is irrelevant.) -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 23:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <403113ed-61db-4147-8de7-5d409af50ab6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398662 |
W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 08:36:00 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:14:51 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 21:11:21 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. > > > > > > > > > > > > So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . > > > > > > > > > > This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was > > > > > a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this > > > > > some sort of a secret now? > > > > > > > > > > BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being > > > > > not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > > > > > Not even wrong. > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > You are making this up just to divert attention from the fact you now cannot answer TWO > simple test questions. A lie, as expected from relativistic trash. You are making this up just to divert attention from the fact you don't know what a differential is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 00:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <abebdf35-9585-42a5-aa23-dd1197eb885c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398665 |
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:52:31 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 08:36:00 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:14:51 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 21:11:21 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was > > > > > > a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this > > > > > > some sort of a secret now? > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being > > > > > > not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > > > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > > > > > > > Not even wrong. > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > > > You are making this up just to divert attention from the fact you now cannot answer TWO > > simple test questions. > > A lie, as expected from relativistic trash. > You are making this up just to divert attention from > the fact you don't know what a differential is. Asking me a question is not an answer. And if you cannot answer, it means you have no standing to reject relativity en bloc, in stupidly foul language, no less. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | paparios <paparios@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 03:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3f5e9a90-ca70-4915-aa5f-38d8f3958e78@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398670 |
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:26:00 AM UTC-3, JanPB wrote: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:52:31 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 08:36:00 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:14:51 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 21:11:21 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was > > > > > > > a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this > > > > > > > some sort of a secret now? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being > > > > > > > not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > > > > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > > > > > > > > > Not even wrong. > > > > > > > > This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms > > > > and he doesn't know, what a differential is. > > > > > > You are making this up just to divert attention from the fact you now cannot answer TWO > > > simple test questions. > > > > A lie, as expected from relativistic trash. > > You are making this up just to divert attention from > > the fact you don't know what a differential is. > > Asking me a question is not an answer. And if you cannot answer, it means you have no > standing to reject relativity en bloc, in stupidly foul language, no less. > > -- > Jan Unfortunately, this is what you get when talking to lunatics. This guy along with Wilson, Seto, Valev, the nymshifter, the number crunching idiot, Riedt, etc. are just that: pure and simple lunatics which fill their poor lives by writing nonsense on a daily basis. Unfortunately, the Internet is becoming a fertile field for all these loons and this group has steadily been decreasing in the quality of the science discussion. I remember with nostalgia the high level discussion on the speed of gravity involving Carlip, Roberts, Van Flandern ond other, some 20 years ago which resulted in some ISI papers. While Van Flandern was a sort of loon (by his exploding planet theory and his support of the Mars face artificial origin), he had a PhD in Astronomy from Yale, and he knew the math and the discussion here was quite interesting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 12:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o0k6qr$2a4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #398678 |
paparios wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:26:00 AM UTC-3, JanPB wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:52:31 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: >>> W dniu czwartek, 17 listopada 2016 08:36:00 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: >>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:14:51 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: >>>>> W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 21:11:21 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: >>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ds^2 = dx^2/x^4 + dy^2 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ...is a square, then please write the entity it's the square _of_. Good luck. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I have my answer: 2)you don't know what ds is . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is not the answer. You claimed that "ds^2" in my question was >>>>>>>> a square. Just WRITE the thing this "ds^2" is the square of. Is this >>>>>>>> some sort of a secret now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW, this is now the SECOND mistake you're making (the first being >>>>>>>> not answering the test question in the first place). Care to continue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms >>>>>>> and he doesn't know, what a differential is. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not even wrong. >>>>> >>>>> This is your guru: he screams, he waves his arms >>>>> and he doesn't know, what a differential is. >>>> >>>> You are making this up just to divert attention from the fact you now cannot answer TWO >>>> simple test questions. >>> >>> A lie, as expected from relativistic trash. >>> You are making this up just to divert attention from >>> the fact you don't know what a differential is. >> >> Asking me a question is not an answer. And if you cannot answer, it means you have no >> standing to reject relativity en bloc, in stupidly foul language, no less. >> >> -- >> Jan > > Unfortunately, this is what you get when talking to lunatics. This guy along with Wilson, Seto, Valev, the nymshifter, the number crunching idiot, Riedt, etc. are just that: pure and simple lunatics which fill their poor lives by writing nonsense on a daily basis. > > Unfortunately, the Internet is becoming a fertile field for all these loons and this group has steadily been decreasing in the quality of the science discussion. > > I remember with nostalgia the high level discussion on the speed of gravity involving Carlip, Roberts, Van Flandern ond other, some 20 years ago which resulted in some ISI papers. While Van Flandern was a sort of loon (by his exploding planet theory and his support of the Mars face artificial origin), he had a PhD in Astronomy from Yale, and he knew the math and the discussion here was quite interesting. > What was decided on the speed of gravity? I'm hopeless at this sort of stuff, but I've often wondered if it is propagated (or whatever happens to it) over any distance instantly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 05:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2006257.ElGaqSPkdT@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #398679 |
Dan S. MacAbre wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ That is probably as forged as your e-mail address. > What was decided on the speed of gravity? Equals the speed of light. > I'm hopeless at this sort of stuff, but I've often wondered if it is > propagated (or whatever happens to it) over any distance instantly. Have you been sleeping through the media circus caused by the detection of gravitational waves this year? -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 10:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o0mjiv$ft2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #398750 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Dan S. MacAbre wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > That is probably as forged as your e-mail address. My real name is rather boring, and I thought no-one in usenet cared about real names anyway :-) I tend to change display names whenever I think of a more 'amusing' one. >> What was decided on the speed of gravity? > > Equals the speed of light. Thanks. >> I'm hopeless at this sort of stuff, but I've often wondered if it is >> propagated (or whatever happens to it) over any distance instantly. > > Have you been sleeping through the media circus caused by the detection > of gravitational waves this year? I don't watch TV, so although I'm not exposed to the usual garbage, I do occasionally miss interesting stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 22:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5123693.MhkbZ0Pkbq@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #398771 |
Dan S. MacAbre wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Dan S. MacAbre wrote: >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> That is probably as forged as your e-mail address. > > My real name is rather boring, and I thought no-one in usenet cared > about real names anyway :-) I tend to change display names whenever I > think of a more 'amusing' one. However, to post using your real name, however boring you think it is, will go a long way for you to be taken seriously on Usenet (especially in a scientific newsgroup like this). Because the record shows that those who do not post using their real name are, more often than not, trolls: people who only post to provocate others from the shadow of *assumed* anonymity and who find delight in the irritated responses. >>> What was decided on the speed of gravity? >> Equals the speed of light. > > Thanks. You’re welcome. >>> I'm hopeless at this sort of stuff, but I've often wondered if it is >>> propagated (or whatever happens to it) over any distance instantly. >> Have you been sleeping through the media circus caused by the detection >> of gravitational waves this year? > > I don't watch TV, so although I'm not exposed to the usual garbage, I do > occasionally miss interesting stuff. “Media” in this case includes everything from newspapers, magazines and radio broadcasts to the whole Internet :) HTH -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web