Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #475190
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Future Of Universe |
| Date | 2018-10-18 15:40 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pqa9gr$1gdr$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ffec4509-e29d-498f-bda8-e3fba37e200c@googlegroups.com> |
AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> wrote: > Once you eliminate the impossible - whatever remains - no matter how > improbable - must be the Truth. > > But sadly almost nobody follows this rule. > > Can I put a card under your feet in your shoe - when you are wearing it - > without touching you and without making your touch sensation aware of it ? > > Your obvious answer is 'NO". But magicians like David Blaine are already > doing it. Your next stance will be to claim that it's trick or illusion > or whatever. But you yourself drew the physical card from your shoe and > that card is same which you had chosen few seconds ago. You will get > amused, but will convince yourself that David has done some kind of trick. > > But as you are most brilliant physicist - the person who gives supreme > importance to logic - you should be able to explain it logically in > reasonably short time. Because as a physicist, you are emperor while this > magician is weird beggar on street. > > But you don't do it. You simply ignore it. > > Of course, some people use logical tricks, but as a logician you should > know how far a person can stretch logic to sound it look like magic. > Magic is an art where the magician exhibits something surprising happening. The audience then tries to formulate a hypothesis that explains how it happened. The magician anticipates this hypothesis, and then through a bit of theater, shows that the hypothesis is wrong. This is where the audience tosses up its hands and says it must just be magic then. It of course is not magic, and there is a perfectly rational but not obvious or easy-to-understand explanation, but the magician usually does not share that. In physics, many of the same steps occur. Except that the physicist does not withhold the explanation. Instead, the physicist says, ok, the explanation is rather involved and requires you to be familiar with certain ideas. Many times, the audience member says, no thanks, that’s too much work, I’ll just believe it’s magic and you’re trying to be mysterious. > What I am trying to say is that ignoring some magic of magicians by > treating them tricks is the biggest mistake you are doing. > > That Force or dark force is already wandering on streets of earth since time immemorial. > > Military (physical strength), religious people (faith), actors (emotions) > have already dominated earth. > > The future belongs to Magicians. Expect megalomaniac things being created > bu magicians. I mean expect them to create matter and even life. Because > you must learn how that Force created this matter Universe. > > https://youtu.be/Dw0AOj12Exw > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Future Of Universe AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 10:23 -0700
Re:The Future Of Universe Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-10-17 20:14 +0200
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 13:26 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 03:57 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 05:54 -0700
Re:The Future Of Universe Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-22 09:38 +0000
Re: The Future Of Universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 15:40 +0000
Re: The Future Of Universe AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 19:19 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-19 04:51 +0200
Magic tricks (was: The Future Of Universe) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-19 05:05 +0200
Magic tricks (was: The Future Of Universe) AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 21:07 -0700
Magic tricks (was: The Future Of Universe) AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 21:10 -0700
Re: Magic tricks Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-19 06:25 +0200
Re: Magic tricks AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 22:30 -0700
Re: Magic tricks Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-19 14:32 +0200
Re: The Future Of Universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 16:42 +0000
Re: The Future Of Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-18 09:31 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-18 12:59 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-18 13:39 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-19 20:06 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:32 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-20 13:22 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 13:46 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 14:24 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-20 19:30 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-21 11:34 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-21 12:39 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-21 18:43 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-23 11:52 -0800
Re: The Future Of Universe Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 13:54 -0700
Re: The Future Of Universe Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-22 09:44 +0000
csiph-web